nd->stack[0] is unused until the handling of trailing symlinks and
we want to get rid of that. Having fucked that transformation up
several times, I went for bloody pedantic series of provably equivalent
transformations. Sorry.
Step 1: keep nd->depth higher by one in link_path_walk() - increment upon
entry, decrement on exits, adjust the arithmetics inside and surround the
calls of functions that care about nd->depth value (nd_alloc_stack(),
get_link(), put_link()) with decrement/increment pairs.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
The only restriction is that on the total amount of symlinks
crossed; how they are nested does not matter
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Array of MAX_NESTED_LINKS + 1 elements put into nameidata;
what used to be a local array in link_path_walk() occupies
entries 1 .. MAX_NESTED_LINKS in it, link and cookie from
the trailing symlink handling loops - entry 0.
This is _not_ the final arrangement; just an easily verified
incremental step.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Deal with skipping leading slashes before what used to be the
recursive call. That way we can get rid of that goto completely.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
absolutely straightforward now - the only variables we need to preserve
across the recursive call are name, link and cookie, and recursion depth
is limited (and can is equal to nd->depth). So arrange an array of
triples to hold instances of those and be done with that.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
reduce the number of returns in there - turn all places
where it returns zero into goto OK and places where it
returns non-zero into goto Err. The only non-trivial
detail is that all breaks in the loop are guaranteed
to be with non-zero err.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
What we do after the second walk_component() + put_link() + depth
decrement in there is exactly equivalent to what's done right
after the first walk_component(). Easy to verify and not at all
surprising, seeing that there we have just walked the last
component of nested symlink.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Pull the block after the if-else in the end of what used to be do-while
body into all branches there. We are almost done with the massage...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
If we get ERR_PTR() from get_link(), we are guaranteed to get err != 0
when we break out of do-while, so we are going to hit if (err) return err;
shortly after it. Pull that into the if (IS_ERR(s)) body.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
... and strip __always_inline from follow_link() - remaining callers
don't need that.
Now link_path_walk() recursion is a direct one.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
shares space with nameidata->next, walk_component() et.al. store
the struct path of symlink instead of returning it into a variable
passed by caller.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Split a piece of fs/namei.c:follow_link() that does obtaining the link
body into a separate function. follow_link() itself is converted to
calling get_link() and then doing the body traversal (if any).
The next step will expand follow_link() call in link_path_walk()
and this helps to keep the size down...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Al Viro