Commit Graph

39 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Qu Wenruo c43d160fcd btrfs: delayed-ref: Cleanup the unneeded functions.
Cleanup the rb_tree merge/insert/update functions, since now we use list
instead of rb_tree now.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-10 09:25:09 -07:00
Qu Wenruo c6fc245499 btrfs: delayed-ref: Use list to replace the ref_root in ref_head.
This patch replace the rbtree used in ref_head to list.
This has the following advantage:
1) Easier merge logic.
With the new list implement, we only need to care merging the tail
ref_node with the new ref_node.
And this can be done quite easy at insert time, no need to do a
indicated merge at run_delayed_refs().

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-10 09:25:03 -07:00
Josef Bacik 1262133b8d Btrfs: account for crcs in delayed ref processing
As we delete large extents, we end up doing huge amounts of COW in order
to delete the corresponding crcs.  This adds accounting so that we keep
track of that space and flushing of delayed refs so that we don't build
up too much delayed crc work.

This helps limit the delayed work that must be done at commit time and
tries to avoid ENOSPC aborts because the crcs eat all the global
reserves.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-04-10 14:04:47 -07:00
Josef Bacik fcebe4562d Btrfs: rework qgroup accounting
Currently qgroups account for space by intercepting delayed ref updates to fs
trees.  It does this by adding sequence numbers to delayed ref updates so that
it can figure out how the tree looked before the update so we can adjust the
counters properly.  The problem with this is that it does not allow delayed refs
to be merged, so if you say are defragging an extent with 5k snapshots pointing
to it we will thrash the delayed ref lock because we need to go back and
manually merge these things together.  Instead we want to process quota changes
when we know they are going to happen, like when we first allocate an extent, we
free a reference for an extent, we add new references etc.  This patch
accomplishes this by only adding qgroup operations for real ref changes.  We
only modify the sequence number when we need to lookup roots for bytenrs, this
reduces the amount of churn on the sequence number and allows us to merge
delayed refs as we add them most of the time.  This patch encompasses a bunch of
architectural changes

1) qgroup ref operations: instead of tracking qgroup operations through the
delayed refs we simply add new ref operations whenever we notice that we need to
when we've modified the refs themselves.

2) tree mod seq:  we no longer have this separation of major/minor counters.
this makes the sequence number stuff much more sane and we can remove some
locking that was needed to protect the counter.

3) delayed ref seq: we now read the tree mod seq number and use that as our
sequence.  This means each new delayed ref doesn't have it's own unique sequence
number, rather whenever we go to lookup backrefs we inc the sequence number so
we can make sure to keep any new operations from screwing up our world view at
that given point.  This allows us to merge delayed refs during runtime.

With all of these changes the delayed ref stuff is a little saner and the qgroup
accounting stuff no longer goes negative in some cases like it was before.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:48 -07:00
Filipe Manana 21543baddc Btrfs: fix race when updating existing ref head
While we update an existing ref head's extent_op, we're not holding
its spinlock, so while we're updating its extent_op contents (key,
flags) we can have a task running __btrfs_run_delayed_refs() that
holds the ref head's lock and sets its extent_op to NULL right after
the task updating the ref head just checked its extent_op was not NULL.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:28 -07:00
Filipe Manana 85fdfdf611 Btrfs: cleanup delayed-ref.c:find_ref_head()
The argument last wasn't used, all callers supplied a NULL value
for it. Also removed unnecessary intermediate storage of the result
of key comparisons.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:46 -04:00
Filipe Manana 6103fb43fb Btrfs: remove unnecessary ref heads rb tree search
When we didn't find the exact ref head we were looking for, if
return_bigger != 0 we set a new search key to match either the
next node after the last one we found or the first one in the
ref heads rb tree, and then did another full tree search. For both
cases this ended up being pointless as we would end up returning
an entry we already had before repeating the search.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:46 -04:00
Josef Bacik d7df2c796d Btrfs: attach delayed ref updates to delayed ref heads
Currently we have two rb-trees, one for delayed ref heads and one for all of the
delayed refs, including the delayed ref heads.  When we process the delayed refs
we have to hold onto the delayed ref lock for all of the selecting and merging
and such, which results in quite a bit of lock contention.  This was solved by
having a waitqueue and only one flusher at a time, however this hurts if we get
a lot of delayed refs queued up.

So instead just have an rb tree for the delayed ref heads, and then attach the
delayed ref updates to an rb tree that is per delayed ref head.  Then we only
need to take the delayed ref lock when adding new delayed refs and when
selecting a delayed ref head to process, all the rest of the time we deal with a
per delayed ref head lock which will be much less contentious.

The locking rules for this get a little more complicated since we have to lock
up to 3 things to properly process delayed refs, but I will address that problem
later.  For now this passes all of xfstests and my overnight stress tests.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:20:25 -08:00
Liu Bo 9e5ac13acb Btrfs: skip merge part for delayed data refs
When we have data deduplication on, we'll hang on the merge part
because it needs to verify every queued delayed data refs related to
this disk offset but we may have millions refs.

And in the case of delayed data refs, we don't usually have too much
data refs to merge.

So it's safe to shut it down for data refs.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:19:23 -08:00
Liu Bo c46effa601 Btrfs: introduce a head ref rbtree
The way how we process delayed refs is
1) get a bunch of head refs,
2) pick up one head ref,
3) go one node back for any delayed ref updates.

The head ref is also linked in the same rbtree as the delayed ref is,
so in 1) stage, we have to walk one by one including not only head refs, but
delayed refs.

When we have a great number of delayed refs pending to process,
this'll cost time a lot.

Here we introduce a head ref specific rbtree, it only has head refs, so troubles
go away.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:19:22 -08:00
Stefan Behrens 35a3621beb Btrfs: get rid of sparse warnings
make C=2 fs/btrfs/ CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__

I tried to filter out the warnings for which patches have already
been sent to the mailing list, pending for inclusion in btrfs-next.

All these changes should be obviously safe.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:15:50 -04:00
Liu Bo 599c75ec3f Btrfs/tracepoint: update delayed ref tracepoints
This shows exactly how btrfs processes the delayed refs onto disks,
which is very helpful on understanding delayed ref mechanism and
debugging related bugs.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 07:57:39 -04:00
Jan Schmidt fc36ed7e0b Btrfs: separate sequence numbers for delayed ref tracking and tree mod log
Sequence numbers for delayed refs have been introduced in the first version
of the qgroup patch set. To solve the problem of find_all_roots on a busy
file system, the tree mod log was introduced. The sequence numbers for that
were simply shared between those two users.

However, at one point in qgroup's quota accounting, there's a statement
accessing the previous sequence number, that's still just doing (seq - 1)
just as it would have to in the very first version.

To satisfy that requirement, this patch makes the sequence number counter 64
bit and splits it into a major part (used for qgroup sequence number
counting) and a minor part (incremented for each tree modification in the
log). This enables us to go exactly one major step backwards, as required
for qgroups, while still incrementing the sequence counter for tree mod log
insertions to keep track of their order. Keeping them in a single variable
means there's no need to change all the code dealing with comparisons of two
sequence numbers.

The sequence number is reset to 0 on commit (not new in this patch), which
ensures we won't overflow the two 32 bit counters.

Without this fix, the qgroup tracking can occasionally go wrong and WARN_ONs
from the tree mod log code may happen.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-05-06 15:55:17 -04:00
Josef Bacik 41b0fc4280 Btrfs: compare relevant parts of delayed tree refs
A user reported a panic while running a balance.  What was happening was he was
relocating a block, which added the reference to the relocation tree.  Then
relocation would walk through the relocation tree and drop that reference and
free that block, and then it would walk down a snapshot which referenced the
same block and add another ref to the block.  The problem is this was all
happening in the same transaction, so the parent block was free'ed up when we
drop our reference which was immediately available for allocation, and then it
was used _again_ to add a reference for the same block from a different
snapshot.  This resulted in something like this in the delayed ref tree

add ref to 90234880, parent=2067398656, ref_root 1766, level 1
del ref to 90234880, parent=2067398656, ref_root 18446744073709551608, level 1
add ref to 90234880, parent=2067398656, ref_root 1767, level 1

as you can see the ref_root's don't match, because when we inc the ref we use
the header owner, which is the original tree the block belonged to, instead of
the data reloc tree.  Then when we remove the extent we use the reloc tree
objectid.  But none of this matters, since it is a shared reference which means
only the parent matters.  When the delayed ref stuff runs it adds all the
increments first, and then does all the drops, to make sure that we don't delete
the ref if we net a positive ref count.  But tree blocks aren't allowed to have
multiple refs from the same block, so this panics when it tries to add the
second ref.  We need the add and the drop to cancel each other out in memory so
we only do the final add.

So to fix this we need to adjust how the delayed refs are added to the tree.
Only the ref_root matters when it is a normal backref, and only the parent
matters when it is a shared backref.  So make our decision based on what ref
type we have.  This allows us to keep the ref_root in memory in case anybody
wants to use it for something else, and it allows the delayed refs to be merged
properly so we don't end up with this panic.

With this patch the users image no longer panics on mount, and it has a clean
fsck after a normal mount/umount cycle.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-05-06 15:54:29 -04:00
Miao Xie 093486c453 Btrfs: make delayed ref lock logic more readable
Locking and unlocking delayed ref mutex are in the different functions,
and the name of lock functions is not uniform, so the readability is not
so good, this patch optimizes the lock logic and makes it more readable.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20 09:36:41 -05:00
Miao Xie 78a6184a3f Btrfs: use slabs for delayed reference allocation
The delayed reference allocation is in the fast path of the IO, so use slabs
to improve the speed of the allocation.

And besides that, it can do check for leaked objects when the module is removed.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2013-02-20 09:36:34 -05:00
Josef Bacik ae1e206b80 Btrfs: allow delayed refs to be merged
Daniel Blueman reported a bug with fio+balance on a ramdisk setup.
Basically what happens is the balance relocates a tree block which will drop
the implicit refs for all of its children and adds a full backref.  Once the
block is relocated we have to add the implicit refs back, so when we cow the
block again we add the implicit refs for its children back.  The problem
comes when the original drop ref doesn't get run before we add the implicit
refs back.  The delayed ref stuff will specifically prefer ADD operations
over DROP to keep us from freeing up an extent that will have references to
it, so we try to add the implicit ref before it is actually removed and we
panic.  This worked fine before because the add would have just canceled the
drop out and we would have been fine.  But the backref walking work needs to
be able to freeze the delayed ref stuff in time so we have this ever
increasing sequence number that gets attached to all new delayed ref updates
which makes us not merge refs and we run into this issue.

So to fix this we need to merge delayed refs.  So everytime we run a
clustered ref we need to try and merge all of its delayed refs.  The backref
walking stuff locks the delayed ref head before processing, so if we have it
locked we are safe to merge any refs inside of the sequence number.  If
there is no sequence number we can merge all refs.  Doing this not only
fixes our bug but keeps the delayed ref code from adding and removing
useless refs and batching together multiple refs into one search instead of
one search per delayed ref, which will really help our commit times.  I ran
this with Daniels test and 276 and I haven't seen any problems.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2012-08-28 16:53:38 -04:00
Arne Jansen 1fa11e265f Btrfs: fix deadlock in wait_for_more_refs
Commit a168650c introduced a waiting mechanism to prevent busy waiting in
btrfs_run_delayed_refs. This can deadlock with btrfs_run_ordered_operations,
where a tree_mod_seq is held while waiting for the io to complete, while
the end_io calls btrfs_run_delayed_refs.
This whole mechanism is unnecessary. If not enough runnable refs are
available to satisfy count, just return as count is more like a guideline
than a strict requirement.
In case we have to run all refs, commit transaction makes sure that no
other threads are working in the transaction anymore, so we just assert
here that no refs are blocked.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-08-28 16:53:32 -04:00
Jan Schmidt 546adb0d81 Btrfs: hooks for qgroup to record delayed refs
Hooks into qgroup code to record refs and into transaction commit.
This is the main entry point for qgroup. Basically every change in
extent backrefs got accounted to the appropriate qgroups.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-07-12 10:54:38 +02:00
Jan Schmidt 097b8a7c9e Btrfs: join tree mod log code with the code holding back delayed refs
We've got two mechanisms both required for reliable backref resolving (tree
mod log and holding back delayed refs). You cannot make use of one without
the other. So instead of requiring the user of this mechanism to setup both
correctly, we join them into a single interface.

Additionally, we stop inserting non-blockers into fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list
as we did before, which was of no value.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-07-10 15:14:41 +02:00
Jan Schmidt 95a06077f7 Btrfs: use delayed ref sequence numbers for all fs-tree updates
The sequence number for delayed refs is needed to postpone certain delayed
refs for a very short period while walking backrefs. Before the tree
modification log, we thought we'd only have to hold back those references
that don't have a counter operation.

While now we've the tree mod log, we're rewinding fs tree blocks to a
defined consistent state. We cannot know in advance for which tree block
we'll be doing rewind operations later. Therefore, we must postpone all the
delayed refs for fs-tree blocks, even those having a counter operation.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-05-30 18:18:21 +02:00
Jeff Mahoney 143bede527 btrfs: return void in functions without error conditions
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
2012-03-22 01:45:34 +01:00
Jeff Mahoney cddcd80018 btrfs: Fix kfree of member instead of structure
Correctness fix: The kfree calls in the add_delayed_* functions free
the node that's passed into it, but the node is a member of another
structure. It works because it's always the first member of the
containing structure, but it should really be using the containing
structure itself.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
2012-03-22 01:45:30 +01:00
Jan Schmidt a168650c08 Btrfs: add waitqueue instead of doing busy waiting for more delayed refs
Now that we may be holding back delayed refs for a limited period, we
might end up having no runnable delayed refs. Without this commit, we'd
do busy waiting in that thread until another (runnable) ref arives.
Instead, we're detecting this situation and use a waitqueue, such that
we only try to run more refs after
	a) another runnable ref was added  or
	b) delayed refs are no longer held back

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-01-04 16:12:48 +01:00
Arne Jansen d1270cd91f Btrfs: put back delayed refs that are too new
When processing a delayed ref, first check if there are still old refs in
the process of being added. If so, put this ref back to the tree. To avoid
looping on this ref, choose a newer one in the next loop.
btrfs_find_ref_cluster has to take care of that.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-01-04 16:12:45 +01:00