We currently have a kernel internal type called aligned_u64 which aligns
__u64's on 8 bytes boundaries even on systems which would normally align
them on 4 byte boundaries. This patch creates a new type __aligned_u64
which does the same thing but which is exposed to userspace rather than
being kernel internal.
[akpm: merge early as both the net and audit trees want this]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: enhance the comment describing the reasons for using aligned_u64. Via Andreas and Andi.]
Based-on-patch-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Move the preprocessor #warning message:
warning: #warning Attempt to use kernel headers from user space,
see http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelHeaders
from kernel.h to types.h.
And also fixe the #warning message due to the preprocessor not being able to
read the web address due to it thinking it was the start of a comment. also
remove the extra #ifndef _KERNEL_ since it's already there.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This allows a list_head (or hlist_head, etc.) to be used from places
that used to be impractical, in particular <asm/processor.h>, which
used to cause include file recursion: <linux/list.h> includes
<linux/prefetch.h>, which always includes <asm/processor.h> for the
prefetch macros, as well as <asm/system.h>, which often includes
<asm/processor.h> directly or indirectly.
This avoids a lot of painful workaround hackery on the tile
architecture, where we use a list_head in the thread_struct to chain
together tasks that are activated on a particular hardwall.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
When looking at a performance problem on PowerPC, I noticed some awful code
generation:
c00000000051fc98: 3b 60 00 01 li r27,1
...
c00000000051fca0: 3b 80 00 00 li r28,0
...
c00000000051fcdc: 93 61 00 70 stw r27,112(r1)
c00000000051fce0: 93 81 00 74 stw r28,116(r1)
c00000000051fce4: 81 21 00 70 lwz r9,112(r1)
c00000000051fce8: 80 01 00 74 lwz r0,116(r1)
c00000000051fcec: 7d 29 07 b4 extsw r9,r9
c00000000051fcf0: 7c 00 07 b4 extsw r0,r0
c00000000051fcf4: 7c 20 04 ac lwsync
c00000000051fcf8: 7d 60 f8 28 lwarx r11,0,r31
c00000000051fcfc: 7c 0b 48 00 cmpw r11,r9
c00000000051fd00: 40 c2 00 10 bne- c00000000051fd10
c00000000051fd04: 7c 00 f9 2d stwcx. r0,0,r31
c00000000051fd08: 40 c2 ff f0 bne+ c00000000051fcf8
c00000000051fd0c: 4c 00 01 2c isync
We create two constants, write them out to the stack, read them straight back
in and sign extend them. What a mess.
It turns out this bad code is a result of us defining atomic_t as a
volatile int.
We removed the volatile attribute from the powerpc atomic_t definition years
ago, but commit ea43546750 (atomic_t: unify all
arch definitions) added it back in.
To dig up an old quote from Linus:
> The fact is, volatile on data structures is a bug. It's a wart in the C
> language. It shouldn't be used.
>
> Volatile accesses in *code* can be ok, and if we have "atomic_read()"
> expand to a "*(volatile int *)&(x)->value", then I'd be ok with that.
>
> But marking data structures volatile just makes the compiler screw up
> totally, and makes code for initialization sequences etc much worse.
And screw up it does :)
With the volatile removed, we see much more reasonable code generation:
c00000000051f5b8: 3b 60 00 01 li r27,1
...
c00000000051f5c0: 3b 80 00 00 li r28,0
...
c00000000051fc7c: 7c 20 04 ac lwsync
c00000000051fc80: 7c 00 f8 28 lwarx r0,0,r31
c00000000051fc84: 7c 00 d8 00 cmpw r0,r27
c00000000051fc88: 40 c2 00 10 bne- c00000000051fc98
c00000000051fc8c: 7f 80 f9 2d stwcx. r28,0,r31
c00000000051fc90: 40 c2 ff f0 bne+ c00000000051fc80
c00000000051fc94: 4c 00 01 2c isync
Six instructions less.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Follow-up to "block: enable by default support for large devices
and files on 32-bit archs".
Rename CONFIG_LBD to CONFIG_LBDAF to:
- allow update of existing [def]configs for "default y" change
- reflect that it is used also for large files support nowadays
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
With the last used of non-strict names gone from the
exported header files, we can remove the old libc5
compatibility cruft from our headers and only export
strict types.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The typedefs for __u64 and __s64 where fixed to be available for other
compiler on May 2 2008 by H. Peter Anvin (in commit edfa5cfa3d)
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We have two seperate config entries for large devices/files. One
is CONFIG_LBD that guards just the devices, the other is CONFIG_LSF
that handles large files. This doesn't make a lot of sense, you typically
want both or none. So get rid of CONFIG_LSF and change CONFIG_LBD wording
to indicate that it covers both.
Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
There's no good reason why a resource_size_t shouldn't just be a
physical address, so simply redefine it in terms of phys_addr_t.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Add a kernel-wide "phys_addr_t" which is guaranteed to be able to hold
any physical address. By default it equals the word size of the
architecture, but a 32-bit architecture can set ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
if it needs a 64-bit phys_addr_t.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
<linux/types.h> can't be used together with <sys/ustat.h> because they
both define struct ustat:
$ cat test.c
#include <sys/ustat.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
$ gcc -c test.c
In file included from test.c:2:
/usr/include/linux/types.h:165: error: redefinition of 'struct ustat'
has been reported a while ago to debian, but seems to have been
lost in cat fighting: http://bugs.debian.org/429064
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
All of the asm-*/types.h headers have been updated to no longer check
__STRICT_ANSI__ for the 64bit types, so this brings linux/types.h in line.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Use of ptrdiff_t in places like
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, u_tmp->rx_buf, u_tmp->len))
+ if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (u8 __user *)
+ (ptrdiff_t) u_tmp->rx_buf,
+ u_tmp->len))
is wrong; for one thing, it's a bad C (it's what uintptr_t is for; in general
we are not even promised that ptrdiff_t is large enough to hold a pointer,
just enough to hold a difference between two pointers within the same object).
For another, it confuses the fsck out of sparse.
Use unsigned long or uintptr_t instead. There are several places misusing
ptrdiff_t; fixed.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
define first set of BIT* macros
- move BITOP_MASK and BITOP_WORD from asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h to
include/linux/bitops.h and rename it to BIT_MASK and BIT_WORD
- move BITS_TO_LONGS and BITS_PER_BYTE to bitops.h too and allow easily
define another BITS_TO_something (e.g. in event.c) by BITS_TO_TYPE macro
Remaining (and common) BIT macro will be defined after all occurences and
conflicts will be sorted out in the patches.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CONFIG_LBD and CONFIG_LSF are spread into asm/types.h for no particularly
good reason.
Centralising the definition in linux/types.h means that arch maintainers
don't need to bother adding it, as well as fixing the problem with
x86-64 users being asked to make a decision that has absolutely no
effect.
The H8/300 porters seem particularly confused since I'm not aware of any
microcontrollers that need to support 2TB filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
