The documentation calls this GFX_MODE bit "Flush TLB invalidate Mode".
However, that is not a good name for an enable bit as it doesn't make it
clear what is enabled. An even worse name is GFX_TLB_INVALIDATE_ALWAYS
as enabling that bit actually prevents the TLB from being invalidated at
every flush. This leads to great confusion when reading code and
proposed patches. To get around this try to bake in what is enabled by
setting the bit and call it GFX_TLB_INVALIDATE_EXPLICIT.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Gupta, Sourab" <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Acked-by: "Gupta, Sourab" <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because gen6_gt_force_wake_{get,put} should already be responsible for
getting/putting runtime PM. If we keep these calls, debugfs will not
be testing the get/put calls of the forcewake functions.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If runtime PM is enabled and we unset all modes, we will runtime
suspend after __intel_set_mode() , then function
intel_modeset_check_state() will try to read the HW state while it is
suspended and trigger lots of WARNs because it shouldn't be reading
registers.
So on this patch we make intel_ddi_connector_get_hw_state() return
false in case the power domain is disabled, and we also make
intel_display_power_enabled() return false in case the device is
suspended. Notice that we can't just use
intel_display_power_enabled_sw() because while the driver is being
initialized the power domain refcounts are not reflecting the real
state of the hardware.
Just for reference, I have previously published an alternate patch for
this problem, called "drm/i915: get runtime PM at intel_set_mode".
Testcase: igt/pm_pc8
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
At i915_display_info, don't call cursor_position() for a disabled
CRTC, since the CRTC may be on a powered down pipe, and this will
cause "Unclaimed register before interrupt" error messages.
Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/debugfs-read
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Otherwise we may get some WARNs complaining that we're reading a
register while we're suspended.
Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/debugfs-read
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
So far force_wake_timer was only used by gen6_gt_force_wake_put. Since
we always had balanced gen6_gt_force_wake_get/put calls, we could
guarantee balanced calls to intel_runtime_pm_get/put.
Commit 8232644ccf, "drm/i915: Convert
the forcewake worker into a timer func" started scheduling the
force_wake_timer at gen6_read, which resulted in an unbalanced
runtime_pm refcount.
So this commit just reverts to the old behavior until we can find a
proper way to used delayed force_wake from the register read/write
macros without leaving the runtime_pm refcounts unbalanced and without
runtime suspending the driver while forcewake is active.
Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/rte
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76544
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Atm we reserve/allocate and free the power context during GT power
enable/disable time. There is no need to do this, we can reserve/allocate
the buffer once during driver loading and free it during driver cleanup.
The re-reservation can also fail in case the driver previously manages to
allocate something on the given fixed address.
The buffer isn't exepected to move even if allocated by the BIOS, for
safety add an assert to check this assumption.
This also fixed a bug for Ville, where re-reserving the context failed
during a GPU reset (I assume because something else got allocated on its
fixed address).
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Remove the rest of the references to drm_i915_private_t. No functional
changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop hunk in i915_cmd_parser.c]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The speculation is that we can conserve more power by masking off
the interrupts at source (PMINTRMSK) rather than filtering them by the
up/down thresholds (RPINTLIM). We can select which events we know will
be active based on the current frequency versus our imposed range, i.e.
if at minimum, we know we will not want to generate any more
down-interrupts and vice versa.
v2: We only need the TIMEOUT when above min frequency.
v3: Tweak VLV at the same time
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by:Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
What used to be a short-circuit now needs to adjust interrupt masking in
response to user requests for changing the min/max allowed frequencies.
This is currently done by a special case and early return, but the next
patch adds another common action to take, so refactor the code to reduce
duplication.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by:Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This reverts commit 2754436913.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
The partial application of interrupt masking without regard to other
pathways for adjusting the RPS frequency results in completely disabling
the PM interrupts. This leads to excessive power consumption as the GPU
is kept at max clocks (until the failsafe mechanism fires of explicitly
downclocking the GPU when all requests are idle). Or equally as bad for
the UX, the GPU is kept at minimum clocks and prevented from upclocking
in response to a requirement for more power.
Testcase: pm_rps/blocking
Cc: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by:Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If vsyncshift comes out as negative, add one htotal to it to get the
corresponding positive value.
This is rather theoretical as it would require a mode where the
hsync+back porch is very long and the active+front porch very short.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION is only meant to be used for sdvo
since it implies a slightly weird vsync shift of htotal/2. For everything
else we should use PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_SYNC_SHIFT and let the value in
the VSYNCSHIFT register take effect.
The only exception is gen3 simply because VSYNCSHIFT didn't exist yet.
Gen2 doesn't support interlaced modes at all, so we can drop the
explicit gen2 checks.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When interlaced sdvo output is used, vsyncshift should supposedly
be (htotal-1)/2. In reality PIPECONF/TRANSCONF will override it by
using the legacy vsyncshift interlace mode which causes the hardware
to ignore the VSYNCSHIFT register.
The only odd thing here is that on PCH platforms we program the
VSYNCSHIFT on both CPU and PCH, and it's not entirely clear if both
sides have to agree on the value or not. On the CPU side there's no
way to override the value via PIPECONF anymore, so if we want to make
the CPU side agree with the PCH side, we should probably program the
approriate value into VSYNCSHIFT manually. So let's do that, but for
now leave the PCH side to still use the legacy interlace mode in
TRANSCONF.
We can also drop the gen2 check since gen2 doesn't support interlaced
modes at all.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We want future generations to at least attempt to use all features, so
restrict the stolen memory disabling when vt-d is enabled to the
latest generation we have reports for. Which is a HSW per the original
report.
Also once we get a bit a hold of some of the mysterious framebuffer in
stolen memory issues that still haunt bugzilla, we should probably
drop this hack again and see what happens.
This was introduced in
commit 0f4706d274
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue Mar 18 14:50:50 2014 +0200
drm/i915: Disable stolen memory when DMAR is active
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68535
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Chris Wilson
Paulo Zanoni
Imre Deak
Jani Nikula
Ville Syrjälä
Jesse Barnes
Daniel Vetter