If the algorithm we're parallelizing is asynchronous we might change
CPUs between padata_do_parallel() and padata_do_serial(). However, we
don't expect this to happen as we need to enqueue the padata object into
the per-cpu reorder queue we took it from, i.e. the same-cpu's parallel
queue.
Ensure we're not switching CPUs for a given padata object by tracking
the CPU within the padata object. If the serial callback gets called on
the wrong CPU, defer invoking padata_reorder() via a kernel worker on
the CPU we're expected to run on.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
The reorder timer function runs on the CPU where the timer interrupt was
handled which is not necessarily one of the CPUs of the 'pcpu' CPU mask
set.
Ensure the padata_reorder() callback runs on the correct CPU, which is
one in the 'pcpu' CPU mask set and, preferrably, the next expected one.
Do so by comparing the current CPU with the expected target CPU. If they
match, call padata_reorder() right away. If they differ, schedule a work
item on the target CPU that does the padata_reorder() call for us.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
The parallel queue per-cpu data structure gets initialized only for CPUs
in the 'pcpu' CPU mask set. This is not sufficient as the reorder timer
may run on a different CPU and might wrongly decide it's the target CPU
for the next reorder item as per-cpu memory gets memset(0) and we might
be waiting for the first CPU in cpumask.pcpu, i.e. cpu_index 0.
Make the '__this_cpu_read(pd->pqueue->cpu_index) == next_queue->cpu_index'
compare in padata_get_next() fail in this case by initializing the
cpu_index member of all per-cpu parallel queues. Use -1 for unused ones.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
The author meant to free the variable that was just allocated, instead
of the one that failed to be allocated, but made a simple typo. This
patch rectifies that.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Under extremely heavy uses of padata, crashes occur, and with list
debugging turned on, this happens instead:
[87487.298728] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 882 at lib/list_debug.c:33
__list_add+0xae/0x130
[87487.301868] list_add corruption. prev->next should be next
(ffffb17abfc043d0), but was ffff8dba70872c80. (prev=ffff8dba70872b00).
[87487.339011] [<ffffffff9a53d075>] dump_stack+0x68/0xa3
[87487.342198] [<ffffffff99e119a1>] ? console_unlock+0x281/0x6d0
[87487.345364] [<ffffffff99d6b91f>] __warn+0xff/0x140
[87487.348513] [<ffffffff99d6b9aa>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50
[87487.351659] [<ffffffff9a58b5de>] __list_add+0xae/0x130
[87487.354772] [<ffffffff9add5094>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x70
[87487.357915] [<ffffffff99eefd66>] padata_reorder+0x1e6/0x420
[87487.361084] [<ffffffff99ef0055>] padata_do_serial+0xa5/0x120
padata_reorder calls list_add_tail with the list to which its adding
locked, which seems correct:
spin_lock(&squeue->serial.lock);
list_add_tail(&padata->list, &squeue->serial.list);
spin_unlock(&squeue->serial.lock);
This therefore leaves only place where such inconsistency could occur:
if padata->list is added at the same time on two different threads.
This pdata pointer comes from the function call to
padata_get_next(pd), which has in it the following block:
next_queue = per_cpu_ptr(pd->pqueue, cpu);
padata = NULL;
reorder = &next_queue->reorder;
if (!list_empty(&reorder->list)) {
padata = list_entry(reorder->list.next,
struct padata_priv, list);
spin_lock(&reorder->lock);
list_del_init(&padata->list);
atomic_dec(&pd->reorder_objects);
spin_unlock(&reorder->lock);
pd->processed++;
goto out;
}
out:
return padata;
I strongly suspect that the problem here is that two threads can race
on reorder list. Even though the deletion is locked, call to
list_entry is not locked, which means it's feasible that two threads
pick up the same padata object and subsequently call list_add_tail on
them at the same time. The fix is thus be hoist that lock outside of
that block.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Remove the unused but set variable pinst in padata_parallel_worker to
fix the following warning when building with 'W=1':
kernel/padata.c: In function ‘padata_parallel_worker’:
kernel/padata.c:68:26: warning: variable ‘pinst’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Also remove the now unused variable pd which is only used to set pinst.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
A recent cleanup removed some exported functions that were not used
anywhere, which in turn exposed the fact that some other functions in
the same file are only used in some configurations.
We now get a warning about them when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is disabled:
kernel/padata.c:670:12: error: '__padata_remove_cpu' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int __padata_remove_cpu(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpu)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/padata.c:650:12: error: '__padata_add_cpu' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int __padata_add_cpu(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpu)
This rearranges the code so the __padata_remove_cpu/__padata_add_cpu
functions are within the #ifdef that protects the code that calls them.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Fixes: 4ba6d78c671e ("kernel/padata.c: removed unused code")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <rcochran@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
By accident I stumbled across code that has never been used. This
driver has EXPORT_SYMBOL functions, and the only user of the code is
pcrypt.c, but this only uses a subset of the exported symbols.
According to 'git log -G', the functions, padata_set_cpumasks,
padata_add_cpu, and padata_remove_cpu have never been used since they
were first introduced. This patch removes the unused code.
On one 64 bit build, with CRYPTO_PCRYPT built in, the text is more than
4k smaller.
kbuild_hp> size $KBUILD_OUTPUT/vmlinux
text data bss dec hex filename
10566658 4678360 1122304 16367322 f9beda vmlinux
10561984 4678360 1122304 16362648 f9ac98 vmlinux
On another config, 32 bit, the saving is about 0.5k bytes.
kbuild_hp-x86> size $KBUILD_OUTPUT/vmlinux
6012005 2409513 2785280 11206798 ab008e vmlinux
6011491 2409513 2785280 11206284 aafe8c vmlinux
Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <rcochran@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
printk and friends can now format bitmaps using '%*pb[l]'. cpumask
and nodemask also provide cpumask_pr_args() and nodemask_pr_args()
respectively which can be used to generate the two printf arguments
necessary to format the specified cpu/nodemask.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
A kernel with enabled lockdep complains about the wrong usage of
rcu_dereference() under a rcu_read_lock_bh() protected region.
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
3.13.0-rc1+ #126 Not tainted
-------------------------------
linux/kernel/padata.c:115 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by cryptomgr_test/153:
#0: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<ffffffff8115c235>] padata_do_parallel+0x5/0x270
Fix that by using rcu_dereference_bh() instead.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Using a spinlock to atomically increase a counter sounds wrong -- we've
atomic_t for this!
Also move 'seq_nr' to a different cache line than 'lock' to reduce cache
line trashing. This has the nice side effect of decreasing the size of
struct parallel_data from 192 to 128 bytes for a x86-64 build, e.g.
occupying only two instead of three cache lines.
Those changes results in a 5% performance increase on an IPsec test run
using pcrypt.
Btw. the seq_lock spinlock was never explicitly initialized -- one more
reason to get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <mathias.krause@secunet.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
padata_cpu_callback() takes pinst->lock, to avoid taking
an uninitialized lock, register the notifier after it's
initialization.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
"not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and __padata_add_cpu()".
"need add 'break' between CPU_UP_CANCELED and CPU_DOWN_FAILED".
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
We don't remove the cpu that went offline from our cpumasks
on cpu hotplug. This got lost somewhere along the line, so
restore it. This fixes a hang of the padata instance on cpu
hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
We use the active cpumask to determine the superset of cpus
to use for parallelization. However, the active cpumask is
for internal usage of the scheduler and therefore not the
appropriate cpumask for these purposes. So use the online
cpumask instead.
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
When padata_do_parallel() is called from multiple cpus for the same
padata instance, we can get object reordering on sequence number wrap
because testing for sequence number wrap and reseting the sequence
number must happen atomically but is implemented with two atomic
operations. This patch fixes this by converting the sequence number
from atomic_t to an unsigned int and protect the access with a
spin_lock. As a side effect, we get rid of the sequence number wrap
handling because the seqence number wraps back to null now without
the need to do anything.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
When a padata object is queued to the serialization queue, another
cpu might process and free the padata object. So don't dereference
it after queueing to the serialization queue.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
