Bytes are being copied from/to a single page. The intent
of the warning is to warn if the page boundary is crossed.
There are two problems. First, PAGE_MASK is mistaken for
(PAGE_SIZE - 1). Secondly, instead of using the number
of bytes to copy, the warning is using the maximum that
that value could be. Fix both.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The ADMA2 descriptor table size was being calculated incorrectly
Fix it.
Note that it has been wrong for a long time and likely has not
caused any problems because of a combination of 1) not needing
alignment descriptors for block operations 2) more memory being
allocated than was requested 3) the use of
SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_ENDATTR_IN_NOPDESC which does not use an extra
descriptor for the end marker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Besides the I/O clock, some PXAv3 SDHCI IP also requires a core clock to
be enabled. Add an optional core clock to the corresponding driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
With support for more than one clock, we'll need to distinguish between
the clock by name. Change clock probing to first try to get "io" clock
before falling back to unnamed clock.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
As we are using references to the I/O clock throughout the driver,
move it to the private data. Also, in preparation for core clock,
rename it to clk_io.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
sdhci_add_host and sdhci_platfm_init already report failure,
so don't emit error messages when a failure occurs. This prevents
occurences of "deferred" messages when required power supplies
are not ready for operation yet.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Due to previous patches, all callers of mmc_send_cxd_data() now
allocates their buffers from the heap. This enables us to simplify
mmc_send_cxd_data() by removing the support of handling buffers, which
are allocated from the stack.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Previous patches has replaced the calls to mmc_send_ext_csd() into
mmc_get_ext_csd(), thus mmc_send_ext_csd() has become redundant. Let's
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Callers of mmc_send_ext_csd() will be able to decrease code duplication
by using mmc_get_ext_csd() instead. Let's make it available.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The callers of mmc_get_ext_csd() need the flexibility to handle errors
themselves, because they behave differently.
Let's clean up mmc_get_ext_csd() with its friends and adopt the error
handling as stated above.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
As a step in cleaning up code around reading/decoding EXT_CSD, convert
the current mmc_read_ext_csd(), to handle both fetching the EXT_CSD
and decoding its data.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The helper function mmc_can_ext_csd() will return a positive value if
the card supports the EXT_CSD register. Start using it at relavant
places in the mmc core.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
If the MMC spec version is < CSD_SPEC_VER_4, there aren't support for
the EXT_CSD register. Since max_dtr is fetched from there, it will
default to zero, which thus isn't needed to verify.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The validation of the buswidth and the MMC spec version in
__mmc_select_powerclass() is redundant, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
mmc_send_ext_csd() is an exported function used by both the mmc core
and the mmc block layer. Let's remove the local duplicated definition
in the mmc core.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The dw_mmc driver had a bunch of code that ran whenever a card was
ejected and inserted. However, this code was old and crufty and
should be removed. Some evidence that it's really not needed:
1. Is is supposed to be legal to use 'cd-gpio' on dw_mmc instead of
using the built-in card detect mechanism. The 'cd-gpio' code
doesn't run any of the crufty old code but yet still works.
2. While looking at this, I realized that my old change (369ac86 mmc:
dw_mmc: don't queue up a card detect at slot startup) actually
castrated the old code a little bit already and nobody noticed.
Specifically "last_detect_state" was left as 0 at bootup. That
means that on the first card removal none of the crufty code ran.
3. I can run "while true; do dd if=/dev/mmcblk1 of=/dev/null; done"
while ejecting and inserting an SD Card and the world doesn't
explode.
If some of the crufty old code is actually needed, we should justify
it and also put it in some place where it will be run even with
"cd-gpio".
Note that in my case I'm using the "cd-gpio" mechanism but for various
reasons the hardware triggers a dw_mmc "card detect" at bootup. That
was actually causing a real bug. The card detect workqueue was
running while the system was trying to enumerate the card. The
"present != slot->last_detect_state" triggered and we were doing all
kinds of crazy stuff and messing up enumeration. The new mechanism of
just asking the core to check the card is much safer and then the
bogus interrupt doesn't hurt.
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Tested-by: alim.akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Presumably ->slotno is normally fairly small and the shift doesn't wrap
but static checkers will complain about it.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
"ret" is a signed int, so use "%d" in format strings instead of "%u".
This prevents cryptic codes in error messages like this:
sdhci-arasan e0101000.sdhci: platform register failed (4294966779)
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Reviewed-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>