Commit Graph

896 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zqiang
3a010c4932 locking/mutex: clear MUTEX_FLAGS if wait_list is empty due to signal
When a interruptible mutex locker is interrupted by a signal
without acquiring this lock and removed from the wait queue.
if the mutex isn't contended enough to have a waiter
put into the wait queue again, the setting of the WAITER
bit will force mutex locker to go into the slowpath to
acquire the lock every time, so if the wait queue is empty,
the WAITER bit need to be clear.

Fixes: 040a0a3710 ("mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210517034005.30828-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com
2021-05-18 12:53:51 +02:00
Leo Yan
89e70d5c58 locking/lockdep: Correct calling tracepoints
The commit eb1f00237a ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") reverses
tracepoints for lock_contended() and lock_acquired(), thus the ftrace
log shows the wrong locking sequence that "acquired" event is prior to
"contended" event:

  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501685: lock_acquire: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501686: lock_acquired: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501689: lock_contended: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501690: lock_release: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock

This patch fixes calling tracepoints for lock_contended() and
lock_acquired().

Fixes: eb1f00237a ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints")
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210512120937.90211-1-leo.yan@linaro.org
2021-05-18 12:53:50 +02:00
Waiman Long
28ce0e70ec locking/qrwlock: Cleanup queued_write_lock_slowpath()
Make the code more readable by replacing the atomic_cmpxchg_acquire()
by an equivalent atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire() and change atomic_add()
to atomic_or().

For architectures that use qrwlock, I do not find one that has an
atomic_add() defined but not an atomic_or().  I guess it should be fine
by changing atomic_add() to atomic_or().

Note that the previous use of atomic_add() isn't wrong as only one
writer that is the wait_lock owner can set the waiting flag and the
flag will be cleared later on when acquiring the write lock.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210426185017.19815-1-longman@redhat.com
2021-05-06 15:33:49 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
0ff0edb550 Merge tag 'locking-core-2021-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

 - rtmutex cleanup & spring cleaning pass that removes ~400 lines of
   code

 - Futex simplifications & cleanups

 - Add debugging to the CSD code, to help track down a tenacious race
   (or hw problem)

 - Add lockdep_assert_not_held(), to allow code to require a lock to not
   be held, and propagate this into the ath10k driver

 - Misc LKMM documentation updates

 - Misc KCSAN updates: cleanups & documentation updates

 - Misc fixes and cleanups

 - Fix locktorture bugs with ww_mutexes

* tag 'locking-core-2021-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (44 commits)
  kcsan: Fix printk format string
  static_call: Relax static_call_update() function argument type
  static_call: Fix unused variable warn w/o MODULE
  locking/rtmutex: Clean up signal handling in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
  locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug
  locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in rt_mutex_postunlock()
  locking/rtmutex: Consolidate the fast/slowpath invocation
  locking/rtmutex: Make text section and inlining consistent
  locking/rtmutex: Move debug functions as inlines into common header
  locking/rtmutex: Decrapify __rt_mutex_init()
  locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs
  locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check
  locking/rtmutex: Move rt_mutex_debug_task_free() to rtmutex.c
  locking/rtmutex: Remove empty and unused debug stubs
  locking/rtmutex: Consolidate rt_mutex_init()
  locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock detector
  locking/rtmutex: Remove rtmutex deadlock tester leftovers
  locking/rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_timed_lock()
  MAINTAINERS: Add myself as futex reviewer
  locking/mutex: Remove repeated declaration
  ...
2021-04-28 12:37:53 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
ffc766b31e Merge tag 'tomoyo-pr-20210426' of git://git.osdn.net/gitroot/tomoyo/tomoyo-test1
Pull lockdep capacity limit updates from Tetsuo Handa:
 "syzbot is occasionally reporting that fuzz testing is terminated due
  to hitting upper limits lockdep can track.

  Analysis via /proc/lockdep* did not show any obvious culprits, allow
  tuning tracing capacity constants"

* tag 'tomoyo-pr-20210426' of git://git.osdn.net/gitroot/tomoyo/tomoyo-test1:
  lockdep: Allow tuning tracing capacity constants.
2021-04-26 08:44:23 -07:00
Ali Saidi
84a24bf8c5 locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()
While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can
acquire the lock without holding wait_lock.  The writer side loops
checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly
acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed
successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the
acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads
following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before
the write lock is truly acquired.

We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while
holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from
under it.

  Writer                                | Reader
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ep_scan_ready_list()                  |
  |- write_lock_irq()                   |
      |- queued_write_lock_slowpath()   |
	|- atomic_cond_read_acquire()   |
				        | read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
     --> (observes value before unlock) |  chain_epi_lockless()
     |                                  |    epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi);
     |                                  | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags);
     |                                  |
     |     atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed()     |
     |-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist);        |

A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the
atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire
semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can
be switched to use relaxed semantics.

Fixes: b519b56e37 ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock")
Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
[peterz: use try_cmpxchg()]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
2021-04-17 13:40:50 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
add6b92660 Merge tag 'locking-urgent-2021-04-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixlets from Ingo Molnar:
 "Two minor fixes: one for a Clang warning, the other improves an
  ambiguous/confusing kernel log message"

* tag 'locking-urgent-2021-04-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  lockdep: Address clang -Wformat warning printing for %hd
  lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message
2021-04-11 11:47:03 -07:00
Tetsuo Handa
5dc33592e9 lockdep: Allow tuning tracing capacity constants.
Since syzkaller continues various test cases until the kernel crashes,
syzkaller tends to examine more locking dependencies than normal systems.
As a result, syzbot is reporting that the fuzz testing was terminated
due to hitting upper limits lockdep can track [1] [2] [3]. Since analysis
via /proc/lockdep* did not show any obvious culprit [4] [5], we have no
choice but allow tuning tracing capacity constants.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3d97ba93fb3566000c1c59691ea427370d33ea1b
[2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=381cb436fe60dc03d7fd2a092b46d7f09542a72a
[3] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a588183ac34c1437fc0785e8f220e88282e5a29f
[4] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4b8f7a57-fa20-47bd-48a0-ae35d860f233@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
[5] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1c351187-253b-2d49-acaf-4563c63ae7d2@i-love.sakura.ne.jp

References: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1595640639-9310-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
2021-04-05 20:33:57 +09:00
Thomas Gleixner
a51a327f3b locking/rtmutex: Clean up signal handling in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
The signal handling in __rt_mutex_slowlock() is open coded.

Use signal_pending_state() instead.

Aside of the cleanup this also prepares for the RT lock substituions which
require support for TASK_KILLABLE.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.533811987@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:05 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
c2c360ed7f locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug
The warning as written is expensive and not really required for a
production kernel. Make it depend on rt mutex debugging and use !in_task()
for the condition which generates far better code and gives the same
answer.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.436565064@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
82cd5b1039 locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in rt_mutex_postunlock()
Preemption is disabled in mark_wakeup_next_waiter(,) not in
rt_mutex_slowunlock().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.341734608@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
70c80103aa locking/rtmutex: Consolidate the fast/slowpath invocation
The indirection via a function pointer (which is at least optimized into a
tail call by the compiler) is making the code hard to read.

Clean it up and move the futex related trylock functions down to the futex
section.

Move the wake_q wakeup into rt_mutex_slowunlock(). No point in handing it
to the caller. The futex code uses a different function.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.247927548@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
d7a2edb890 locking/rtmutex: Make text section and inlining consistent
rtmutex is half __sched and the other half is not. If the compiler decides
to not inline larger static functions then part of the code ends up in the
regular text section.

There are also quite some performance related small helpers which are
either static or plain inline. Force inline those which make sense and mark
the rest __sched.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.152977820@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
f41dcc1869 locking/rtmutex: Move debug functions as inlines into common header
There is no value in having two header files providing just empty stubs and
a C file which implements trivial debug functions which can just be inlined.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.052454464@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
f5a98866e5 locking/rtmutex: Decrapify __rt_mutex_init()
The conditional debug handling is just another layer of obfuscation. Split
the function so rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked() can invoke the inner init and
__rt_mutex_init() gets the full treatment.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.955697588@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
37350e3b26 locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs
None of these functions are used when CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n.

Remove the gunk. Remove pointless comments and clean up the coding style
mess while at it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.863379182@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
f7efc4799f locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check
There is no point for this wrapper at all.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.754254046@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
fae37feee0 locking/rtmutex: Move rt_mutex_debug_task_free() to rtmutex.c
Prepare for removing the header maze.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.646359691@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
8188d74e68 locking/rtmutex: Remove empty and unused debug stubs
No users or useless and therefore just ballast.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.549192485@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
6d41c675a5 locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock detector
The rtmutex specific deadlock detector predates lockdep coverage of rtmutex
and since commit f5694788ad ("rt_mutex: Add lockdep annotations") it
contains a lot of redundant functionality:

 - lockdep will detect an potential deadlock before rtmutex-debug
   has a chance to do so

 - the deadlock debugging is restricted to rtmutexes which are not
   associated to futexes and have an active waiter, which is covered by
   lockdep already

Remove the redundant functionality and move actual deadlock WARN() into the
deadlock code path. The latter needs a seperate cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.320398604@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:02 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2d445c3e4a locking/rtmutex: Remove rtmutex deadlock tester leftovers
The following debug members of 'struct rtmutex' are unused:

 - save_state: No users

 - file,line: Printed if ::name is NULL. This is only used for non-futex
	      locks so ::name is never NULL

 - magic:     Assigned to NULL by rt_mutex_destroy(), no further usage

Remove them along with unused inline and macro leftovers related to
the long gone deadlock tester.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.195064296@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:02 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
c15380b72d locking/rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_timed_lock()
rt_mutex_timed_lock() has no callers since:

  c051b21f71 ("rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex")

Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.061103415@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:02 +02:00
Arnd Bergmann
6d48b7912c lockdep: Address clang -Wformat warning printing for %hd
Clang doesn't like format strings that truncate a 32-bit
value to something shorter:

  kernel/locking/lockdep.c:709:4: error: format specifies type 'short' but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]

In this case, the warning is a slightly questionable, as it could realize
that both class->wait_type_outer and class->wait_type_inner are in fact
8-bit struct members, even though the result of the ?: operator becomes an
'int'.

However, there is really no point in printing the number as a 16-bit
'short' rather than either an 8-bit or 32-bit number, so just change
it to a normal %d.

Fixes: de8f5e4f2d ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210322115531.3987555-1-arnd@kernel.org
2021-03-22 22:07:09 +01:00
Ingo Molnar
e2db7592be locking: Fix typos in comments
Fix ~16 single-word typos in locking code comments.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2021-03-22 02:45:52 +01:00
Tetsuo Handa
3a85969e9d lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message
Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g.
kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()),
suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects
were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing.

[ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ]

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2021-03-21 11:59:57 +01:00