Use "unsigned int/short" instead of "unsigned", and change the type of
iteration variable "i" to "unsigned int".
Signed-off-by: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Ben Hutchings says:
====================
1. Change PTP clock name to 'sfc'.
2. Complete support for hardware timestamping and PTP clock on the
SFC9100 family.
3. Various cleanups for the PTP code.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_resend_igmp_join_requests_delayed() and
bond_resend_igmp_join_requests() should be integrated,
because the bond_resend_igmp_join_requests_delayed() did
nothing except bond_resend_igmp_join_requests().
The bond igmp_retrans could only be changed in bond_change_active_slave
and here, bond_change_active_slave will be called in RTNL and curr_slave_lock,
the bond_resend_igmp_join_requests already hold RTNL, so no need
to free RTNL and hold curr_slave_lock again, it may be a small optimization,
so move the igmp_retrans in RTNL and remove the curr_slave_lock.
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_select_active_slave() will not release and acquire
bond lock, so it is no need to read the bond lock for them,
and the bond_store_primaryxxx() is already in RTNL, so remove the
unwanted lock.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_option_active_slave_set() is always called in RTNL,
the RTNL could protect bond slave list, so remove the unwanted
bond lock.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() use the bond lock to protect
the bond slave list and slave port together, but it is not enough,
the bond slave list was link and unlink in RTNL, not bond lock,
so I add RCU to protect the slave list from leaving.
The bond lock is still used here, because when the slave has been
removed from the list by the time the state machine runs, it appears
to be possible for both function to manupulate the same aggregator->lag_ports
by finding the aggregator via two different ports that are both members of
that aggregator (i.e., port A of the agg is being unbound, and port B
of the agg is runing its state machine).
If I remove the bond lock, there are nothing to mutex changes
to aggregator->lag_ports between bond_3ad_state_machine_handler and
bond_3ad_unbind_slave, So the bond lock is the simplest way to protect
aggregator->lag_ports.
There was a lot of function need RCU protect, I have two choice
to make the function in RCU-safe, (1) create new similar functions
and make the bond slave list in RCU. (2) modify the existed functions
and make them in read-side critical section, because the RCU
read-side critical sections may be nested.
I choose (2) because it is no need to create more similar functions.
The nots in the function is still too old, clean up the nots.
Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_change_active_slave() and bond_select_active_slave()
do't need bond lock anymore, so remove the unwanted bond lock
for these two functions.
The bond_select_active_slave() will release and acquire
curr_slave_lock, so the curr_slave_lock need to protect
the function.
In bond enslave and bond release, the bond slave list is also
protected by RTNL, so bond lock is no need to exist, remove
the lock and clean the functions.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_activebackup_arp_mon() use the bond lock for read to
protect the slave list, it is no effect, and the RTNL is only
called for bond_ab_arp_commit() and peer notify, for the performance
better, use RCU to replace with the bond lock, to the bond slave
list need to called in RCU, add a new bond_first_slave_rcu()
to get the first slave in RCU protection.
In bond_ab_arp_probe(), the bond->current_arp_slave may changd
if bond release slave, just like:
bond_ab_arp_probe() bond_release()
cpu 0 cpu 1
...
if (bond->current_arp_slave...) ...
... bond->current_arp_slave = NULl
bond->current_arp_slave->dev->name ...
So the current_arp_slave need to dereference in the section.
Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_first_slave_rcu() will be used to instead of bond_first_slave()
in rcu_read_lock().
According to the Jay Vosburgh's suggestion, the struct netdev_adjacent
should hide from users who wanted to use it directly. so I package a
new function to get the first slave of the bond.
Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() use the bond lock to protect the
bond slave list, it is no effect, so I could use RTNL or RCU to
replace it, considering the performance impact, the RCU is more
better here, so the bond lock replace with the RCU.
The bond_select_active_slave() need RTNL and curr_slave_lock
together, but there is no RTNL lock here, so add a rtnl_rtylock.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_alb_monitor use bond lock to protect the bond slave list,
it is no effect here, we need to use RTNL or RCU to replace bond lock,
the bond_alb_monitor will called 10 times one second, RTNL may loss
performance here, so I replace bond lock with RCU to protect the
bond slave list, also the RTNL is preserved, the logic of the monitor
did not changed.
Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond_mii_monitor() still use bond lock to protect bond slave list,
it is no effect, I have 2 way to fix the problem, move the RTNL to the
top of the function, or add RCU to protect the bond slave list,
according to the Jay Vosburgh's opinion, 10 times one second is a
truely big performance loss if use RTNL to protect the whole monitor,
so I would take the advice and use RCU to protect the bond slave list.
The bond_has_slave() will not protect by anything, there will no things
happen if the slave list is be changed, unless the bond was free, but
it will not happened before the monitor, the bond will closed before
be freed.
The peers notify for the bond will calling curr_active_slave, so
derefence the slave to make sure we will accessing the same slave
if the curr_active_slave changed, as the rcu dereference need in
read-side critical sector and bond_change_active_slave() will call
it with no RCU hold, so add peer notify in rcu_read_lock which
will be nested in monitor.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The bond slave list was no longer protected by bond lock and only
protected by RTNL or RCU, so anywhere that use bond lock to protect
slave list is meaningless.
remove the release and acquire bond lock for bond_select_active_slave().
The curr_active_slave could only be changed in 3 place:
1. enslave slave.
2. release slave.
3. change_active_slave.
all above place were holding bond lock, RTNL and curr_slave_lock
together, it is tedious and meaningless, obviously bond lock is no
need here, but RTNL or curr_slave_lock is needed, so if you want
to access active slave, you have to choose one lock, RTNL or
curr_slave_lock, if RTNL is exist, no need to add curr_slave_lock,
otherwise curr_slave_lock is better, because of the performance.
there are several place calling bond_select_active_slave() and
bond_change_active_slave(), the next step I will clean these place
and remove the no effect lock.
there are some document changed together when update the function.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Ben Hutchings says:
====================
An assortment of changes for Linux 3.14:
1. Merge the sfc fixes that you have already merged into net.git.
(The branch point for those was such that this does not bring in any
other changes.)
2. Reduce log level for a generally useless warning message, from
Robert Stonehouse.
3. Include BISTs in ethtool offline self-test for EF10 and recover from
BISTs initiated through other functions, from Jon Cooper.
4. Improve a sanity check on RX completions.
5. Avoid incrementing RX dropped count while the interface is down, from
Jon Cooper.
6. Improve hardware sensor naming and log messages, from Edward Cree.
7. Log all unexpected errors returned by firmware, from Edward Cree.
8. Expose another NVRAM partition to userland.
9. Some refactoring of the PTP code in preparation for EF10 support.
10. Various minor cleanups.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add IFLA_BOND_ARP_ALL_TARGETS to allow get/set of bonding parameter
arp_all_targets via netlink.
Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add IFLA_BOND_ARP_IP_TARGET to allow get/set of bonding parameter
arp_ip_target via netlink.
Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The SFC9100 family has only one clock per controller, shared by all
functions. Therefore only create a clock device under the primary
function, and make all other functions refer to the primary's clock
device.
Since PTP functionality is limited to port 0 and PF 0 on the earlier
SFN[56]322F boards, and we also set the primary flag for that
function, we can make the creation of a clock device conditional only
on this flag.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
tanxiaojun
David S. Miller
dingtianhong
sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com
Ben Hutchings