Commit Graph

51 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matthew Garrett ad71c96213 PCI: pcie: Add support for setting default ASPM policy
Distributions may wish to provide different defaults for PCIE ASPM
depending on their target audience. Provide a configuration option for
choosing the default policy.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2012-02-17 09:22:03 -08:00
Matthew Garrett 3c076351c4 PCI: Rework ASPM disable code
Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates
that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation
"PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think
that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform
grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features -
including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless
the platform has granted us that control.

This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing
of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS.
The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the
ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been
disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where
only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the
BIOS state.

It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do -
there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these
components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this
bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone.

Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2011-12-05 10:21:45 -08:00
Michael Witten 8072ba1ba7 PCIe ASPM: forcedly -> forcibly
Merriam-Webster tells us that the word exists. However ...

  * Google suggests `forcibly' because it doesn't recognize `forcedly'.
  * Google lists 494 thousand results for `forcedly'.
  * Google lists 13.7 million results for `forcibly'.
  * Linus's repo contains  1 occurrence  of `forcedly' ( 0 after my change).
  * Linus's repo contains 60 occurrences of `forcibly' (61 after my change).

Signed-off-by: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2011-06-29 14:24:14 +02:00
Yinghai Lu 9f728f53dd PCI/e1000e: Add and use pci_disable_link_state_locked()
Need to use it in _e1000e_disable_aspm.  This routine is used for error
recovery, where the pci_bus_sem is already held, and we don't want
pci_disable_link_state to try to take it again.  So add a locked variant
for use in cases like this.

Found lock up:

[ 2374.654557] kworker/32:1    D ffff881027f6b0f0     0  6075      2 0x00000000
[ 2374.654816]  ffff88503f099a68 0000000000000046 ffff88503f098000 0000000000004000
[ 2374.654837]  00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503f099fd8 00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503f099fd8
[ 2374.654860]  0000000000004000 00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503dcc8000 ffff88503f090000
[ 2374.654880] Call Trace:
[ 2374.654898]  [<ffffffff810b1302>] ? __lock_acquired+0x3a/0x224
[ 2374.654914]  [<ffffffff81c2b59c>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x36
[ 2374.654925]  [<ffffffff810b069d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x178
[ 2374.654936]  [<ffffffff81c2ab24>] rwsem_down_failed_common+0xd3/0x103
[ 2374.654945]  [<ffffffff810b158f>] ? __lock_contended+0x3a/0x2a2
[ 2374.654955]  [<ffffffff81c2ab7b>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0x12/0x14
[ 2374.654967]  [<ffffffff813371e4>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x14/0x30
[ 2374.654981]  [<ffffffff8135df20>] ? pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5
[ 2374.654990]  [<ffffffff81c2a0e6>] ? down_read+0x7e/0x91
[ 2374.654999]  [<ffffffff8135df20>] ? pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5
[ 2374.655008]  [<ffffffff8135df20>] pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5
[ 2374.655024]  [<ffffffff81661796>] e1000e_disable_aspm+0x55/0x5a
[ 2374.655037]  [<ffffffff816677eb>] e1000_io_slot_reset+0x59/0xea
[ 2374.655048]  [<ffffffff8135fe0d>] ? report_mmio_enabled+0x5d/0x5d
[ 2374.655057]  [<ffffffff8135fe3b>] report_slot_reset+0x2e/0x5d
[ 2374.655072]  [<ffffffff8135369e>] pci_walk_bus+0x8a/0xb7
[ 2374.655081]  [<ffffffff8135fe0d>] ? report_mmio_enabled+0x5d/0x5d
[ 2374.655091]  [<ffffffff813603be>] broadcast_error_message+0xa4/0xb2
[ 2374.655101]  [<ffffffff81352c71>] ? pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x72/0x80
[ 2374.655110]  [<ffffffff813606df>] do_recovery+0x9e/0xf9
[ 2374.655120]  [<ffffffff81360786>] handle_error_source+0x4c/0x51
[ 2374.655129]  [<ffffffff81360974>] aer_isr_one_error+0x1e9/0x21a
[ 2374.655138]  [<ffffffff81360a6c>] aer_isr+0xc7/0xcc
[ 2374.655147]  [<ffffffff813609a5>] ? aer_isr_one_error+0x21a/0x21a
[ 2374.655159]  [<ffffffff81096d9f>] process_one_work+0x237/0x3ec
[ 2374.655168]  [<ffffffff81096d10>] ? process_one_work+0x1a8/0x3ec
[ 2374.655178]  [<ffffffff8109728d>] worker_thread+0x17c/0x240
[ 2374.655186]  [<ffffffff810b0803>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 2374.655196]  [<ffffffff81097111>] ? manage_workers+0xab/0xab
[ 2374.655209]  [<ffffffff8109c8ed>] kthread+0xa0/0xa8
[ 2374.655223]  [<ffffffff81c332d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 2374.655232]  [<ffffffff81c2b880>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[ 2374.655243]  [<ffffffff8109c84d>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5b/0x5b
[ 2374.655252]  [<ffffffff81c332d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb

when aer happens,
pci_walk_bus already have down_read(&pci_bus_sem)...
then report_slot_reset
        ==> e1000_io_slot_reset
                ==> e1000e_disable_aspm
                        ==> pci_disable_link_state...

We can not use pci_disable_link_state, and it will try to hold pci_bus_sem again.

Try to have __pci_disable_link_state that will not need to hold pci_bus_sem.

-v2: change name to pci_disable_link_state_locked() according to Jesse.

[jbarnes: make sure new function is exported for modules]

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2011-05-21 12:16:44 -07:00
Alex Williamson 3504e47ffc PCI: Enable ASPM state clearing regardless of policy
Commit 2f671e2d allowed us to clear ASPM state when the FADT
tells us it isn't supported, but we don't put this into effect
if the aspm_policy is set to POLICY_POWERSAVE.  Enable the
state to be cleared regardless of policy.

Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2011-05-10 15:43:28 -07:00
Naga Chumbalkar bbfa306a1e PCI: Changing ASPM policy, via /sys, to POWERSAVE could cause NMIs
v3 -> v2: Modified the text that describes the problem
v2 -> v1: Returned -EPERM
v1      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013194803727&w=2

For servers whose hardware cannot handle ASPM the BIOS ought to set the
FADT bit shown below:
In Sec 5.2.9.3 (IA-PC Boot Arch. Flags) of ACPI4.0a Specification, please
see Table 5-11:
PCIe ASPM Controls: If set, indicates to OSPM that it must not enable
OPSM ASPM control on this platform.

However there are shipping servers whose BIOS did not set this bit. (An
example is the HP ProLiant DL385 G6. A Maintenance BIOS will fix that).
For such servers even if a call is made via pci_no_aspm(), based on _OSC
support in the BIOS, it may be too late because the ASPM code may have
already allocated and filled its "link_list".

So if a user sets the ASPM "policy" to "powersave" via /sys then
pcie_aspm_set_policy() will run through the "link_list" and re-configure
ASPM policy on devices that advertise ASPM L0s/L1 capability:
# echo powersave > /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy
# cat /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy
default performance [powersave]

That can cause NMIs since the hardware doesn't play well with ASPM:
[ 1651.906015] NMI: PCI system error (SERR) for reason b1 on CPU 0.
[ 1651.906015] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue

Ideally, the BIOS should have set that FADT bit in the first place but we
could be more robust - especially given the fact that Windows doesn't
cause NMIs in the above scenario.

There should be a sanity check to not allow a user to modify ASPM policy
when aspm_disabled is set.

Signed-off-by: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2011-03-21 09:40:57 -07:00
Naga Chumbalkar 1a680b7c32 PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPM under POWERSAVE mode
v3 -> v2: Moved ASPM enabling logic to pci_set_power_state()
v2 -> v1: Preserved the logic in pci_raw_set_power_state()
	: Added ASPM enabling logic after scanning Root Bridge
	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130046996216391&w=2
v1	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013164703283&w=2

The assumption made in commit 41cd766b06
(PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it) that
pci_enable_device() will result in re-configuring ASPM when aspm_policy is
POWERSAVE is no longer valid.  This is due to commit
97c145f7c8 (PCI: read current power state
at enable time) which resets dev->current_state to D0. Due to this the
call to pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() is never made. Note the equality check
(below) that returns early:
./drivers/pci/pci.c: pci_raw_set_pci_power_state()
546         /* Check if we're already there */
547         if (dev->current_state == state)
548                 return 0;

Therefore OSPM never configures the PCIe links for ASPM to turn them "on".

Fix it by configuring ASPM from the pci_enable_device() code path. This
also allows a driver such as the e1000e networking driver a chance to
disable ASPM (L0s, L1), if need be, prior to enabling the device. A
driver may perform this action if the device is known to mis-behave
wrt ASPM.

Signed-off-by: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2011-03-21 09:40:43 -07:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 8b8bae901c PCI/ACPI: Report ASPM support to BIOS if not disabled from command line
We need to distinguish the situation in which ASPM support is
disabled from the command line or through .config from the situation
in which it is disabled, because the hardware or BIOS can't handle
it.  In the former case we should not report ASPM support to the BIOS
through ACPI _OSC, but in the latter case we should do that.

Introduce pcie_aspm_support_enabled() that can be used by
acpi_pci_root_add() to determine whether or not it should report ASPM
support to the BIOS through _OSC.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29722
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232
Reported-and-tested-by: Ortwin Glück <odi@odi.ch>
Reviewed-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2011-03-21 09:38:02 -07:00
Matthew Garrett 2f671e2dbf PCI: Disable ASPM if BIOS asks us to
We currently refuse to touch the ASPM registers if the BIOS tells us that
ASPM isn't supported. This can cause problems if the BIOS has (for any
reason) enabled ASPM on some devices anyway. Change the code such that we
explicitly clear ASPM if the FADT indicates that ASPM isn't supported,
and make sure we tidy up appropriately on device removal in order to deal
with the hotplug case. If ASPM is disabled because the BIOS doesn't hand
over control then we won't touch the registers.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-12-23 12:53:08 -08:00
Matthew Garrett 41cd766b06 PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it
The aspm code will currently set the configured aspm policy before drivers
have had an opportunity to indicate that their hardware doesn't support it.
Unfortunately, putting some hardware in L0 or L1 can result in the hardware
no longer responding to any requests, even after aspm is disabled. It makes
more sense to leave aspm policy at the BIOS defaults at initial setup time,
reconfiguring it after pci_enable_device() is called. This allows the
driver to blacklist individual devices beforehand.

Reviewed-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-07-30 09:29:15 -07:00
Stefan Assmann 45e829ea41 PCI: change PCI nomenclature in drivers/pci/ (comment changes)
Changing occurrences of variants of PCI-X and PCIe to the PCI-SIG
terms listed in the "Trademark and Logo Usage Guidelines".
http://www.pcisig.com/developers/procedures/logos/Trademark_and_Logo_Usage_Guidelines_updated_112206.pdf

Patch is limited to drivers/pci/ and changes concern comments only.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-12-16 13:37:53 -08:00
Kenji Kaneshige b26a34aa47 PCI: fix BUG_ON triggered by logical PCIe root port removal
This problem happened when removing PCIe root port using PCI logical
hotplug operation.

The immediate cause of this problem is that the pointer to invalid
data structure is passed to pcie_update_aspm_capable() by
pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(). When pcie_aspm_exit_link_state() received
a pointer to root port link, it unconfigures the root port link and
frees its data structure at first. At this point, there are not links
to configure under the root port and the data structure for root port
link is already freed. So pcie_aspm_exit_link_state() must not call
pcie_update_aspm_capable() and pcie_config_aspm_path().

This patch fixes the problem by changing pcie_aspm_exit_link_state()
not to call pcie_update_aspm_capable() and pcie_config_aspm_path() if
the specified link is root port link.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:606!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:13.0/remove
CPU 1
Modules linked in: shpchp
Pid: 9345, comm: sysfsd Not tainted 2.6.32-rc5 #98 ProLiant DL785 G6
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811df69b>]  [<ffffffff811df69b>] pcie_update_aspm_capable+0x15/0xbe
RSP: 0018:ffff88082a2f5ca0  EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000e77 RBX: ffff88182cc3e000 RCX: ffff88082a33d006
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff811dff4a RDI: ffff88182cc3e000
RBP: ffff88082a2f5cc0 R08: ffff88182cc3e000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff88182fc00180 R11: ffff88182fc00198 R12: ffff88182cc3e000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88182cc3e000 R15: ffff88082a2f5e20
FS:  00007f259a64b6f0(0000) GS:ffff880864600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00007feb53f73da0 CR3: 000000102cc94000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process sysfsd (pid: 9345, threadinfo ffff88082a2f4000, task ffff88082a33cf00)
Stack:
 ffff88182cc3e000 ffff88182cc3e000 0000000000000000 ffff88082a33cf00
<0> ffff88082a2f5cf0 ffffffff811dff52 ffff88082a2f5cf0 ffff88082c525168
<0> ffff88402c9fd2f8 ffff88402c9fd2f8 ffff88082a2f5d20 ffffffff811d7db2
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff811dff52>] pcie_aspm_exit_link_state+0xf5/0x11e
 [<ffffffff811d7db2>] pci_stop_bus_device+0x76/0x7e
 [<ffffffff811d7d67>] pci_stop_bus_device+0x2b/0x7e
 [<ffffffff811d7e4f>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x15/0xb9
 [<ffffffff811dcb8c>] remove_callback+0x29/0x3a
 [<ffffffff81135aeb>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x15/0x6d
 [<ffffffff81072790>] worker_thread+0x19d/0x298
 [<ffffffff8107273b>] ? worker_thread+0x148/0x298
 [<ffffffff81135ad6>] ? sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x0/0x6d
 [<ffffffff810765c0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
 [<ffffffff810725f3>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x298
 [<ffffffff8107629e>] kthread+0x7d/0x85
 [<ffffffff8102eafa>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff8102e4bc>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff81076221>] ? kthread+0x0/0x85
 [<ffffffff8102eaf0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Code: 89 e5 8a 50 48 31 c0 c0 ea 03 83 e2 07 e8 b2 de fe ff c9 48 98 c3 55 48 89 e5 41 56 49 89 fe 41 55 41 54 53 48 83 7f 10 00 74 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 48 8b 05 da 7d 63 00 4c 8d 60 e8 4c 89 e1 eb 24 4c
RIP  [<ffffffff811df69b>] pcie_update_aspm_capable+0x15/0xbe
 RSP <ffff88082a2f5ca0>
---[ end trace 6ae0f65bdeab8555 ]---

Reported-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Tested-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-12-04 16:09:59 -08:00
Kenji Kaneshige 8b06477dc4 PCIe ASPM: use pci_is_pcie()
Change for PCIe ASPM driver to use pci_is_pcie() instead of checking
pci_dev->is_pcie.

Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-11-24 15:25:17 -08:00
Kenji Kaneshige db9538a749 PCIe ASPM: use pci_pcie_cap()
Use pci_pcie_cap() instead of pci_find_capability() to get PCIe capability
offset in PCIe ASPM driver. This avoids unnecessary search in PCI
configuration space.

Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-11-24 15:25:14 -08:00
Kenji Kaneshige 7557b5d632 PCI ASPM: support L1 only
The definition of the ASPM support field in the Link Capabilities
Register had been changed by the "ASPM optionality ECN" as follows:

<Before>
	00b	Reserved
	01b	L0s Supported
	10b	Reserved
	11b	L0s and L1 Supported

<After>
	00b	No ASPM Support
	01b	L0s Supported
	10b	L1 Supported
	11b	L0s and L1 Supported

Current linux ASPM driver doesn't enable ASPM if the support field is
00b or 10b. So there is no impact about 00b. But current linux ASPM
driver doesn't enable L1 if the support field is 10b. With this patch,
10b (L1 support) is handled properly.

Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-17 10:05:16 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige ac18018a41 PCI ASPM: support per direction l0s management
The L0s state can be managed separately for each direction (upstream
direction and downstream direction) of the link. But in the current
implementation, those are mixed up. With this patch, L0s for each
direction are managed separately.

To maintain three states (upstream direction L0s, downstream L0s and
L1), 'aspm_support', 'aspm_enabled', 'aspm_capable', 'aspm_disable'
and 'aspm_default' fields in struct pcie_link_state are changed to
3-bit from 2-bit. The 'latency' field is separated to two 'latency_up'
and 'latency_dw' fields to maintain exit latencies for each direction
of the link. For L0, 'latency_up.l0' and 'latency_dw.l0' are used to
configure upstream direction L0s and downstream direction L0s
respectively. For L1, larger value of 'latency_up.l1' and
'latency_dw.l1' is considered as L1 exit latency.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-09 13:29:49 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige b7206cbf02 PCI ASPM: support partial aspm enablement
In the current implementation, ASPM L0s/L1 is disabled for all links
in the hierarchy if one of the link doesn't meet latency requirement.
But we can partially enable ASPM L0s/L1 on sub-tree in the hierarchy.
This patch allows partial L0s/L1 enablement in the hierarchy. And it
also reduce the calculation cost of ASPM configuration very much.

In the previous implementation, all links were enabled with the same
state. With this patch, enabled state for each link is determined
simply as follows (the 'requested' is from policy_to_aspm_state()).

    enabled = requested & (link->aspm_capable & link->aspm_disable)

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-09 13:29:48 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige 07d92760d2 PCI ASPM: introduce capable flag
Introduce 'aspm_capable' field to maintain the capable ASPM setting of
the link. By the 'aspm_capable', we don't need to recheck latency
every time ASPM policy is changed.

Each bit in 'aspm_capable' is associated to ASPM state (L0S/L1). The
bit is set if the associated ASPM state is supported by the link and
it satisfies the latency requirement (i.e. exit latency < endpoint
acceptable latency). The 'aspm_capable' is updated when

  - an endpoint device is added (boot time or hot-plug time)
  - an endpoint device is removed (hot-unplug time)
  - PCI power state is changed.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-09 13:29:47 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige f1c0ca29ae PCI ASPM: introduce disable flag
Introduce 'aspm_disable' flag to manage disabled ASPM state more
robust way.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-09 13:29:46 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige fc87e919c0 PCI ASPM: fix possible null pointer dereference
Fix possible NULL dereference in pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(). This
patch also cleanup some code.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-09 13:29:45 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige 8a339e7321 PCI ASPM: remove redundant list check
Remove the following check in __pcie_aspm_config_link() because it
nerver be true.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-09 13:29:45 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige b127bd55d9 PCI ASPM: do not clear enabled field by support field
We must not clear bits in 'aspm_enabled' using 'aspm_support', or
'aspm_enabled' and 'aspm_default' might be different from the actual
state. In addtion, 'aspm_default' should be intialized even if
'aspm_support' is 0.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-09-09 13:29:44 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige 5c92ffb1ec PCI ASPM: remove get_root_port_link
By having a pointer to the root port link, we can remove loops in
get_root_port_link() to search the root port link.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-06-18 14:02:23 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige 3647584d9e PCI ASPM: cleanup pcie_aspm_sanity_check
Minor cleanup for pcie_aspm_sanity_check().

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-06-18 14:02:22 -07:00
Kenji Kaneshige efdf828881 PCI ASPM: remove has_switch field
We don't need the 'has_switch' field in the struct pcie_link_state.

Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-06-18 14:02:22 -07:00