Prepare for a tighter pairing of user namespaces and apparmor policy
namespaces, by making the ns to be viewed available.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Prepare for a tighter pairing of user namespaces and apparmor policy
namespaces, by making the ns to be viewed available and checking
that the user namespace level is the same as the policy ns level.
This strict pairing will be relaxed once true support of user namespaces
lands.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Borrow the special null device file from selinux to "close" fds that
don't have sufficient permissions at exec time.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Instead of testing whether a given dfa exists in every code path, have
a default null dfa that is used when loaded policy doesn't provide a
dfa.
This will let us get rid of special casing and avoid dereference bugs
when special casing is missed.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
The dfa is currently setup to be shared (has the basis of refcounting)
but currently can't be because the count can't be increased.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
When possible its better to name a learning profile after the missing
profile in question. This allows for both more informative names and
for profile reuse.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
prepare_ns() will need to be called from alternate views, and namespaces
will need to be created via different interfaces. So refactor and
allow specifying the view ns.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Rename to indicate the test is only about whether path mediation is used,
not whether other types of mediation might be used.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Policy namespaces will be diverging from profile management and
expanding so put it in its own file.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
John Johansen