Adding the ability to get a physical address from point() in addition
to virtual address. This physical address is required for XIP of
userspace code from flash.
Signed-off-by: Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To support NFS export, we need to know the parent inode of directories.
Rather than growing the jffs2_inode_cache structure, share space with
the nlink field -- which was always set to 1 for directories anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We don't actually care about nlink; we only care whether the inode in
question is unlinked or not.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Don't hold f->sem while calling into jffs2_do_create(). It makes lockdep
unhappy, and we don't really need it -- the _reason_ it's a false
positive is because nobody else can see this inode yet and so nobody
will be trying to lock it anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Ditch a couple of pointless casts from void *, and use the normal
variable name 'f' for jffs2_inode_info pointers -- especially since
it actually shows up in lockdep reports.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We haven't seen bugs in this for a while now, since the rewrite. No need
to be _quite_ so verbose...
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
When _all_ the blocks were on the erase_pending_list, we could't find a
block to GC from but there was no _actually_ free space, and
jffs2_reserve_space() would get a little unhappy.
Handle this case by returning -EAGAIN from jffs2_garbage_collect_pass().
There are two callers of that function -- jffs2_flush_wbuf_gc(), which
will interpret it as an error and flush the writebuffer by other means,
and jffs2_reserve_space(), which we modify to respond to -EAGAIN with an
immediate call to jffs2_erase_pending_blocks() and another run round the
loop.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Just to keep the debug code happy when it's adding all the blocks up.
Otherwise, they disappear for a while while the locks are dropped to
check them and write the cleanmarker.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
It looks the error paths in jffs2_block_check_erase() have wrong return
values. A block that failed to be erased never gets marked as bad.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Haven't had any complaints about it recently, despite having the test
code enabled to verify that the calculated length is correct.
Kill it off, just by #undef TEST_TOTLEN for now; removing it for real
can come a little later.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
The problem fixed in commit 014b164e13
(space leak with in-band cleanmarkers) would have been caught a lot
quicker if our paranoid debugging mode had included adding up the size
counts from all the eraseblocks and comparing the totals with the counts
in the superblock. Add that.
Make jffs2_mark_erased_block() file the newly-erased block on the
free_list before calling the debug function, to make it happy.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We were accounting for the cleanmarker by calling jffs2_link_node_ref()
(without locking!), which adjusted both superblock and per-eraseblock
accounting, subtracting the size of the cleanmarker from {jeb,c}->free_size
and adding it to {jeb,c}->used_size.
But only _then_ were we adding the size of the newly-erased block back
to the superblock counts, and we were adding each of jeb->{free,used}_size
to the corresponding superblock counts. Thus, the size of the cleanmarker
was effectively subtracted from the superblock's free_size _twice_.
Fix this, by always adding a full eraseblock size to c->free_size when
we've erased a block. And call jffs2_link_node_ref() under the proper
lock, while we're at it.
Thanks to Alexander Yurchenko and/or Damir Shayhutdinov for (almost)
pinpointing the problem.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Add the write verification buffer to the dataflash. The mtd_dataflash has
the CONFIG_DATAFLASH_WRITE_VERIFY so is better a change to Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
fs/jffs2/gc.c:1147:29: warning: symbol 'jeb' shadows an earlier one
fs/jffs2/gc.c:1084:89: originally declared here
fs/jffs2/gc.c:1197:29: warning: symbol 'jeb' shadows an earlier one
fs/jffs2/gc.c:1084:89: originally declared here
Rename the unused 'jeb' argument to avoid this. We could potentially
remove the argument, but GCC should be doing that anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
fs/jffs2/write.c:585:28: warning: symbol 'fd' shadows an earlier one
fs/jffs2/write.c:536:27: originally declared here
No need to redeclare fd, use the original one, after this point,
fd is always reassigned before it used again.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:60:8: warning: symbol 'ret' shadows an earlier one
fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:45:6: originally declared here
(reported by Harvey Harrison)
Just remove the offending declaration of 'int ret' and use the earlier one.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This fixes a regression introduced in commit
205c109a7a when switching to
write_begin/write_end operations in JFFS2.
The page offset is miscalculated, leading to corruption of the fragment
lists and subsequently to memory corruption and panics.
[ Side note: the bug is a fairly direct result of the naming. Nick was
likely misled by the use of "offs", since we tend to use the notion of
"offset" not as an absolute position, but as an offset _within_ a page
or allocation.
Alternatively, a "pgoff_t" is a page index, but not a byte offset -
our VM naming can be a bit confusing.
So in this case, a VM person would likely have called this a "pos",
not an "offs", or perhaps talked about byte offsets rather than page
offsets (since it's counted in bytes, not pages). - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Korolev <akorolev@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Leonenko <vasiliy.leonenko@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
