Using offsetof() to calculate name length does not work because
it does not produce consistent results with with structure packing.
This caused memcpy to corrupt memory by copying 4 extra bytes off
the end of the buffer on 64 bit kernels with 32 bit userspace
(the only case where this 32/64 compat code is used).
The fix is to calculate name length directly from the start instead
of trying to derive it later using count and offsetof.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Return immediately from dlm_unlock(CANCEL) if the lock is
granted and not being converted; there's nothing to cancel.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel
of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point),
preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel.
That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored.
Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug
messages in this area.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Integer nodeids can be too large for the idr code; use a hash
table instead.
Signed-off-by: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The ls_dirtbl[].lock was an rwlock, but since it was only used in write
mode a spinlock will suffice.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
dlm_posix_get fills out the relevant fields in the file_lock before
returning when there is a lock conflict, but doesn't clean out any of
the other fields in the file_lock.
When nfsd does a NFSv4 lockt call, it sets the fl_lmops to
nfsd_posix_mng_ops before calling the lower fs. When the lock comes back
after testing a lock on GFS2, it still has that field set. This confuses
nfsd into thinking that the file_lock is a nfsd4 lock.
Fix this by making DLM reinitialize the file_lock before copying the
fields from the conflicting lock.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
We should use the original copy of the file_lock, fl, instead
of the copy, flc in the lockd notify callback. The range in flc has
been modified by posix_lock_file(), so it will not match a copy of the
lock in lockd.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason
to not use a spinlock instead.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The old code would leak iterators and leave reference counts on
rsbs because it was ignoring the "stop" seq callback. The code
followed an example that used the seq operations differently.
This new code is based on actually understanding how the seq
operations work. It also improves things by saving the hash bucket
in the position to avoid cycling through completed buckets in start.
Siged-off-by: Davd Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
fs/dlm/ast.c: In function 'dlm_astd':
fs/dlm/ast.c:64: warning: 'bastmode' may be used uninitialized in this function
Cleans code up.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The new debugfs entry dumps all rsb and lkb structures, and includes
a lot more information than has been available before. This includes
the new timestamps added by a previous patch for debugging callback
issues.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Record the time the latest blocking callback was queued for
a lock. This will be used for debugging in combination with
lock queue timestamp changes in the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the
time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of
just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use
timestamps more widely for debugging all locks.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The lkb bastmode value is set in the context of processing the
lock, and read by the dlm_astd thread. Because it's accessed
in these two separate contexts, the writing/reading ought to
be done under a lock. This is simple to do by setting it and
reading it when the lkb is added to and removed from dlm_astd's
callback list which is properly locked.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Just before delivering a blocking callback (bast), the dlm_astd
thread checks again that the granted mode of the lkb actually
blocks the mode requested by the bast. The idea behind this was
originally that the granted mode may have changed since the bast
was queued, making the callback now unnecessary. Reasons for
removing this extra check are:
- dlm_astd doesn't lock the rsb before reading the lkb grmode, so
it's not technically safe (this removes the long standing FIXME)
- after running some tests, it doesn't appear the check ever actually
eliminates a bast
- delivering an unnecessary blocking callback isn't a bad thing and
can happen anyway
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This is a one-liner to use cond_resched() rather than schedule()
in the ast delivery loop. It should not be necessary to schedule
every time, so this will save some cpu time while continuing to
allow scheduling when required.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Use ls_allocation for memory allocations, which a cluster fs sets to
GFP_NOFS. Use GFP_NOFS for allocations when no lockspace struct is
available. Taking dlm locks needs to avoid calling back into the
cluster fs because write-out can require taking dlm locks.
Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
this warning:
fs/dlm/netlink.c: In function ‘dlm_timeout_warn’:
fs/dlm/netlink.c:131: warning: ‘send_skb’ may be used uninitialized in this function
triggers because GCC does not recognize the (correct) error flow
between prepare_data() and send_skb.
Annotate it.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fixes a regression from commit 0f8e0d9a31,
"dlm: allow multiple lockspace creates".
An extraneous 'else' slipped into a code fragment being moved from
release_lockspace() to dlm_release_lockspace(). The result of the
unwanted 'else' is that dlm threads and structures are not stopped
and cleaned up when the final dlm lockspace is removed. Trying to
create a new lockspace again afterward will fail with
"kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache dlm_conn" because the cache
was not previously destroyed.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
sparc32:
fs/dlm/config.c:397: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
fs/dlm/config.c: In function 'drop_node':
fs/dlm/config.c:589: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
fs/dlm/config.c:589: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
fs/dlm/config.c: In function 'release_node':
fs/dlm/config.c:601: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
fs/dlm/config.c:601: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
fs/dlm/config.c: In function 'show_node':
fs/dlm/config.c:717: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
fs/dlm/config.c:717: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
fs/dlm/config.c: In function 'store_node':
fs/dlm/config.c:726: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
fs/dlm/config.c:726: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
David Teigland
Christine Caulfield
Joe Perches
Steven Whitehouse
Jeff Layton
Linus Torvalds
Andrew Morton
Harvey Harrison
Ingo Molnar