[ Upstream commit 3d2786d65aaa954ebd3fcc033ada433e10da21c4 ]
In case of malformed relocation record of kind BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL
referencing a non-existing BTF type, function bpf_core_calc_relo_insn
would cause a null pointer deference.
Fix this by adding a proper check upper in call stack, as malformed
relocation records could be passed from user space.
Simplest reproducer is a program:
r0 = 0
exit
With a single relocation record:
.insn_off = 0, /* patch first instruction */
.type_id = 100500, /* this type id does not exist */
.access_str_off = 6, /* offset of string "0" */
.kind = BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL,
See the link for original reproducer or next commit for a test case.
Fixes: 74753e1462 ("libbpf: Replace btf__type_by_id() with btf_type_by_id().")
Reported-by: Liu RuiTong <cnitlrt@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAK55_s6do7C+DVwbwY_7nKfUz0YLDoiA1v6X3Y9+p0sWzipFSA@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822080124.2995724-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3f31e0d14d44ad491a81b7c1f83f32fbc300a867 ]
The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to
something more modern, let's use sockptr in setsockptr BPF hooks, so, it
could be used by other callers.
The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring
{g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a
kernel value for optlen.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-3-leitao@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a615f67e1a426f35366b8398c11f31c148e7df48 ]
The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to
something more modern, let's use sockptr in getsockptr BPF hooks, so, it
could be used by other callers.
The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring
{g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a
kernel value for optlen.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-2-leitao@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 01793ed86b5d7df1e956520b5474940743eb7ed8 ]
It's confusing to inspect 'prog->aux->tail_call_reachable' with drgn[0],
when bpf prog has tail call but 'tail_call_reachable' is false.
This patch corrects 'tail_call_reachable' when bpf prog has tail call.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610124224.34673-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25 upstream.
Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext.
Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access
in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code:
if (exact != NOT_EXACT &&
old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] !=
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE])
return false;
The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack.
If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound
access will happen.
To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if
the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise,
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal.
Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks")
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[ shung-hsi.yu: "exact" variable is bool instead enum because commit
4f81c16f50ba ("bpf: Recognize that two registers are safe when their
ranges match") is not present. ]
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 59f2f841179aa6a0899cb9cf53659149a35749b7 ]
syzbot reported the following lock sequence:
cpu 2:
grabs timer_base lock
spins on bpf_lpm lock
cpu 1:
grab rcu krcp lock
spins on timer_base lock
cpu 0:
grab bpf_lpm lock
spins on rcu krcp lock
bpf_lpm lock can be the same.
timer_base lock can also be the same due to timer migration.
but rcu krcp lock is always per-cpu, so it cannot be the same lock.
Hence it's a false positive.
To avoid lockdep complaining move kfree_rcu() after spin_unlock.
Reported-by: syzbot+1fa663a2100308ab6eab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240329171439.37813-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 896880ff30866f386ebed14ab81ce1ad3710cfc4 ]
Replace deprecated 0-length array in struct bpf_lpm_trie_key with
flexible array. Found with GCC 13:
../kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:207:51: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'const __u8[0]' {aka 'const unsigned char[]'} [-Warray-bounds=]
207 | *(__be16 *)&key->data[i]);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: in definition of macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
../include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:97:21: note: in expansion of macro '__be16_to_cpu'
97 | #define be16_to_cpu __be16_to_cpu
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:206:28: note: in expansion of macro 'be16_to_cpu'
206 | u16 diff = be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)&node->data[i]
^
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../include/linux/bpf.h:7:
../include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:82:17: note: while referencing 'data'
82 | __u8 data[0]; /* Arbitrary size */
| ^~~~
And found at run-time under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:218:49
index 0 is out of range for type '__u8 [*]'
Changing struct bpf_lpm_trie_key is difficult since has been used by
userspace. For example, in Cilium:
struct egress_gw_policy_key {
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key lpm_key;
__u32 saddr;
__u32 daddr;
};
While direct references to the "data" member haven't been found, there
are static initializers what include the final member. For example,
the "{}" here:
struct egress_gw_policy_key in_key = {
.lpm_key = { 32 + 24, {} },
.saddr = CLIENT_IP,
.daddr = EXTERNAL_SVC_IP & 0Xffffff,
};
To avoid the build time and run time warnings seen with a 0-sized
trailing array for struct bpf_lpm_trie_key, introduce a new struct
that correctly uses a flexible array for the trailing bytes,
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_u8. As part of this, include the "header"
portion (which is just the "prefixlen" member), so it can be used
by anything building a bpf_lpr_trie_key that has trailing members that
aren't a u8 flexible array (like the self-test[1]), which is named
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_hdr.
Unfortunately, C++ refuses to parse the __struct_group() helper, so
it is not possible to define struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_hdr directly in
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_u8, so we must open-code the union directly.
Adjust the kernel code to use struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_u8 through-out,
and for the selftest to use struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_hdr. Add a comment
to the UAPI header directing folks to the two new options.
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Closes: https://paste.debian.net/hidden/ca500597/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202206281009.4332AA33@keescook/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240222155612.it.533-kees@kernel.org
Stable-dep-of: 59f2f841179a ("bpf: Avoid kfree_rcu() under lock in bpf_lpm_trie.")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2454075f8e2915cebbe52a1195631bc7efe2b7e1 ]
As reported by Mirsad [1] we still see format warnings in kernel/bpf/btf.o
at W=1 warning level:
CC kernel/bpf/btf.o
./kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function ‘btf_type_seq_show_flags’:
./kernel/bpf/btf.c:7553:21: warning: assignment left-hand side might be a candidate for a format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
7553 | sseq.showfn = btf_seq_show;
| ^
./kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function ‘btf_type_snprintf_show’:
./kernel/bpf/btf.c:7604:31: warning: assignment left-hand side might be a candidate for a format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
7604 | ssnprintf.show.showfn = btf_snprintf_show;
| ^
Combined with CONFIG_WERROR=y these can halt the build.
The fix (annotating the structure field with __printf())
suggested by Mirsad resolves these. Apologies I missed this last time.
No other W=1 warnings were observed in kernel/bpf after this fix.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/92c9d047-f058-400c-9c7d-81d4dc1ef71b@gmail.com/
Fixes: b3470da314fd ("bpf: annotate BTF show functions with __printf")
Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240712092859.1390960-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d4523831f07a267a943f0dde844bf8ead7495f13 ]
Given a schedule:
timer1 cb timer2 cb
bpf_timer_cancel(timer2); bpf_timer_cancel(timer1);
Both bpf_timer_cancel calls would wait for the other callback to finish
executing, introducing a lockup.
Add an atomic_t count named 'cancelling' in bpf_hrtimer. This keeps
track of all in-flight cancellation requests for a given BPF timer.
Whenever cancelling a BPF timer, we must check if we have outstanding
cancellation requests, and if so, we must fail the operation with an
error (-EDEADLK) since cancellation is synchronous and waits for the
callback to finish executing. This implies that we can enter a deadlock
situation involving two or more timer callbacks executing in parallel
and attempting to cancel one another.
Note that we avoid incrementing the cancelling counter for the target
timer (the one being cancelled) if bpf_timer_cancel is not invoked from
a callback, to avoid spurious errors. The whole point of detecting
cur->cancelling and returning -EDEADLK is to not enter a busy wait loop
(which may or may not lead to a lockup). This does not apply in case the
caller is in a non-callback context, the other side can continue to
cancel as it sees fit without running into errors.
Background on prior attempts:
Earlier versions of this patch used a bool 'cancelling' bit and used the
following pattern under timer->lock to publish cancellation status.
lock(t->lock);
t->cancelling = true;
mb();
if (cur->cancelling)
return -EDEADLK;
unlock(t->lock);
hrtimer_cancel(t->timer);
t->cancelling = false;
The store outside the critical section could overwrite a parallel
requests t->cancelling assignment to true, to ensure the parallely
executing callback observes its cancellation status.
It would be necessary to clear this cancelling bit once hrtimer_cancel
is done, but lack of serialization introduced races. Another option was
explored where bpf_timer_start would clear the bit when (re)starting the
timer under timer->lock. This would ensure serialized access to the
cancelling bit, but may allow it to be cleared before in-flight
hrtimer_cancel has finished executing, such that lockups can occur
again.
Thus, we choose an atomic counter to keep track of all outstanding
cancellation requests and use it to prevent lockups in case callbacks
attempt to cancel each other while executing in parallel.
Reported-by: Dohyun Kim <dohyunkim@google.com>
Reported-by: Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>
Fixes: b00628b1c7 ("bpf: Introduce bpf timers.")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240709185440.1104957-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit be2749beff62e0d63cf97fe63cabc79a68443139 ]
To be able to add workqueues and reuse most of the timer code, we need
to make bpf_hrtimer more generic.
There is no code change except that the new struct gets a new u64 flags
attribute. We are still below 2 cache lines, so this shouldn't impact
the current running codes.
The ordering is also changed. Everything related to async callback
is now on top of bpf_hrtimer.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-1-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: d4523831f07a ("bpf: Fail bpf_timer_cancel when callback is being cancelled")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit af253aef183a31ce62d2e39fc520b0ebfb562bb9 ]
The original function call passed size of smap->bucket before the number of
buckets which raises the error 'calloc-transposed-args' on compilation.
Vlastimil Babka added:
The order of parameters can be traced back all the way to 6ac99e8f23
("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage") accross several refactorings,
and that's why the commit is used as a Fixes: tag.
In v6.10-rc1, a different commit 2c321f3f70bc ("mm: change inlined
allocation helpers to account at the call site") however exposed the
order of args in a way that gcc-14 has enough visibility to start
warning about it, because (in !CONFIG_MEMCG case) bpf_map_kvcalloc is
then a macro alias for kvcalloc instead of a static inline wrapper.
To sum up the warning happens when the following conditions are all met:
- gcc-14 is used (didn't see it with gcc-13)
- commit 2c321f3f70bc is present
- CONFIG_MEMCG is not enabled in .config
- CONFIG_WERROR turns this from a compiler warning to error
Fixes: 6ac99e8f23 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")
Reviewed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Signed-off-by: Mohammad Shehar Yaar Tausif <sheharyaar48@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240710100521.15061-2-vbabka@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cfa1a2329a691ffd991fcf7248a57d752e712881 ]
The BPF ring buffer internally is implemented as a power-of-2 sized circular
buffer, with two logical and ever-increasing counters: consumer_pos is the
consumer counter to show which logical position the consumer consumed the
data, and producer_pos which is the producer counter denoting the amount of
data reserved by all producers.
Each time a record is reserved, the producer that "owns" the record will
successfully advance producer counter. In user space each time a record is
read, the consumer of the data advanced the consumer counter once it finished
processing. Both counters are stored in separate pages so that from user
space, the producer counter is read-only and the consumer counter is read-write.
One aspect that simplifies and thus speeds up the implementation of both
producers and consumers is how the data area is mapped twice contiguously
back-to-back in the virtual memory, allowing to not take any special measures
for samples that have to wrap around at the end of the circular buffer data
area, because the next page after the last data page would be first data page
again, and thus the sample will still appear completely contiguous in virtual
memory.
Each record has a struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr { u32 len; u32 pg_off; } header for
book-keeping the length and offset, and is inaccessible to the BPF program.
Helpers like bpf_ringbuf_reserve() return `(void *)hdr + BPF_RINGBUF_HDR_SZ`
for the BPF program to use. Bing-Jhong and Muhammad reported that it is however
possible to make a second allocated memory chunk overlapping with the first
chunk and as a result, the BPF program is now able to edit first chunk's
header.
For example, consider the creation of a BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF map with size
of 0x4000. Next, the consumer_pos is modified to 0x3000 /before/ a call to
bpf_ringbuf_reserve() is made. This will allocate a chunk A, which is in
[0x0,0x3008], and the BPF program is able to edit [0x8,0x3008]. Now, lets
allocate a chunk B with size 0x3000. This will succeed because consumer_pos
was edited ahead of time to pass the `new_prod_pos - cons_pos > rb->mask`
check. Chunk B will be in range [0x3008,0x6010], and the BPF program is able
to edit [0x3010,0x6010]. Due to the ring buffer memory layout mentioned
earlier, the ranges [0x0,0x4000] and [0x4000,0x8000] point to the same data
pages. This means that chunk B at [0x4000,0x4008] is chunk A's header.
bpf_ringbuf_submit() / bpf_ringbuf_discard() use the header's pg_off to then
locate the bpf_ringbuf itself via bpf_ringbuf_restore_from_rec(). Once chunk
B modified chunk A's header, then bpf_ringbuf_commit() refers to the wrong
page and could cause a crash.
Fix it by calculating the oldest pending_pos and check whether the range
from the oldest outstanding record to the newest would span beyond the ring
buffer size. If that is the case, then reject the request. We've tested with
the ring buffer benchmark in BPF selftests (./benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh)
before/after the fix and while it seems a bit slower on some benchmarks, it
is still not significantly enough to matter.
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: Bing-Jhong Billy Jheng <billy@starlabs.sg>
Reported-by: Muhammad Ramdhan <ramdhan@starlabs.sg>
Co-developed-by: Bing-Jhong Billy Jheng <billy@starlabs.sg>
Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bing-Jhong Billy Jheng <billy@starlabs.sg>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240621140828.18238-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 44b7f7151dfc2e0947f39ed4b9bc4b0c2ccd46fc ]
In coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(), for the case where upper
sign extension bits are the same for smax32 and smin32
values, we missed to setup properly. This is especially
problematic if both smax32 and smin32's sign extension
bits are 1.
The following is a simple example illustrating the inconsistent
verifier states due to missed var_off:
0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar()
1: (bf) r3 = r0 ; R0_w=scalar(id=1) R3_w=scalar(id=1)
2: (57) r3 &= 15 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=15,var_off=(0x0; 0xf))
3: (47) r3 |= 128 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=128,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=143,var_off=(0x80; 0xf))
4: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (alu): range bounds violation u64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f]
u32=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s32=[0x80, 0xffffff8f] var_off=(0x80, 0xf)
The var_off=(0x80, 0xf) is not correct, and the correct one should
be var_off=(0xffffff80; 0xf) since from insn 3, we know that at
insn 4, the sign extension bits will be 1. This patch fixed this
issue by setting var_off properly.
Fixes: 8100928c88 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174632.3995278-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 380d5f89a4815ff88461a45de2fb6f28533df708 ]
Zac reported a verification failure and Alexei reproduced the issue
with a simple reproducer ([1]). The verification failure is due to missed
setting for var_off.
The following is the reproducer in [1]:
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387) ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
2: (36) if w7 >= 0x2533823b goto pc-3
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 2 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387)
2: R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
3: (b4) w0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
4: (95) exit
Note that after insn 1, the var_off for R7 is (0x0; 0x7f). This is not correct
since upper 24 bits of w7 could be 0 or 1. So correct var_off should be
(0x0; 0xffffffff). Missing var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val() caused later
incorrect analysis in zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) and reg_bounds_sync(dst_reg).
To fix the issue, set var_off correctly in set_sext32_default_val(). The correct
reg state after insn 1 becomes:
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=-128,smax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
and at insn 2, the verifier correctly determines either branch is possible.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLPU0Shz7dWV4bn2BgtGdxN3uFHPeobGBA72tpg5Xoykw@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 8100928c88 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174626.3994813-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2884dc7d08d98a89d8d65121524bb7533183a63a ]
After commit 1a80dbcb2dba, bpf_link can be freed by
link->ops->dealloc_deferred, but the code still tests and uses
link->ops->dealloc afterward, which leads to a use-after-free as
reported by syzbot. Actually, one of them should be sufficient, so
just call one of them instead of both. Also add a WARN_ON() in case
of any problematic implementation.
Fixes: 1a80dbcb2dba ("bpf: support deferring bpf_link dealloc to after RCU grace period")
Reported-by: syzbot+1989ee16d94720836244@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240602182703.207276-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit af66bfd3c8538ed21cf72af18426fc4a408665cf ]
When removing the inner map from the outer map, the inner map will be
freed after one RCU grace period and one RCU tasks trace grace
period, so it is certain that the bpf program, which may access the
inner map, has exited before the inner map is freed.
However there is no need to wait for one RCU tasks trace grace period if
the outer map is only accessed by non-sleepable program. So adding
sleepable_refcnt in bpf_map and increasing sleepable_refcnt when adding
the outer map into env->used_maps for sleepable program. Although the
max number of bpf program is INT_MAX - 1, the number of bpf programs
which are being loaded may be greater than INT_MAX, so using atomic64_t
instead of atomic_t for sleepable_refcnt. When removing the inner map
from the outer map, using sleepable_refcnt to decide whether or not a
RCU tasks trace grace period is needed before freeing the inner map.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 2884dc7d08d9 ("bpf: Fix a potential use-after-free in bpf_link_free()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1f2a74b41ea8b902687eb97c4e7e3f558801865b ]
r10 is a special register that is not under BPF program's control and is
always effectively precise. The rest of precision logic assumes that
only r0-r9 SCALAR registers are marked as precise, so prevent r10 from
being marked precise.
This can happen due to signed cast instruction allowing to do something
like `r0 = (s8)r10;`, which later, if r0 needs to be precise, would lead
to an attempt to mark r10 as precise.
Prevent this with an extra check during instruction backtracking.
Fixes: 8100928c88 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: syzbot+148110ee7cf72f39f33e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404214536.3551295-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
