All but two of the callers already have a folio; pass a folio into
try_to_free_buffers(). This removes the last user of cancel_dirty_page()
so remove that wrapper function too.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
For the follow scenario:
1. jbd start commit transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some ineligible actions and mark FC_INELIGIBLE
4. jbd complete transaction n and clean FC_INELIGIBLE
5. task A call fsync
In this case fast commit will not fallback to full commit and
transaction n+1 also not handled by jbd.
Make ext4_fc_mark_ineligible() also record transaction tid for
latest ineligible case, when call ext4_fc_cleanup() check
current transaction tid, if small than latest ineligible tid
do not clear the EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
The on-disk superblock field sb->s_maxlen represents the total size of
the journal including the fast commit area and is no more the max
number of blocks available for a transaction. The maximum number of
blocks available to a transaction is reduced by the number of fast
commit blocks. So, this patch renames j_maxlen to j_total_len to
better represent its intent. Also, it adds a function to calculate max
number of bufs available for a transaction.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106035911.1942128-6-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Introduce journal callbacks to allow different behaviors
for an inode in journal_submit|finish_inode_data_buffers().
The existing users of the current behavior (ext4, ocfs2)
are adapted to use the previously exported functions
that implement the current behavior.
Users are callers of jbd2_journal_inode_ranged_write|wait(),
which adds the inode to the transaction's inode list with
the JI_WRITE|WAIT_DATA flags. Only ext4 and ocfs2 in-tree.
Both CONFIG_EXT4_FS and CONFIG_OCSFS2_FS select CONFIG_JBD2,
which builds fs/jbd2/commit.c and journal.c that define and
export the functions, so we can call directly in ext4/ocfs2.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201006004841.600488-3-mfo@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The argument isn't used by any caller, and drivers don't fill out
bi_sector for flush requests either.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Commit 904cdbd41d ("jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from
an older transaction") set the BH_Freed flag when forgetting a metadata
buffer which belongs to the committing transaction, it indicate the
committing process clear dirty bits when it is done with the buffer. But
it also clear the BH_Mapped flag at the same time, which may trigger
below NULL pointer oops when block_size < PAGE_SIZE.
rmdir 1 kjournald2 mkdir 2
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
commit transaction N
jbd2_journal_forget
set_buffer_freed(bh1)
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
commit transaction N+1
...
clear_buffer_mapped(bh1)
ext4_getblk(bh2 ummapped)
...
grow_dev_page
init_page_buffers
bh1->b_private=NULL
bh2->b_private=NULL
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh1)
__journal_remove_journal_head(hb1)
jh1 is NULL and trigger oops
*) Dir entry block bh1 and bh2 belongs to one page, and the bh2 has
already been unmapped.
For the metadata buffer we forgetting, we should always keep the mapped
flag and clear the dirty flags is enough, so this patch pick out the
these buffers and keep their BH_Mapped flag.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213063821.30455-3-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Fixes: 904cdbd41d ("jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from an older transaction")
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
We invoke jbd2_journal_abort() to abort the journal and record errno
in the jbd2 superblock when committing journal transaction besides the
failure on submitting the commit record. But there is no need for the
case and we can also invoke jbd2_journal_abort() instead of
__jbd2_journal_abort_hard().
Fixes: 818d276ceb ("ext4: Add the journal checksum feature")
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204124614.45424-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently, journal descriptor blocks were not accounted in
transaction->t_outstanding_credits and we were just leaving some slack
space in the journal for them (in jbd2_log_space_left() and
jbd2_space_needed()). This is making proper accounting (and reservation
we want to add) of descriptor blocks difficult so switch to accounting
descriptor blocks in transaction->t_outstanding_credits and just reserve
the same amount of credits in t_outstanding credits for journal
descriptor blocks when creating transaction.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-18-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
jbd2 statistics counting number of blocks logged in a transaction was
wrong. It didn't count the commit block and more importantly it didn't
count revoke descriptor blocks. Make sure these get properly counted.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-13-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Bit-spinlocks are problematic on PREEMPT_RT if functions which might sleep
on RT, e.g. spin_lock(), alloc/free(), are invoked inside the lock held
region because bit spinlocks disable preemption even on RT.
A first attempt was to replace state lock with a spinlock placed in struct
buffer_head and make the locking conditional on PREEMPT_RT and
DEBUG_BIT_SPINLOCKS.
Jan pointed out that there is a 4 byte hole in struct journal_head where a
regular spinlock fits in and he would not object to convert the state lock
to a spinlock unconditionally.
Aside of solving the RT problem, this also gains lockdep coverage for the
journal head state lock (bit-spinlocks are not covered by lockdep as it's
hard to fit a lockdep map into a single bit).
The trivial change would have been to convert the jbd_*lock_bh_state()
inlines, but that comes with the downside that these functions take a
buffer head pointer which needs to be converted to a journal head pointer
which adds another level of indirection.
As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites.
Fixup all locking comments as well.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() drop
transaction's jh reference when they remove jh from a transaction. This
will be however inconvenient once we move state lock into journal_head
itself as we still need to unlock it and we'd need to grab jh reference
just for that. Move dropping of jh reference out of these functions into
the few callers.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space
of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry. The
consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly
appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of
time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the
pages under writeback to be written out.
The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from
/dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem. This can
cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of
the entire dd operation.
We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges
associated with a given transaction. We do this via the jbd2_inode
structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it
follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure.
This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in
journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for
a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode
in question is still being appended to.
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
In jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(), if we are in abort mode,
we may flush the buffer without setting descriptor block checksum
by goto start_journal_io. Then fs is mounted,
jbd2_descriptor_block_csum_verify() failed.
[ 271.379811] EXT4-fs (vdd): shut down requested (2)
[ 271.381827] Aborting journal on device vdd-8.
[ 271.597136] JBD2: Invalid checksum recovering block 22199 in log
[ 271.598023] JBD2: recovery failed
[ 271.598484] EXT4-fs (vdd): error loading journal
Fix this problem by keep setting descriptor block checksum if the
descriptor buffer is not NULL.
This checksum problem can be reproduced by xfstests generic/388.
Signed-off-by: luojiajun <luojiajun3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
