There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation
mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
struct acpi_resource_address and struct acpi_resource_extended_address64 share substracts
just at different offsets. To unify the parsing functions, OSPMs like Linux
need a new ACPI_ADDRESS64_ATTRIBUTE as their substructs, so they can
extract the shared data.
This patch also synchronizes the structure changes to the Linux kernel.
The usages are searched by matching the following keywords:
1. acpi_resource_address
2. acpi_resource_extended_address
3. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS
4. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_ADDRESS
And we found and fixed the usages in the following files:
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-ext.c
arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
drivers/acpi/resource.c
drivers/char/hpet.c
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
Build tests are passed with defconfig/allnoconfig/allyesconfig and
defconfig+CONFIG_ACPI=n.
Original-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Original-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI memory device
objects if CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY is unset by compiling out the
memory hotplug scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still
compiling its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in
either case.
Also unset the memory hotplug scan handler's .attach() callback
if acpi_no_memhotplug is set, but still register the scan handler to
avoid creating platform devices for ACPI memory devices in that case
too.
This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
When booting a kexec/kdump kernel on a system that has specific memory
hotplug regions the boot will fail with warnings like:
swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:9, mode:0x84d0
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.10.0-65.el7.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R, BIOS QSSC-S4R.QCI.01.00.S013.032920111005 03/29/2011
0000000000000000 ffff8800341bd8c8 ffffffff815bcc67 ffff8800341bd950
ffffffff8113b1a0 ffff880036339b00 0000000000000009 00000000000084d0
ffff8800341bd950 ffffffff815b87ee 0000000000000000 0000000000000200
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff815bcc67>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<ffffffff8113b1a0>] warn_alloc_failed+0xf0/0x160
[<ffffffff815b87ee>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xac/0x196
[<ffffffff8113f14f>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7ff/0xa00
[<ffffffff815b417c>] vmemmap_alloc_block+0x62/0xba
[<ffffffff815b41e9>] vmemmap_alloc_block_buf+0x15/0x3b
[<ffffffff815b1ff6>] vmemmap_populate+0xb4/0x21b
[<ffffffff815b461d>] sparse_mem_map_populate+0x27/0x35
[<ffffffff815b400f>] sparse_add_one_section+0x7a/0x185
[<ffffffff815a1e9f>] __add_pages+0xaf/0x240
[<ffffffff81047359>] arch_add_memory+0x59/0xd0
[<ffffffff815a21d9>] add_memory+0xb9/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81333b9c>] acpi_memory_device_add+0x18d/0x26d
[<ffffffff81309a01>] acpi_bus_device_attach+0x7d/0xcd
[<ffffffff8132379d>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0xc8/0x17f
[<ffffffff81309984>] ? acpi_bus_type_and_status+0x90/0x90
[<ffffffff81309984>] ? acpi_bus_type_and_status+0x90/0x90
[<ffffffff81323c8c>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x95/0xc5
[<ffffffff8130a6d6>] acpi_bus_scan+0x8b/0x9d
[<ffffffff81a2019a>] acpi_scan_init+0x63/0x160
[<ffffffff81a1ffb5>] acpi_init+0x25d/0x2a6
[<ffffffff81a1fd58>] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x2a/0x2a
[<ffffffff810020e2>] do_one_initcall+0xe2/0x190
[<ffffffff819e20c4>] kernel_init_freeable+0x17c/0x207
[<ffffffff819e18d0>] ? do_early_param+0x88/0x88
[<ffffffff8159fea0>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
[<ffffffff8159feae>] kernel_init+0xe/0x180
[<ffffffff815cca2c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff8159fea0>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 42, btch: 7 usd: 0
active_anon:0 inactive_anon:0 isolated_anon:0
active_file:0 inactive_file:0 isolated_file:0
unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:872 slab_reclaimable:13 slab_unreclaimable:1880
mapped:0 shmem:0 pagetables:0 bounce:0
free_cma:0
because the system has run out of memory at boot time. This occurs
because of the following sequence in the boot:
Main kernel boots and sets E820 map. The second kernel is booted with a
map generated by the kdump service using memmap= and memmap=exactmap.
These parameters are added to the kernel parameters of the kexec/kdump
kernel. The kexec/kdump kernel has limited memory resources so as not
to severely impact the main kernel.
The system then panics and the kdump/kexec kernel boots (which is a
completely new kernel boot). During this boot ACPI is initialized and the
kernel (as can be seen above) traverses the ACPI namespace and finds an
entry for a memory device to be hotadded.
ie)
[<ffffffff815a1e9f>] __add_pages+0xaf/0x240
[<ffffffff81047359>] arch_add_memory+0x59/0xd0
[<ffffffff815a21d9>] add_memory+0xb9/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81333b9c>] acpi_memory_device_add+0x18d/0x26d
[<ffffffff81309a01>] acpi_bus_device_attach+0x7d/0xcd
[<ffffffff8132379d>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0xc8/0x17f
[<ffffffff81309984>] ? acpi_bus_type_and_status+0x90/0x90
[<ffffffff81309984>] ? acpi_bus_type_and_status+0x90/0x90
[<ffffffff81323c8c>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x95/0xc5
[<ffffffff8130a6d6>] acpi_bus_scan+0x8b/0x9d
[<ffffffff81a2019a>] acpi_scan_init+0x63/0x160
[<ffffffff81a1ffb5>] acpi_init+0x25d/0x2a6
At this point the kernel adds page table information and the the kexec/kdump
kernel runs out of memory.
This can also be reproduced by using the memmap=exactmap and mem=X
parameters on the main kernel and booting.
This patchset resolves the problem by adding a kernel parameter,
acpi_no_memhotplug, to disable ACPI memory hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no reason to pass an ACPI handle to acpi_bind_one() instead
of a struct acpi_device pointer to the target device object, so
modify that function to take a struct acpi_device pointer as its
second argument and update all code depending on it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI
* acpi-hotplug:
ACPI / memhotplug: Use defined marco METHOD_NAME__STA
ACPI / hotplug: Use kobject_init_and_add() instead of _init() and _add()
ACPI / hotplug: Don't set kobject parent pointer explicitly
ACPI / hotplug: Set kobject name via kobject_add(), not kobject_set_name()
hotplug, powerpc, x86: Remove cpu_hotplug_driver_lock()
hotplug / x86: Disable ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE on x86
hotplug / x86: Add hotplug lock to missing places
hotplug / x86: Fix online state in cpu0 debug interface
We already have predefined marco for method name "_STA', so
using the marco instead of directly using the string.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
device->driver_data needs to be cleared when releasing its data,
mem_device, in an error path of acpi_memory_device_add().
The function evaluates the _CRS of memory device objects, and fails
when it gets an unexpected resource or cannot allocate memory. A
kernel crash or data corruption may occur when the kernel accesses
the stale pointer.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 2.6.32+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that the memory offlining should be taken care of by the
companion device offlining code in acpi_scan_hot_remove(), the
ACPI memory hotplug driver doesn't need to offline it in
remove_memory() any more. Moreover, since the return value of
remove_memory() is not used, it's better to make it be a void
function and trigger a BUG() if the memory scheduled for removal is
not offline.
Change the code in accordance with the above observations.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
During ACPI memory hotplug configuration bind memory blocks residing
in modules removable through the standard ACPI mechanism to struct
acpi_device objects associated with ACPI namespace objects
representing those modules. Accordingly, unbind those memory blocks
from the struct acpi_device objects when the memory modules in
question are being removed.
When "offline" operation for devices representing memory blocks is
introduced, this will allow the ACPI core's device hot-remove code to
use it to carry out remove_memory() for those memory blocks and check
the results of that before it actually removes the modules holding
them from the system.
Since walk_memory_range() is used for accessing all memory blocks
corresponding to a given ACPI namespace object, it is exported from
memory_hotplug.c so that the code in acpi_memhotplug.c can use it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
acpi_memory_info has enabled bit and failed bit for controlling memory
hotplug. But we don't need to keep both bits.
The patch removes acpi_memory_info->failed bit.
Signed-off-by: yasuaki ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
At http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135769405622667&w=2 thread,
Toshi Kani mentioned as follows:
"I have a question about the change you made in commit 65479472 in
acpi_memhotplug.c. This change seems to require that
acpi_memory_enable_device() calls add_memory() to add all memory ranges
represented by memory device objects at boot-time, and keep the results
be used for hot-remove.
If I understand it right, this add_memory() call fails with EEXIST at
boot-time since all memory ranges should have been added from EFI memory
table (or e820) already. This results all memory ranges be marked as !
enabled & !failed. I think this means that we cannot hot-delete any
memory ranges presented at boot-time since acpi_memory_remove_memory()
only calls remove_memory() when the enabled flag is set. Is that
correct?"
Above mention is correct. Thus even if memory device supports hotplug,
memory presented at boot-time cannot be hot removed since the memory
device's acpi_memory_info->enabled is always 0.
This patch changes to set 1 to "acpi_memory_info->enabled" of memory
device presented at boot-time for hot removing the memory device.
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Make the ACPI memory hotplug driver use struct acpi_scan_handler
for representing the object used to set up ACPI memory hotplug
functionality and to remove hotplug memory ranges and data
structures used by the driver before unregistering ACPI device
nodes representing memory. Register the new struct acpi_scan_handler
object with the help of acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug() to allow
user space to manipulate the attributes of the memory hotplug
profile.
This results in a significant reduction of the drvier's code size
and removes some ACPI hotplug code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related
problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure.
First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with
acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct
acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created),
those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races
from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present
for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by
acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler).
Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and
acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock
should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by
these functions themselves.
For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device
addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the
acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim().
Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they
are always called under acpi_scan_lock.
Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously
with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help
of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the
ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example,
acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and
the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that
acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct
acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be
invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that,
make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on
ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if
their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear
the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work).
Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail,
in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the
context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to
run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on
previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used
by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver
through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device
object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver
.remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.
For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and
get the device pointer again later.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When memory hotadd, acpi_memory_enable_device has already been done
at drv->ops.add (acpi_memory_device_add), no need to do it again
at notify callback.
At acpi_memory_enable_device, acpi_memory_get_device_resources
is also a redundant action, since it has been done at drv->ops.add.
Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).
For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().
Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).
Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
We had introduced acpi_hotmem_initialized to avoid strange add_memory fail
message. But the memory device may not be used by the kernel, and the
device should be bound when the driver is being loaded. Remove
acpi_hotmem_initialized to allow that the device can be bound when the
driver is being loaded.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Jarkko Nikula
Lv Zheng
Rafael J. Wysocki
Prarit Bhargava
Zhang Yanfei
Jianguo Wu
Toshi Kani
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Tang Chen
Yinghai Lu
Liu Jinsong
Wen Congyang