* 'for-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hch/hfsplus:
hfsplus: free space correcly for files unlinked while open
hfsplus: fix double lock typo in ioctl
hfsplus_delete_inode only truncates away all block allocations if
i_nlink is zero. Make sure we properly drop the unlink count even
when doing the rename hack for open but unlinked files.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
Make node look as if it was on hlist, with hlist_del()
working correctly. Usable without any locking...
Convert a couple of places where we want to do that to
inode->i_hash.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This was supposed to be a mutex_unlock() instead of a mutex_lock().
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
We need to support -EOPNOTSUPP for attributes that are not supported to
match other filesystems and allow userspace to detect if Posix ACLs
are supported or not. setxattr already gets this right.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
Make sure the initial insertation of the catalog entry already contains
the device number by calling init_special_inode early and setting writing
out the dev field of the on-disk permission structure. The latter is
facilitated by sharing the almost identical hfsplus_set_perms helpers
between initial catalog entry creating and ->write_inode.
Unless we crashed just after mknod this bug was harmless as the inode
is marked dirty at the end of hfsplus_mknod, and hfsplus_write_inode
will update the catalog entry to contain the correct value.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
The rootflags field in hfsplus_inode_info only caches the immutable and
append-only flags in the VFS inode, so we can easily get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
HFS implements hardlink by using indirect catalog entries that refer to a hidden
directly. The link target is cached in the dev field in the HFS+ specific
inode, which is also used for the device number for device files, and inside
for passing the nlink value of the indirect node from hfsplus_cat_write_inode
to a helper function. Now if we happen to write out the indirect node while
hfsplus_link is creating the catalog entry we'll get a link pointing to the
linkid of the current nlink value. This can easily be reproduced by a large
enough loop of local git-clone operations.
Stop abusing the dev field in the HFS+ inode for short term storage by
refactoring the way the permission structure in the catalog entry is
set up, and rename the dev field to linkid to avoid any confusion.
While we're at it also prevent creating hard links to special files, as
the HFS+ dev and linkid share the same space in the on-disk structure.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
hfs seems prone to bad things when it encounters on disk corruption. Many
values are read from disk, and used as lengths to memcpy, as an example.
This patch fixes up several of these problematic cases.
o sanity check the on-disk maximum key lengths on mount
(these are set to a defined value at mkfs time and shouldn't differ)
o check on-disk node keylens against the maximum key length for each tree
o fix hfs_btree_open so that going out via free_tree: doesn't wind
up in hfs_releasepage, which wants to follow the very pointer
we were trying to set up:
HFS_SB(sb)->cat_tree = hfs_btree_open()
.
failure gets to hfs_releasepage and tries to follow HFS_SB(sb)->cat_tree
Tested with the fsfuzzer; it survives more than it used to.
[hch: ported of commit cf05946250 from hfs]
[hch: added the fixes from 5581d018ed3493d226e7a4d645d9c8a5af6c36b]
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
oops and fs corruption; the latter can happen even on valid fs in case of oom.
[hch: port of commit 3d10a15d69 from hfs]
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
A particular fsfuzzer run caused an hfs file system to crash on mount. This
is due to a corrupted MDB extent record causing a miscalculation of
HFSPLUS_I(inode)->first_blocks for the extent tree. If the extent records
are zereod out, then it won't trigger the first_blocks special case and
instead falls through to the extent code, which we're in the middle
of initializing.
This patch catches the 0 size extent records, reports the corruption,
and fails the mount.
[hch: ported of commit 47f365eb57 from hfs]
Reported-by: Ramon de Carvalho Valle <rcvalle@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
When renaming over a directory we need to use hfsplus_rmdir instead of
hfsplus_unlink to evict the victim. This makes sure we properly error out
on non-empty directory as required by Posix (BZ #16571), and it also makes
sure we do the right thing in case i_nlink will every be set correctly for
directories on hfsplus.
Reported-by: Vlado Plaga <rechner@vlado-do.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
Most of the extent handling code already does proper SMP locking, but
hfsplus_write_inode was calling into hfsplus_ext_write_extent without
taking the extents_lock. Fix this by splitting hfsplus_ext_write_extent
into an internal helper that expects the lock, and a public interface
that first acquires it.
Also add a few locking asserts and document the locking rules in
hfsplus_fs.h.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
We already have i_mutex for readdir and the namespace operations that add
entries to open_dir_list, the only thing that was missing was the removal
in hfsplus_dir_release.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
The flags in the HFS+-specific superlock do get modified during runtime,
use atomic bitops to make the modifications SMP safe.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
Lock updates to the mutal fields in the volume header, and document the
locing in the hfsplus_sb_info structure.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
We never walk the list - the only reason for it is to make the resource fork
inodes appear hashed to the writeback code. Borrow a trick from JFS to do
that without needing a list head.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
We never look at it, nor change the next_alloc field in the superblock. So
don't bother caching it or writing it out in hfsplus_sync_fs.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
Al Viro
Linus Torvalds
Christoph Hellwig
Dan Carpenter
Eric Sandeen
Al Viro
Jeff Mahoney
Thomas Gleixner