You've already forked linux-rockchip
mirror of
https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip.git
synced 2026-01-06 11:08:10 -08:00
ARM: dts: BCM53573: Fix Ethernet info for Luxul devices
[ Upstream commit 44ad8207806973f4e4f7d870fff36cc01f494250 ] Both Luxul's XAP devices (XAP-810 and XAP-1440) are access points that use a non-default design. They don't include switch but have a single Ethernet port and BCM54210E PHY connected to the Ethernet controller's MDIO bus. Support for those devices regressed due to two changes: 1. Describing MDIO bus with switch After commit9fb90ae6ca("ARM: dts: BCM53573: Describe on-SoC BCM53125 rev 4 switch") Linux stopped probing for MDIO devices. 2. Dropping hardcoded BCM54210E delays In commitfea7fda7f5("net: phy: broadcom: Fix RGMII delays configuration for BCM54210E") support for other PHY modes was added but that requires a proper "phy-mode" value in DT. Both above changes are correct (they don't need to be reverted or anything) but they need this fix for DT data to be correct and for Linux to work properly. Fixes:9fb90ae6ca("ARM: dts: BCM53573: Describe on-SoC BCM53125 rev 4 switch") Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230713111145.14864-1-zajec5@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
ed4e48de89
commit
0eea279e01
@@ -46,3 +46,16 @@
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
&gmac0 {
|
||||
phy-mode = "rgmii";
|
||||
phy-handle = <&bcm54210e>;
|
||||
|
||||
mdio {
|
||||
/delete-node/ switch@1e;
|
||||
|
||||
bcm54210e: ethernet-phy@0 {
|
||||
reg = <0>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -83,3 +83,16 @@
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
&gmac0 {
|
||||
phy-mode = "rgmii";
|
||||
phy-handle = <&bcm54210e>;
|
||||
|
||||
mdio {
|
||||
/delete-node/ switch@1e;
|
||||
|
||||
bcm54210e: ethernet-phy@0 {
|
||||
reg = <0>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user