[ Upstream commit 2ebe8f840c7450ecbfca9d18ac92e9ce9155e269 ]
As it says in commit 3bc07321cc ("xfrm: Force a dst refcount before
entering the xfrm type handlers"):
"Crypto requests might return asynchronous. In this case we leave the
rcu protected region, so force a refcount on the skb's destination
entry before we enter the xfrm type input/output handlers."
On TIPC decryption path it has the same problem, and skb_dst_force()
should be called before doing decryption to avoid a possible crash.
Shuang reported this issue when this warning is triggered:
[] WARNING: include/net/dst.h:337 tipc_sk_rcv+0x1055/0x1ea0 [tipc]
[] Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W --------- - - 4.18.0-496.el8.x86_64+debug
[] Workqueue: crypto cryptd_queue_worker
[] RIP: 0010:tipc_sk_rcv+0x1055/0x1ea0 [tipc]
[] Call Trace:
[] tipc_sk_mcast_rcv+0x548/0xea0 [tipc]
[] tipc_rcv+0xcf5/0x1060 [tipc]
[] tipc_aead_decrypt_done+0x215/0x2e0 [tipc]
[] cryptd_aead_crypt+0xdb/0x190
[] cryptd_queue_worker+0xed/0x190
[] process_one_work+0x93d/0x17e0
Fixes: fc1b6d6de2 ("tipc: introduce TIPC encryption & authentication")
Reported-by: Shuang Li <shuali@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fbe3195fad6997a4eec62d9bf076b2ad03ac336b.1718476040.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit de52e17326c3e9a719c9ead4adb03467b8fae0ef ]
If tipc_link_bc_create() fails inside tipc_node_create() for a newly
allocated tipc node then we should stop its tipc crypto and free the
resources allocated with a call to tipc_crypto_start().
As the node ref is initialized to one to that point, just put the ref on
tipc_link_bc_create() error case that would lead to tipc_node_free() be
eventually executed and properly clean the node and its crypto resources.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
Fixes: cb8092d70a ("tipc: move bc link creation back to tipc_node_create")
Suggested-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Reviewed-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230725214628.25246-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c244c092f1ed2acfb5af3d3da81e22367d3dd733 ]
This unexpected behavior is observed:
node 1 | node 2
------ | ------
link is established | link is established
reboot | link is reset
up | send discovery message
receive discovery message |
link is established | link is established
send discovery message |
| receive discovery message
| link is reset (unexpected)
| send reset message
link is reset |
It is due to delayed re-discovery as described in function
tipc_node_check_dest(): "this link endpoint has already reset
and re-established contact with the peer, before receiving a
discovery message from that node."
However, commit 598411d70f has changed the condition for calling
tipc_node_link_down() which was the acceptance of new media address.
This commit fixes this by restoring the old and correct behavior.
Fixes: 598411d70f ("tipc: make resetting of links non-atomic")
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
When sending packets between nodes in netns, it calls tipc_lxc_xmit() for
peer node to receive the packets where tipc_sk_mcast_rcv()/tipc_sk_rcv()
might be called, and it's pretty much like in tipc_rcv().
Currently the local 'node rw lock' is held during calling tipc_lxc_xmit()
to protect the peer_net not being freed by another thread. However, when
receiving these packets, tipc_node_add_conn() might be called where the
peer 'node rw lock' is acquired. Then a dead lock warning is triggered by
lockdep detector, although it is not a real dead lock:
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
--------------------------------------------
conn_server/1086 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880065cb020 (&n->lock#2){++--}-{2:2}, \
at: tipc_node_add_conn.cold.76+0xaa/0x211 [tipc]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880065cd020 (&n->lock#2){++--}-{2:2}, \
at: tipc_node_xmit+0x285/0xb30 [tipc]
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&n->lock#2);
lock(&n->lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by conn_server/1086:
#0: ffff8880036d1e40 (sk_lock-AF_TIPC){+.+.}-{0:0}, \
at: tipc_accept+0x9c0/0x10b0 [tipc]
#1: ffff8880036d5f80 (sk_lock-AF_TIPC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, \
at: tipc_accept+0x363/0x10b0 [tipc]
#2: ffff8880065cd020 (&n->lock#2){++--}-{2:2}, \
at: tipc_node_xmit+0x285/0xb30 [tipc]
#3: ffff888012e13370 (slock-AF_TIPC){+...}-{2:2}, \
at: tipc_sk_rcv+0x2da/0x1b40 [tipc]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5b
__lock_acquire.cold.77+0x1f2/0x3d7
lock_acquire+0x1d2/0x610
_raw_write_lock_bh+0x38/0x80
tipc_node_add_conn.cold.76+0xaa/0x211 [tipc]
tipc_sk_finish_conn+0x21e/0x640 [tipc]
tipc_sk_filter_rcv+0x147b/0x3030 [tipc]
tipc_sk_rcv+0xbb4/0x1b40 [tipc]
tipc_lxc_xmit+0x225/0x26b [tipc]
tipc_node_xmit.cold.82+0x4a/0x102 [tipc]
__tipc_sendstream+0x879/0xff0 [tipc]
tipc_accept+0x966/0x10b0 [tipc]
do_accept+0x37d/0x590
This patch avoids this warning by not holding the 'node rw lock' before
calling tipc_lxc_xmit(). As to protect the 'peer_net', rcu_read_lock()
should be enough, as in cleanup_net() when freeing the netns, it calls
synchronize_rcu() before the free is continued.
Also since tipc_lxc_xmit() is like the RX path in tipc_rcv(), it makes
sense to call it under rcu_read_lock(). Note that the right lock order
must be:
rcu_read_lock();
tipc_node_read_lock(n);
tipc_node_read_unlock(n);
tipc_lxc_xmit();
rcu_read_unlock();
instead of:
tipc_node_read_lock(n);
rcu_read_lock();
tipc_node_read_unlock(n);
tipc_lxc_xmit();
rcu_read_unlock();
and we have to call tipc_node_read_lock/unlock() twice in
tipc_node_xmit().
Fixes: f73b12812a ("tipc: improve throughput between nodes in netns")
Reported-by: Shuang Li <shuali@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5bdd1f8fee9db695cfff4528a48c9b9d0523fb00.1670110641.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Shuang Li reported a NULL pointer dereference crash:
[] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000068
[] RIP: 0010:tipc_link_is_up+0x5/0x10 [tipc]
[] Call Trace:
[] <IRQ>
[] tipc_bcast_rcv+0xa2/0x190 [tipc]
[] tipc_node_bc_rcv+0x8b/0x200 [tipc]
[] tipc_rcv+0x3af/0x5b0 [tipc]
[] tipc_udp_recv+0xc7/0x1e0 [tipc]
It was caused by the 'l' passed into tipc_bcast_rcv() is NULL. When it
creates a node in tipc_node_check_dest(), after inserting the new node
into hashtable in tipc_node_create(), it creates the bc link. However,
there is a gap between this insert and bc link creation, a bc packet
may come in and get the node from the hashtable then try to dereference
its bc link, which is NULL.
This patch is to fix it by moving the bc link creation before inserting
into the hashtable.
Note that for a preliminary node becoming "real", the bc link creation
should also be called before it's rehashed, as we don't create it for
preliminary nodes.
Fixes: 4cbf8ac2fe ("tipc: enable creating a "preliminary" node")
Reported-by: Shuang Li <shuali@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The previous bug fix had an unfortunate side effect that broke
distribution of binding table entries between nodes. The updated
tipc_sock_addr struct is also used further down in the same
function, and there the old value is still the correct one.
Fixes: 032062f363 ("tipc: fix wrong publisher node address in link publications")
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216020009.3404578-1-jmaloy@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
When a link comes up we add its presence to the name table to make it
possible for users to subscribe for link up/down events. However, after
a previous call signature change the binding is wrongly published with
the peer node as publishing node, instead of the own node as it should
be. This has the effect that the command 'tipc name table show' will
list the link binding (service type 2) with node scope and a peer node
as originator, something that obviously is impossible.
We correct this bug here.
Fixes: 50a3499ab8 ("tipc: simplify signature of tipc_namtbl_publish()")
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220214013852.2803940-1-jmaloy@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The using of the node address and node link identity are not thread safe,
meaning that two publications may be published the same values, as result
one of them will get failure because of already existing in the name table.
To avoid this we have to use the node address and node link identity values
from inside the node item's write lock protection.
Fixes: 50a3499ab8 ("tipc: simplify signature of tipc_namtbl_publish()")
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le <hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Conflicts:
MAINTAINERS
- keep Chandrasekar
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
- simple fix + trust the code re-added to param.c in -next is fine
include/linux/bpf.h
- trivial
include/linux/ethtool.h
- trivial, fix kdoc while at it
include/linux/skmsg.h
- move to relevant place in tcp.c, comment re-wrapped
net/core/skmsg.c
- add the sk = sk // sk = NULL around calls
net/tipc/crypto.c
- trivial
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This patch fixes the following warning from sparse:
net/tipc/monitor.c:263:35: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/tipc/monitor.c:263:35: expected unsigned int
net/tipc/monitor.c:263:35: got restricted __be32 [usertype]
[...]
net/tipc/node.c:374:13: warning: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_read_lock' - wrong count at exit
net/tipc/node.c:379:13: warning: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_read_unlock' - unexpected unlock
net/tipc/node.c:384:13: warning: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_write_lock' - wrong count at exit
net/tipc/node.c:389:13: warning: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_write_unlock_fast' - unexpected unlock
net/tipc/node.c:404:17: warning: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_write_unlock' - unexpected unlock
[...]
net/tipc/crypto.c:1201:9: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
net/tipc/crypto.c:1201:9: expected struct tipc_aead [noderef] __rcu *__tmp
net/tipc/crypto.c:1201:9: got struct tipc_aead *
[...]
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le <hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
A function has a different name between their prototype
and its kernel-doc markup:
../net/tipc/link.c:2551: warning: expecting prototype for link_reset_stats(). Prototype was for tipc_link_reset_stats() instead
../net/tipc/node.c:1678: warning: expecting prototype for is the general link level function for message sending(). Prototype was for tipc_node_xmit() instead
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
xdp_return_frame_bulk() needs to pass a xdp_buff
to __xdp_return().
strlcpy got converted to strscpy but here it makes no
functional difference, so just keep the right code.
Conflicts:
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
`tipc_node_apply_property` does a null check on a `tipc_link_entry`
pointer but also accesses the same pointer out of the null check block.
This triggers a warning on Coverity Static Analyzer because we're
implying that `e->link` can BE null.
Move "Update MTU for node link entry" line into if block to make sure
that we're not in a state that `e->link` is null.
Signed-off-by: Cengiz Can <cengiz@kernel.wtf>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fix Return: kernel-doc notation in all net/tipc/ source files.
Also keep ReST list notation intact for output formatting.
Fix a few typos in comments.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Fix node.c kernel-doc warnings in preparation for adding to the
networking docbook.
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'kref' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'bc_entry' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'failover_sent' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'peer_id' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'peer_id_string' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'conn_sks' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'keepalive_intv' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'timer' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'peer_net' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:141: warning: Function parameter or member 'peer_hash_mix' not described in 'tipc_node'
../net/tipc/node.c:273: warning: Function parameter or member '__n' not described in 'tipc_node_crypto_rx'
../net/tipc/node.c:822: warning: Function parameter or member 'n' not described in '__tipc_node_link_up'
../net/tipc/node.c:822: warning: Function parameter or member 'bearer_id' not described in '__tipc_node_link_up'
../net/tipc/node.c:822: warning: Function parameter or member 'xmitq' not described in '__tipc_node_link_up'
../net/tipc/node.c:888: warning: Function parameter or member 'n' not described in 'tipc_node_link_up'
../net/tipc/node.c:888: warning: Function parameter or member 'bearer_id' not described in 'tipc_node_link_up'
../net/tipc/node.c:888: warning: Function parameter or member 'xmitq' not described in 'tipc_node_link_up'
../net/tipc/node.c:948: warning: Function parameter or member 'n' not described in '__tipc_node_link_down'
../net/tipc/node.c:948: warning: Function parameter or member 'bearer_id' not described in '__tipc_node_link_down'
../net/tipc/node.c:948: warning: Function parameter or member 'xmitq' not described in '__tipc_node_link_down'
../net/tipc/node.c:948: warning: Function parameter or member 'maddr' not described in '__tipc_node_link_down'
../net/tipc/node.c:1537: warning: Function parameter or member 'net' not described in 'tipc_node_get_linkname'
../net/tipc/node.c:1537: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'tipc_node_get_linkname'
../net/tipc/node.c:1891: warning: Function parameter or member 'n' not described in 'tipc_node_check_state'
../net/tipc/node.c:1891: warning: Function parameter or member 'xmitq' not described in 'tipc_node_check_state'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
kernel-doc and Sphinx fixes to eliminate lots of warnings
in preparation for adding to the networking docbook.
../net/tipc/crypto.c:57: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'enum '
../net/tipc/crypto.c:69: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'enum '
../net/tipc/crypto.c:130: warning: Function parameter or member 'tfm' not described in 'tipc_tfm'
../net/tipc/crypto.c:130: warning: Function parameter or member 'list' not described in 'tipc_tfm'
../net/tipc/crypto.c:172: warning: Function parameter or member 'stat' not described in 'tipc_crypto_stats'
../net/tipc/crypto.c:232: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'tipc_crypto'
../net/tipc/crypto.c:329: warning: Function parameter or member 'ukey' not described in 'tipc_aead_key_validate'
../net/tipc/crypto.c:329: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'tipc_aead_key_validate'
../net/tipc/crypto.c:482: warning: Function parameter or member 'aead' not described in 'tipc_aead_tfm_next'
../net/tipc/trace.c:43: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'unsigned long sysctl_tipc_sk_filter[5] __read_mostly = '
Documentation/networking/tipc:57: ../net/tipc/msg.c:584: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
Documentation/networking/tipc:63: ../net/tipc/name_table.c:536: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
Documentation/networking/tipc:63: ../net/tipc/name_table.c:537: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
Documentation/networking/tipc:78: ../net/tipc/socket.c:3809: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
Documentation/networking/tipc:78: ../net/tipc/socket.c:3807: WARNING: Inline strong start-string without end-string.
Documentation/networking/tipc:72: ../net/tipc/node.c:904: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
Documentation/networking/tipc:39: ../net/tipc/crypto.c:97: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
Documentation/networking/tipc:39: ../net/tipc/crypto.c:98: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
Documentation/networking/tipc:39: ../net/tipc/crypto.c:141: WARNING: Inline strong start-string without end-string.
../net/tipc/discover.c:82: warning: Function parameter or member 'skb' not described in 'tipc_disc_init_msg'
../net/tipc/msg.c:69: warning: Function parameter or member 'gfp' not described in 'tipc_buf_acquire'
../net/tipc/msg.c:382: warning: Function parameter or member 'offset' not described in 'tipc_msg_build'
../net/tipc/msg.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'net' not described in 'tipc_msg_lookup_dest'
../net/tipc/subscr.c:65: warning: Function parameter or member 'seq' not described in 'tipc_sub_check_overlap'
../net/tipc/subscr.c:65: warning: Function parameter or member 'found_lower' not described in 'tipc_sub_check_overlap'
../net/tipc/subscr.c:65: warning: Function parameter or member 'found_upper' not described in 'tipc_sub_check_overlap'
../net/tipc/udp_media.c:75: warning: Function parameter or member 'proto' not described in 'udp_media_addr'
../net/tipc/udp_media.c:75: warning: Function parameter or member 'port' not described in 'udp_media_addr'
../net/tipc/udp_media.c:75: warning: Function parameter or member 'ipv4' not described in 'udp_media_addr'
../net/tipc/udp_media.c:75: warning: Function parameter or member 'ipv6' not described in 'udp_media_addr'
../net/tipc/udp_media.c:98: warning: Function parameter or member 'rcast' not described in 'udp_bearer'
Also fixed a typo of "duest" to "dest".
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
