We're in the process of turning bset.c into library code, so none of the code in
that file should know about struct cache_set or struct btree - so, move the
btree traversal part of the stats code to sysfs.c.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
More disentangling bset.c from the rest of the bcache code - soon, the
sorting routines won't have any dependencies on any outside structs.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Only use extent comparison for comparing extents, so we're not using
START_KEY() on other key types (i.e. btree pointers)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Getting away from KEY_PTRS and moving toward KEY_U64s - and getting rid of magic
2s
Also - split out the part that checks against journal entry size so as to avoid
a dependancy on struct cache_set in bset.c
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Now that we've got code for raid5/6 stripe awareness, bcache just needs
to know about the stripes and when writing partial stripes is expensive
- we probably don't want to enable this optimization for raid1 or 10,
even though they have stripes. So add a flag to queue_limits.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This error path shouldn't have been hit in practice.. and we've got reworked
reserve code coming soon so that it shouldn't _ever_ be bit... but if we've got
code for this error path it should be correct.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
We need a reserve for allocating buckets for new btree nodes - and now that
we've got multiple btrees, it really needs to be per btree.
This reworks the reserves so we've got separate freelists for each reserve
instead of watermarks, which seems to make things a bit cleaner, and it adds
some code so that btree_split() can make sure the reserve is available before it
starts.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Unnecessary since a bucket that has dirty pointers pointing to it can
never be invalidated - and skipping it is a measurable performance
boost, since the bucket gen will usually be a cache miss.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
We were unnecessarily waiting on a journal write to complete when we just needed
to start a journal write and start setting up the next one.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
The real fix is where we check the bytes we need against how much is
remaining - we also need to check for a journal entry bigger than our
buffer, we'll never write those and it would be bad if we tried to read
one.
Also improve the diagnostic messages.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
The code that handles overlapping extents that we've just read back in from disk
was depending on the behaviour of the code that handles overlapping extents as
we're inserting into a btree node in the case of an insert that forced an
existing extent to be split: on insert, if we had to split we'd also insert a
new extent to represent the top part of the old extent - and then that new
extent would get written out.
The code that read the extents back in thus not bother with splitting extents -
if it saw an extent that ovelapped in the middle of an older extent, it would
trim the old extent to only represent the bottom part, assuming that the
original insert would've inserted a new extent to represent the top part.
I still haven't figured out _how_ it can happen, but I'm now pretty convinced
(and testing has confirmed) that there's some kind of an obscure corner case
(probably involving extent merging, and multiple overwrites in different sets)
that breaks this. The fix is to change the mergesort fixup code to split extents
itself when required.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10
Kent Overstreet