You've already forked linux-rockchip
mirror of
https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip.git
synced 2026-01-06 11:08:10 -08:00
__follow_mount_rcu(): verify that mount_lock remains unchanged
commit20aac6c609upstream. Validate mount_lock seqcount as soon as we cross into mount in RCU mode. Sure, ->mnt_root is pinned and will remain so until we do rcu_read_unlock() anyway, and we will eventually fail to unlazy if the mount_lock had been touched, but we might run into a hard error (e.g. -ENOENT) before trying to unlazy. And it's possible to end up with RCU pathwalk racing with rename() and umount() in a way that would fail with -ENOENT while non-RCU pathwalk would've succeeded with any timings. Once upon a time we hadn't needed that, but analysis had been subtle, brittle and went out of window as soon as RENAME_EXCHANGE had been added. It's narrow, hard to hit and won't get you anything other than stray -ENOENT that could be arranged in much easier way with the same priveleges, but it's a bug all the same. Cc: stable@kernel.org X-sky-is-falling: unlikely Fixes:da1ce0670c"vfs: add cross-rename" Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
bda7046d4d
commit
bc8c5b3b3e
@@ -1348,6 +1348,8 @@ static bool __follow_mount_rcu(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
|
||||
* becoming unpinned.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
flags = dentry->d_flags;
|
||||
if (read_seqretry(&mount_lock, nd->m_seq))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (read_seqretry(&mount_lock, nd->m_seq))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user