VLV gets confused if two power sequencers have the same port selected.
It would seem the port doesn't start up properly in the is case and
vlv_wait_port_ready() will fail as will the link training. Clearing the
port select in the PP_ON_DELAYS register fixes this problem.
CHV doesn't seem to need this, but it doesn't seem to hurt either so
let's just do it for both to keep the code between the platforms as
uniform as possible.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If there's no power sequencer assigned to the port currently we can't
very well have vdd or panel power enabled either. If we would try to
check that from the pps registers we'd need to pick a power seqeuncer
and kick it. So let's skip the register read and the kick.
Note that there's still a bit an issue about correctly recovering pps
state from resume if the bios is nasty: With this check we'll always
assume that the pps is off. But that's better done in a follow-up
patch and it shouldn't be too harmful - at most we waste time enabling
the pps if it's on already.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add note about resume issues Imre spotted.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When we pick a new power sequencer for the port but we're not doing a
full modeset, the power sequencer may have locked on to another port (or
no port). So kick it a bit to make sure it controls the port we want.
Again just like when we attempt to actually enable the DP port, we
must first write the port register with the approriate value except
the enable bit, and then we must enable the port to make the power
sequencer happy. In this case since we don't want the port actually
enabled we just toggle it on and immediately back off. Going forward
the power sequencer will keep working on that specific port until again
moved to another port.
v2: Refine the kick procedure
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When switching from one pipe to another, the power sequencer of the new
pipe seems to need a bit of kicking to lock into the port. Even the vdd
force bit doesn't work before the power sequencer has been sufficiently
kicked, so this must be done before any AUX transactions are attempted.
After extensive experimentation I've determined that it's sufficient
to first write the port register with the correct values except the
port must remain disabled, then we can do a second write to enable the
port, after which the power sequencer is operational and allows the port
to start up properly.
Contrary to my earlier theories we don't need to enable the port with
the idle pattern, so let's just use training pattern 1 as that's what
other platforms use here.
v2: Refine the kick procedure
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Just grab the pps_mutex once and do all the pps panel startup operations
while holding the mutex instead of grabbing the mutex separately for
each individual step.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We'll be needing to the call the power seqeuencer functions while
already holding pps_mutex, so split the locking out to small wrapper
functions.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Since we read the current power seqeuncer delays from the registers
(as well as looking at the vbt and spec values) we may end up
corrupting delays we already initialized when we switch to another
pipe and the power seqeuncer there has different values currently
in the registers.
So make sure we only initialize the delays once even if
intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer() gets called multiple times.
There was some discussion in the review about when exactly we need to
unlock the pps. Quoting Bspec:
"If this bit is not a zero, it activates the register write protect
and writes to those registers will be ignored unless the write
protect key value is set in the panel sequencing control register."
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add Bspec quote per review discussion between Imre and
Ville.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The power seqeuncer delays are fixed for a given panel, so we can keep
them around once computed.
Not that on VLV/CHV we still re-compute them every time we initialize
the power seqeuncer registers, but that will change soon enough.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
want_panel_vdd is a bool so it can't cope with interleaving on/off calls
from multiple threads. If we want to make that possible we'd need to
convert want_panel_vdd into a proper ref count. But an easier fix is to
remove the high level vdd on/off calls from detect/hpd code paths and
just rely on the delayed vdd off to avoid needless vdd on<->off ping
pong.
After this change only the encoder enable/disable paths use the high
level functions, which is fine since both the on and off low level edp
vdd calls from intel_dp_aux_ch() happen without dropping pps_mutex in
between and so want_panel_vdd can't change in between.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Only ports B and C have the power sequencer and backlight controls,
so complain if we ever try to register an eDP connector on some other
port.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because I got annoyed that I had to document what values "int
ddi_personality" is supposed to hold.
A good side-effect of this change is that now the compilers can do
some additional checks on our code, which may prevent some bugs in the
future. A bad side-effect of this change is that now the compilers do
some additional checks on our code and complain when a switch
statement doesn't check for all possible values, so we need to add
"default" cases to all those switches. Hopefully, this may help
preventing confusions against DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_* and
DRM_MODE_ENCODER_*.
I guess that just by looking at the patch, some people will think this
change is not worth its benefits. In this case, I don't really mind
dropping the patch.
Also, there's probably still a few more places where we can
s/int/enum intel_output_type/, but we can change that later, when we
spot the places.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: Resolve conflict due to reordered patches.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
libva uses chained batch buffers in a way that the command parser
can't generally handle. Fortunately, libva doesn't need to write
registers from batch buffers in the way that mesa does, so this
patch causes the driver to fall back to non-secure dispatch if
the parser detects a chained batch buffer.
Note: The 2nd hunk to munge the error code of the parser looks a bit
superflous. At least until we have the batch copy code ready and can
run the cmd parser in granting mode. But it isn't since we still need
to let existing libva buffers pass (though not with elevated privs
ofc!).
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_parse/chained-batch
Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
[danvet: Add note - this confused me in review and Brad clarified
things (after a few mails ...).]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This allows the cursor plane to be updated the same way as primary and sprites,
and same set_property handler is used for all of these planes.
v2 (by Matt Roper): Rework to apply to latest di-nightly codebase. The
switch to split check/commit plane programming changed the code
flow enough that the original patch could no longer be applied.
Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Tested-by (IVB): Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If these flags are on the object level it will be more difficult to allow
for multiple VMAs per object.
v2: Simplification and cleanup after code review comments (Chris Wilson).
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Ville Syrjälä
Paulo Zanoni
Jani Nikula
Gustavo Padovan
Damien Lespiau
Armin Reese
Brad Volkin
Sonika Jindal
Tvrtko Ursulin