* acpi-enumeration:
ACPI / scan: use platform bus type by default for _HID enumeration
ACPI / scan: always register ACPI LPSS scan handler
ACPI / scan: always register memory hotplug scan handler
ACPI / scan: always register container scan handler
ACPI / scan: Change the meaning of missing .attach() in scan handlers
ACPI / scan: introduce platform_id device PNP type flag
ACPI / scan: drop unsupported serial IDs from PNP ACPI scan handler ID list
ACPI / scan: drop IDs that do not comply with the ACPI PNP ID rule
ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumeration
ACPI / scan: .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers
* acpi-pm:
ACPI / PM: Export rest of the subsys PM callbacks
ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspend
ACPI / PM: Hold ACPI scan lock over the "freeze" sleep state
ACPI / PM: Export acpi_target_system_state() to modules
Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
platform bus, change the code to enumerate ACPI device objects to
platform bus by default. Namely, create platform devices for the
ACPI device objects that
1. Have pnp.type.platform_id set (device objects with _HID currently).
2. Do not have a scan handler attached.
3. Are not SPI/I2C slave devices (that should be enumerated to the
appropriate buses bus by their parent).
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Subject and changelog, rebase and code cleanup]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Currently, some scan handlers can be compiled out entirely, which
leaves the device objects they normally attach to without a scan
handler. This isn't a problem as long as we don't have any default
enumeration mechanism that applies to all devices without a scan
handler. However, if such a default enumeration is added, it still
should not be applied to devices that are normally attached to by
scan handlers, because that may result in creating "physical" device
objects of a wrong type for them.
Since we are going to create platform device objects for all ACPI
device objects with pnp.type.platform_id set by default, clear
pnp.type.platform_id where there is a matching scan handler without
an .attach() callback and otherwise simply treat that scan handler
as though the .attach() callback was present but always returned 0.
This will allow us to compile out scan handler callbacks and leave
the device ID lists used by them so as to prevent creating platform
device objects for the matching ACPI devices.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Only certain types of ACPI device objects can be enumerated as
platform devices, so in order to distinguish them from the others
introduce a new ACPI device PNP type flag, platform_id, and set it
for devices with a valid _HID to start with.
This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not
handle this in the right way currently. Namely, if an ACPI device
object
1. Has a _CRS method,
2. Has an identification of
"three capital characters followed by four hex digits",
3. Is not in the excluded IDs list,
it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will
be create for it). This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is
used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI.
However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the
platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be
created for them). As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c
is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP
device objects for matching devices. That list has been continuously
growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to
grow even more in the future.
To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices
as platform devices by default. To this end, change the way of
enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that
will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI
device objects whose device IDs are present in that list.
The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains
all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers,
so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the
PNP drivers. Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce
its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any
technical reasons into platform drivers.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Introduce a .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers to allow them to
use more elaborate matching algorithms if necessary. That is needed
for the upcoming PNP scan handler in particular.
This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices
during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.)
if that isn't necessary.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fixed hardware does not exist on HW-reduced ACPI platforms since the
programming interface for them is not implemented on them, so no need
to scan that hardware on them.
This patch avoids creating the fixed power button ACPI device and
eliminates a probe error message from ACPI button driver on ASUS T100.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-ost:
ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
ACPI: use device name LNXSYBUS.xx for ACPI \_SB and \_TZ objects
ACPI / processor: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
ACPI / PAD / xen: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
ACPI / PAD: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
ACPI: rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() to acpi_evaluate_ost()
Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is
acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core,
simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the
ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to
acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to
the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the
definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is
an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of
struct acpi_hp_work accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost()
everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug
_OST is supported unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions
of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock
operations using register_hotplug_dock_device().
That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI
dock operations to be dropped in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock
operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to
struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that
callback if available. Also rename the existing .event() callback
in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible
confusion in the future.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Use device name "LNXSYBUS:xx" instead of "device.xx" for ACPI objects
\_SB and \_TZ.
BTW, the original check of "handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT" in statment
"else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT)"
is always false because of the code at the begin of that block.
if (handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SYSTEM_HID);
break;
}
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since we already know what the device's PNP IDs are when
acpi_device_is_battery() is called, it is not necessary to run
acpi_get_object_info() for the device in that function. Instead, if
acpi_device_is_battery() is passed a pointer to a struct acpi_device
object, it can use the list of PNP IDs from that object, so make that
happen and modify the function's header accordingly
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan
before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock
device objects. Then, it registers a notify handler for each of
them for handling dock events.
However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront. They
very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase
of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI
drivers to ACPI device objects. Then, the dependent devices can be
added to the in the second phase. That makes it possible to drop
the extra namespace scan, so do it.
Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all
of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may
be dispatched from the global notify handler for them. Do that and
drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb()
and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more.
Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the
ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects
and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea,
because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway.
For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI
device objects representing dock stations and the container scan
handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup
operations on a device object representing a physical device after
it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or
before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(),
respectively. If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the
given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there
are executed for these purposes. However, an analogous mechanism will
be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding
struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers.
For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct
acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify()
right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI
comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling
acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively.
To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their
.attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the
ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the
scan handler at hand.
This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all
devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all
hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to
the same function for all hotplug devices.
This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device
hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does
significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler,
or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices
had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed
before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any
more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler()
can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To avoid the need to install a hotplug notify handler for each ACPI
namespace node representing a device and having a matching scan
handler, move the check whether or not the ejection of the given
device is enabled through its scan handler from acpi_hotplug_notify_cb()
to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(). Also, move the execution of
ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS _OST to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(),
because in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() or in acpi_eject_store() we really
don't know whether or not the eject is going to be in progress (for
example, acpi_hotplug_execute() may still fail without queuing up the
work item).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its
hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing
hotplug devices. However, after recent changes causing struct
acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a
device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more.
Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI
handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and
hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a
result of a concurrent table unload).
In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty
release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to
acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that
function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn(). For this reason, it's
better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to
struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it
use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler. At the same
time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new
.hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI
device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic
ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan
handlers.
This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the
ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device
hotplug consolidation possible.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock
protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of
the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Rafael J. Wysocki
Zhang Rui
Aaron Lu
Jiang Liu