Commit 701b3a3c0a ("PATCH scripts/kernel-doc") fixed the two
instances of literal braces that Perl 5.28 warns about, but there are
still more than it doesn't warn about.
Escape all left braces that are treated as literal characters. Also
escape literal right braces, for consistency and to avoid confusing
bracket-matching in text editors.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Fix a warning whinge from Perl introduced by "scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions"
Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/({ <-- HERE [^\{\}]*})/ at ./scripts/kernel-doc line 1155.
Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/({ <-- HERE )/ at ./scripts/kernel-doc line 1179.
Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The logic with parses array has a bug that prevents it to
parse arrays like:
struct {
...
struct {
u64 msdu[IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS + 1];
...
...
Fix the parser to accept it.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
I find the __sched annotations unaesthetic in the kernel-doc. Remove
them like we remove __inline, __weak, __init and so on.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
So once upon a time I set out to fix the problem reported by Tobin wherein
a literal block within a kerneldoc comment would be corrupted in
processing. On the way, though, I got annoyed at the way I have to learn
how kernel-doc works from the beginning every time I tear into it.
As a result, seven of the following eight patches just get rid of some dead
code and reorganize the rest - mostly turning the 500-line process_file()
function into something a bit more rational. Sphinx output is unchanged
after these are applied. Then, at the end, there's a tweak to stop messing
with literal blocks.
If anybody was unaware that I've not done any serious Perl since the
1990's, they will certainly understand that fact now.
Add the SPDX header while I'm in the neighborhood. The source itself just
says "GNU General Public License", but it also refers people to the COPYING
file for further information. Since COPYING says 2.0-only, that is what I
have put into the header.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The parser at kernel-doc rejects names with dots in the middle.
Fix it, in order to support nested structs/unions.
Tested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
When function description includes brackets after the function name as
suggested by Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc, the kernel-doc script
omits the function name from "Scanning doc for" report.
Extending match for identifier name with optional brackets fixes this
issue.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
It can be useful to put code snippets into kerneldoc comments; that can be
done with the "::" operator at the end of a line like this::
if (desperate)
run_in_circles();
The ".. code-block::" directive can also be used to this end. kernel-doc
currently fails to understand these literal blocks and applies its normal
markup to them, which is then treated as literal by sphinx. The result is
unsightly markup instead of a useful code snippet.
Apply a hack to the output code to recognize literal blocks and avoid
performing any special markup on them. It's ugly, but that means it fits
in well with the rest of the script.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Move STATE_INLINE and STATE_DOCBLOCK code out of process_file(), which now
actually fits on a single screen. Delete an unused variable and add a
couple of comments while I'm at it.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Move the top-level prototype-processing code out of process_file().
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Also group the pseudo-global $leading_space variable with its peers.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Move this code out of process_file() in the name of readability and
maintainability.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Begin the process of splitting up the nearly 500-line process_file()
function by moving STATE_NORMAL processing to a separate function.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
STATE_FIELD describes a parser state that can handle any part of a
kerneldoc comment body; rename it to STATE_BODY to reflect that.
The $in_purpose variable was a hidden substate of STATE_FIELD; get rid of
it and make a proper state (STATE_BODY_MAYBE) instead. This will make the
subsequent process_file() splitup easier.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
XML escaping is a worry that came with DocBook, which we no longer have any
dealings with. So get rid of the useless xml_escape()/xml_unescape()
functions. No change to the generated output.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The logic with inhibits warnings for definitions that is not
output is incomplete: it doesn't cover the cases where
OUTPUT_INTERNAL and OUTPUT_EXPORTED are used.
As the most common case is OUTPUT_ALL, place it first,
in order to optimize a litte bit the check logic.
Fixes: 2defb27292 ("scripts: kernel-doc: apply filtering rules to warnings")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-and-Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
When kernel-doc is called with output selection filters,
it will be called lots of time for a single file. If
there is a warning present there, it means that it may
print hundreds of identical warnings.
Worse than that, the -function NAME actually filters only
functions. So, it makes no sense at all to print warnings
for structs or enums.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
It is possible to use nested structs like:
struct {
struct {
void *arg1;
} st1, st2, *st3, st4;
};
Handling it requires to split each parameter. Change the logic
to allow such definitions.
In order to test the new nested logic, the following file
was used to test
<code>
struct foo { int a; }; /* Just to avoid errors if compiled */
/**
* struct my_struct - a struct with nested unions and structs
* @arg1: first argument of anonymous union/anonymous struct
* @arg2: second argument of anonymous union/anonymous struct
* @arg1b: first argument of anonymous union/anonymous struct
* @arg2b: second argument of anonymous union/anonymous struct
* @arg3: third argument of anonymous union/anonymous struct
* @arg4: fourth argument of anonymous union/anonymous struct
* @bar.st1.arg1: first argument of struct st1 on union bar
* @bar.st1.arg2: second argument of struct st1 on union bar
* @bar.st1.bar1: bar1 at st1
* @bar.st1.bar2: bar2 at st1
* @bar.st2.arg1: first argument of struct st2 on union bar
* @bar.st2.arg2: second argument of struct st2 on union bar
* @bar.st3.arg2: second argument of struct st3 on union bar
* @f1: nested function on anonimous union/struct
* @bar.st2.f2: nested function on named union/struct
*/
struct my_struct {
/* Anonymous union/struct*/
union {
struct {
char arg1 : 1;
char arg2 : 3;
};
struct {
int arg1b;
int arg2b;
};
struct {
void *arg3;
int arg4;
int (*f1)(char foo, int bar);
};
};
union {
struct {
int arg1;
int arg2;
struct foo bar1, *bar2;
} st1; /* bar.st1 is undocumented, cause a warning */
struct {
void *arg1; /* bar.st3.arg1 is undocumented, cause a warning */
int arg2;
int (*f2)(char foo, int bar); /* bar.st3.fn2 is undocumented, cause a warning */
} st2, st3, *st4;
int (*f3)(char foo, int bar); /* f3 is undocumented, cause a warning */
} bar; /* bar is undocumented, cause a warning */
/* private: */
int undoc_privat; /* is undocumented but private, no warning */
/* public: */
int undoc_public; /* is undocumented, cause a warning */
};
</code>
It produces the following warnings, as expected:
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st1' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st2' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st3' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st3.arg1' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st3.f2' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st4' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st4.arg1' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st4.arg2' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st4.f2' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.f3' not described in 'my_struct'
test2.h:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'undoc_public' not described in 'my_struct'
Suggested-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Function arguments are different than usual ones. So, an
special logic is needed in order to handle such arguments
on nested structs.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The logic at create_parameterlist()'s ancillary push_parameter()
function has already a way to output the declaration name, with
would help to discover what declaration is missing.
However, currently, the logic is utterly broken, as it uses
the var $type with a wrong meaning. With the current code,
it will never print anything. I suspect that originally
it was using the second argument of output_declaration().
I opted to not rely on a globally defined $declaration_name,
but, instead, to pass it explicitly as a parameter.
While here, I removed a unaligned check for !$anon_struct_union.
This is not needed, as, if $anon_struct_union is not zero,
$parameterdescs{$param} will be defined.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The check_sections() function has a $nested parameter, meant
to identify when a nested struct is present. As we now have
a logic that handles it, get rid of such parameter.
Suggested-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested
structs/unions, like this one:
struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info {
const char *name;
enum {
CGU_CLK_NONE = 0,
CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0),
CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1),
CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2),
CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3),
CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4),
CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5),
CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6),
CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7),
} type;
int parents[4];
union {
struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll;
struct {
struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate;
struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux;
struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div;
struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv;
};
struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom;
};
};
Currently, such struct is documented as:
**Definition**
::
struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info {
const char * name;
};
**Members**
``name``
name of the clock
With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error:
drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum'
However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything
is documented there.
It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a
way for the core to parse those structs.
With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Sphinx has a hard time dealing with tabs, causing it to
misinterpret paragraph continuation.
As we're now mainly focused on supporting ReST output,
replace tabs by spaces, in order to avoid troubles when
the output is parsed by Sphinx.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Right now, if kernel-doc is called without arguments, it
defaults to man pages. IMO, it makes more sense to
default to ReST, as this is the output that it is most
used nowadays, and it easier to check if everything got
parsed fine on an enriched text mode format.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
