Commit Graph

165 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Suzuki K. Poulose 5e249d4528 uprobes/powerpc: Add dependency on single step emulation
Uprobes uses emulate_step in sstep.c, but we haven't explicitly specified
the dependency. On pseries HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT protects us, but 44x has no
such luxury.

Consolidate other users that depend on sstep and create a new config option.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2013-01-29 11:35:06 +11:00
Anton Blanchard 1fbe9cf259 powerpc: Build kernel with -mcmodel=medium
Finally remove the two level TOC and build with -mcmodel=medium.

Unfortunately we can't build modules with -mcmodel=medium due to
the tricks the kernel module loader plays with percpu data:

# -mcmodel=medium breaks modules because it uses 32bit offsets from
# the TOC pointer to create pointers where possible. Pointers into the
# percpu data area are created by this method.
#
# The kernel module loader relocates the percpu data section from the
# original location (starting with 0xd...) to somewhere in the base
# kernel percpu data space (starting with 0xc...). We need a full
# 64bit relocation for this to work, hence -mcmodel=large.

On older kernels we fall back to the two level TOC (-mminimal-toc)

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2013-01-10 17:00:31 +11:00
Nishanth Aravamudan c8adfeccee powerpc: Fix VMX fix for memcpy case
In 2fae7cdb60 ("powerpc: Fix VMX in
interrupt check in POWER7 copy loops"), Anton inadvertently
introduced a regression for memcpy on POWER7 machines. copyuser and
memcpy diverge slightly in their use of cr1 (copyuser doesn't use it,
but memcpy does) and you end up clobbering that register with your fix.
That results in (taken from an FC18 kernel):

[   18.824604] Unrecoverable VMX/Altivec Unavailable Exception f20 at c000000000052f40
[   18.824618] Oops: Unrecoverable VMX/Altivec Unavailable Exception, sig: 6 [#1]
[   18.824623] SMP NR_CPUS=1024 NUMA pSeries
[   18.824633] Modules linked in: tg3(+) be2net(+) cxgb4(+) ipr(+) sunrpc xts lrw gf128mul dm_crypt dm_round_robin dm_multipath linear raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq raid6_pq async_xor xor async_tx raid1 raid0 scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua squashfs cramfs
[   18.824705] NIP: c000000000052f40 LR: c00000000020b874 CTR: 0000000000000512
[   18.824709] REGS: c000001f1fef7790 TRAP: 0f20   Not tainted  (3.6.0-0.rc6.git0.2.fc18.ppc64)
[   18.824713] MSR: 8000000000009032 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI>  CR: 4802802e  XER: 20000010
[   18.824726] SOFTE: 0
[   18.824728] CFAR: 0000000000000f20
[   18.824731] TASK = c000000fa7128400[0] 'swapper/24' THREAD: c000000fa7480000 CPU: 24
GPR00: 00000000ffffffc0 c000001f1fef7a10 c00000000164edc0 c000000f9b9a8120
GPR04: c000000f9b9a8124 0000000000001438 0000000000000060 03ffffff064657ee
GPR08: 0000000080000000 0000000000000010 0000000000000020 0000000000000030
GPR12: 0000000028028022 c00000000ff25400 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
GPR16: 0000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff c0000000016b2180 c00000000156a500
GPR20: c000000f968c7a90 c0000000131c31d8 c000001f1fef4000 c000000001561d00
GPR24: 000000000000000a 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000012
GPR28: c000000fa5c04f80 00000000000008bc c0000000015c0a28 000000000000022e
[   18.824792] NIP [c000000000052f40] .memcpy_power7+0x5a0/0x7c4
[   18.824797] LR [c00000000020b874] .pcpu_free_area+0x174/0x2d0
[   18.824800] Call Trace:
[   18.824803] [c000001f1fef7a10] [c000000000052c14] .memcpy_power7+0x274/0x7c4 (unreliable)
[   18.824809] [c000001f1fef7b10] [c00000000020b874] .pcpu_free_area+0x174/0x2d0
[   18.824813] [c000001f1fef7bb0] [c00000000020ba88] .free_percpu+0xb8/0x1b0
[   18.824819] [c000001f1fef7c50] [c00000000043d144] .throtl_pd_exit+0x94/0xd0
[   18.824824] [c000001f1fef7cf0] [c00000000043acf8] .blkg_free+0x88/0xe0
[   18.824829] [c000001f1fef7d90] [c00000000018c048] .rcu_process_callbacks+0x2e8/0x8a0
[   18.824835] [c000001f1fef7e90] [c0000000000a8ce8] .__do_softirq+0x158/0x4d0
[   18.824840] [c000001f1fef7f90] [c000000000025ecc] .call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
[   18.824845] [c000000fa7483650] [c000000000010e80] .do_softirq+0x160/0x1a0
[   18.824850] [c000000fa74836f0] [c0000000000a94a4] .irq_exit+0xf4/0x120
[   18.824854] [c000000fa7483780] [c000000000020c44] .timer_interrupt+0x154/0x4d0
[   18.824859] [c000000fa7483830] [c000000000003be0] decrementer_common+0x160/0x180
[   18.824866] --- Exception: 901 at .plpar_hcall_norets+0x84/0xd4
[   18.824866]     LR = .check_and_cede_processor+0x48/0x80
[   18.824871] [c000000fa7483b20] [c00000000007f018] .check_and_cede_processor+0x18/0x80 (unreliable)
[   18.824877] [c000000fa7483b90] [c00000000007f104] .dedicated_cede_loop+0x84/0x150
[   18.824883] [c000000fa7483c50] [c0000000006bc030] .cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x50
[   18.824887] [c000000fa7483cc0] [c0000000006bc9f4] .cpuidle_idle_call+0x104/0x720
[   18.824892] [c000000fa7483d80] [c000000000070af8] .pSeries_idle+0x18/0x40
[   18.824897] [c000000fa7483df0] [c000000000019084] .cpu_idle+0x1a4/0x380
[   18.824902] [c000000fa7483ec0] [c0000000008a4c18] .start_secondary+0x520/0x528
[   18.824907] [c000000fa7483f90] [c0000000000093f0] .start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
[   18.824911] Instruction dump:
[   18.824914] 38840008 90030000 90e30004 38630008 7ca62850 7cc300d0 78c7e102 7cf01120
[   18.824923] 78c60660 39200010 39400020 39600030 <7e00200c> 7c0020ce 38840010 409f001c
[   18.824935] ---[ end trace 0bb95124affaaa45 ]---
[   18.825046] Unrecoverable VMX/Altivec Unavailable Exception f20 at c000000000052d08

I believe the right fix is to make memcpy match usercopy and not use
cr1.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: <stable@kernel.org> [v3.6]
2012-10-04 18:02:43 +10:00
Tiejun Chen 8e9f693715 powerpc/kprobe: Don't emulate store when kprobe stwu r1
We don't do the real store operation for kprobing 'stwu Rx,(y)R1'
since this may corrupt the exception frame, now we will do this
operation safely in exception return code after migrate current
exception frame below the kprobed function stack.

So we only update gpr[1] here and trigger a thread flag to mask
this.

Note we should make sure if we trigger kernel stack over flow.

Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-09-18 15:32:45 +10:00
Benjamin Herrenschmidt 636802ef96 powerpc: Don't use __put_user() in patch_instruction
patch_instruction() can be called very early on ppc32, when the kernel
isn't yet running at it's linked address. That can cause the !
is_kernel_addr() test in __put_user() to trip and call might_sleep()
which is very bad at that point during boot.

Use a lower level function instead for now, at least until we get to
rework ppc32 boot process to do the code patching later, like ppc64
does.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-09-05 16:05:23 +10:00
Anton Blanchard 2fae7cdb60 powerpc: Fix VMX in interrupt check in POWER7 copy loops
The enhanced prefetch hint patches corrupt the condition register
that was used to check if we are in interrupt. Fix this by using cr1.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-08-24 20:26:09 +10:00
Anton Blanchard dad477ccd6 powerpc: POWER7 copy_to_user/copy_from_user patch applied twice
"powerpc: Use enhanced touch instructions in POWER7
copy_to_user/copy_from_user" was applied twice. Remove one.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-08-24 20:26:09 +10:00
Stephen Rothwell 1d5a436d2c powerpc: Put the gpr save/restore functions in their own section
This allows the linker to know that calls to them do not need to switch
TOC and stop errors like the following when linking large configurations:

powerpc64-linux-ld: drivers/built-in.o: In function `.gpiochip_is_requested':
(.text+0x4): sibling call optimization to `_savegpr0_29' does not allow automatic multiple TOCs; recompile with -mminimal-toc or -fno-optimize-sibling-calls, or make `_savegpr0_29' extern

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-11 14:19:59 +10:00
Michael Neuling e55174e911 powerpc: Fixes for instructions not using correct register naming
These macros are using integers where they could be using logical
names since they take registers.

We are going to enforce this soon, so fix these up now.

Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-10 19:18:16 +10:00
Michael Neuling 86e32fdce7 powerpc: Change mtcrf to use real register names
mtocrf define is just a wrapper around the real instructions so we can
just use real register names here (ie. lower case).

Also remove braces in macro so this is possible.

Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-10 19:18:11 +10:00
Michael Neuling 44ce6a5ee7 powerpc: Merge STK_REG/PARAM/FRAMESIZE
Merge the defines of STACKFRAMESIZE, STK_REG, STK_PARAM from different
places.

Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-10 19:18:03 +10:00
Michael Neuling c75df6f96c powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change
Anything that uses a constructed instruction (ie. from ppc-opcode.h),
need to use the new R0 macro, as %r0 is not going to work.

Also convert usages of macros where we are just determining an offset
(usually for a load/store), like:
	std	r14,STK_REG(r14)(r1)
Can't use STK_REG(r14) as %r14 doesn't work in the STK_REG macro since
it's just calculating an offset.

Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-10 19:17:55 +10:00
Anton Blanchard cf8fb5533f powerpc: Optimise the 64bit optimised __clear_user
I blame Mikey for this. He elevated my slightly dubious testcase:

to benchmark status. And naturally we need to be number 1 at creating
zeros. So lets improve __clear_user some more.

As Paul suggests we can use dcbz for large lengths. This patch gets
the destination cacheline aligned then uses dcbz on whole cachelines.

Before:
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 0.414744 s, 25.3 GB/s

After:
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 0.268597 s, 39.0 GB/s

39 GB/s, a new record.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Tested-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:48 +10:00
Anton Blanchard b3f271e86e powerpc: POWER7 optimised memcpy using VMX and enhanced prefetch
Implement a POWER7 optimised memcpy using VMX and enhanced prefetch
instructions.

This is a copy of the POWER7 optimised copy_to_user/copy_from_user
loop. Detailed implementation and performance details can be found in
commit a66086b819 (powerpc: POWER7 optimised
copy_to_user/copy_from_user using VMX).

I noticed memcpy issues when profiling a RAID6 workload:

	.memcpy
	.async_memcpy
	.async_copy_data
	.__raid_run_ops
	.handle_stripe
	.raid5d
	.md_thread

I created a simplified testcase by building a RAID6 array with 4 1GB
ramdisks (booting with brd.rd_size=1048576):

# mdadm -CR -e 1.2 /dev/md0 --level=6 -n4 /dev/ram[0-3]

I then timed how long it took to write to the entire array:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1M

Before: 892 MB/s
After:  999 MB/s

A 12% improvement.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:46 +10:00
Anton Blanchard bce4b4bd91 powerpc: Use enhanced touch instructions in POWER7 copy_to_user/copy_from_user
Version 2.06 of the POWER ISA introduced enhanced touch instructions,
allowing us to specify a number of attributes including the length of
a stream.

This patch adds a software stream for both loads and stores in the
POWER7 copy_tofrom_user loop. Since the setup is quite complicated
and we have to use an eieio to ensure correct ordering of the "GO"
command we only do this for copies above 4kB.

To quantify any performance improvements we need a working set
bigger than the caches so we operate on a 1GB file:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/foo bs=1M count=1024

And we compare how fast we can read the file:

# dd if=/tmp/foo of=/dev/null bs=1M

before: 7.7 GB/s
after:  9.6 GB/s

A 25% improvement.

The worst case for this patch will be a completely L1 cache contained
copy of just over 4kB. We can test this with the copy_to_user
testcase we used to tune copy_tofrom_user originally:

http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/copy_to_user.c

# time ./copy_to_user2 -l 4224 -i 10000000

before: 6.807 s
after:  6.946 s

A 2% slowdown, which seems reasonable considering our data is unlikely
to be completely L1 contained.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:45 +10:00
Anton Blanchard fde69282b7 powerpc: POWER7 optimised copy_page using VMX and enhanced prefetch
Implement a POWER7 optimised copy_page using VMX and enhanced
prefetch instructions. We use enhanced prefetch hints to prefetch
both the load and store side. We copy a cacheline at a time and
fall back to regular loads and stores if we are unable to use VMX
(eg we are in an interrupt).

The following microbenchmark was used to assess the impact of
the patch:

http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/page_fault_file.c

We test MAP_PRIVATE page faults across a 1GB file, 100 times:

# time ./page_fault_file -p -l 1G -i 100

Before: 22.25s
After:  18.89s

17% faster

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:44 +10:00
Anton Blanchard 6f7839e542 powerpc: Rename copyuser_power7_vmx.c to vmx-helper.c
Subsequent patches will add more VMX library functions and it makes
sense to keep all the c-code helper functions in the one file.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:43 +10:00
Anton Blanchard a9514dc69d powerpc: Use enhanced touch instructions in POWER7 copy_to_user/copy_from_user
Version 2.06 of the POWER ISA introduced enhanced touch instructions,
allowing us to specify a number of attributes including the length of
a stream.

This patch adds a software stream for both loads and stores in the
POWER7 copy_tofrom_user loop. Since the setup is quite complicated
and we have to use an eieio to ensure correct ordering of the "GO"
command we only do this for copies above 4kB.

To quantify any performance improvements we need a working set
bigger than the caches so we operate on a 1GB file:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/foo bs=1M count=1024

And we compare how fast we can read the file:

# dd if=/tmp/foo of=/dev/null bs=1M

before: 7.7 GB/s
after:  9.6 GB/s

A 25% improvement.

The worst case for this patch will be a completely L1 cache contained
copy of just over 4kB. We can test this with the copy_to_user
testcase we used to tune copy_tofrom_user originally:

http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/copy_to_user.c

# time ./copy_to_user2 -l 4224 -i 10000000

before: 6.807 s
after:  6.946 s

A 2% slowdown, which seems reasonable considering our data is unlikely
to be completely L1 contained.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:42 +10:00
Anton Blanchard 17968fbbd1 powerpc: 64bit optimised __clear_user
I noticed __clear_user high up in a profile of one of my RAID stress
tests. The testcase was doing a dd from /dev/zero which ends up
calling __clear_user.

__clear_user is basically a loop with a single 4 byte store which
is horribly slow. We can do much better by aligning the desination
and doing 32 bytes of 8 byte stores in a loop.

The following testcase was used to verify the patch:

http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/stress_clear_user.c

To show the improvement in performance I ran a dd from /dev/zero
to /dev/null on a POWER7 box:

Before:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10000
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 3.72379 s, 2.8 GB/s

After:

# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10000
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 0.728318 s, 14.4 GB/s

Over 5x faster.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:41 +10:00
Steven Rostedt b6e3796834 powerpc: Have patch_instruction detect faults
For ftrace to use the patch_instruction code, it needs to check for
faults on write. Ftrace updates code all over the kernel, and we need to
know if code is updated or not due to protections that are placed on
some portions of the kernel. If ftrace does not detect a fault, it will
error later on, and it will be much more difficult to find the problem.

By changing patch_instruction() to detect faults, then ftrace will be
able to make use of it too.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-07-03 14:14:38 +10:00
Paul Mackerras 1629372caa powerpc: Use the new generic strncpy_from_user() and strnlen_user()
This is much the same as for SPARC except that we can do the find_zero()
function more efficiently using the count-leading-zeroes instructions.
Tested on 32-bit and 64-bit PowerPC.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-05-27 21:00:07 -07:00
Anton Blanchard 694caf0255 powerpc: Remove CONFIG_POWER4_ONLY
Remove CONFIG_POWER4_ONLY, the option is badly named and only does two
things:

- It wraps the MMU segment table code. With feature fixups there is
  little downside to compiling this in.

- It uses the newer mtocrf instruction in various assembly functions.
  Instead of making this a compile option just do it at runtime via
  a feature fixup.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-04-30 15:37:26 +10:00
David Howells ae3a197e3d Disintegrate asm/system.h for PowerPC
Disintegrate asm/system.h for PowerPC.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
2012-03-28 18:30:02 +01:00
Stephen Rothwell f5339277eb powerpc: Remove FW_FEATURE ISERIES from arch code
This is no longer selectable, so just remove all the dependent code.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-03-21 11:16:11 +11:00
Anton Blanchard a66086b819 powerpc: POWER7 optimised copy_to_user/copy_from_user using VMX
Implement a POWER7 optimised copy_to_user/copy_from_user using VMX.
For large aligned copies this new loop is over 10% faster, and for
large unaligned copies it is over 200% faster.

If we take a fault we fall back to the old version, this keeps
things relatively simple and easy to verify.

On POWER7 unaligned stores rarely slow down - they only flush when
a store crosses a 4KB page boundary. Furthermore this flush is
handled completely in hardware and should be 20-30 cycles.

Unaligned loads on the other hand flush much more often - whenever
crossing a 128 byte cache line, or a 32 byte sector if either sector
is an L1 miss.

Considering this information we really want to get the loads aligned
and not worry about the alignment of the stores. Microbenchmarks
confirm that this approach is much faster than the current unaligned
copy loop that uses shifts and rotates to ensure both loads and
stores are aligned.

We also want to try and do the stores in cacheline aligned, cacheline
sized chunks. If the store queue is unable to merge an entire
cacheline of stores then the L2 cache will have to do a
read/modify/write. Even worse, we will serialise this with the stores
in the next iteration of the copy loop since both iterations hit
the same cacheline.

Based on this, the new loop does the following things:

1 - 127 bytes
Get the source 8 byte aligned and use 8 byte loads and stores. Pretty
boring and similar to how the current loop works.

128 - 4095 bytes
Get the source 8 byte aligned and use 8 byte loads and stores,
1 cacheline at a time. We aren't doing the stores in cacheline
aligned chunks so we will potentially serialise once per cacheline.
Even so it is much better than the loop we have today.

4096 - bytes
If both source and destination have the same alignment get them both
16 byte aligned, then get the destination cacheline aligned. Do
cacheline sized loads and stores using VMX.

If source and destination do not have the same alignment, we get the
destination cacheline aligned, and use permute to do aligned loads.

In both cases the VMX loop should be optimal - we always do aligned
loads and stores and are always doing stores in cacheline aligned,
cacheline sized chunks.

To be able to use VMX we must be careful about interrupts and
sleeping. We don't use the VMX loop when in an interrupt (which should
be rare anyway) and we wrap the VMX loop in disable/enable_pagefault
and fall back to the existing copy_tofrom_user loop if we do need to
sleep.

The VMX breakpoint of 4096 bytes was chosen using this microbenchmark:

http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/copy_to_user.c

Since we are using VMX and there is a cost to saving and restoring
the user VMX state there are two broad cases we need to benchmark:

- Best case - userspace never uses VMX

- Worst case - userspace always uses VMX

In reality a userspace process will sit somewhere between these two
extremes. Since we need to test both aligned and unaligned copies we
end up with 4 combinations. The point at which the VMX loop begins to
win is:

0% VMX
aligned		2048 bytes
unaligned	2048 bytes

100% VMX
aligned		16384 bytes
unaligned	8192 bytes

Considering this is a microbenchmark, the data is hot in cache and
the VMX loop has better store queue merging properties we set the
breakpoint to 4096 bytes, a little below the unaligned breakpoints.

Some future optimisations we can look at:

- Looking at the perf data, a significant part of the cost when a
  task is always using VMX is the extra exception we take to restore
  the VMX state. As such we should do something similar to the x86
  optimisation that restores FPU state for heavy users. ie:

        /*
         * If the task has used fpu the last 5 timeslices, just do a full
         * restore of the math state immediately to avoid the trap; the
         * chances of needing FPU soon are obviously high now
         */
        preload_fpu = tsk_used_math(next_p) && next_p->fpu_counter > 5;

  and

        /*
         * fpu_counter contains the number of consecutive context switches
         * that the FPU is used. If this is over a threshold, the lazy fpu
         * saving becomes unlazy to save the trap. This is an unsigned char
         * so that after 256 times the counter wraps and the behavior turns
         * lazy again; this to deal with bursty apps that only use FPU for
         * a short time
         */

- We could create a paca bit to mirror the VMX enabled MSR bit and check
  that first, avoiding multiple calls to calling enable_kernel_altivec.
  That should help with iovec based system calls like readv.

- We could have two VMX breakpoints, one for when we know the user VMX
  state is loaded into the registers and one when it isn't. This could
  be a second bit in the paca so we can calculate the break points quickly.

- One suggestion from Ben was to save and restore the VSX registers
  we use inline instead of using enable_kernel_altivec.

[BenH: Fixed a problem with preempt and fixed build without CONFIG_ALTIVEC]

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2011-12-19 14:40:40 +11:00