Commit Graph

238 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Baokun Li
d32ff64c87 cachefiles: fix dentry leak in cachefiles_open_file()
commit da6ef2dffe6056aad3435e6cf7c6471c2a62187c upstream.

A dentry leak may be caused when a lookup cookie and a cull are concurrent:

            P1             |             P2
-----------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_lookup_cookie
  cachefiles_look_up_object
    lookup_one_positive_unlocked
     // get dentry
                            cachefiles_cull
                              inode->i_flags |= S_KERNEL_FILE;
    cachefiles_open_file
      cachefiles_mark_inode_in_use
        __cachefiles_mark_inode_in_use
          can_use = false
          if (!(inode->i_flags & S_KERNEL_FILE))
            can_use = true
	  return false
        return false
        // Returns an error but doesn't put dentry

After that the following WARNING will be triggered when the backend folder
is umounted:

==================================================================
BUG: Dentry 000000008ad87947{i=7a,n=Dx_1_1.img}  still in use (1) [unmount of ext4 sda]
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 359261 at fs/dcache.c:1767 umount_check+0x5d/0x70
CPU: 4 PID: 359261 Comm: umount Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #25
RIP: 0010:umount_check+0x5d/0x70
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 d_walk+0xda/0x2b0
 do_one_tree+0x20/0x40
 shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x2c/0x90
 generic_shutdown_super+0x20/0x160
 kill_block_super+0x1a/0x40
 ext4_kill_sb+0x22/0x40
 deactivate_locked_super+0x35/0x80
 cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160
==================================================================

Whether cachefiles_open_file() returns true or false, the reference count
obtained by lookup_positive_unlocked() in cachefiles_look_up_object()
should be released.

Therefore release that reference count in cachefiles_look_up_object() to
fix the above issue and simplify the code.

Fixes: 1f08c925e7 ("cachefiles: Implement backing file wrangling")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240829083409.3788142-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-10-17 15:22:01 +02:00
Baokun Li
8de2531771 cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie()
[ Upstream commit 5d8f805789072ea7fd39504694b7bd17e5f751c4 ]

We got the following issue in our fault injection stress test:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888118efc000 by task kworker/u78:0/109

CPU: 13 PID: 109 Comm: kworker/u78:0 Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #566
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
 fscache_cookie_worker+0x91/0x1c0
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Allocated by task 117:
 kmalloc_trace+0x1b3/0x3c0
 cachefiles_acquire_volume+0xf3/0x9c0
 fscache_create_volume_work+0x97/0x150
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Freed by task 120301:
 kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cache+0x3fa/0x920
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount+0x1f6/0x250
 cachefiles_daemon_release+0x13b/0x290
 __fput+0x204/0xa00
 task_work_run+0x139/0x230
 do_exit+0x87a/0x29b0
 [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

           p1                |             p2
------------------------------------------------------------
                              fscache_begin_lookup
                               fscache_begin_volume_access
                                fscache_cache_is_live(fscache_cache)
cachefiles_daemon_release
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount
  cachefiles_daemon_unbind
   cachefiles_withdraw_cache
    fscache_withdraw_cache
     fscache_set_cache_state(cache, FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN);
    cachefiles_withdraw_objects(cache)
    fscache_wait_for_objects(fscache)
      atomic_read(&fscache_cache->object_count) == 0
                              fscache_perform_lookup
                               cachefiles_lookup_cookie
                                cachefiles_alloc_object
                                 refcount_set(&object->ref, 1);
                                 object->volume = volume
                                 fscache_count_object(vcookie->cache);
                                  atomic_inc(&fscache_cache->object_count)
    cachefiles_withdraw_volumes
     cachefiles_withdraw_volume
      fscache_withdraw_volume
      __cachefiles_free_volume
       kfree(cachefiles_volume)
                              fscache_cookie_state_machine
                               cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
                                cache = object->volume->cache;
                                // cachefiles_volume UAF !!!

After setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, wait for all the cookie lookups
to complete first, and then wait for fscache_cache->object_count == 0 to
avoid the cookie exiting after the volume has been freed and triggering
the above issue. Therefore call fscache_withdraw_volume() before calling
cachefiles_withdraw_objects().

This way, after setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, only the following two
cases will occur:
1) fscache_begin_lookup fails in fscache_begin_volume_access().
2) fscache_withdraw_volume() will ensure that fscache_count_object() has
   been executed before calling fscache_wait_for_objects().

Fixes: fe2140e2f5 ("cachefiles: Implement volume support")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-07-25 09:49:21 +02:00
Baokun Li
90f17e47f1 cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in fscache_withdraw_volume()
[ Upstream commit 522018a0de6b6fcce60c04f86dfc5f0e4b6a1b36 ]

We got the following issue in our fault injection stress test:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in fscache_withdraw_volume+0x2e1/0x370
Read of size 4 at addr ffff88810680be08 by task ondemand-04-dae/5798

CPU: 0 PID: 5798 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #565
Call Trace:
 kasan_check_range+0xf6/0x1b0
 fscache_withdraw_volume+0x2e1/0x370
 cachefiles_withdraw_volume+0x31/0x50
 cachefiles_withdraw_cache+0x3ad/0x900
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount+0x1f6/0x250
 cachefiles_daemon_release+0x13b/0x290
 __fput+0x204/0xa00
 task_work_run+0x139/0x230

Allocated by task 5820:
 __kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0
 fscache_alloc_volume+0x70/0x600
 __fscache_acquire_volume+0x1c/0x610
 erofs_fscache_register_volume+0x96/0x1a0
 erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x49a/0x690
 erofs_fc_fill_super+0x6c0/0xcc0
 vfs_get_super+0xa9/0x140
 vfs_get_tree+0x8e/0x300
 do_new_mount+0x28c/0x580
 [...]

Freed by task 5820:
 kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
 fscache_put_volume.part.0+0x5cb/0x9e0
 erofs_fscache_unregister_fs+0x157/0x1b0
 erofs_kill_sb+0xd9/0x1c0
 deactivate_locked_super+0xa3/0x100
 vfs_get_super+0x105/0x140
 vfs_get_tree+0x8e/0x300
 do_new_mount+0x28c/0x580
 [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

        mount failed         |         daemon exit
------------------------------------------------------------
 deactivate_locked_super        cachefiles_daemon_release
  erofs_kill_sb
   erofs_fscache_unregister_fs
    fscache_relinquish_volume
     __fscache_relinquish_volume
      fscache_put_volume(fscache_volume, fscache_volume_put_relinquish)
       zero = __refcount_dec_and_test(&fscache_volume->ref, &ref);
                                 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount
                                  cachefiles_daemon_unbind
                                   cachefiles_withdraw_cache
                                    cachefiles_withdraw_volumes
                                     list_del_init(&volume->cache_link)
       fscache_free_volume(fscache_volume)
        cache->ops->free_volume
         cachefiles_free_volume
          list_del_init(&cachefiles_volume->cache_link);
        kfree(fscache_volume)
                                     cachefiles_withdraw_volume
                                      fscache_withdraw_volume
                                       fscache_volume->n_accesses
                                       // fscache_volume UAF !!!

The fscache_volume in cache->volumes must not have been freed yet, but its
reference count may be 0. So use the new fscache_try_get_volume() helper
function try to get its reference count.

If the reference count of fscache_volume is 0, fscache_put_volume() is
freeing it, so wait for it to be removed from cache->volumes.

If its reference count is not 0, call cachefiles_withdraw_volume() with
reference count protection to avoid the above issue.

Fixes: fe2140e2f5 ("cachefiles: Implement volume support")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-3-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-07-25 09:49:20 +02:00
Baokun Li
ad61791466 cachefiles: make on-demand read killable
[ Upstream commit bc9dde6155464e906e630a0a5c17a4cab241ffbb ]

Replacing wait_for_completion() with wait_for_completion_killable() in
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req() allows us to kill processes that might
trigger a hunk_task if the daemon is abnormal.

But now only CACHEFILES_OP_READ is killable, because OP_CLOSE and OP_OPEN
is initiated from kworker context and the signal is prohibited in these
kworker.

Note that when the req in xas changes, i.e. xas_load(&xas) != req, it
means that a process will complete the current request soon, so wait
again for the request to be completed.

In addition, add the cachefiles_ondemand_finish_req() helper function to
simplify the code.

Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-13-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-25 09:49:12 +02:00
Zizhi Wo
703bea37d1 cachefiles: Set object to close if ondemand_id < 0 in copen
[ Upstream commit 4f8703fb3482f92edcfd31661857b16fec89c2c0 ]

If copen is maliciously called in the user mode, it may delete the request
corresponding to the random id. And the request may have not been read yet.

Note that when the object is set to reopen, the open request will be done
with the still reopen state in above case. As a result, the request
corresponding to this object is always skipped in select_req function, so
the read request is never completed and blocks other process.

Fix this issue by simply set object to close if its id < 0 in copen.

Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-11-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-25 09:49:12 +02:00
Baokun Li
3b744884c0 cachefiles: add consistency check for copen/cread
[ Upstream commit a26dc49df37e996876f50a0210039b2d211fdd6f ]

This prevents malicious processes from completing random copen/cread
requests and crashing the system. Added checks are listed below:

  * Generic, copen can only complete open requests, and cread can only
    complete read requests.
  * For copen, ondemand_id must not be 0, because this indicates that the
    request has not been read by the daemon.
  * For cread, the object corresponding to fd and req should be the same.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-7-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-25 09:49:12 +02:00
Jingbo Xu
97cfd5e20d cachefiles: add missing lock protection when polling
[ Upstream commit cf5bb09e742a9cf6349127e868329a8f69b7a014 ]

Add missing lock protection in poll routine when iterating xarray,
otherwise:

Even with RCU read lock held, only the slot of the radix tree is
ensured to be pinned there, while the data structure (e.g. struct
cachefiles_req) stored in the slot has no such guarantee.  The poll
routine will iterate the radix tree and dereference cachefiles_req
accordingly.  Thus RCU read lock is not adequate in this case and
spinlock is needed here.

Fixes: b817e22b2e91 ("cachefiles: narrow the scope of triggering EPOLLIN events in ondemand mode")
Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-10-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-18 13:18:32 +02:00
Baokun Li
35710c6c4a cachefiles: cyclic allocation of msg_id to avoid reuse
[ Upstream commit 19f4f399091478c95947f6bd7ad61622300c30d9 ]

Reusing the msg_id after a maliciously completed reopen request may cause
a read request to remain unprocessed and result in a hung, as shown below:

       t1       |      t2       |      t3
-------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
 cachefiles_ondemand_object_is_close(A)
 cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_reopening(A)
 queue_work(fscache_object_wq, &info->work)
                ondemand_object_worker
                 cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(A)
                  cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(OPEN)
                    // get msg_id 6
                    wait_for_completion(&req_A->done)
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
 // read msg_id 6 req_A
 cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
 copy_to_user
                                // Malicious completion msg_id 6
                                copen 6,-1
                                cachefiles_ondemand_copen
                                 complete(&req_A->done)
                                 // will not set the object to close
                                 // because ondemand_id && fd is valid.

                // ondemand_object_worker() is done
                // but the object is still reopening.

                                // new open req_B
                                cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(B)
                                 cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(OPEN)
                                 // reuse msg_id 6
process_open_req
 copen 6,A.size
 // The expected failed copen was executed successfully

Expect copen to fail, and when it does, it closes fd, which sets the
object to close, and then close triggers reopen again. However, due to
msg_id reuse resulting in a successful copen, the anonymous fd is not
closed until the daemon exits. Therefore read requests waiting for reopen
to complete may trigger hung task.

To avoid this issue, allocate the msg_id cyclically to avoid reusing the
msg_id for a very short duration of time.

Fixes: c838305450 ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-9-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-18 13:18:32 +02:00
Hou Tao
ec92893692 cachefiles: wait for ondemand_object_worker to finish when dropping object
[ Upstream commit 12e009d60852f7bce0afc373ca0b320f14150418 ]

When queuing ondemand_object_worker() to re-open the object,
cachefiles_object is not pinned. The cachefiles_object may be freed when
the pending read request is completed intentionally and the related
erofs is umounted. If ondemand_object_worker() runs after the object is
freed, it will incur use-after-free problem as shown below.

process A  processs B  process C  process D

cachefiles_ondemand_send_req()
// send a read req X
// wait for its completion

           // close ondemand fd
           cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release()
           // set object as CLOSE

                       cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read()
                       // set object as REOPENING
                       queue_work(fscache_wq, &info->ondemand_work)

                                // close /dev/cachefiles
                                cachefiles_daemon_release
                                cachefiles_flush_reqs
                                complete(&req->done)

// read req X is completed
// umount the erofs fs
cachefiles_put_object()
// object will be freed
cachefiles_ondemand_deinit_obj_info()
kmem_cache_free(object)
                       // both info and object are freed
                       ondemand_object_worker()

When dropping an object, it is no longer necessary to reopen the object,
so use cancel_work_sync() to cancel or wait for ondemand_object_worker()
to finish.

Fixes: 0a7e54c1959c ("cachefiles: resend an open request if the read request's object is closed")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-8-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-18 13:18:32 +02:00
Baokun Li
4131c5958f cachefiles: cancel all requests for the object that is being dropped
[ Upstream commit 751f524635a4f076117d714705eeddadaf6748ee ]

Because after an object is dropped, requests for that object are useless,
cancel them to avoid causing other problems.

This prepares for the later addition of cancel_work_sync(). After the
reopen requests is generated, cancel it to avoid cancel_work_sync()
blocking by waiting for daemon to complete the reopen requests.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-7-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 12e009d60852 ("cachefiles: wait for ondemand_object_worker to finish when dropping object")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-18 13:18:32 +02:00
Baokun Li
16d47ba6ca cachefiles: stop sending new request when dropping object
[ Upstream commit b2415d1f4566b6939acacc69637eaa57815829c1 ]

Added CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND_OBJSTATE_DROPPING indicates that the cachefiles
object is being dropped, and is set after the close request for the dropped
object completes, and no new requests are allowed to be sent after this
state.

This prepares for the later addition of cancel_work_sync(). It prevents
leftover reopen requests from being sent, to avoid processing unnecessary
requests and to avoid cancel_work_sync() blocking by waiting for daemon to
complete the reopen requests.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-6-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 12e009d60852 ("cachefiles: wait for ondemand_object_worker to finish when dropping object")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-18 13:18:31 +02:00
Jia Zhu
0e19a18f99 cachefiles: narrow the scope of triggering EPOLLIN events in ondemand mode
[ Upstream commit b817e22b2e91257ace32a6768c3c003faeaa1c5c ]

Don't trigger EPOLLIN when there are only reopening read requests in
xarray.

Suggested-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120041422.75170-5-zhujia.zj@bytedance.com
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 12e009d60852 ("cachefiles: wait for ondemand_object_worker to finish when dropping object")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-18 13:18:31 +02:00
Baokun Li
2a54bd7b90 cachefiles: propagate errors from vfs_getxattr() to avoid infinite loop
[ Upstream commit 0ece614a52bc9d219b839a6a29282b30d10e0c48 ]

In cachefiles_check_volume_xattr(), the error returned by vfs_getxattr()
is not passed to ret, so it ends up returning -ESTALE, which leads to an
endless loop as follows:

cachefiles_acquire_volume
retry:
  ret = cachefiles_check_volume_xattr
    ret = -ESTALE
    xlen = vfs_getxattr // return -EIO
    // The ret is not updated when xlen < 0, so -ESTALE is returned.
    return ret
  // Supposed to jump out of the loop at this judgement.
  if (ret != -ESTALE)
      goto error_dir;
  cachefiles_bury_object
    //  EIO causes rename failure
  goto retry;

Hence propagate the error returned by vfs_getxattr() to avoid the above
issue. Do the same in cachefiles_check_auxdata().

Fixes: 32e150037d ("fscache, cachefiles: Store the volume coherency data")
Fixes: 72b957856b ("cachefiles: Implement metadata/coherency data storage in xattrs")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-5-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-07-18 13:18:31 +02:00
David Howells
9afc658ce7 cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode
commit c3d6569a43322f371e7ba0ad386112723757ac8f upstream.

cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() as called from cachefiles_open_file() and
cachefiles_create_tmpfile() does not check if object->ondemand is set
before dereferencing it, leading to an oops something like:

	RIP: 0010:cachefiles_ondemand_init_object+0x9/0x41
	...
	Call Trace:
	 <TASK>
	 cachefiles_open_file+0xc9/0x187
	 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x122/0x2be
	 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0xbe/0x32b
	 fscache_cookie_worker+0x1f/0x2d
	 process_one_work+0x136/0x208
	 process_scheduled_works+0x3a/0x41
	 worker_thread+0x1a2/0x1f6
	 kthread+0xca/0xd2
	 ret_from_fork+0x21/0x33

Fix this by making cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() return immediately if
cachefiles->ondemand is NULL.

Fixes: 3c5ecfe16e76 ("cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-06-21 14:36:00 +02:00
Baokun Li
320ba9cbca cachefiles: flush all requests after setting CACHEFILES_DEAD
[ Upstream commit 85e833cd7243bda7285492b0653c3abb1e2e757b ]

In ondemand mode, when the daemon is processing an open request, if the
kernel flags the cache as CACHEFILES_DEAD, the cachefiles_daemon_write()
will always return -EIO, so the daemon can't pass the copen to the kernel.
Then the kernel process that is waiting for the copen triggers a hung_task.

Since the DEAD state is irreversible, it can only be exited by closing
/dev/cachefiles. Therefore, after calling cachefiles_io_error() to mark
the cache as CACHEFILES_DEAD, if in ondemand mode, flush all requests to
avoid the above hungtask. We may still be able to read some of the cached
data before closing the fd of /dev/cachefiles.

Note that this relies on the patch that adds reference counting to the req,
otherwise it may UAF.

Fixes: c838305450 ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-12-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:47 +02:00
Baokun Li
eac51d9daa cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds
[ Upstream commit 4b4391e77a6bf24cba2ef1590e113d9b73b11039 ]

After installing the anonymous fd, we can now see it in userland and close
it. However, at this point we may not have gotten the reference count of
the cache, but we will put it during colse fd, so this may cause a cache
UAF.

So grab the cache reference count before fd_install(). In addition, by
kernel convention, fd is taken over by the user land after fd_install(),
and the kernel should not call close_fd() after that, i.e., it should call
fd_install() after everything is ready, thus fd_install() is called after
copy_to_user() succeeds.

Fixes: c838305450 ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-10-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:47 +02:00
Baokun Li
1fd5f317b5 cachefiles: never get a new anonymous fd if ondemand_id is valid
[ Upstream commit 4988e35e95fc938bdde0e15880fe72042fc86acf ]

Now every time the daemon reads an open request, it gets a new anonymous fd
and ondemand_id. With the introduction of "restore", it is possible to read
the same open request more than once, and therefore an object can have more
than one anonymous fd.

If the anonymous fd is not unique, the following concurrencies will result
in an fd leak:

     t1     |         t2         |          t3
------------------------------------------------------------
 cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
  cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
   REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
   wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
            cachefiles_daemon_read
             cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
              REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
              cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
                load->fd = fd0
                ondemand_id = object_id0
                                  ------ restore ------
                                  cachefiles_ondemand_restore
                                   // restore REQ_A
                                  cachefiles_daemon_read
                                   cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
                                    REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
                                      cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
                                        load->fd = fd1
                                        ondemand_id = object_id1
             process_open_req(REQ_A)
             write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size))
             cachefiles_ondemand_copen
              xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
              complete(&REQ_A->done)
   kfree(REQ_A)
                                  process_open_req(REQ_A)
                                  // copen fails due to no req
                                  // daemon close(fd1)
                                  cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
                                   // set object closed
 -- umount --
 cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
  cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object
   cachefiles_ondemand_init_close_req
    if (!cachefiles_ondemand_object_is_open(object))
      return -ENOENT;
    // The fd0 is not closed until the daemon exits.

However, the anonymous fd holds the reference count of the object and the
object holds the reference count of the cookie. So even though the cookie
has been relinquished, it will not be unhashed and freed until the daemon
exits.

In fscache_hash_cookie(), when the same cookie is found in the hash list,
if the cookie is set with the FSCACHE_COOKIE_RELINQUISHED bit, then the new
cookie waits for the old cookie to be unhashed, while the old cookie is
waiting for the leaked fd to be closed, if the daemon does not exit in time
it will trigger a hung task.

To avoid this, allocate a new anonymous fd only if no anonymous fd has
been allocated (ondemand_id == 0) or if the previously allocated anonymous
fd has been closed (ondemand_id == -1). Moreover, returns an error if
ondemand_id is valid, letting the daemon know that the current userland
restore logic is abnormal and needs to be checked.

Fixes: c838305450 ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-9-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 4b4391e77a6b ("cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:47 +02:00
Baokun Li
bb00aef6d9 cachefiles: remove err_put_fd label in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read()
[ Upstream commit 3e6d704f02aa4c50c7bc5fe91a4401df249a137b ]

The err_put_fd label is only used once, so remove it to make the code
more readable. In addition, the logic for deleting error request and
CLOSE request is merged to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-6-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 4b4391e77a6b ("cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00
Baokun Li
cb55625f8e cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read()
[ Upstream commit da4a827416066191aafeeccee50a8836a826ba10 ]

We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888122e84088 by task ondemand-04-dae/963

CPU: 13 PID: 963 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #564
Call Trace:
 kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
 cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
 vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
 ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0

Allocated by task 116:
 kmem_cache_alloc+0x140/0x3a0
 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x140/0xcd0
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
 [...]

Freed by task 792:
 kmem_cache_free+0xfe/0x390
 cachefiles_put_object+0x241/0x480
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
 [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

     mount  |   daemon_thread1    |    daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
 cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(object)
  cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
   REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
   wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)

            cachefiles_daemon_read
             cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
              REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
              msg->object_id = req->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
                                  ------ restore ------
                                  cachefiles_ondemand_restore
                                  xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
                                   xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW)

                                  cachefiles_daemon_read
                                   cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
                                    REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
              copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
               xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
               complete(&REQ_A->done)
              ------ close(fd) ------
              cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
               cachefiles_put_object
 cachefiles_put_object
  kmem_cache_free(cachefiles_object_jar, object)
                                    REQ_A->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
                                     // object UAF !!!

When we see the request within xa_lock, req->object must not have been
freed yet, so grab the reference count of object before xa_unlock to
avoid the above issue.

Fixes: 0a7e54c1959c ("cachefiles: resend an open request if the read request's object is closed")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-5-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 4b4391e77a6b ("cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00
Baokun Li
99e9c5bd27 cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd()
[ Upstream commit de3e26f9e5b76fc628077578c001c4a51bf54d06 ]

We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962

CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542
Call Trace:
 kasan_report+0x94/0xc0
 cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
 vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
 ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0

Allocated by task 626:
 __kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0
 cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690
 cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
 cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
 cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
 [...]

Freed by task 626:
 kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
 cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690
 cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
 cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
 cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
 [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

     mount  |   daemon_thread1    |    daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
 cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
  cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
   REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
   wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)

            cachefiles_daemon_read
             cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
              REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
              cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
              copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
            process_open_req(REQ_A)
                                  ------ restore ------
                                  cachefiles_ondemand_restore
                                  xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
                                   xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);

                                  cachefiles_daemon_read
                                   cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
                                    REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req

             write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size));
             cachefiles_ondemand_copen
              xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
              complete(&REQ_A->done)
   kfree(REQ_A)
                                    cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A)
                                     fd = get_unused_fd_flags
                                     file = anon_inode_getfile
                                     fd_install(fd, file)
                                     load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data;
                                     load->fd = fd;
                                     // load UAF !!!

This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is still
alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus
triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference
count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and then
released when the waiting and reading is over.

Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we need to
avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only
complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray.

Fixes: e73fa11a356c ("cachefiles: add restore command to recover inflight ondemand read requests")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 4b4391e77a6b ("cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00
Jia Zhu
a0cc87f866 cachefiles: add restore command to recover inflight ondemand read requests
[ Upstream commit e73fa11a356ca0905c3cc648eaacc6f0f2d2c8b3 ]

Previously, in ondemand read scenario, if the anonymous fd was closed by
user daemon, inflight and subsequent read requests would return EIO.
As long as the device connection is not released, user daemon can hold
and restore inflight requests by setting the request flag to
CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW.

Suggested-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120041422.75170-6-zhujia.zj@bytedance.com
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 4b4391e77a6b ("cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00
Baokun Li
5344f2ab31 cachefiles: add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info
[ Upstream commit 0a790040838c736495d5afd6b2d636f159f817f1 ]

The following concurrency may cause a read request to fail to be completed
and result in a hung:

           t1             |             t2
---------------------------------------------------------
                            cachefiles_ondemand_copen
                              req = xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
// Anon fd is maliciously closed.
cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
  xa_lock(&cache->reqs)
  cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_close(object)
  xa_unlock(&cache->reqs)
                              cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_open
                              // No one will ever close it again.
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
  cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
  // Get a read req but its fd is already closed.
  // The daemon can't issue a cread ioctl with an closed fd, then hung.

So add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info to protect ondemand_id and
state, thus we can avoid the above problem in cachefiles_ondemand_copen()
by using ondemand_id to determine if fd has been closed.

Fixes: c838305450 ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-8-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00
Jia Zhu
f17443d52d cachefiles: resend an open request if the read request's object is closed
[ Upstream commit 0a7e54c1959c0feb2de23397ec09c7692364313e ]

When an anonymous fd is closed by user daemon, if there is a new read
request for this file comes up, the anonymous fd should be re-opened
to handle that read request rather than fail it directly.

1. Introduce reopening state for objects that are closed but have
   inflight/subsequent read requests.
2. No longer flush READ requests but only CLOSE requests when anonymous
   fd is closed.
3. Enqueue the reopen work to workqueue, thus user daemon could get rid
   of daemon_read context and handle that request smoothly. Otherwise,
   the user daemon will send a reopen request and wait for itself to
   process the request.

Signed-off-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120041422.75170-4-zhujia.zj@bytedance.com
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 0a790040838c ("cachefiles: add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00
Jia Zhu
bb512c8587 cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object
[ Upstream commit 3c5ecfe16e7699011c12c2d44e55437415331fa3 ]

We'll introduce a @work_struct field for @object in subsequent patches,
it will enlarge the size of @object.
As the result of that, this commit extracts ondemand info field from
@object.

Signed-off-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120041422.75170-3-zhujia.zj@bytedance.com
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 0a790040838c ("cachefiles: add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00
Jia Zhu
e43fb9a20d cachefiles: introduce object ondemand state
[ Upstream commit 357a18d033143617e9c7d420c8f0dd4cbab5f34d ]

Previously, @ondemand_id field was used not only to identify ondemand
state of the object, but also to represent the index of the xarray.
This commit introduces @state field to decouple the role of @ondemand_id
and adds helpers to access it.

Signed-off-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120041422.75170-2-zhujia.zj@bytedance.com
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 0a790040838c ("cachefiles: add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-06-21 14:35:46 +02:00