This ugly hack was long overdue to die.
It was a way to print out Sparc interrupts in a more freindly format,
since IRQ numbers were arbitrary opaque 32-bit integers which vectored
into PIL levels. These 32-bit integers were not necessarily in the
0-->NR_IRQS range, but the PILs they vectored to were.
The idea now is that we will increase NR_IRQS a little bit and use a
virtual<-->real IRQ number mapping scheme similar to PowerPC.
That makes this IRQ printing hack irrelevant, and furthermore only a
handful of drivers actually used __irq_itoa() making it even less
useful.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fix a link failure by adding the missing can_lock macros for the rw
locks.
Signed-off-by: Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Setup cpu_possible_map so the secondary cpus will get started.
Signed-off-by: Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
These aren't needed by glibc or klibc, and they're broken in some cases
anyway. The uClibc folks are apparently switching over to stop using
them too (now that we agreed that they should be dropped, at least).
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
__NR_sys_sync_file_range part was lost somewhere...
[glibc is already checking __NR_sync_file_range]
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sparc32 lacks vga.h, so lots of fbdev drivers won't compile. There are no
sparc32 systems with PCI slots, so it's a bit moot.
The patch gives sparc32 a copy of the sparc64 vga.h. It fixes sparc32
allmodconfig without mucking up fbdev Kconfig and gives us wider compile
coverage.
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net>
Acked-by: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Bitmap functions for the minix filesystem and the ext2 filesystem except
ext2_set_bit_atomic() and ext2_clear_bit_atomic() do not require the atomic
guarantees.
But these are defined by using atomic bit operations on several architectures.
(cris, frv, h8300, ia64, m32r, m68k, m68knommu, mips, s390, sh, sh64, sparc,
sparc64, v850, and xtensa)
This patch switches to non atomic bit operation.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Implement the half-closed devices notifiation, by adding a new POLLRDHUP
(and its alias EPOLLRDHUP) bit to the existing poll/select sets. Since the
existing POLLHUP handling, that does not report correctly half-closed
devices, was feared to be changed, this implementation leaves the current
POLLHUP reporting unchanged and simply add a new bit that is set in the few
places where it makes sense. The same thing was discussed and conceptually
agreed quite some time ago:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/7/12/116
Since this new event bit is added to the existing Linux poll infrastruture,
even the existing poll/select system calls will be able to use it. As far
as the existing POLLHUP handling, the patch leaves it as is. The
pollrdhup-2.6.16.rc5-0.10.diff defines the POLLRDHUP for all the existing
archs and sets the bit in the six relevant files. The other attached diff
is the simple change required to sys/epoll.h to add the EPOLLRDHUP
definition.
There is "a stupid program" to test POLLRDHUP delivery here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/pollrdhup-test.c
It tests poll(2), but since the delivery is same epoll(2) will work equally.
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Todo items:
- IRQ_INPROGRESS flag - use sparc64 irq buckets, or generic irq_desc?
- sun4d
- re-indent large chunks of sun4m_smp.c
- some places assume sequential cpu numbering (i.e. 0,1 instead of 0,2)
Last I checked (with 2.6.14), random programs segfault with dual
HyperSPARC. And with SuperSPARC II's, it seems stable but will
eventually die from a write lock error (wrong lock owner or something).
I haven't tried the HyperSPARC + highmem combination recently, so that
may still be a problem.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sparc64 and Sparc32 have to have identical socket call
numbering in order to handle compat layer stuff properly.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
