It seems that the pipe-a power well has replaced the disp2d power well
on chv. At least that's the case with the current punit firmware. So
enable the pipe-a power and expand its domains to cover everything the
disp2d well ought to cover.
The other power wells (apart from the cmnlane wells) still seem awol
in the current punit firmware. So leave them disabled in the code.
This fixes a hilarious oops during resume on bsw where
intel_hdmi_get_config() would read the port register and get back
0xffffffff and thus think the port is enabled on pipe D. It would then
go and index the pipe_to_crtc_mapping[] array with PIPE_D and blow up
when intel_hdmi_get_config() tries to write to crtc->config. Someone
really ought to replace all naked pipe_to_crtc_mapping[] uses with the
appropriate function call so we could add a warning there if the pipe
doesn't actually exist...
We must also call the power seqeuencer state reset function from
the pipe-a well disable just like we do from disp2d on vlv. Otherwise
the eDP panel won't recover at resume time since the PPS has lost its
hold on the port.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84903
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CHV has a programmable CSC unit on the pipe B sprites. Program the unit
appropriately for BT.601 limited range YCbCr to full range RGB color
conversion. This matches the programming we currently do for sprites
on the other pipes and on other platforms.
It seems the CSC only works when the input data is YCbCr. For RGB
pixel formats it doesn't matter what we program into the CSC registers.
Doesn't make much sense to me especially since the register names give
the impression that RGB input data would also work. But that's how
it behaves here.
In the review discussions there's been some nice math to explain the
values obtained here. First about the YCbCr->RGB matrix:
"I had the RGB->YCbCr matrix, inverted it and the values came out. But they
should match the wikipedia article. Also keep in mind that the coefficients
are in .12 in fixed point format, hence we need a 1<<12 factor. So let's
try it:
Kb=.114
Kr=.299
(1<<12) * 255/219 ~= 4769
-(1<<12) * 255/112*(1-Kb)*Kb/(1-Kb-Kr) ~= -1605
-(1<<12) * 255/112*(1-Kr)*Kr/(1-Kb-Kr) ~= -3330
(1<<12) * 255/112*(1-Kr) ~= 6537
(1<<12) * 255/112*(1-Kb) ~= 8263
"Looks like the same values to me."
And then about the limits used for clamping:
"> where did you get these min/max?
"The hardware apparently deals in 10bit values, so we need to multiply everything
by 4 when we start with the 8bit min/max values.
Y = [16:235] * 4 = [64:940]
CbCr = ([16:240] - 128) * 4 = [-112:112] * 4 = [-448:448]
"The -128 being the -0.5 bias that the hardware already applied before
the data entered the CSC unit."
Raw data is also supplied in 10bpc in the registers.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[danvet: Copypaste explanations&math from the review discussion.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We want to run intel_uncore_early_sanitize() before we touch any
registers, because on BDW, when we resume, the FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM bit
is set, so we need to clear it - through intel_uncore_early_sanitize()
- before we do anything else. With the current code, we don't clear
the bit before our first register access, so we print a WARN
complaining about an unclaimed register error.
v1: Was called "drm/i915: run intel_uncore_early_sanitize earlier on
resume"
v2: Was called "drm/i915: run intel_uncore_early_sanitize earlier on
resume on non-VLV"
v3: This one, on top of the intel_resume_prepare() rework.
v4: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because, really, the abstraction is not working for us. It is nice for
VLV, but doesn't add anything useful on SNB/HSW/BDW. We want to change
this code due to a recently-discovered bug, but we can't seem to find
a nice solution that repects the current abstraction. So let's kill
intel_resume_prepare() and its friends, and add an equivalent
implementation to both its callers.
Also, look at the diffstat!
v2: - Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CHV adds a bunch of new registers for primary plane size/position and
pipe blender setup. Initialize all those registers to avoid nasty
surprises. PRIMSIZE is especially important as without programming it
the outout will be garbled whenever the primary plane size would not
match what the BIOS set up.
Also program the sprite constant alpha register to disable the constant
alpha blending factor. This applies to vlv as well as chv.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In case the cmnlane power well is down but cmnreset isn't asserted we
would currently skip the off+on toggle for the power well. That could
leave cmnreset deasserted while cmnlane is powered down which might
lead to problems with the PHY.
To avoid such issues skip the cmnlane toggle only if both cmnlane and
disp2d wells are up and cmnreset is already deasserted. In all other
cases power down the cmnlane well which will also make sure cmnreset
gets asserted correctly while cmnlane is powered down.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The power seqeuencer kick procedure requires the DPLL to be running
in order to complete successfully. In case the DPLL isn't currently
running when we need to kick the power seqeuncer enable it
temporarily. This can happen eg. during ->detect() when the pipe is
not already active.
To avoid needlessly duplicating the DPLL programming re-use the already
existing functions by passing a temporary pipe config to them instead
of having them consult the current pipe config at crtc->config.
v2: Introduce vlv_force_pll_{on,off}() (Daniel)
v3: Rebase due to drm_crtc vs. intel_crtc changes
Fix a typo in commit msg (checkpatch)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> (v1)
[danvet: Appease checkpatch.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
eDP ports need the power seqeuncer whenever the port is active. Warn if
we accidentally steal the power sequener from an active eDP port. This
should not happen unless there's a bug somewhere else, but it's best to
scream loudly if it happens to help with debugging.
Note that this only checks for active pipes and not for enabled pipes
which are turned off with dpms. Which means we might run the risk that
the pps might get stolen and we can't reacquire one when enabling the
pipe again with dpms on. But on current platforms that's impossible
since we only support two edp ports with just two panel power
sequencers. So a more elaborate scheme which reserves the pps even
when the pipe is inactive isn't required.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Summarize my discussion with Ville about dpms on/off issues.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We should never enable the panel power twice. That would indicate a bug
somewhere else as we would need to enable the port twice without
disabling it in between. Also print the port name.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In case we fumble something and end up picking an already used power
seqeuencer in vlv_power_sequencer_pipe() at least try to steal it
gracefully. In theory this should never happen though.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
VLV gets confused if two power sequencers have the same port selected.
It would seem the port doesn't start up properly in the is case and
vlv_wait_port_ready() will fail as will the link training. Clearing the
port select in the PP_ON_DELAYS register fixes this problem.
CHV doesn't seem to need this, but it doesn't seem to hurt either so
let's just do it for both to keep the code between the platforms as
uniform as possible.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If there's no power sequencer assigned to the port currently we can't
very well have vdd or panel power enabled either. If we would try to
check that from the pps registers we'd need to pick a power seqeuncer
and kick it. So let's skip the register read and the kick.
Note that there's still a bit an issue about correctly recovering pps
state from resume if the bios is nasty: With this check we'll always
assume that the pps is off. But that's better done in a follow-up
patch and it shouldn't be too harmful - at most we waste time enabling
the pps if it's on already.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add note about resume issues Imre spotted.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When we pick a new power sequencer for the port but we're not doing a
full modeset, the power sequencer may have locked on to another port (or
no port). So kick it a bit to make sure it controls the port we want.
Again just like when we attempt to actually enable the DP port, we
must first write the port register with the approriate value except
the enable bit, and then we must enable the port to make the power
sequencer happy. In this case since we don't want the port actually
enabled we just toggle it on and immediately back off. Going forward
the power sequencer will keep working on that specific port until again
moved to another port.
v2: Refine the kick procedure
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When switching from one pipe to another, the power sequencer of the new
pipe seems to need a bit of kicking to lock into the port. Even the vdd
force bit doesn't work before the power sequencer has been sufficiently
kicked, so this must be done before any AUX transactions are attempted.
After extensive experimentation I've determined that it's sufficient
to first write the port register with the correct values except the
port must remain disabled, then we can do a second write to enable the
port, after which the power sequencer is operational and allows the port
to start up properly.
Contrary to my earlier theories we don't need to enable the port with
the idle pattern, so let's just use training pattern 1 as that's what
other platforms use here.
v2: Refine the kick procedure
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Just grab the pps_mutex once and do all the pps panel startup operations
while holding the mutex instead of grabbing the mutex separately for
each individual step.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We'll be needing to the call the power seqeuencer functions while
already holding pps_mutex, so split the locking out to small wrapper
functions.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Since we read the current power seqeuncer delays from the registers
(as well as looking at the vbt and spec values) we may end up
corrupting delays we already initialized when we switch to another
pipe and the power seqeuncer there has different values currently
in the registers.
So make sure we only initialize the delays once even if
intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer() gets called multiple times.
There was some discussion in the review about when exactly we need to
unlock the pps. Quoting Bspec:
"If this bit is not a zero, it activates the register write protect
and writes to those registers will be ignored unless the write
protect key value is set in the panel sequencing control register."
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add Bspec quote per review discussion between Imre and
Ville.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The power seqeuncer delays are fixed for a given panel, so we can keep
them around once computed.
Not that on VLV/CHV we still re-compute them every time we initialize
the power seqeuncer registers, but that will change soon enough.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
want_panel_vdd is a bool so it can't cope with interleaving on/off calls
from multiple threads. If we want to make that possible we'd need to
convert want_panel_vdd into a proper ref count. But an easier fix is to
remove the high level vdd on/off calls from detect/hpd code paths and
just rely on the delayed vdd off to avoid needless vdd on<->off ping
pong.
After this change only the encoder enable/disable paths use the high
level functions, which is fine since both the on and off low level edp
vdd calls from intel_dp_aux_ch() happen without dropping pps_mutex in
between and so want_panel_vdd can't change in between.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Ville Syrjälä
Paulo Zanoni
Gustavo Padovan