Commit Graph

164 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ingo Molnar 8bc6782fe2 Merge commit 'fixes.2015.02.23a' into core/rcu
Conflicts:
	kernel/rcu/tree.c

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-03-15 09:01:06 +01:00
Paul Gortmaker abedf8e241 rcu: Use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree
As of commit dae6e64d2b ("rcu: Introduce proper blocking to no-CBs kthreads
GP waits") the RCU subsystem started making use of wait queues.

Here we convert all additions of RCU wait queues to use simple wait queues,
since they don't need the extra overhead of the full wait queue features.

Originally this was done for RT kernels[1], since we would get things like...

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:659
  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 8, name: rcu_preempt
  Pid: 8, comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff8106c8d0>] __might_sleep+0xd0/0xf0
   [<ffffffff817d77b4>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x50
   [<ffffffff8106fcf6>] __wake_up+0x36/0x70
   [<ffffffff810c4542>] rcu_gp_kthread+0x4d2/0x680
   [<ffffffff8105f910>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
   [<ffffffff810c4070>] ? rcu_gp_fqs+0x80/0x80
   [<ffffffff8105eabb>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0
   [<ffffffff8106b912>] ? finish_task_switch+0x52/0x100
   [<ffffffff817e0754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
   [<ffffffff8105e9e0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x60/0x60
   [<ffffffff817e0750>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb

...and hence simple wait queues were deployed on RT out of necessity
(as simple wait uses a raw lock), but mainline might as well take
advantage of the more streamline support as well.

[1] This is a carry forward of work from v3.10-rt; the original conversion
was by Thomas on an earlier -rt version, and Sebastian extended it to
additional post-3.10 added RCU waiters; here I've added a commit log and
unified the RCU changes into one, and uprev'd it to match mainline RCU.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455871601-27484-6-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-02-25 11:27:16 +01:00
Daniel Wagner 065bb78c5b rcu: Do not call rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() while holding rnp->lock
rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() is called while holding rnp->lock. Currently,
this is okay because the wake_up_all() in rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() will
not enable the IRQs. lockdep is happy.

By switching over using swait this is not true anymore. swake_up_all()
enables the IRQs while processing the waiters. __do_softirq() can now
run and will eventually call rcu_process_callbacks() which wants to
grap nrp->lock.

Let's move the rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() call outside the lock before we
switch over to swait.

If we would hold the rnp->lock and use swait, lockdep reports
following:

 =================================
 [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
 4.2.0-rc5-00025-g9a73ba0 #136 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------
 inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
 rcu_preempt/8 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  (rcu_node_1){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff811387c7>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xb97/0xeb0
 {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
   [<ffffffff81109b9f>] __lock_acquire+0xd5f/0x21e0
   [<ffffffff8110be0f>] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x2b0
   [<ffffffff81841cc9>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x59/0xa0
   [<ffffffff81136991>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x141/0x3c0
   [<ffffffff810b1a9d>] __do_softirq+0x14d/0x670
   [<ffffffff810b2214>] irq_exit+0x104/0x110
   [<ffffffff81844e96>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x46/0x60
   [<ffffffff81842e70>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80
   [<ffffffff810dba66>] rq_attach_root+0xa6/0x100
   [<ffffffff810dbc2d>] cpu_attach_domain+0x16d/0x650
   [<ffffffff810e4b42>] build_sched_domains+0x942/0xb00
   [<ffffffff821777c2>] sched_init_smp+0x509/0x5c1
   [<ffffffff821551e3>] kernel_init_freeable+0x172/0x28f
   [<ffffffff8182cdce>] kernel_init+0xe/0xe0
   [<ffffffff8184231f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
 irq event stamp: 76
 hardirqs last  enabled at (75): [<ffffffff81841330>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
 hardirqs last disabled at (76): [<ffffffff8184116f>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x1f/0x90
 softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff810a8df2>] copy_process.part.26+0x602/0x1cf0
 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
        CPU0
        ----
   lock(rcu_node_1);
   <Interrupt>
     lock(rcu_node_1);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
 1 lock held by rcu_preempt/8:
  #0:  (rcu_node_1){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff811387c7>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xb97/0xeb0
 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted 4.2.0-rc5-00025-g9a73ba0 #136
 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820/066N7P, BIOS 2.0.20 01/16/2014
  0000000000000000 000000006d7e67d8 ffff881fb081fbd8 ffffffff818379e0
  0000000000000000 ffff881fb0812a00 ffff881fb081fc38 ffffffff8110813b
  0000000000000000 0000000000000001 ffff881f00000001 ffffffff8102fa4f
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff818379e0>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
  [<ffffffff8110813b>] print_usage_bug+0x1db/0x1e0
  [<ffffffff8102fa4f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
  [<ffffffff811087ad>] mark_lock+0x66d/0x6e0
  [<ffffffff81107790>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x150/0x150
  [<ffffffff81108898>] mark_held_locks+0x78/0xa0
  [<ffffffff81841330>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
  [<ffffffff81108a28>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x168/0x220
  [<ffffffff81108aed>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
  [<ffffffff81841330>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
  [<ffffffff810fd1c7>] swake_up_all+0xb7/0xe0
  [<ffffffff811386e1>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xab1/0xeb0
  [<ffffffff811089bf>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xff/0x220
  [<ffffffff81841341>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x41/0x60
  [<ffffffff81137c30>] ? rcu_barrier+0x20/0x20
  [<ffffffff810d2014>] kthread+0x104/0x120
  [<ffffffff81841330>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
  [<ffffffff810d1f10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x260/0x260
  [<ffffffff8184231f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
  [<ffffffff810d1f10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x260/0x260

Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455871601-27484-5-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-02-25 11:27:16 +01:00
Boqun Feng 67c583a7de RCU: Privatize rcu_node::lock
In patch:

"rcu: Add transitivity to remaining rcu_node ->lock acquisitions"

All locking operations on rcu_node::lock are replaced with the wrappers
because of the need of transitivity, which indicates we should never
write code using LOCK primitives alone(i.e. without a proper barrier
following) on rcu_node::lock outside those wrappers. We could detect
this kind of misuses on rcu_node::lock in the future by adding __private
modifier on rcu_node::lock.

To privatize rcu_node::lock, unlock wrappers are also needed. Replacing
spinlock unlocks with these wrappers not only privatizes rcu_node::lock
but also makes it easier to figure out critical sections of rcu_node.

This patch adds __private modifier to rcu_node::lock and makes every
access to it wrapped by ACCESS_PRIVATE(). Besides, unlock wrappers are
added and raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock) and its friends are replaced with
those wrappers.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2016-02-23 19:59:54 -08:00
Chen Gang 1914aab543 rcu: Remove useless rcu_data_p when !PREEMPT_RCU
The related warning from gcc 6.0:

  In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:4630:0:
  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:810:40: warning: ‘rcu_data_p’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable]
   static struct rcu_data __percpu *const rcu_data_p = &rcu_sched_data;
                                          ^~~~~~~~~~

Also remove always redundant rcu_data_p in tree.c.

Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2016-02-23 19:59:53 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 648c630c64 Merge branches 'doc.2015.12.05a', 'exp.2015.12.07a', 'fixes.2015.12.07a', 'list.2015.12.04b' and 'torture.2015.12.05a' into HEAD
doc.2015.12.05a:  Documentation updates
exp.2015.12.07a:  Expedited grace-period updates
fixes.2015.12.07a:  Miscellaneous fixes
list.2015.12.04b:  Linked-list updates
torture.2015.12.05a:  Torture-test updates
2015-12-07 17:02:54 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney a87f203e27 rcu: Eliminate unused rcu_init_one() argument
Now that the rcu_state structure's ->rda field is compile-time initialized,
there is no need to pass the per-CPU rcu_data structure into rcu_init_one().
This commit therefore eliminates this now-unused parameter.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-12-07 17:01:19 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 46a5d164db rcu: Stop disabling interrupts in scheduler fastpaths
We need the scheduler's fastpaths to be, well, fast, and unnecessarily
disabling and re-enabling interrupts is not necessarily consistent with
this goal.  Especially given that there are regions of the scheduler that
already have interrupts disabled.

This commit therefore moves the call to rcu_note_context_switch()
to one of the interrupts-disabled regions of the scheduler, and
removes the now-redundant disabling and re-enabling of interrupts from
rcu_note_context_switch() and the functions it calls.

Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Shift rcu_note_context_switch() to avoid deadlock, as suggested
  by Peter Zijlstra. ]
2015-12-04 12:27:31 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney f0f2e7d307 rcu: Avoid tick_nohz_active checks on NOCBs CPUs
Currently, rcu_prepare_for_idle() checks for tick_nohz_active, even on
individual NOCBs CPUs, unless all CPUs are marked as NOCBs CPUs at build
time.  This check is pointless on NOCBs CPUs because they never have any
callbacks posted, given that all of their callbacks are handed off to the
corresponding rcuo kthread.  There is a check for individually designated
NOCBs CPUs, but it pointelessly follows the check for tick_nohz_active.

This commit therefore moves the check for individually designated NOCBs
CPUs up with the check for CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-12-04 12:27:31 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 699d403520 rcu: Fix obsolete rcu_bootup_announce_oddness() comment
This function no longer has #ifdefs, so this commit removes the
header comment calling them out.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-12-04 12:27:30 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 8ba9153b2c rcu: Remove lock-acquisition loop from rcu_read_unlock_special()
Several releases have come and gone without the warning triggering,
so remove the lock-acquisition loop.  Retain the WARN_ON_ONCE()
out of sheer paranoia.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-12-04 12:27:30 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 5a9be7c628 rcu: Add rcu_normal kernel parameter to suppress expediting
Although expedited grace periods can be quite useful, and although their
OS jitter has been greatly reduced, they can still pose problems for
extreme real-time workloads.  This commit therefore adds a rcu_normal
kernel boot parameter (which can also be manipulated via sysfs)
to suppress expedited grace periods, that is, to treat requests for
expedited grace periods as if they were requests for normal grace periods.
If both rcu_expedited and rcu_normal are specified, rcu_normal wins.
This means that if you are relying on expedited grace periods to speed up
boot, you will want to specify rcu_expedited on the kernel command line,
and then specify rcu_normal via sysfs once boot completes.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-12-04 12:26:53 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 6cf1008122 rcu: Add transitivity to remaining rcu_node ->lock acquisitions
The rule is that all acquisitions of the rcu_node structure's ->lock
must provide transitivity:  The lock is not acquired that frequently,
and sorting out exactly which required it and which did not would be
a maintenance nightmare.  This commit therefore supplies the needed
transitivity to the remaining ->lock acquisitions.

Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-11-23 10:37:35 -08:00
Peter Zijlstra 2a67e741bb rcu: Create transitive rnp->lock acquisition functions
Providing RCU's memory-ordering guarantees requires that the rcu_node
tree's locking provide transitive memory ordering, which the Linux kernel's
spinlocks currently do not provide unless smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()
is used.  Having a separate smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() after each and
every lock acquisition is error-prone, hard to read, and a bit annoying,
so this commit provides wrapper functions that pull in the
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() invocations.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-11-23 10:37:35 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney d2856b046d Merge branches 'fixes.2015.10.06a' and 'exp.2015.10.07a' into HEAD
exp.2015.10.07a:  Reduce OS jitter of RCU-sched expedited grace periods.
fixes.2015.10.06a:  Miscellaneous fixes.
2015-10-07 16:05:21 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney b08517c76d rcu: Enable stall warnings for synchronize_rcu_expedited()
This commit redirects synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s wait to
synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(), thus enabling RCU CPU
stall warnings.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-10-07 16:02:50 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney 74611ecb0f rcu: Add online/offline info to expedited stall warning message
This commit makes the RCU CPU stall warning message print online/offline
indications immediately after the CPU number.  A "O" indicates global
offline, a "." global online, and a "o" indicates RCU believes that the
CPU is offline for the current grace period and "." otherwise, and an
"N" indicates that RCU believes that the CPU will be offline for the
next grace period, and "." otherwise, all right after the CPU number.
So for CPU 10, you would normally see "10-...:" indicating that everything
believes that the CPU is online.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-10-07 16:02:50 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney dcdb8807ba rcu: Consolidate expedited CPU selection
Now that sync_sched_exp_select_cpus() and sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus()
are identical aside from the the argument to smp_call_function_single(),
this commit consolidates them with a functional argument.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-10-07 16:02:50 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney 7f21aeef72 rcu: Add online/offline info to stall warning message
This commit makes the RCU CPU stall warning message print online/offline
indications immediately after a hyphen following the CPU number.  A "O"
indicates that the global CPU-hotplug system believes that the CPU is
online, a "o" that RCU perceived the CPU to be online at the beginning
of the current expedited grace period, and an "N" that RCU currently
believes that it will perceive the CPU as being online at the beginning
of the next expedited grace period, with "." otherwise for all three
indications.  So for CPU 10, you would normally see "10-OoN:" indicating
that everything believes that the CPU is online.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-10-06 11:10:18 -07:00
Boqun Feng b6a4ae766e rcu: Use rcu_callback_t in call_rcu*() and friends
As we now have rcu_callback_t typedefs as the type of rcu callbacks, we
should use it in call_rcu*() and friends as the type of parameters. This
could save us a few lines of code and make it clear which function
requires an rcu callbacks rather than other callbacks as its argument.

Besides, this can also help cscope to generate a better database for
code reading.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
2015-10-06 11:08:05 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney 5b74c45890 rcu: Make ->cpu_no_qs be a union for aggregate OR
This commit converts the rcu_data structure's ->cpu_no_qs field
to a union.  The bytewise side of this union allows individual access
to indications as to whether this CPU needs to find a quiescent state
for a normal (.norm) and/or expedited (.exp) grace period.  The setwise
side of the union allows testing whether or not a quiescent state is
needed at all, for either type of grace period.

For now, only .norm is used.  A later commit will introduce the expedited
usage.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-09-20 21:16:21 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney 0d43eb34f9 rcu: Invert passed_quiesce and rename to cpu_no_qs
This commit inverts the sense of the rcu_data structure's ->passed_quiesce
field and renames it to ->cpu_no_qs.  This will allow a later commit to
use an "aggregate OR" operation to test expedited as well as normal grace
periods without added overhead.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-09-20 21:16:21 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney 97c668b8e9 rcu: Rename qs_pending to core_needs_qs
An upcoming commit needs to invert the sense of the ->passed_quiesce
rcu_data structure field, so this commit is taking this opportunity
to clarify things a bit by renaming ->qs_pending to ->core_needs_qs.

So if !rdp->core_needs_qs, then this CPU need not concern itself with
quiescent states, in particular, it need not acquire its leaf rcu_node
structure's ->lock to check.  Otherwise, it needs to report the next
quiescent state.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-09-20 21:16:20 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney 8203d6d0ee rcu: Use single-stage IPI algorithm for RCU expedited grace period
The current preemptible-RCU expedited grace-period algorithm invokes
synchronize_sched_expedited() to enqueue all tasks currently running
in a preemptible-RCU read-side critical section, then waits for all the
->blkd_tasks lists to drain.  This works, but results in both an IPI and
a double context switch even on CPUs that do not happen to be running
in a preemptible RCU read-side critical section.

This commit implements a new algorithm that causes less OS jitter.
This new algorithm IPIs all online CPUs that are not idle (from an
RCU perspective), but refrains from self-IPIs.  If a CPU receiving
this IPI is not in a preemptible RCU read-side critical section (or
is just now exiting one), it pushes quiescence up the rcu_node tree,
otherwise, it sets a flag that will be handled by the upcoming outermost
rcu_read_unlock(), which will then push quiescence up the tree.

The expedited grace period must of course wait on any pre-existing blocked
readers, and newly blocked readers must be queued carefully based on
the state of both the normal and the expedited grace periods.  This
new queueing approach also avoids the need to update boost state,
courtesy of the fact that blocked tasks are no longer ever migrated to
the root rcu_node structure.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-09-20 21:16:19 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney b9585e940a rcu: Consolidate tree setup for synchronize_rcu_expedited()
This commit replaces sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init1(() and
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2() with sync_exp_reset_tree_hotplug()
and sync_exp_reset_tree(), which will also be used by
synchronize_sched_expedited(), and sync_rcu_exp_select_nodes(), which
contains code specific to synchronize_rcu_expedited().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-09-20 21:16:18 -07:00