The jiffies-based off_on_delay implementation has a couple of problems
that cause it to sometimes not actually delay for the required time:
(1) If, for example, the off_on_delay time is equivalent to one jiffy,
and the ->last_off_jiffy is set just before a new jiffy starts,
then _regulator_do_enable() does not wait at all since it checks
using time_before().
(2) When jiffies overflows, the value of "remaining" becomes higher
than "max_delay" and the code simply proceeds without waiting.
Fix these problems by changing it to use ktime_t instead.
[Note that since jiffies doesn't start at zero but at INITIAL_JIFFIES
("-5 minutes"), (2) above also led to the code not delaying if
the first regulator_enable() is called when the ->last_off_jiffy is not
initialised, such as for regulators with ->constraints->boot_on set.
It's not clear to me if this was intended or not, but I've preserved
this behaviour explicitly with the check for a non-zero ->last_off.]
Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210423114524.26414-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
By default the PCA9450 doesn't handle the assertion of the WDOG_B
signal, but this is required to guarantee that things like software
resets triggered by the watchdog work reliably.
As we don't want to rely on the bootloader to enable this, we tell
the PMIC to issue a cold reset in case the WDOG_B signal is
asserted (WDOG_B_CFG = 10), just as the NXP U-Boot code does.
Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210211105534.38972-3-frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The struct ab8500_regulator_platform_data was a leftover
since the days before we probed all regulators from the
device tree. The ab8500-ext regulator was the only used,
defining platform data and register intialization that
was never used for anything, a copy of a boardfile no
longer in use.
Delete the ab8500_regulator_platform_data and make the
ab8500-ext regulator reference the regulator init data
in the local file directly. We are 100% device tree
these days.
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201205004057.1712753-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
During regulators registration, if .of_match and .regulators_node are
defined as non-null strings in struct regulator_desc the core searches the
DT subtree rooted at .regulators_node trying to match, at first, .of_match
against the 'regulator-compatible' property and, then, falling back to use
the name of the node itself to determine a good match.
Property 'regulator-compatible', though, is now deprecated and falling back
to match against the node name, works fine only as long as the involved
nodes are named in an unique way across the searched subtree; if that's not
the case, like when using <common-name>@<unit> style naming for properties
indexed via 'reg' property (as advised by the standard), the above matching
mechanism based on the simple common name will lead to multiple matches and
the only viable alternative would be to properly define the now deprecated
'regulator-compatible' as the node full name, i.e. <common-name>@<unit>.
In order to address this case without using such deprecated binding, define
a new boolean flag .of_match_full_name in struct regulator_desc to force
the core to match against the node full-name instead of the plain name.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191051.46363-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Silence documentation build warning by correcting kernel-doc comments.
./include/linux/regulator/machine.h:196: warning: Function parameter or member 'max_uV_step' not described in 'regulation_constraints'
./include/linux/regulator/driver.h:206: warning: Function parameter or member 'resume' not described in 'regulator_ops'
Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200715191438.29312-1-colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Some regulators might need to verify that they have indeed been enabled
after the enable() call is made and enable_time delay has passed.
This is implemented by repeatedly checking is_enabled() upto
poll_enabled_time, waiting for the already calculated enable delay in
each iteration.
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200622124110.20971-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
regulator_suspend_enable(), regulator_suspend_disable() and
regulator_set_suspend_voltage() are all exported members of the
API, but are all missing prototypes.
Fixes the following W=1 warning(s):
drivers/regulator/core.c:3805:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘regulator_suspend_enable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3805 | int regulator_suspend_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/core.c:3812:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘regulator_suspend_disable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3812 | int regulator_suspend_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/core.c:3851:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘regulator_set_suspend_voltage’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3851 | int regulator_set_suspend_voltage(struct regulator *regulator, int min_uV,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200625163614.4001403-2-lee.jones@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Hi!
This patchset is another attempt to fix the regulator coupling on
Exynos5800/5422 SoCs. Here are links to the previous attempts:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20191008101709.qVNy8eijBi0LynOteWFMnTg4GUwKG599n6OyYoX1Abs@z/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191017102758.8104-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/cover.1589528491.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200528131130.17984-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/
The problem is with "vdd_int" regulator coupled with "vdd_arm" on Odroid
XU3/XU4 boards family. "vdd_arm" is handled by CPUfreq. "vdd_int" is
handled by devfreq. CPUfreq initialized quite early during boot and it
starts changing OPPs and "vdd_arm" value. Sometimes CPU activity during
boot goes down and some low-frequency OPPs are selected, what in turn
causes lowering "vdd_arm". This happens before devfreq applies its
requirements on "vdd_int". Regulator balancing code reduces "vdd_arm"
voltage value, what in turn causes lowering "vdd_int" value to the lowest
possible value. This is much below the operation point of the wcore bus,
which still runs at the highest frequency.
The issue was hard to notice because in the most cases the board managed
to boot properly, even when the regulator was set to lowest value allowed
by the regulator constraints. However, it caused some random issues,
which can be observed as "Unhandled prefetch abort" or low USB stability.
Adding more and more special cases to the generic code has been rejected,
so the only way to ensure the desired behavior on Exynos5800-based SoCs
is to make a custom regulator coupler driver.
Best regards,
Marek Szyprowski
Patch summary:
Marek Szyprowski (2):
regulator: extract voltage balancing code to separate function
soc: samsung: Add simple voltage coupler for Exynos5800
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/regulator/core.c | 49 ++++++++-------
drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
.../soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/regulator/coupler.h | 8 +++
6 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c
--
2.17.1
base-commit: 8f3d9f3542
The toolchain produces a warning on this driver when building
the docs:
./include/linux/regulator/driver.h:284: WARNING: Unknown target name: "regulator_regmap_x_voltage".
While fixing it, we notices that there's no function names
with the above pattern. It seems that some previous patch
renamed it to regulator_map_* instead.
So, change the function name, replacing "x" by "*", with is
a more used way to add a wildcard, and escape those with
``literal`` markup, in order to avoid the toolchain to think
that this is a link to some existing document chapter.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b9f5687bcf981a88c9d1fd04d759a540fda53a99.1584456635.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
