commit 0c32706dac upstream.
When the function_graph tracer is in use, arch_stack_walk() may unwind
the stack incorrectly, erroneously reporting itself, missing the final
entry which is being traced, and reporting all traced entries between
these off-by-one from where they should be.
When ftrace hooks a function return, the original return address is
saved to the fgraph ret_stack, and the return address in the LR (or the
function's frame record) is replaced with `return_to_handler`.
When arm64's unwinder encounter frames returning to `return_to_handler`,
it finds the associated original return address from the fgraph ret
stack, assuming the most recent `ret_to_hander` entry on the stack
corresponds to the most recent entry in the fgraph ret stack, and so on.
When arch_stack_walk() is used to dump the current task's stack, it
starts from the caller of arch_stack_walk(). However, arch_stack_walk()
can be traced, and so may push an entry on to the fgraph ret stack,
leaving the fgraph ret stack offset by one from the expected position.
This can be seen when dumping the stack via /proc/self/stack, where
enabling the graph tracer results in an unexpected
`stack_trace_save_tsk` entry at the start of the trace, and `el0_svc`
missing form the end of the trace.
This patch fixes this by marking arch_stack_walk() as notrace, as we do
for all other functions on the path to ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack().
While a few helper functions are not marked notrace, their calls/returns
are balanced, and will have no observable effect when examining the
fgraph ret stack.
It is possible for an exeption boundary to cause a similar offset if the
return address of the interrupted context was in the LR. Fixing those
cases will require some more substantial rework, and is left for
subsequent patches.
Before:
| # cat /proc/self/stack
| [<0>] proc_pid_stack+0xc4/0x140
| [<0>] proc_single_show+0x6c/0x120
| [<0>] seq_read_iter+0x240/0x4e0
| [<0>] seq_read+0xe8/0x140
| [<0>] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1e4
| [<0>] ksys_read+0x74/0x100
| [<0>] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x3c
| [<0>] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
| [<0>] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xd4
| [<0>] do_el0_svc+0x30/0x9c
| [<0>] el0_svc+0x2c/0x54
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
| # echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/tracing/current_tracer
| # cat /proc/self/stack
| [<0>] stack_trace_save_tsk+0xa4/0x110
| [<0>] proc_pid_stack+0xc4/0x140
| [<0>] proc_single_show+0x6c/0x120
| [<0>] seq_read_iter+0x240/0x4e0
| [<0>] seq_read+0xe8/0x140
| [<0>] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1e4
| [<0>] ksys_read+0x74/0x100
| [<0>] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x3c
| [<0>] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
| [<0>] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xd4
| [<0>] do_el0_svc+0x30/0x9c
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
After:
| # cat /proc/self/stack
| [<0>] proc_pid_stack+0xc4/0x140
| [<0>] proc_single_show+0x6c/0x120
| [<0>] seq_read_iter+0x240/0x4e0
| [<0>] seq_read+0xe8/0x140
| [<0>] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1e4
| [<0>] ksys_read+0x74/0x100
| [<0>] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x3c
| [<0>] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
| [<0>] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xd4
| [<0>] do_el0_svc+0x30/0x9c
| [<0>] el0_svc+0x2c/0x54
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
| # echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/tracing/current_tracer
| # cat /proc/self/stack
| [<0>] proc_pid_stack+0xc4/0x140
| [<0>] proc_single_show+0x6c/0x120
| [<0>] seq_read_iter+0x240/0x4e0
| [<0>] seq_read+0xe8/0x140
| [<0>] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1e4
| [<0>] ksys_read+0x74/0x100
| [<0>] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x3c
| [<0>] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
| [<0>] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xd4
| [<0>] do_el0_svc+0x30/0x9c
| [<0>] el0_svc+0x2c/0x54
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0
| [<0>] el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210802164845.45506-3-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit c607ab4f91 upstream.
We recently converted arm64 to use arch_stack_walk() in commit:
5fc57df2f6 ("arm64: stacktrace: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK")
The core stacktrace code expects that (when tracing the current task)
arch_stack_walk() starts a trace at its caller, and does not include
itself in the trace. However, arm64's arch_stack_walk() includes itself,
and so traces include one more entry than callers expect. The core
stacktrace code which calls arch_stack_walk() tries to skip a number of
entries to prevent itself appearing in a trace, and the additional entry
prevents skipping one of the core stacktrace functions, leaving this in
the trace unexpectedly.
We can fix this by having arm64's arch_stack_walk() begin the trace with
its caller. The first value returned by the trace will be
__builtin_return_address(0), i.e. the caller of arch_stack_walk(). The
first frame record to be unwound will be __builtin_frame_address(1),
i.e. the caller's frame record. To prevent surprises, arch_stack_walk()
is also marked noinline.
While __builtin_frame_address(1) is not safe in portable code, local GCC
developers have confirmed that it is safe on arm64. To find the caller's
frame record, the builtin can safely dereference the current function's
frame record or (in theory) could stash the original FP into another GPR
at function entry time, neither of which are problematic.
Prior to this patch, the tracing code would unexpectedly show up in
traces of the current task, e.g.
| # cat /proc/self/stack
| [<0>] stack_trace_save_tsk+0x98/0x100
| [<0>] proc_pid_stack+0xb4/0x130
| [<0>] proc_single_show+0x60/0x110
| [<0>] seq_read_iter+0x230/0x4d0
| [<0>] seq_read+0xdc/0x130
| [<0>] vfs_read+0xac/0x1e0
| [<0>] ksys_read+0x6c/0xfc
| [<0>] __arm64_sys_read+0x20/0x30
| [<0>] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x60/0x120
| [<0>] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90
| [<0>] el0_svc+0x2c/0x54
| [<0>] el0_sync_handler+0x1a4/0x1b0
| [<0>] el0_sync+0x170/0x180
After this patch, the tracing code will not show up in such traces:
| # cat /proc/self/stack
| [<0>] proc_pid_stack+0xb4/0x130
| [<0>] proc_single_show+0x60/0x110
| [<0>] seq_read_iter+0x230/0x4d0
| [<0>] seq_read+0xdc/0x130
| [<0>] vfs_read+0xac/0x1e0
| [<0>] ksys_read+0x6c/0xfc
| [<0>] __arm64_sys_read+0x20/0x30
| [<0>] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x60/0x120
| [<0>] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90
| [<0>] el0_svc+0x2c/0x54
| [<0>] el0_sync_handler+0x1a4/0x1b0
| [<0>] el0_sync+0x170/0x180
Erring on the side of caution, I've given this a spin with a bunch of
toolchains, verifying the output of /proc/self/stack and checking that
the assembly looked sound. For GCC (where we require version 5.1.0 or
later) I tested with the kernel.org crosstool binares for versions
5.5.0, 6.4.0, 6.5.0, 7.3.0, 7.5.0, 8.1.0, 8.3.0, 8.4.0, 9.2.0, and
10.1.0. For clang (where we require version 10.0.1 or later) I tested
with the llvm.org binary releases of 11.0.0, and 11.0.1.
Fixes: 5fc57df2f6 ("arm64: stacktrace: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10.x
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319184106.5688-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently the code for displaying a stack trace on the console is located
in traps.c rather than stacktrace.c, using the unwinding code that is in
stacktrace.c. This can be confusing and make the code hard to find since
such output is often referred to as a stack trace which might mislead the
unwary. Due to this and since traps.c doesn't interact with this code
except for via the public interfaces move the code to stacktrace.c to
make it easier to find.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200921122341.11280-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Historically architectures have had duplicated code in their stack trace
implementations for filtering what gets traced. In order to avoid this
duplication some generic code has been provided using a new interface
arch_stack_walk(), enabled by selecting ARCH_STACKWALK in Kconfig, which
factors all this out into the generic stack trace code. Convert arm64
to use this common infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914153409.25097-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
As with the generic arch_stack_walk() code the arm64 stack walk code takes
a callback that is called per stack frame. Currently the arm64 code always
passes a struct stackframe to the callback and the generic code just passes
the pc, however none of the users ever reference anything in the struct
other than the pc value. The arm64 code also uses a return type of int
while the generic code uses a return type of bool though in both cases the
return value is a boolean value and the sense is inverted between the two.
In order to reduce code duplication when arm64 is converted to use
arch_stack_walk() change the signature and return sense of the arm64
specific callback to match that of the generic code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914153409.25097-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
When we enable pointer authentication in the kernel, LR values saved to
the stack will have a PAC which we must strip in order to retrieve the
real return address.
Strip PACs when unwinding the stack in order to account for this.
When function graph tracer is used with patchable-function-entry then
return_to_handler will also have pac bits so strip it too.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Re-position ptrauth_strip_insn_pac, comment]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Prohibit probing on return_address() and subroutines which
is called from return_address(), since the it is invoked from
trace_hardirqs_off() which is also kprobe blacklisted.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The arm64 stacktrace code is careful to only dereference frame records
in valid stack ranges, ensuring that a corrupted frame record won't
result in a faulting access.
However, it's still possible for corrupt frame records to result in
infinite loops in the stacktrace code, which is also undesirable.
This patch ensures that we complete a stacktrace in finite time, by
keeping track of which stacks we have already completed unwinding, and
verifying that if the next frame record is on the same stack, it is at a
higher address.
As this has turned out to be particularly subtle, comments are added to
explain the procedure.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Tengfei Fan <tengfeif@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Some common code is required by each stacktrace user to initialise
struct stackframe before the first call to unwind_frame().
In preparation for adding to the common code, this patch factors it
out into a separate function start_backtrace(), and modifies the
stacktrace callers appropriately.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
[Mark: drop tsk argument, update more callsites]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation this program is
distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general
public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org
licenses
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The ARM64 implements the save_stack_trace_regs function, but it is
unusable for any diagnostic tooling compiled as a kernel module due
the missing EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the function. Export
save_stack_trace_regs() to align with other architectures such as
s390, openrisc, and powerpc. This is similar to the ARM64 export of
save_stack_trace_tsk() added in git commit e27c7fa015.
Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The structure of the ret_stack array on the task struct is going to
change, and accessing it directly via the curr_ret_stack index will no
longer give the ret_stack entry that holds the return address. To access
that, architectures must now use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() to get the
associated ret_stack that matches the saved return address.
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Functions in the set_graph_notrace no longer subtract FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH
from curr_ret_stack, as that is now implemented via the trace_recursion
flags. Access to curr_ret_stack no longer needs to worry about checking for
this. curr_ret_stack is still initialized to -1, when there's not a shadow
stack allocated.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
In preparation for enabling the stackleak plugin on arm64,
we need a way to get the bounds of the current stack. Extend
on_accessible_stack to get this information.
Acked-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
[will: folded in fix for allmodconfig build breakage w/ sdei]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
This reverts commit 7e7df71fd5.
When unwinding out of the IRQ stack and onto the interrupted EL1 stack,
we cannot rely on the frame pointer being strictly increasing, as this
could terminate the backtrace early depending on how the stacks have
been allocated.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
do_task_stat() calls get_wchan(), which further does unwind_frame().
unwind_frame() restores frame->pc to original value in case function
graph tracer has modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook
a function return. However, if function graph tracer has hit a filtered
function, then we can't unwind it as ftrace_push_return_trace() has
biased the index(frame->graph) with a 'huge negative'
offset(-FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH).
Moreover, arm64 stack walker defines index(frame->graph) as unsigned
int, which can not compare a -ve number.
Similar problem we can have with calling of walk_stackframe() from
save_stack_trace_tsk() or dump_backtrace().
This patch fixes unwind_frame() to test the index for -ve value and
restore index accordingly before we can restore frame->pc.
Reproducer:
cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
echo schedule > set_graph_notrace
echo 1 > options/display-graph
echo wakeup > current_tracer
ps -ef | grep -i agent
Above commands result in:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff801bd3d1e000
pgd = ffff8003cbe97c00
[ffff801bd3d1e000] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP
[...]
CPU: 5 PID: 11696 Comm: ps Not tainted 4.11.0+ #33
[...]
task: ffff8003c21ba000 task.stack: ffff8003cc6c0000
PC is at unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180
LR is at get_wchan+0xd4/0x134
pc : [<ffff00000808892c>] lr : [<ffff0000080860b8>] pstate: 60000145
sp : ffff8003cc6c3ab0
x29: ffff8003cc6c3ab0 x28: 0000000000000001
x27: 0000000000000026 x26: 0000000000000026
x25: 00000000000012d8 x24: 0000000000000000
x23: ffff8003c1c04000 x22: ffff000008c83000
x21: ffff8003c1c00000 x20: 000000000000000f
x19: ffff8003c1bc0000 x18: 0000fffffc593690
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001
x15: 0000b855670e2b60 x14: 0003e97f22cf1d0f
x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 00000000e8f4883e x10: 0000000154f47ec8
x9 : 0000000070f367c0 x8 : 0000000000000000
x7 : 00008003f7290000 x6 : 0000000000000018
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff8003c1c03cb0
x3 : ffff8003c1c03ca0 x2 : 00000017ffe80000
x1 : ffff8003cc6c3af8 x0 : ffff8003d3e9e000
Process ps (pid: 11696, stack limit = 0xffff8003cc6c0000)
Stack: (0xffff8003cc6c3ab0 to 0xffff8003cc6c4000)
[...]
[<ffff00000808892c>] unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180
[<ffff000008305008>] do_task_stat+0x864/0x870
[<ffff000008305c44>] proc_tgid_stat+0x3c/0x48
[<ffff0000082fde0c>] proc_single_show+0x5c/0xb8
[<ffff0000082b27e0>] seq_read+0x160/0x414
[<ffff000008289e6c>] __vfs_read+0x58/0x164
[<ffff00000828b164>] vfs_read+0x88/0x144
[<ffff00000828c2e8>] SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
[<ffff0000080834a0>] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4
Fixes: 20380bb390 (arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer)
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: replace WARN_ON with WARN_ON_ONCE]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The stacktraces always begin as follows:
[<c00117b4>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x0/0x98
[<c0011870>] save_stack_trace+0x24/0x28
...
This is because the stack trace code includes the stack frames for
itself. This is incorrect behaviour, and also leads to "skip" doing the
wrong thing (which is the number of stack frames to avoid recording.)
Perversely, it does the right thing when passed a non-current thread.
Fix this by ensuring that we have a known constant number of frames
above the main stack trace function, and always skip these.
This was fixed for arch arm by commit 3683f44c42 ("ARM: stacktrace:
avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1504078343-28754-1-git-send-email-guptap@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Prakash Gupta <guptap@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Both unwind_frame() and dump_backtrace() try to check whether a stack
address is sane to access, with very similar logic. Both will need
updating in order to handle overflow stacks.
Factor out this logic into a helper, so that we can avoid further
duplication when we add overflow stacks.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
The unwind code sets the sp member of struct stackframe to
'frame pointer + 0x10' unconditionally, without regard for whether
doing so produces a legal value. So let's simply remove it now that
we have stopped using it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
As it turns out, the unwind code is slightly broken, and probably has
been for a while. The problem is in the dumping of the exception stack,
which is intended to dump the contents of the pt_regs struct at each
level in the call stack where an exception was taken and routed to a
routine marked as __exception (which means its stack frame is right
below the pt_regs struct on the stack).
'Right below the pt_regs struct' is ill defined, though: the unwind
code assigns 'frame pointer + 0x10' to the .sp member of the stackframe
struct at each level, and dump_backtrace() happily dereferences that as
the pt_regs pointer when encountering an __exception routine. However,
the actual size of the stack frame created by this routine (which could
be one of many __exception routines we have in the kernel) is not known,
and so frame.sp is pretty useless to figure out where struct pt_regs
really is.
So it seems the only way to ensure that we can find our struct pt_regs
when walking the stack frames is to put it at a known fixed offset of
the stack frame pointer that is passed to such __exception routines.
The simplest way to do that is to put it inside pt_regs itself, which is
the main change implemented by this patch. As a bonus, doing this allows
us to get rid of a fair amount of cruft related to walking from one stack
to the other, which is especially nice since we intend to introduce yet
another stack for overflow handling once we add support for vmapped
stacks. It also fixes an inconsistency where we only add a stack frame
pointing to ELR_EL1 if we are executing from the IRQ stack but not when
we are executing from the task stack.
To consistly identify exceptions regs even in the presence of exceptions
taken from entry code, we must check whether the next frame was created
by entry text, rather than whether the current frame was crated by
exception text.
To avoid backtracing using PCs that fall in the idmap, or are controlled
by userspace, we must explcitly zero the FP and LR in startup paths, and
must ensure that the frame embedded in pt_regs is zeroed upon entry from
EL0. To avoid these NULL entries showin in the backtrace, unwind_frame()
is updated to avoid them.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[Mark: compare current frame against .entry.text, avoid bogus PCs]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Currently, when unwinding the call stack, we validate the frame pointer
of each frame against frame.sp, whose value is not clearly defined, and
which makes it more difficult to link stack frames together across
different stacks. It is far better to simply check whether the frame
pointer itself points into a valid stack.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Our IRQ_STACK_PTR() and on_irq_stack() helpers both take a cpu argument,
used to generate a percpu address. In all cases, they are passed
{raw_,}smp_processor_id(), so this parameter is redundant.
Since {raw_,}smp_processor_id() use a percpu variable internally, this
approach means we generate a percpu offset to find the current cpu, then
use this to index an array of percpu offsets, which we then use to find
the current CPU's IRQ stack pointer. Thus, most of the work is
redundant.
Instead, we can consistently use raw_cpu_ptr() to generate the CPU's
irq_stack pointer by simply adding the percpu offset to the irq_stack
address, which is simpler in both respects.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
