* 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6: (179 commits)
ACPI: Fix acpi_processor_idle and idle= boot parameters interaction
acpi: fix section mismatch warning in pnpacpi
intel_menlo: fix build warning
ACPI: Cleanup: Remove unneeded, multiple local dummy variables
ACPI: video - fix permissions on some proc entries
ACPI: video - properly handle errors when registering proc elements
ACPI: video - do not store invalid entries in attached_array list
ACPI: re-name acpi_pm_ops to acpi_suspend_ops
ACER_WMI/ASUS_LAPTOP: fix build bug
thinkpad_acpi: fix possible NULL pointer dereference if kstrdup failed
ACPI: check a return value correctly in acpi_power_get_context()
#if 0 acpi/bay.c:eject_removable_drive()
eeepc-laptop: add hwmon fan control
eeepc-laptop: add backlight
eeepc-laptop: add base driver
ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: bump up version to 0.20
ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: fix selects in Kconfig
ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: use a private workqueue
ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: fluff really minor fix
ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: use uppercase for "LED" on user documentation
...
Fixed conflicts in drivers/acpi/video.c and drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c
manually.
Some time ago it turned out that our suspend code ordering broke some
NVidia-based systems that hung if _PTS was executed with one of the PCI
devices, specifically a USB controller, in a low power state.
Then, it was noticed that the suspend code ordering was not compliant
with ACPI 1.0, although it was compliant with ACPI 2.0 (and later), and
it was argued that the code had to be changed for that reason (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
So we did, but evidently we did wrong, because it's now turning out that
some systems have been broken by this change. Refs:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10340https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217#c16
[ I said at that time that something like this might happend, but the
majority of people involved thought that it was improbable due to the
necessity to preserve the compliance of hardware with ACPI 1.0. ]
This actually is a quite serious regression from 2.6.24.
Moreover, the ACPI 1.0 ordering of suspend code introduced another issue
that I have only noticed recently. Namely, if the suspend of one of
devices fails, the already suspended devices will be resumed without
executing _WAK before, which leads to problems on some systems (for
example, in such situations thermal management is broken on my HP
nx6325). Consequently, it also breaks suspend debugging on the affected
systems.
Note also, that the requirement to execute _PTS before suspending
devices does not really make sense, because the device in question may
be put into a low power state at run time for a reason unrelated to a
system-wide suspend.
For the reasons outlined above, the change of the suspend ordering
should be reverted, which is done by the patch below.
[ Felix Möller: "I am the reporter from the original Novell Bug:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217
I just tried current git head (two hours ago) with the patch (the one
from the beginning of this thread) from Rafael and without it. With
the patch my MacBook does suspend without it does not." ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: Felix Möller <felix@derklecks.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Make acpi_sleep_prepare() static and cause it to print a message
specifying the ACPI system sleep state to be entered (helpful for
debugging the suspend/hibernation code).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current
hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into
low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the
possibility to override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel
command line option.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Introduce global hibernation callback .end() and rename global
hibernation callback .start() to .begin(), in analogy with the
recent modifications of the global suspend callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current
suspend code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which causes some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during suspend (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
Make the suspend code execute _PTS before putting devices into low
power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) and provide a command
line option to override the default if need be.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to
the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before
suspending devices. Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global
control method should be executed before suspending devices, we
need to disable GPEs separately.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is
currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the
leaving of the sleep state, respectively. However, these functions
are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling
them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them
ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the
ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering
the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the
platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up.
Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
On ACPI systems the target state set by acpi_pm_set_target() is
reset by acpi_pm_finish(), but that need not be called if the
suspend fails. All platforms that use the .set_target() global
suspend callback are affected by analogous issues.
For this reason, we need an additional global suspend callback that
will reset the target state regardless of whether or not the suspend
is successful. Also, it is reasonable to rename the .set_target()
callback, since it will be used for a different purpose on ACPI
systems (due to ACPI 1.0x code ordering requirements).
Introduce the global suspend callback .end() to be executed at the
end of the suspend sequence and rename the .set_target() global
suspend callback to .begin().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Wakeup GPE hasn't a handler. If system is waked up by such GPE like a
USB hotplug, I saw a lot of error reporting the GPE hasn't handler.
acpi_leave_sleep_state will clear the GPE but it's too late, we should
do it before interrupt is re-enabled.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some code in acpi_hibernation_finish() was moved to acpi_hibernation_leave(),
but the old copy had been left (it's harmless, but also useless). Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned
by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from
given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW
is not present).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
/proc/acpi/alarm can't be set correctly, here is a sample:
[root@localhost /]# echo "2006 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-09 09:09:09
[root@localhost /]# echo "2006 04" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-04 04:04:04
[root@localhost /]#
Obviously, it is wrong, it should consider it as an invalid input.
after this patch:
[root@localhost /]# echo "2008 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost /]#
Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
In function acpi_system_write_alarm in file drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c,
big sec, min, hr, mo, day and yr are counted twice to get reasonable
values, that is very superfluous, we can do that only once.
In additon, /proc/acpi/alarm can set a related value which can be
specified as YYYY years MM months DD days HH hours MM minutes SS
senconds, it isn't a date, so you can specify as +0000-00-00 96:00:00
, that means 3 days later, current code can't handle such a case.
This patch removes unnecessary code and does with the aforementioned
situation.
Before applying this patch:
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost /]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-02 **:**:**
[root@localhost /]#
After applying this patch:
[root@localhost ~]# echo "2007-12-00 00:00:00" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost ~]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-04 03:03:00
[root@localhost ~]#
Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This fixes some totally illogical and wrong code that converts things to
and from BCD mode essentially randomly, does math on values in BCD mode
etc etc. Introduce a few helper functions to make it a bit more obvious
what is going on, and make sure that we always do all the arithmetic
(and anythign else, for that matter) in binary, not BCD.
Tested by Mark Lord, who found the problem originally, and also pushed
the patch back and reminded me about it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
acpi_leave_sleep_state() should have correct list of wake and
runtime GPEs, which is available only after disable_wakeup_device()
is called.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
