Clang will perform various compile-time diagnostics on uses of various
functions (e.g. simple bounds-checking on strcpy(), etc). These
diagnostics can be assigned to other functions (for example, new
implementations of the string functions under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE)
using the "diagnose_as_builtin" attribute. This allows those functions
to retain their compile-time diagnostic warnings.
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208225350.1331628-5-keescook@chromium.org
In order to gain greater visibility to type information when using
__builtin_object_size(), Clang has a function attribute "pass_object_size"
that will make size information available for marked arguments in
a function by way of implicit additional function arguments that are
then wired up the __builtin_object_size().
This is needed to implement FORTIFY_SOURCE in Clang, as a workaround
to Clang's __builtin_object_size() having limited visibility[1] into types
across function calls (even inlines).
This attribute has an additional benefit that it can be used even on
non-inline functions to gain argument size information.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53516
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208225350.1331628-3-keescook@chromium.org
The new attribute maps to
__attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)), which will be
supported by Clang >= 14.0. Future support in GCC is also possible.
This attribute disables compiler instrumentation for kernel sanitizer
tools, making it easier to implement noinstr. It is different from the
existing __no_sanitize* attributes, which may still allow certain types
of instrumentation to prevent false positives.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Pull compiler attributes update from Miguel Ojeda:
"An improvement for `__compiletime_assert` and a trivial cleanup"
* tag 'compiler-attributes-for-linus-v5.16' of git://github.com/ojeda/linux:
compiler_types: mark __compiletime_assert failure as __noreturn
Compiler Attributes: remove GCC 5.1 mention
GCC and Clang can use the "alloc_size" attribute to better inform the
results of __builtin_object_size() (for compile-time constant values).
Clang can additionally use alloc_size to inform the results of
__builtin_dynamic_object_size() (for run-time values).
Because GCC sees the frequent use of struct_size() as an allocator size
argument, and notices it can return SIZE_MAX (the overflow indication),
it complains about these call sites overflowing (since SIZE_MAX is
greater than the default -Walloc-size-larger-than=PTRDIFF_MAX). This
isn't helpful since we already know a SIZE_MAX will be caught at
run-time (this was an intentional design). To deal with this, we must
disable this check as it is both a false positive and redundant. (Clang
does not have this warning option.)
Unfortunately, just checking the -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than is not
sufficient to make the __alloc_size attribute behave correctly under
older GCC versions. The attribute itself must be disabled in those
situations too, as there appears to be no way to reliably silence the
SIZE_MAX constant expression cases for GCC versions less than 9.1:
In file included from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11,
from ./include/linux/pci.h:40,
from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h:9,
from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c:4:
In function 'kmalloc_node',
inlined from 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector' at ./include/linux/slab.h:743:9:
./include/linux/slab.h:618:9: error: argument 1 value '18446744073709551615' exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=alloc-size-larger-than=]
return __kmalloc_node(size, flags, node);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/slab.h: In function 'ixgbe_alloc_q_vector':
./include/linux/slab.h:455:7: note: in a call to allocation function '__kmalloc_node' declared here
void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Specifically:
'-Wno-alloc-size-larger-than' is not correctly handled by GCC < 9.1
https://godbolt.org/z/hqsfG7q84 (doesn't disable)
https://godbolt.org/z/P9jdrPTYh (doesn't admit to not knowing about option)
https://godbolt.org/z/465TPMWKb (only warns when other warnings appear)
'-Walloc-size-larger-than=18446744073709551615' is not handled by GCC < 8.2
https://godbolt.org/z/73hh1EPxz (ignores numeric value)
Since anything marked with __alloc_size would also qualify for marking
with __malloc, just include __malloc along with it to avoid redundant
markings. (Suggested by Linus Torvalds.)
Finally, make sure checkpatch.pl doesn't get confused about finding the
__alloc_size attribute on functions. (Thanks to Joe Perches.)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930222704.2631604-3-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com>
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Merge patch series from Nick Desaulniers to update the minimum gcc
version to 5.1.
This is some of the left-overs from the merge window that I didn't want
to deal with yesterday, so it comes in after -rc1 but was sent before.
Gcc-4.9 support has been an annoyance for some time, and with -Werror I
had the choice of applying a fairly big patch from Kees Cook to remove a
fair number of initializer warnings (still leaving some), or this patch
series from Nick that just removes the source of the problem.
The initializer cleanups might still be worth it regardless, but
honestly, I preferred just tackling the problem with gcc-4.9 head-on.
We've been more aggressiuve about no longer having to care about
compilers that were released a long time ago, and I think it's been a
good thing.
I added a couple of patches on top to sort out a few left-overs now that
we no longer support gcc-4.x.
As noted by Arnd, as a result of this minimum compiler version upgrade
we can probably change our use of '--std=gnu89' to '--std=gnu11', and
finally start using local loop declarations etc. But this series does
_not_ yet do that.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210909182525.372ee687@canb.auug.org.au/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK7LNASs6dvU6D3jL2GG3jW58fXfaj6VNOe55NJnTB8UPuk2pA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438
* emailed patches from Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>:
Drop some straggling mentions of gcc-4.9 as being stale
compiler_attributes.h: drop __has_attribute() support for gcc4
vmlinux.lds.h: remove old check for GCC 4.9
compiler-gcc.h: drop checks for older GCC versions
Makefile: drop GCC < 5 -fno-var-tracking-assignments workaround
arm64: remove GCC version check for ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
powerpc: remove GCC version check for UPD_CONSTR
riscv: remove Kconfig check for GCC version for ARCH_RV64I
Kconfig.debug: drop GCC 5+ version check for DWARF5
mm/ksm: remove old GCC 4.9+ check
compiler.h: drop fallback overflow checkers
Documentation: raise minimum supported version of GCC to 5.1
Fix up the admin-guide README file to the new gcc-5.1 requirement, and
remove a stale comment about gcc support for the __assume_aligned__
attribute.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Now that GCC 5.1 is the minimally supported default, the manual
workaround for older gcc versions not having __has_attribute() are no
longer relevant and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Pull compiler attributes updates from Miguel Ojeda:
- Fix __has_attribute(__no_sanitize_coverage__) for GCC 4 (Marco Elver)
- Add Nick as Reviewer for compiler_attributes.h (Nick Desaulniers)
- Move __compiletime_{error|warning} (Nick Desaulniers)
* tag 'compiler-attributes-for-linus-v5.15-rc1-v2' of git://github.com/ojeda/linux:
compiler_attributes.h: move __compiletime_{error|warning}
MAINTAINERS: add Nick as Reviewer for compiler_attributes.h
Compiler Attributes: fix __has_attribute(__no_sanitize_coverage__) for GCC 4
Fix __has_attribute(__no_sanitize_coverage__) for GCC 4 by defining
__GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_coverage__.
Fixes: 540540d06e ("kcov: add __no_sanitize_coverage to fix noinstr for all architectures")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Pull clang feature updates from Kees Cook:
- Add CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR in preparation for PGO support in the
face of the noinstr attribute, paving the way for PGO and fixing
GCOV. (Nick Desaulniers)
- x86_64 LTO coverage is expanded to 32-bit x86. (Nathan Chancellor)
- Small fixes to CFI. (Mark Rutland, Nathan Chancellor)
* tag 'clang-features-v5.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
qemu_fw_cfg: Make fw_cfg_rev_attr a proper kobj_attribute
Kconfig: Introduce ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR and CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR
compiler_attributes.h: cleanups for GCC 4.9+
compiler_attributes.h: define __no_profile, add to noinstr
x86, lto: Enable Clang LTO for 32-bit as well
CFI: Move function_nocfi() into compiler.h
MAINTAINERS: Add Clang CFI section
pcpu_build_alloc_info() is an __init function that makes a call to
cpumask_clear_cpu(). With CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL enabled, the inline
heuristics are modified and such cpumask_clear_cpu() which is marked
inline doesn't get inlined. Because it works on mask in __initdata,
modpost throws a section mismatch error.
Arnd sent a patch with the flatten attribute as an alternative [2]. I've
added it to compiler_attributes.h.
modpost complaint:
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x735425): Section mismatch in reference from the function cpumask_clear_cpu() to the variable .init.data:pcpu_build_alloc_info.mask
The function cpumask_clear_cpu() references
the variable __initdata pcpu_build_alloc_info.mask.
This is often because cpumask_clear_cpu lacks a __initdata
annotation or the annotation of pcpu_build_alloc_info.mask is wrong.
clang output:
mm/percpu.c:2724:5: remark: cpumask_clear_cpu not inlined into pcpu_build_alloc_info because too costly to inline (cost=725, threshold=325) [-Rpass-missed=inline]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202012220454.9F6Bkz9q-lkp@intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a2ZWfNeXKSm8K_SUhhwkor17jFo3xApLXjzfPqX0eUDUA@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Revert commit cebc04ba9a ("add CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK").
A lot of warn_unused_result warnings existed in 2006, but until now
they have been fixed thanks to people doing allmodconfig tests.
Our goal is to always enable __must_check where appropriate, so this
CONFIG option is no longer needed.
I see a lot of defconfig (arch/*/configs/*_defconfig) files having:
# CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK is not set
I did not touch them for now since it would be a big churn. If arch
maintainers want to clean them up, please go ahead.
While I was here, I also moved __must_check to compiler_attributes.h
from compiler_types.h
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Acked-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
[Moved addition in compiler_attributes.h to keep it sorted]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
GCC 4.6 is not supported anymore, so remove a reference to it,
leaving just the part about version prior GCC 5.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Sparse supports __has_attribute() since 2018-08-31, so the comment
is not true anymore but more importantly is rather confusing.
So remove it.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Pull gcc plugin updates from Kees Cook:
"Primarily improvements to STACKLEAK from Alexander Popov, along with
some additional cleanups.
- Update URLs for HTTPS scheme where available (Alexander A. Klimov)
- Improve STACKLEAK code generation on x86 (Alexander Popov)"
* tag 'gcc-plugins-v5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
gcc-plugins: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones
gcc-plugins/stackleak: Add 'verbose' plugin parameter
gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use asm instrumentation to avoid useless register saving
ARM: vdso: Don't use gcc plugins for building vgettimeofday.c
gcc-plugins/stackleak: Don't instrument itself
The kernel code instrumentation in stackleak gcc plugin works in two stages.
At first, stack tracking is added to GIMPLE representation of every function
(except some special cases). And later, when stack frame size info is
available, stack tracking is removed from the RTL representation of the
functions with small stack frame. There is an unwanted side-effect for these
functions: some of them do useless work with caller-saved registers.
As an example of such case, proc_sys_write without() instrumentation:
55 push %rbp
41 b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%r8d
48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
e8 11 ff ff ff callq ffffffff81284610 <proc_sys_call_handler>
5d pop %rbp
c3 retq
0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
00 00 00
proc_sys_write() with instrumentation:
55 push %rbp
48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
41 56 push %r14
41 55 push %r13
41 54 push %r12
53 push %rbx
49 89 f4 mov %rsi,%r12
48 89 fb mov %rdi,%rbx
49 89 d5 mov %rdx,%r13
49 89 ce mov %rcx,%r14
4c 89 f1 mov %r14,%rcx
4c 89 ea mov %r13,%rdx
4c 89 e6 mov %r12,%rsi
48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
41 b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%r8d
e8 f2 fe ff ff callq ffffffff81298e80 <proc_sys_call_handler>
5b pop %rbx
41 5c pop %r12
41 5d pop %r13
41 5e pop %r14
5d pop %rbp
c3 retq
66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
00 00
Let's improve the instrumentation to avoid this:
1. Make stackleak_track_stack() save all register that it works with.
Use no_caller_saved_registers attribute for that function. This attribute
is available for x86_64 and i386 starting from gcc-7.
2. Insert calling stackleak_track_stack() in asm:
asm volatile("call stackleak_track_stack" :: "r" (current_stack_pointer))
Here we use ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT trick from arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h.
The input constraint is taken into account during gcc shrink-wrapping
optimization. It is needed to be sure that stackleak_track_stack() call is
inserted after the prologue of the containing function, when the stack
frame is prepared.
This work is a deep reengineering of the idea described on grsecurity blog
https://grsecurity.net/resolving_an_unfortunate_stackleak_interaction
Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624123330.83226-5-alex.popov@linux.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
UBSAN is supported since GCC 4.9, which unfortunately did not yet have
__has_attribute(). To work around, the __GCC4_has_attribute workaround
requires defining which compiler version supports the given attribute.
In the case of no_sanitize_undefined, it is the first version that
supports UBSAN, which is GCC 4.9.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200615231529.GA119644@google.com
