Fix SPI driver to work with SPI flash ST M25P16 on bf548
Currently the SPI driver enables the SPI controller and sets the SPI baud
register for each SPI transfer. But they should never be changed within a SPI
message session, in which several SPI transfers are pumped.
This patch moves SPI setting to the begining of a message session, and
never disables SPI controller until an error occurs.
Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Given the patch which simplifies the spi_sync calling convention, this one
updates the callers of that routine which tried using it according to the
previous specification. (Most didn't.)
Signed-off-by: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Simplify spi_sync calling convention, eliminating the need to check both
the return value AND the message->status. In consequence, this corrects
misbehaviours of spi_read and spi_write (which only checked the former) and
their callers.
Signed-off-by: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add comment to at25 driver that it's for EEPROM chips, not FLASH
chips ... the AT25 series has both types of chip, and sometimes
they're even pin-compatible. The command sets are different, as
is the treatment of erasure. (FLASH needs explicit erasure, but
with EEPROM it's implicit.) Note that all vendors seem to have
this same confusion in their *25* series SPI memory parts.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Lately I've got this nice badness on mdio bus removal:
Device 'e0103120:06' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at drivers/base/core.c:107
NIP: c015c1a8 LR: c015c1a8 CTR: c0157488
REGS: c34bdcf0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.23-rc5-g9ebadfbb-dirty)
MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 24088422 XER: 00000000
...
[c34bdda0] [c015c1a8] device_release+0x78/0x80 (unreliable)
[c34bddb0] [c01354cc] kobject_cleanup+0x80/0xbc
[c34bddd0] [c01365f0] kref_put+0x54/0x6c
[c34bdde0] [c013543c] kobject_put+0x24/0x34
[c34bddf0] [c015c384] put_device+0x1c/0x2c
[c34bde00] [c0180e84] mdiobus_unregister+0x2c/0x58
...
Though actually there is nothing broken, it just device
subsystem core expects another "pattern" of resource managment.
This patch implement phy device's release function, thus
we're getting rid of this badness.
Also small hidden bug fixed, hope none other introduced. ;-)
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Acked-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Eliminate an uninitialized variable warning. The code is correct, but
a pointer to the automatic variable 'addr' is passed to dma_alloc_coherent.
Since addr has never been initialized, and the compiler doesn't know
what dma_alloc_coherent will do with it, it complains.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Turns out we're freeing the skb when we detect CRC error, but we're
not clearing out info->skb. We could either clear it and have the stack
reallocate it, or just leave it and the rx ring refill code will reuse
the one that was allocated.
Reusing a freed skb obviously caused some nasty crashes of various kind,
as reported by Brent Baude and David Woodhouse.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>