acpi_evaluate_integer() is an ACPI API introduced to evaluate an
ACPI control method that is known to have an integer return value.
This API can simplify the code because the calling function does not need to
use the specified acpi_buffer structure required by acpi_evaluate_object();
Convert acpi_evaluate_object() to acpi_evaluate_integer()
in drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
acpi_has_method() is a new ACPI API introduced to check
the existence of an ACPI control method.
It can be used to replace acpi_get_handle() in the case that
1. the calling function doesn't need the ACPI handle of the control method.
and
2. the calling function doesn't care the reason why the method is unavailable.
Convert acpi_get_handle() to acpi_has_method()
in drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
acpi_execute_simple_method() is a new ACPI API introduced to invoke
an ACPI control method that has single integer parameter and no return value.
Convert acpi_evaluate_object() to acpi_execute_simple_method()
in drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The only part of proc_dir_entry the code outside of fs/proc
really cares about is PDE(inode)->data. Provide a helper
for that; static inline for now, eventually will be moved
to fs/proc, along with the knowledge of struct proc_dir_entry
layout.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Pull vfs pile (part one) from Al Viro:
"Assorted stuff - cleaning namei.c up a bit, fixing ->d_name/->d_parent
locking violations, etc.
The most visible changes here are death of FS_REVAL_DOT (replaced with
"has ->d_weak_revalidate()") and a new helper getting from struct file
to inode. Some bits of preparation to xattr method interface changes.
Misc patches by various people sent this cycle *and* ocfs2 fixes from
several cycles ago that should've been upstream right then.
PS: the next vfs pile will be xattr stuff."
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (46 commits)
saner proc_get_inode() calling conventions
proc: avoid extra pde_put() in proc_fill_super()
fs: change return values from -EACCES to -EPERM
fs/exec.c: make bprm_mm_init() static
ocfs2/dlm: use GFP_ATOMIC inside a spin_lock
ocfs2: fix possible use-after-free with AIO
ocfs2: Fix oops in ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage() code path
get_empty_filp()/alloc_file() leave both ->f_pos and ->f_version zero
target: writev() on single-element vector is pointless
export kernel_write(), convert open-coded instances
fs: encode_fh: return FILEID_INVALID if invalid fid_type
kill f_vfsmnt
vfs: kill FS_REVAL_DOT by adding a d_weak_revalidate dentry op
nfsd: handle vfs_getattr errors in acl protocol
switch vfs_getattr() to struct path
default SET_PERSONALITY() in linux/elf.h
ceph: prepopulate inodes only when request is aborted
d_hash_and_lookup(): export, switch open-coded instances
9p: switch v9fs_set_create_acl() to inode+fid, do it before d_instantiate()
9p: split dropping the acls from v9fs_set_create_acl()
...
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used
by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver
through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device
object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver
.remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option. As a result, the __dev*
markings need to be removed.
This change removes the use of __devinit, __devexit_p, __devinitdata,
__devinitconst, and __devexit from these drivers.
Based on patches originally written by Bill Pemberton, but redone by me
in order to handle some of the coding style issues better, by hand.
Cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: Joey Lee <jlee@novell.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Feuerer <peter@piie.net>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Cc: Cezary Jackiewicz <cezary.jackiewicz@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Gerlach <khnz@gmx.de>
Cc: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@canonical.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
According to compiler warnings, quite some suspend/resume functions
in platform x86 drivers are not used for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP unset, so
add #ifdefs to prevent them from being built in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Make the toshiba_acpi driver define its PM callbacks through
a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks
in struct acpi_device_ops.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
None of the drivers implementing the ACPI device suspend callback
uses the pm_message_t argument of it, so this argument may be dropped
entirely from that callback. This will simplify switching the ACPI
bus type to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
I managed to screw up the various backlight changes and ended up memsetting
the props structure after it had already been populated. This should fix it.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Some Toshiba laptops have the transflective LCD and toshset
can control its backlight state. I brought this feature to the
mainline. To support transflective LCD, it's implemented by
adding an extra level to the backlight and having 0 change to
transflective mode. It was tested on a Toshiba Portege R500.
Signed-off-by: Akio Idehara <zbe64533@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Currently the backlight device is registered unconditionally, but many
(probably most) Toshibas either don't support HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS or only
support reading from it. This patch adds a test of HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS
during initialization and only registers the backlight device if this
interface supports both reads and writes.
Cc: Akio Idehara <zbe64533@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Several Satellite models have a buggy implementation of the INFO method
that causes ACPI exceptions when executed:
ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=ffff88012d70f800 (20110413/dswstate-98)
ACPI Exception: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand (20110413/dsutils-646)
ACPI Exception: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0 (20110413/dsutils-763)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.VALZ.GETE] (Node ffff880131175eb0), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE (20110413/psparse-536)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.VALZ.INFO] (Node ffff880131175ed8), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE (20110413/psparse-536)
toshiba_acpi: ACPI INFO method execution failed
toshiba_acpi: Failed to query hotkey event
All known machines with this implementation also have a WMI interface
with event GUID 59142400-C6A3-40FA-BADB-8A2652834100 which is not seen
on any other models. Refuse to load toshiba_acpi on machines with this
guid.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
These scancodes are used by many of the models now supported with
the addition of TOS1900 device support.
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
There are two types of problems that prevent hotkeys from working
on many of the machines supported by toshiba_acpi. The first of
these is the lack of a functioning SCI for hotkey events. For these
machines it is possible to filter the Fn keypresses from the
keyboard and generate a notification by executing the ACPI NTFY
method.
The second problem is a lack of support for HCI_SYSTEM_EVENT, which
is used for reading the hotkey scancodes. On these machines the
scancodes can be read by executing the ACPI NTFY method.
This patch fixes both problems by installing an i8042 filter when
the NTFY method is present to generate notifications and by
detecting which of INFO or HCI_SYSTEM_EVENT is supported for
reading scancodes. If neither method of reading scancodes is
supported, the hotkey input device is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
This doesn't change how the code works, but it silences a Sparse
complaint:
drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c:121:37: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
The Satellite C670-10V generates notifications for hotkeys but does
not support HCI_SYSTEM_EVENT. As a result when a hotkey is pressed
it gets stuck in an infinite loop in toshiba_acpi_notify. To fix
this, detect whether or not HCI_SYSTEM_EVENT is supported up-front
and don't try to read system events if it isn't supported. In
addition, limit the number of retries when reading HCI_SYSTEM_EVENT
fails so that this loop cannot run unbounded.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Test for features up-front to determine whether or not they are
supported, and avoid creating devices and proc files for
unsupported features.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Some Toshiba models, notably those with the TOS1900 device, use
the SPFC method for HCI calls instead of GHCI. Test for this method
if GHCI isn't found, and if it exists use it for all HCI calls.
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Now that we're using an acpi driver we already have a handle to
the namespace of the HCI call, so there's no need to test various
paths to the HCI call or even be aware of the path at all.
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Many routines are returning success on failure, and those that are
indicating failure frequently return incorrect error codes. Fix
these up throughout the driver.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>