An extent type osd operation currently implies that there will
be corresponding data supplied in the data portion of the request
(for write) or response (for read) message. Similarly, an osd class
method operation implies a data item will be supplied to receive
the response data from the operation.
Add a ceph_osd_data pointer to each of those structures, and assign
it to point to eithre the incoming or the outgoing data structure in
the osd message. The data is not always available when an op is
initially set up, so add two new functions to allow setting them
after the op has been initialized.
Begin to make use of the data item pointer available in the osd
operation rather than the request data in or out structure in
places where it's convenient. Add some assertions to verify
pointers are always set the way they're expected to be.
This is a sort of stepping stone toward really moving the data
into the osd request ops, to allow for some validation before
making that jump.
This is the first in a series of patches that resolve:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An osd request keeps a pointer to the osd operations (ops) array
that it builds in its request message.
In order to allow each op in the array to have its own distinct
data, we will need to keep track of each op's data, and that
information does not go over the wire.
As long as we're tracking the data we might as well just track the
entire (source) op definition for each of the ops. And if we're
doing that, we'll have no more need to keep a pointer to the
wire-encoded version.
This patch makes the array of source ops be kept with the osd
request structure, and uses that instead of the version encoded in
the message in places where that was previously used. The array
will be embedded in the request structure, and the maximum number of
ops we ever actually use is currently 2. So reduce CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP
to 2 to reduce the size of the structure.
The result of doing this sort of ripples back up, and as a result
various function parameters and local variables become unnecessary.
Make r_num_ops be unsigned, and move the definition of struct
ceph_osd_req_op earlier to ensure it's defined where needed.
It does not yet add per-op data, that's coming soon.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
These are very small changes that make use osd_data local pointers
as shorthands for structures being operated on.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Define and use functions that encapsulate the initializion of a
ceph_osd_data structure.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Hold off building the osd request message in ceph_writepages_start()
until just before it will be submitted to the osd client for
execution.
We'll still create the request and allocate the page pointer array
after we learn we have at least one page to write. A local variable
will be used to keep track of the allocated array of pages. Wait
until just before submitting the request for assigning that page
array pointer to the request message.
Create ands use a new function osd_req_op_extent_update() whose
purpose is to serve this one spot where the length value supplied
when an osd request's op was initially formatted might need to get
changed (reduced, never increased) before submitting the request.
Previously, ceph_writepages_start() assigned the message header's
data length because of this update. That's no longer necessary,
because ceph_osdc_build_request() will recalculate the right
value to use based on the content of the ops in the request.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Defer building the osd request until just before submitting it in
all callers except ceph_writepages_start(). (That caller will be
handed in the next patch.)
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
There is a helper function alloc_page_vec() that, despite its
generic sounding name depends heavily on an osd request structure
being populated with certain information.
There is only one place this function is used, and it ends up
being a bit simpler to just open code what it does, so get
rid of the helper.
The real motivation for this is deferring building the of the osd
request message, and this is a step in that direction.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Mostly for readability, define ceph_writepages_osd_request() and
use it to allocate the osd request for ceph_writepages_start().
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This patch moves the call to ceph_osdc_build_request() out of
ceph_osdc_new_request() and into its caller.
This is in order to defer formatting osd operation information into
the request message until just before request is started.
The only unusual (ab)user of ceph_osdc_build_request() is
ceph_writepages_start(), where the final length of write request may
change (downward) based on the current inode size or the oldest
snapshot context with dirty data for the inode.
The remaining callers don't change anything in the request after has
been built.
This means the ops array is now supplied by the caller. It also
means there is no need to pass the mtime to ceph_osdc_new_request()
(it gets provided to ceph_osdc_build_request()). And rather than
passing a do_sync flag, have the number of ops in the ops array
supplied imply adding a second STARTSYNC operation after the READ or
WRITE requested.
This and some of the patches that follow are related to having the
messenger (only) be responsible for filling the content of the
message header, as described here:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
In create_fs_client() a memory pool is set up be used for arrays of
pages that might be needed in ceph_writepages_start() if memory is
tight. There are two problems with the way it's initialized:
- The size provided is the number of pages we want in the
array, but it should be the number of bytes required for
that many page pointers.
- The number of pages computed can end up being 0, while we
will always need at least one page.
This patch fixes both of these problems.
This resolves the two simple problems defined in:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4603
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Use wrapper functions that check whether the auth op exists so that callers
do not need a bunch of conditional checks. Simplifies the external
interface.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Currently the messenger calls out to a get_authorizer con op, which will
create a new authorizer if it doesn't yet have one. In the meantime, when
we rotate our service keys, the authorizer doesn't get updated. Eventually
it will be rejected by the server on a new connection attempt and get
invalidated, and we will then rebuild a new authorizer, but this is not
ideal.
Instead, if we do have an authorizer, call a new update_authorizer op that
will verify that the current authorizer is using the latest secret. If it
is not, we will build a new one that does. This avoids the transient
failure.
This fixes one of the sorry sequence of events for bug
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4282
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
We should advance the user data pointer by _len_ instead of _written_.
_len_ is the data length written in each iteration while _written_ is the
accumulated data length we have writtent out.
Signed-off-by: Henry C Chang <henry.cy.chang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
Tested-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Current ceph code tracks directory's completeness in two places.
ceph_readdir() checks i_release_count to decide if it can set the
I_COMPLETE flag in i_ceph_flags. All other places check the I_COMPLETE
flag. This indirection introduces locking complexity.
This patch adds a new variable i_complete_count to ceph_inode_info.
Set i_release_count's value to it when marking a directory complete.
By comparing the two variables, we know if a directory is complete
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Change it so we only assign outgoing data information for messages
if there is outgoing data to send.
This then allows us to add a few more (currently commented-out)
assertions.
This is related to:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4284
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
Define ceph_msg_data_set_pagelist(), ceph_msg_data_set_bio(), and
ceph_msg_data_set_trail() to clearly abstract the assignment of the
remaining data-related fields in a ceph message structure. Use the
new functions in the osd client and mds client.
This partially resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4263
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
When setting page array information for message data, provide the
byte length rather than the page count ceph_msg_data_set_pages().
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Define a function ceph_msg_data_set_pages(), which more clearly
abstracts the assignment page-related fields for data in a ceph
message structure. Use this new function in the osd client and mds
client.
Ideally, these fields would never be set more than once (with
BUG_ON() calls to guarantee that). At the moment though the osd
client sets these every time it receives a message, and in the event
of a communication problem this can happen more than once. (This
will be resolved shortly, but setting up these helpers first makes
it all a bit easier to work with.)
Rearrange the field order in a ceph_msg structure to group those
that are used to define the possible data payloads.
This partially resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4263
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Record the byte count for an osd request rather than the page count.
The number of pages can always be derived from the byte count (and
alignment/offset) but the reverse is not true.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An osd request defines information about where data to be read
should be placed as well as where data to write comes from.
Currently these are represented by common fields.
Keep information about data for writing separate from data to be
read by splitting these into data_in and data_out fields.
This is the key patch in this whole series, in that it actually
identifies which osd requests generate outgoing data and which
generate incoming data. It's less obvious (currently) that an osd
CALL op generates both outgoing and incoming data; that's the focus
of some upcoming work.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4127
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An osd request uses either pages or a bio list for its data. Use a
union to record information about the two, and add a data type
tag to select between them.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Pull the fields in an osd request structure that define the data for
the request out into a separate structure.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Currently ceph_osdc_new_request() assigns an osd request's
r_num_pages and r_alignment fields. The only thing it does
after that is call ceph_osdc_build_request(), and that doesn't
need those fields to be assigned.
Move the assignment of those fields out of ceph_osdc_new_request()
and into its caller. As a result, the page_align parameter is no
longer used, so get rid of it.
Note that in ceph_sync_write(), the value for req->r_num_pages had
already been calculated earlier (as num_pages, and fortunately
it was computed the same way). So don't bother recomputing it,
but because it's not needed earlier, move that calculation after the
call to ceph_osdc_new_request(). Hold off making the assignment to
r_alignment, doing it instead r_pages and r_num_pages are
getting set.
Similarly, in start_read(), nr_pages already holds the number of
pages in the array (and is calculated the same way), so there's no
need to recompute it. Move the assignment of the page alignment
down with the others there as well.
This and the next few patches are preparation work for:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4127
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
(This is being reposted. The first one had a problem because it
erroneously added a similar change elsewhere; that change has been
dropped.)
The next patch in this series points out that the calculation for
the number of pages in an osd request is getting done twice. It
is not obvious, but the result of both calculations is identical.
This patch simplifies one of them--as a separate step--to make
it clear that the transformation in the next patch is valid.
In ceph_sync_write() there is some magic that computes page_align
for an osd request. But a little analysis shows it can be
simplified.
First, we have:
io_align = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
which is used here:
page_align = (pos - io_align + buf_align) & ~PAGE_MASK;
Note (pos - io_align) simply rounds "pos" down to the nearest multiple
of the page size.
We also have:
buf_align = (unsigned long)data & ~PAGE_MASK;
Adding buf_align to that rounded-down "pos" value will stay within
the same page; the result will just be offset by the page offset for
the "data" pointer. The final mask therefore leaves just the value
of "buf_align".
One more simplification. Note that the result of calc_pages_for()
is invariant of which page the offset starts in--the only thing that
matters is the offset within the starting page. We will have
put the proper page offset to use into "page_align", so just use
that in calculating num_pages.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4166
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Alex Elder
Sage Weil
Henry C Chang
Yan, Zheng