The idea behind it, is that all devm_ calls in ST sensors are bound to the
parent device object.
However, the reference to that object is kept on both the st_sensor_data
struct and the IIO object parent (indio_dev->dev.parent).
This change only adds a bit consistency and uses the reference stored on
indio_dev->dev.parent, to enforce the assumption that all ST sensors' devm_
calls are bound to the same reference as the one store on st_sensor_data.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210823112204.243255-6-aardelean@deviqon.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This change converts the st_sensors_power_enable() function to use
devm_add_action_or_reset() handlers to register regulator_disable hooks for
when the drivers get unloaded.
The parent device of the IIO device object is used. This is based on the
assumption that all other devm_ calls in the ST sensors use this reference.
This makes the st_sensors_power_disable() un-needed.
Removing this also changes unload order a bit, as all ST drivers would call
st_sensors_power_disable() first and iio_device_unregister() after that.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210823112204.243255-4-aardelean@deviqon.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The samples buffer is passed to iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp()
which requires a buffer aligned to 8 bytes as it is assumed that
the timestamp will be naturally aligned if present.
Fixes tag is inaccurate but prior to that likely manual backporting needed
(for anything before 4.18) Earlier than that the include file to fix is
drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.h:
commit 974e6f02e2 ("iio: cros_ec_sensors_core: Add common functions
for the ChromeOS EC Sensor Hub.") present since kernel stable 4.10.
(Thanks to Gwendal for tracking this down)
Fixes: 5a0b8cb466 ("iio: cros_ec: Move cros_ec_sensors_core.h in /include")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210501171352.512953-7-jic23@kernel.org
Commit 2e2366c2d1 ("iio: cros_ec: unify hw fifo attributes into the core file")
should be reverted as it set buffer extended attributes at
the wrong place. However, to revert it will requires to revert more
commits:
commit 165aea80e2 ("iio: cros_ec: use devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()")
commit 21232b4456 ("iio: buffer: remove iio_buffer_set_attrs() helper")).
and we would still have conflict with more recent development.
commit ee708e6baa ("iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers")
Instead, this commit reverts the first 2 commits without re-adding
iio_buffer_set_attrs() and set the buffer extended attributes at the
right place:
1. Instead of adding has_fw_fifo, deduct it from the configuration:
- EC must support FIFO (EC_FEATURE_MOTION_SENSE_FIFO) set.
- sensors send data a regular interval (accelerometer, gyro,
magnetomer, barometer, light sensor).
- "Legacy accelerometer" is only present on EC without FIFO, so we don't
need to set buffer attributes.
2. devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext() does not need to be called when
EC does not support FIFO, as there is no FIFO to manage.
3. Use devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext() when EC has a FIFO to
specify the buffer extended attributes.
Fixes: 2e2366c2d1 ("iio: cros_ec: unify hw fifo attributes into the core file")
Fixes: 165aea80e2 ("iio: cros_ec: use devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()")
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318184857.2679181-1-gwendal@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The intent here is to minimize the use of iio_buffer_set_attrs(). Since we
are planning to add support for multiple IIO buffers per IIO device, the
issue has to do with:
1. Accessing 'indio_dev->buffer' directly (as is done with
'iio_buffer_set_attrs(indio_dev->buffer, <attrs>)').
2. The way that the buffer attributes would get handled or expanded when
there are more buffers per IIO device. Current a sysfs kobj_type expands
into a 'device' object that expands into an 'iio_dev' object.
We will need to change this, so that the sysfs attributes for IIO
buffers expand into IIO buffers at some point.
Right now, the current IIO framework works fine for the
'1 IIO device == 1 IIO buffer' case (that is now).
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200923130339.997902-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
EC does not currently preserve range across sensor reinit.
If sensor is powered down at suspend, it will default to the EC default
range at resume, not the range set by the host.
Save range if modified, and apply at resume.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To be compliant with other sensors, set and get sensor sampling
frequency in Hz, not mHz.
Fixes: ae7b02ad2f ("iio: common: cros_ec_sensors: Expose cros_ec_sensors frequency range via iio sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Report the maximum amount of sample the EC can hold.
This is not tunable, but can be useful for application to find out the
maximum amount of time it can sleep when hwfifo_timeout is set to a
large number.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Expose EC minimal interrupt period through buffer/hwfifo_timeout:
- Maximal timeout is limited to 65s.
- When timeout for all sensors is set to 0, EC will not send events,
even if the sensor sampling rate is greater than 0.
Rename frequency to sampling_frequency to match IIO ABI.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Since cros_ec_sensorhub is shutting down the FIFO when the device
suspends, no need to slow down the EC sampling period rate.
It was necesseary to do that before command CMD_FIFO_INT_ENABLE was
introduced, but now all supported chromebooks have it.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
When EC supports FIFO, each IIO device registers a callback, to put
samples in the buffer when they arrives from the FIFO.
When no FIFO, the user space app needs to call trigger_new, or better
register a high precision timer.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Since we have access to the struct device_driver and thus to the ID table,
there is no need to supply special parameters to st_sensors_of_name_probe().
Besides that we have a common API to get driver match data, there is
no need to do matching separately for OF and ACPI.
Taking into consideration above, simplify the ST sensors code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Pull chrome platform updates from Benson Leung:
"CrOS EC / MFD Migration:
- Move cros_ec core driver from mfd into chrome platform.
Wilco EC:
- Add batt_ppid_info command to Wilco telemetry driver.
CrOS EC:
- cros_ec_rpmsg : Add support to inform EC of suspend/resume status
- cros_ec_rpmsg : Fix race condition on probe failed
- cros_ec_chardev : Add a poll handler to receive MKBP events
Misc:
- bugfixes in cros_usbpd_logger and cros_ec_ishtp"
* tag 'tag-chrome-platform-for-v5.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chrome-platform/linux:
platform/chrome: cros_usbpd_logger: null check create_singlethread_workqueue
platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Add a poll handler to receive MKBP events
platform/chrome: cros_ec_rpmsg: Fix race with host command when probe failed
platform/chrome: chromeos_tbmc: Report wake events
mfd: cros_ec: Use mfd_add_hotplug_devices() helper
mfd: cros_ec: Add convenience struct to define autodetectable CrOS EC subdevices
mfd: cros_ec: Add convenience struct to define dedicated CrOS EC MCUs
mfd: cros_ec: Use kzalloc and cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status helper
mfd / platform: cros_ec: Reorganize platform and mfd includes
mfd / platform: cros_ec: Rename config to a better name
mfd: cros_ec: Switch to use the new cros-ec-chardev driver
mfd / platform: cros_ec: Miscellaneous character device to talk with the EC
mfd / platform: cros_ec: Move cros-ec core driver out from MFD
mfd / platform: cros_ec: Handle chained ECs as platform devices
platform/chrome: cros_ec_rpmsg: Add host command AP sleep state support
platform/chrome: chromeos_laptop: drop checks of NULL-safe functions
platform/chrome: wilco_ec: Add batt_ppid_info command to telemetry driver
There is a bit of mess between cros-ec mfd includes and platform
includes. For example, we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h include that
exports the interface implemented in platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c. Or
we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h file that is non related to the
multifunction device (in the sense that is not exporting any function of
the mfd device). This causes crossed includes between mfd and
platform/chrome subsystems and makes the code difficult to read, apart
from creating 'curious' situations where a platform/chrome driver includes
a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h file just to get the exported functions that are
implemented in another platform/chrome driver.
In order to have a better separation on what the cros-ec multifunction
driver does and what the cros-ec core provides move and rework the
affected includes doing:
- Move cros_ec_commands.h to include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
- Get rid of the parts that are implemented in the platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
driver from include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h to a new file
include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
- Update all the drivers with the new includes, so
- Drivers that only need to know about the protocol include
- linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
- linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
- Drivers that need to know about the cros-ec mfd device also include
- linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Series changes: 3
- Fix dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'struct cros_ec_dev' (lkp)
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
This patch is removing the buffer allocation at each buffer enable.
We just allocate enough memory in the main structure during probe
to cover maximum size needed (that anyway is pretty small) [16bytes].
Signed-off-by: Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Not even sure why it was there since the beginning. Just use IRQ
number in the sensor_data struct.
Signed-off-by: Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Embedded controller return minimum and maximum frequencies, unfortunately
we have no way to know the step for all available frequencies.
Even if not complete, we can return a list of known values using the
standard read_avail callback (IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) to provide them to
userland.
Now cros_ec_* sensors provides frequencies values in sysfs like this:
"0 min max". 0 is always true to disable the sensor.
Default frequencies are provided for earlier protocol.
Signed-off-by: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com>
[rebased on top of iio/testing and solved conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
