an ATA bay can be in a dock and itself can be ejected separately.
This patch handles such eject bay. Found by Holger.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
dock's uevent reported itself, not ata. It might be difficult to find an
ata device just according to a dock. This patch introduces docking ops
for each device in a dock. when docking, dock driver can send device
specific uevent. This should help dock station too (not just bay)
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
dock driver can handle ata(bay) hotplug now. dock driver already handles
_EJ0 and _STA, so remove them. Also libata doesn't need register
notification handler anymore.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The hotplug notification handler and drivers' notification handler all
run in one workqueue. Before hotplug removes an acpi device, the
device driver's notification handler is already be recorded to run just
after global notification handler. After hotplug notification handler
runs, acpica will notice a NULL notification handler and crash.
So now we run run hotplug in another workqueue and wait
for all acpi notication handlers finish.
This was found in battery hotplug, but actually all
hotplug can be affected.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The battery driver already registers notification handler.
To avoid registering notification handler again,
introduce a notifier chain in global system notifier handler
and use it in dock driver.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Make the dock driver support bay and battery hotplug.
They are all regarded as dock, so handling can be unified.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
support _LCK method, which is a optional method for hotplug
lenb: we have not seen _LCK used in the field yet
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 2a7feab28d3fc060d320eaba192e49dad1079b7e introduces a bug.
My thinkpad actually will send an eject_request and we should follow the
eject process to finish the eject, otherwise system still thinks the bay
is present.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
In some BIOSes, every _STA method call will send a notification again,
this cause freeze. And in some BIOSes, it appears _STA should be called
after _DCK. This tries to avoid calls _STA, and still keep the device
present check.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10431
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some devices emit a ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK while physically unplugging
even if the software undock has already been done and dock_present() check
fails. However, the internal flags need to be cleared (complete_undock()).
Also, even notify userspace if the dock station suddently went away
without proper software undocking.
This happens on a Acer TravelMate 3000
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
commit 816c2eda3c ("dock: bay: Don't call
acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled.") was merged between
2.6.26-rc8 and -rc9)
Due to rebasing the ACPI tree via quilt the same patch got applied again
via commit cc7e51666d ("dock: bay: Don't
call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled.")
Revert it, as it is obviously bogus.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
begin_undock() is only called when triggered via a acpi notify handler
(pressing the undock button on the dock station), but complete_undock() is
always called after the eject. So if a undock is triggered through a sysfs
write, the flag DOCK_UNDOCKING has to be set for the dock station,
too. Otherwise this will freeze the system hard.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Data returned by acpi_get_name in acpi_buffer is not acpi_object and
therefore should not be cast to it, otherwise we'll get an nice oops
trying to print error message.
Also print name of the ACPI object corresponding to the docking station
and elevate severity of the message printed when _DCK fails to KERN_ERR.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Send an env along with our KOBJ_CHANGE uevent so that user space has
the option of checking for that to see if a dock or undock has occurred.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Platform devices may not send uevents by default - override the setting
so that we can send uevents on dock/undock.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Allow the driver to be loaded with an option that will allow userspace to
control whether the laptop is ejected immediately when the user presses the
button, or only when the syfs undock file is written.
if immediate_undock == 1, then when the user presses the undock button, the
laptop will send an event to userspace to notify userspace of the undock, but
then immediately undock without waiting for userspace. This is the current
behavior, and I set this to be the default.
if immediate_undock == 0, then when the user presses the undock button, the
laptop will send an event to userspace and do nothing. User space can query
the "flags" sysfs entry to determine if an undock request has been made by
the user (if bit 1 is set). User space will then need to write the undock
sysfs entry to complete the undocking process.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Get rid of no release function warnings by switching to dynamically
allocating the platform_device and using the platform device release
routine in the base driver.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Shaohua Li
Zhang Rui
Holger Macht
Thomas Gleixner
Len Brown
Tim Pepper
Adrian Bunk
Frank Seidel
Dmitry Torokhov
Kristen Carlson Accardi