In case of a wakeup interrupt, irq_pm_check_wakeup disables the interrupt
and marks it pending and suspended, disables it and notifies the pm core
about the wake event. The interrupt gets handled later once the system
is resumed.
However the irq stats is updated twice: once when it's disabled waiting
for the system to resume and later when it's handled, resulting in wrong
counting of the wakeup interrupt when waking up the system.
This patch updates the interrupt count so that it's updated only when
the interrupt gets handled. It's already handled correctly in
handle_edge_irq and handle_edge_eoi_irq.
Reported-by: Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446661957-1019-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
If an irq chip does not implement the irq_disable callback, then we
use a lazy approach for disabling the interrupt. That means that the
interrupt is marked disabled, but the interrupt line is not
immediately masked in the interrupt chip. It only becomes masked if
the interrupt is raised while it's marked disabled. We use this to avoid
possibly expensive mask/unmask operations for common case operations.
Unfortunately there are devices which do not allow the interrupt to be
disabled easily at the device level. They are forced to use
disable_irq_nosync(). This can result in taking each interrupt twice.
Instead of enforcing the non lazy mode on all interrupts of a irq
chip, provide a settings flag, which can be set by the driver for that
particular interrupt line.
Reported-and-tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1510092348370.6097@nanos
When a CPU is offlined all interrupts that have an action are migrated to
other still online CPUs. However, if the interrupt has chained handler
installed this is not done. Chained handlers are used by GPIO drivers which
support interrupts, for instance.
When the affinity is not corrected properly we end up in situation where
most interrupts are not arriving to the online CPUs anymore. For example on
Intel Braswell system which has SD-card card detection signal connected to
a GPIO the IO-APIC routing entries look like below after CPU1 is offlined:
pin30, enabled , level, low , V(52), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1)
pin31, enabled , level, low , V(42), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1)
pin32, enabled , level, low , V(62), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1)
pin5b, enabled , level, low , V(72), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1)
The problem here is that the destination mask still contains both CPUs even
if CPU1 is already offline. This means that the IO-APIC still routes
interrupts to the other CPU as well.
We solve the problem by providing a default action for chained interrupts.
This action allows the migration code to correct affinity (as it finds
desc->action != NULL).
Also make the default action handler to emit a warning if for some reason a
chained handler ends up calling it.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444039935-30475-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Most interrupt flow handlers do not use the irq argument. Those few
which use it can retrieve the irq number from the irq descriptor.
Remove the argument.
Search and replace was done with coccinelle and some extra helper
scripts around it. Thanks to Julia for her help!
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Pull irq updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"This updated pull request does not contain the last few GIC related
patches which were reported to cause a regression. There is a fix
available, but I let it breed for a couple of days first.
The irq departement provides:
- new infrastructure to support non PCI based MSI interrupts
- a couple of new irq chip drivers
- the usual pile of fixlets and updates to irq chip drivers
- preparatory changes for removal of the irq argument from interrupt
flow handlers
- preparatory changes to remove IRQF_VALID"
* 'irq-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (129 commits)
irqchip/imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup sources
irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2
irqchip: Add documentation for the bcm2836 interrupt controller
irqchip/bcm2835: Add support for being used as a second level controller
irqchip/bcm2835: Refactor handle_IRQ() calls out of MAKE_HWIRQ
PCI: xilinx: Fix typo in function name
irqchip/gic: Ensure gic_cpu_if_up/down() programs correct GIC instance
irqchip/gic: Only allow the primary GIC to set the CPU map
PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Consolidate chained IRQ handler install/remove
unicore32/irq: Prepare puv3_gpio_handler for irq argument removal
tile/pci_gx: Prepare trio_handle_level_irq for irq argument removal
m68k/irq: Prepare irq handlers for irq argument removal
C6X/megamode-pic: Prepare megamod_irq_cascade for irq argument removal
blackfin: Prepare irq handlers for irq argument removal
arc/irq: Prepare idu_cascade_isr for irq argument removal
sparc/irq: Use access helper irq_data_get_affinity_mask()
sparc/irq: Use helper irq_data_get_irq_handler_data()
parisc/irq: Use access helper irq_data_get_affinity_mask()
mn10300/irq: Use access helper irq_data_get_affinity_mask()
irqchip/i8259: Prepare i8259_irq_dispatch for irq argument removal
...
It's only required for debug output and can be retrieved from the irq
descriptor if necessary.
[ tglx: Split out from combo patch ]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
With Posted-Interrupts support in Intel CPU and IOMMU, an external
interrupt from assigned-devices could be directly delivered to a
virtual CPU in a virtual machine. Instead of hacking KVM and Intel
IOMMU drivers, we propose a platform independent interface to target
an interrupt to a specific virtual CPU in a virtual machine, or set
virtual CPU affinity for an interrupt.
By adopting this new interface and the hierarchy irqdomain, we could
easily support posted-interrupts on Intel platforms, and also provide
flexible enough interfaces for other platforms to support similar
features.
Here is the usage scenario for this interface:
Guest update MSI/MSI-X interrupt configuration
-->QEMU and KVM handle this
-->KVM call this interface (passing posted interrupts descriptor
and guest vector)
-->irq core will transfer the control to IOMMU
-->IOMMU will do the real work of updating IRTE (IRTE has new
format for VT-d Posted-Interrupts)
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432026437-16560-2-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
With the introduction of stacked domains, we have the issue that,
depending on where in the stack this is called, __irq_set_handler
will succeed or fail: If this is called from the inner irqchip,
__irq_set_handler() will fail, as it will look at the outer domain
as the (desc->irq_data.chip == &no_irq_chip) test fails (we haven't
set the top level yet).
This patch implements the following: "If there is at least one
valid irqchip in the domain, it will probably sort itself out".
This is clearly not ideal, but it is far less confusing then
crashing because the top-level domain is not up yet.
[ tglx: Added comment and a protection against chained interrupts in
that context ]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416048553-29289-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>