commit 2f8dea1692eef2b7ba6a256246ed82c365fdc686 upstream.
Consider a scenario where a CPU transitions from CPUHP_ONLINE to halfway
through a CPU hotunplug down to CPUHP_HRTIMERS_PREPARE, and then back to
CPUHP_ONLINE:
Since hrtimers_prepare_cpu() does not run, cpu_base.hres_active remains set
to 1 throughout. However, during a CPU unplug operation, the tick and the
clockevents are shut down at CPUHP_AP_TICK_DYING. On return to the online
state, for instance CFS incorrectly assumes that the hrtick is already
active, and the chance of the clockevent device to transition to oneshot
mode is also lost forever for the CPU, unless it goes back to a lower state
than CPUHP_HRTIMERS_PREPARE once.
This round-trip reveals another issue; cpu_base.online is not set to 1
after the transition, which appears as a WARN_ON_ONCE in enqueue_hrtimer().
Aside of that, the bulk of the per CPU state is not reset either, which
means there are dangling pointers in the worst case.
Address this by adding a corresponding startup() callback, which resets the
stale per CPU state and sets the online flag.
[ tglx: Make the new callback unconditionally available, remove the online
modification in the prepare() callback and clear the remaining
state in the starting callback instead of the prepare callback ]
Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241220134421.3809834-1-koichiro.den@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit dad6a09f3148257ac1773cd90934d721d68ab595 upstream.
The hrtimers migration on CPU-down hotplug process has been moved
earlier, before the CPU actually goes to die. This leaves a small window
of opportunity to queue an hrtimer in a blind spot, leaving it ignored.
For example a practical case has been reported with RCU waking up a
SCHED_FIFO task right before the CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD stage, queuing that
way a sched/rt timer to the local offline CPU.
Make sure such situations never go unnoticed and warn when that happens.
Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129235646.3171983-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 5c0930ccaad5a74d74e8b18b648c5eb21ed2fe94 ]
2b8272ff4a ("cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug")
solved the straight forward CPU hotplug deadlock vs. the scheduler
bandwidth timer. Yu discovered a more involved variant where a task which
has a bandwidth timer started on the outgoing CPU holds a lock and then
gets throttled. If the lock required by one of the CPU hotplug callbacks
the hotplug operation deadlocks because the unthrottling timer event is not
handled on the dying CPU and can only be recovered once the control CPU
reaches the hotplug state which pulls the pending hrtimers from the dead
CPU.
Solve this by pushing the hrtimers away from the dying CPU in the dying
callbacks. Nothing can queue a hrtimer on the dying CPU at that point because
all other CPUs spin in stop_machine() with interrupts disabled and once the
operation is finished the CPU is marked offline.
Reported-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Liu Tie <liutie4@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a5rphara.ffs@tglx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Resuming timekeeping is a clock-was-set event and uses the clock-was-set
notification mechanism. This is in the way of making the clock-was-set
update for hrtimers selective so unnecessary IPIs are avoided when a CPU
base does not have timers queued which are affected by the clock setting.
Distangle it by invoking hrtimer_resume() on each unfreezing CPU and invoke
the new timerfd_resume() function from timekeeping_resume() which is the
only place where this is needed.
Rename hrtimer_resume() to hrtimer_resume_local() to reflect the change.
With this the clock_was_set*() functions are not longer required to IPI all
CPUs unconditionally and can get some smarts to avoid them.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210713135158.488853478@linutronix.de
Resuming timekeeping is a clock-was-set event and uses the clock-was-set
notification mechanism. This is in the way of making the clock-was-set
update for hrtimers selective so unnecessary IPIs are avoided when a CPU
base does not have timers queued which are affected by the clock setting.
Provide a seperate timerfd_resume() interface so the resume logic and the
clock-was-set mechanism can be distangled in the core code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210713135158.395287410@linutronix.de
If high resolution timers are disabled the timerfd notification about a
clock was set event is not happening for all cases which use
clock_was_set_delayed() because that's a NOP for HIGHRES=n, which is wrong.
Make clock_was_set_delayed() unconditially available to fix that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210713135158.196661266@linutronix.de
The hrtimer_get_remaining() markup is documenting, instead,
__hrtimer_get_remaining(), as it is placed at the C file.
In order to properly document it, a kernel-doc markup is needed together
with the function prototype. So, add a new one, while preserving the
existing one, just fixing the function name.
The hrtimer_is_queued prototype has a typo: it is using
'=' instead of '-' to split: identifier - description
as required by kernel-doc markup.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9dc87808c2fd07b7e050bafcd033c5ef05808fea.1605521731.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
A sequence counter write side critical section must be protected by some
form of locking to serialize writers. A plain seqcount_t does not
contain the information of which lock must be held when entering a write
side critical section.
Use the new seqcount_raw_spinlock_t data type, which allows to associate
a raw spinlock with the sequence counter. This enables lockdep to verify
that the raw spinlock used for writer serialization is held when the
write side critical section is entered.
If lockdep is disabled this lock association is compiled out and has
neither storage size nor runtime overhead.
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200720155530.1173732-25-a.darwish@linutronix.de
clock_nanosleep() accepts absolute values of expiration time when
TIMER_ABSTIME flag is set. This absolute value is inside the task's
time namespace, and has to be converted to the host's time.
There is timens_ktime_to_host() helper for converting time, but
it accepts ktime argument.
As a preparation, make hrtimer_nanosleep() accept a clock value in ktime
instead of timespec64.
Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-17-dima@arista.com
When PREEMPT_RT is enabled, the soft interrupt thread can be preempted. If
the soft interrupt thread is preempted in the middle of a timer callback,
then calling hrtimer_cancel() can lead to two issues:
- If the caller is on a remote CPU then it has to spin wait for the timer
handler to complete. This can result in unbound priority inversion.
- If the caller originates from the task which preempted the timer
handler on the same CPU, then spin waiting for the timer handler to
complete is never going to end.
To avoid these issues, add a new lock to the timer base which is held
around the execution of the timer callbacks. If hrtimer_cancel() detects
that the timer callback is currently running, it blocks on the expiry
lock. When the callback is finished, the expiry lock is dropped by the
softirq thread which wakes up the waiter and the system makes progress.
This addresses both the priority inversion and the life lock issues.
The same issue can happen in virtual machines when the vCPU which runs a
timer callback is scheduled out. If a second vCPU of the same guest calls
hrtimer_cancel() it will spin wait for the other vCPU to be scheduled back
in. The expiry lock mechanism would avoid that. It'd be trivial to enable
this when paravirt spinlocks are enabled in a guest, but it's not clear
whether this is an actual problem in the wild, so for now it's an RT only
mechanism.
[ tglx: Refactored it for mainline ]
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726185753.737767218@linutronix.de
hrtimer_start_range_ns() has a WARN_ONCE() which verifies that a timer
which is marker for softirq expiry is not queued in the hard interrupt base
and vice versa.
When PREEMPT_RT is enabled, timers which are not explicitely marked to
expire in hard interrupt context are deferrred to the soft interrupt. So
the regular check would trigger.
Change the check, so when PREEMPT_RT is enabled, it is verified that the
timers marked for hard interrupt expiry are not tried to be queued for soft
interrupt expiry or any of the unmarked and softirq marked is tried to be
expired in hard interrupt context.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
On PREEMPT_RT not all hrtimers can be expired in hard interrupt context
even if that is perfectly fine on a PREEMPT_RT=n kernel, e.g. because they
take regular spinlocks. Also for latency reasons PREEMPT_RT tries to defer
most hrtimers' expiry into soft interrupt context.
But there are hrtimers which must be expired in hard interrupt context even
when PREEMPT_RT is enabled:
- hrtimers which must expiry in hard interrupt context, e.g. scheduler,
perf, watchdog related hrtimers
- latency critical hrtimers, e.g. nanosleep, ..., kvm lapic timer
Add a new mode flag HRTIMER_MODE_HARD which allows to mark these timers so
PREEMPT_RT will not move them into softirq expiry mode.
[ tglx: Split out of a larger combo patch. Added changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726185752.981398465@linutronix.de
hrtimer_sleepers will gain a scheduling class dependent treatment on
PREEMPT_RT. Create a wrapper around hrtimer_start_expires() to make that
possible.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
hrtimer_init_sleeper() calls require prior initialisation of the hrtimer
object which is embedded into the hrtimer_sleeper.
Combine the initialization and spare a function call. Fixup all call sites.
This is also a preparatory change for PREEMPT_RT to do hrtimer sleeper
specific initializations of the embedded hrtimer without modifying any of
the call sites.
No functional change.
[ anna-maria: Minor cleanups ]
[ tglx: Adopted to the removal of the task argument of
hrtimer_init_sleeper() and trivial polishing.
Folded a fix from Stephen Rothwell for the vsoc code ]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726185752.887468908@linutronix.de
Revert commits
92af4dcb4e ("tracing: Unify the "boot" and "mono" tracing clocks")
127bfa5f43 ("hrtimer: Unify MONOTONIC and BOOTTIME clock behavior")
7250a4047a ("posix-timers: Unify MONOTONIC and BOOTTIME clock behavior")
d6c7270e91 ("timekeeping: Remove boot time specific code")
f2d6fdbfd2 ("Input: Evdev - unify MONOTONIC and BOOTTIME clock behavior")
d6ed449afd ("timekeeping: Make the MONOTONIC clock behave like the BOOTTIME clock")
72199320d4 ("timekeeping: Add the new CLOCK_MONOTONIC_ACTIVE clock")
As stated in the pull request for the unification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC and
CLOCK_BOOTTIME, it was clear that we might have to revert the change.
As reported by several folks systemd and other applications rely on the
documented behaviour of CLOCK_MONOTONIC on Linux and break with the above
changes. After resume daemons time out and other timeout related issues are
observed. Rafael compiled this list:
* systemd kills daemons on resume, after >WatchdogSec seconds
of suspending (Genki Sky). [Verified that that's because systemd uses
CLOCK_MONOTONIC and expects it to not include the suspend time.]
* systemd-journald misbehaves after resume:
systemd-journald[7266]: File /var/log/journal/016627c3c4784cd4812d4b7e96a34226/system.journal
corrupted or uncleanly shut down, renaming and replacing.
(Mike Galbraith).
* NetworkManager reports "networking disabled" and networking is broken
after resume 50% of the time (Pavel). [May be because of systemd.]
* MATE desktop dims the display and starts the screensaver right after
system resume (Pavel).
* Full system hang during resume (me). [May be due to systemd or NM or both.]
That happens on debian and open suse systems.
It's sad, that these problems were neither catched in -next nor by those
folks who expressed interest in this change.
Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Reported-by: Genki Sky <sky@genki.is>,
Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Kevin Easton <kevin@guarana.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
* pm-cpuidle:
tick-sched: avoid a maybe-uninitialized warning
cpuidle: Add definition of residency to sysfs documentation
time: hrtimer: Use timerqueue_iterate_next() to get to the next timer
nohz: Avoid duplication of code related to got_idle_tick
nohz: Gather tick_sched booleans under a common flag field
cpuidle: menu: Avoid selecting shallow states with stopped tick
cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick
sched: idle: Select idle state before stopping the tick
time: hrtimer: Introduce hrtimer_next_event_without()
time: tick-sched: Split tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick()
cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select()
jiffies: Introduce USER_TICK_USEC and redefine TICK_USEC
sched: idle: Do not stop the tick before cpuidle_idle_call()
sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop
time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code
* pm-qos:
PM / QoS: mark expected switch fall-throughs
The next set of changes will need to compute the time to the next
hrtimer event over all hrtimers except for the scheduler tick one.
To that end introduce a new helper function,
hrtimer_next_event_without(), for computing the time until the next
hrtimer event over all timers except for one and modify the underlying
code in __hrtimer_next_event_base() to prepare it for being called by
that new function.
No intentional changes in functionality.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
