Add a new entry to 'enum mem_type' and a new string to
'edac_mem_types[]' for DDR5 new memory type.
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
There are {Low-Power DDR3/4, WIO2} types of memory.
Add new entries to 'enum mem_type' and new strings to
'edac_mem_types[]' for the new types.
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
When acpi_extlog was added, we were worried that the same error would
be reported more than once by different subsystems. But in the ensuing
years I've seen complaints that people could not find an error log
(because this mechanism suppressed the log they were looking for).
Rip it all out. People are smart enough to notice the same address from
different reporting mechanisms.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200214222720.13168-8-tony.luck@intel.com
Looking at how mci->{ue,ce}_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS] is used, it
turns out that only the leaves in the memory hierarchy are consumed
(in sysfs), but not the intermediate layers, e.g.:
count = dimm->mci->ce_per_layer[dimm->mci->n_layers-1][dimm->idx];
These unused counters only add complexity, remove them. The error
counter values are directly stored in struct dimm_info now.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200123090210.26933-11-rrichter@marvell.com
Many functions carry the enable_per_layer_report argument. This is a
bool value indicating the error information contains some location
data where the error occurred. This can easily being determined by
checking the pos[] array for values. Negative values indicate there is
no location available. So if the top layer is negative, the error
location is unknown.
Just check if the top layer is negative and remove
enable_per_layer_report as function argument and also from struct
edac_raw_error_desc.
[ bp: Reflow comments to 80 columns, while at it. ]
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200123090210.26933-8-rrichter@marvell.com
The EDAC_DIMM_OFF() macro takes 5 arguments to get the DIMM's index.
Simplify this by storing the index in struct dimm_info to avoid its
calculation and remove the EDAC_DIMM_OFF() macro. The index can be
directly used then.
Another advantage is that edac_mc_alloc() could be used even if the
exact size of the layers is unknown. Only the number of DIMMs would be
needed.
Rename iterator variable to idx, while at it. The name is more handy,
esp. when searching for it in the code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191106093239.25517-3-rrichter@marvell.com
The EDAC_DIMM_PTR() macro takes 3 arguments from struct mem_ctl_info.
Clean up this interface to only pass the mci struct and replace this
macro with a new function edac_get_dimm().
Also introduce an edac_get_dimm_by_index() function for later use.
This allows it to get a DIMM pointer only by a given index. This can
be useful if the DIMM's position within the layers of the memory
controller or the exact size of the layers are unknown.
Small style changes made for some hunks after applying the semantic
patch.
Semantic patch used:
@@ expression mci, a, b,c; @@
-EDAC_DIMM_PTR(mci->layers, mci->dimms, mci->n_layers, a, b, c)
+edac_get_dimm(mci, a, b, c)
[ bp: Touchups. ]
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191106093239.25517-2-rrichter@marvell.com
We observe an oops in the skx_edac module during boot:
EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module skx_edac controller Skylake Socket#0 IMC#0
EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module skx_edac controller Skylake Socket#0 IMC#1
EDAC MC2: Giving out device to module skx_edac controller Skylake Socket#1 IMC#0
...
EDAC MC13: Giving out device to module skx_edac controller Skylake Socket#0 IMC#1
EDAC MC14: Giving out device to module skx_edac controller Skylake Socket#1 IMC#0
EDAC MC15: Giving out device to module skx_edac controller Skylake Socket#1 IMC#1
Too many memory controllers: 16
EDAC MC: Removed device 0 for skx_edac Skylake Socket#0 IMC#0
We observe there are two memory controllers per socket, with a limit
of 16. Raise the maximum number of memory controllers from 16 to 2 *
MAX_NUMNODES (1024).
[ bp: This is just a band-aid fix until we've sorted out the whole issue
with the bus_type association and handling in EDAC and can get rid of
this arbitrary limit. ]
Signed-off-by: Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925143449.284634-1-justin.ernst@hpe.com
Use mc_devices list instead to check whether we have EDAC driver
instances successfully registered with EDAC core.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
