28e05dd845 "knfsd: nfsd4: represent nfsv4 acl with array instead of
linked list" removed the last user that wanted a custom free function.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The name of a link is currently stored in cr_name and cr_namelen, and
the content in cr_linkname and cr_linklen. That's confusing.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
An NFS operation that creates a new symlink includes the symlink data,
which is xdr-encoded as a length followed by the data plus 0 to 3 bytes
of zero-padding as required to reach a 4-byte boundary.
The vfs, on the other hand, wants null-terminated data.
The simple way to handle this would be by copying the data into a newly
allocated buffer with space for the final null.
The current nfsd_symlink code tries to be more clever by skipping that
step in the (likely) case where the byte following the string is already
0.
But that assumes that the byte following the string is ours to look at.
In fact, it might be the first byte of a page that we can't read, or of
some object that another task might modify.
Worse, the NFSv4 code tries to fix the problem by actually writing to
that byte.
In the NFSv2/v3 cases this actually appears to be safe:
- nfs3svc_decode_symlinkargs explicitly null-terminates the data
(after first checking its length and copying it to a new
page).
- NFSv2 limits symlinks to 1k. The buffer holding the rpc
request is always at least a page, and the link data (and
previous fields) have maximum lengths that prevent the request
from reaching the end of a page.
In the NFSv4 case the CREATE op is potentially just one part of a long
compound so can end up on the end of a page if you're unlucky.
The minimal fix here is to copy and null-terminate in the NFSv4 case.
The nfsd_symlink() interface here seems too fragile, though. It should
really either do the copy itself every time or just require a
null-terminated string.
Reported-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
XDR requires 4-byte alignment; nfs4d READLINK reply writes out the padding,
but truncates the packet to the padding-less size.
Fix by taking the padding into consideration when truncating the packet.
Symptoms:
# ll /mnt/
ls: cannot read symbolic link /mnt/test: Input/output error
total 4
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jun 14 01:21 123456
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 6 Jul 2 03:33 test
drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 0 Jul 2 23:50 tmp
drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 60 Jul 2 23:44 tree
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@cloudius-systems.com>
Fixes: 476a7b1f4b (nfsd4: don't treat readlink like a zero-copy operation)
Reviewed-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
An NFS operation that creates a new symlink includes the symlink data,
which is xdr-encoded as a length followed by the data plus 0 to 3 bytes
of zero-padding as required to reach a 4-byte boundary.
The vfs, on the other hand, wants null-terminated data.
The simple way to handle this would be by copying the data into a newly
allocated buffer with space for the final null.
The current nfsd_symlink code tries to be more clever by skipping that
step in the (likely) case where the byte following the string is already
0.
But that assumes that the byte following the string is ours to look at.
In fact, it might be the first byte of a page that we can't read, or of
some object that another task might modify.
Worse, the NFSv4 code tries to fix the problem by actually writing to
that byte.
In the NFSv2/v3 cases this actually appears to be safe:
- nfs3svc_decode_symlinkargs explicitly null-terminates the data
(after first checking its length and copying it to a new
page).
- NFSv2 limits symlinks to 1k. The buffer holding the rpc
request is always at least a page, and the link data (and
previous fields) have maximum lengths that prevent the request
from reaching the end of a page.
In the NFSv4 case the CREATE op is potentially just one part of a long
compound so can end up on the end of a page if you're unlucky.
The minimal fix here is to copy and null-terminate in the NFSv4 case.
The nfsd_symlink() interface here seems too fragile, though. It should
really either do the copy itself every time or just require a
null-terminated string.
Reported-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Commit 561f0ed498 (nfsd4: allow large readdirs) introduces a bug
about readdir the root of pseudofs.
Call xdr_truncate_encode() revert encoded name when skipping.
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
While we're here, let's kill off a couple of the read-side macros.
Leaving the more complicated ones alone for now.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
sparse says:
CHECK fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:2043:1: warning: symbol 'nfsd4_encode_fattr' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Note nobody's ever noticed because the typical client probably never
requests FILES_AVAIL without also requesting something else on the list.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
RPC_MAX_AUTH_SIZE is scattered around several places. Better to set it
once in the auth code, where this kind of estimate should be made. And
while we're at it we can leave it zero when we're not using krb5i or
krb5p.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
And switch a couple other functions from the encode(&p,...) convention
to the p = encode(p,...) convention mostly used elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
encode_getattr, for example, can return nfserr_resource to indicate it
ran out of buffer space. That's not a legal error in the 4.1 case.
And in the 4.1 case, if we ran out of buffer space, we should have
exceeded a session limit too.
(Note in 1bc49d83c3 "nfsd4: fix
nfs4err_resource in 4.1 case" we originally tried fixing this error
return before fixing the problem that we could error out while we still
had lots of available space. The result was to trade one illegal error
for another in those cases. We decided that was helpful, so reverted
the change in fc208d026b, and are only
reinstating it now that we've elimited almost all of those cases.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
I'm not sure why a client would want to stuff multiple reads in a
single compound rpc, but it's legal for them to do it, and we should
really support it.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The splice and readv cases are actually quite different--for example the
former case ignores the array of vectors we build up for the latter.
It is probably clearer to separate the two cases entirely.
There's some code duplication between the split out encoders, but this
is only temporary and will be fixed by a later patch.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
We currently allow only one read per compound, with operations before
and after whose responses will require no more than about a page to
encode.
While we don't expect clients to violate those limits any time soon,
this limitation isn't really condoned by the spec, so to future proof
the server we should lift the limitation.
At the same time we'd like to continue to support zero-copy reads.
Supporting multiple zero-copy-reads per compound would require a new
data structure to replace struct xdr_buf, which can represent only one
set of included pages.
So for now we plan to modify encode_read() to support either zero-copy
or non-zero-copy reads, and use some heuristics at the start of the
compound processing to decide whether a zero-copy read will work.
This will allow us to support more exotic compounds without introducing
a performance regression in the normal case.
Later patches handle those "exotic compounds", this one just makes sure
zero-copy is turned off in those cases.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
There's no advantage to this zero-copy-style readlink encoding, and it
unnecessarily limits the kinds of compounds we can handle. (In practice
I can't see why a client would want e.g. multiple readlink calls in a
comound, but it's probably a spec violation for us not to handle it.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
J. Bruce Fields
Kinglong Mee
Avi Kivity
Jeff Layton
Christoph Hellwig