a) in device_write(): add sentinel NUL byte, making sure that lspace.name will
be NUL-terminated
b) in compat_input() be keep it simple about the amounts of data we are copying.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
... those can happen and BUG() from DLM_ASSERT() in allocate_direntry() is
not a good way to handle them.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
We *can* get there from receive_request() and dlm_recover_master_copy()
with namelen too large if incoming request is invalid; BUG() from
DLM_ASSERT() in allocate_rsb() is a bit excessive reaction to that
and in case of dlm_recover_master_copy() we would actually oops before
that while calculating hash of up to 64Kb worth of data - with data
actually being 64 _bytes_ in kmalloc()'ed struct.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
* check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or
rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of
course).
* kill more pointless casts
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
a) don't cast the pointer to dlm_header *, we use it as dlm_message *
anyway.
b) we copy the message into a queue element, then pass the pointer to
copy to dlm_receive_message_saved(); declare it properly to make sure
that we have the right alignment.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
also change name_prefix from char pointer to char array.
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
A couple small clean-ups. Remove unnecessary wrapper-functions in
rcom.c, and remove unnecessary casting and an unnecessary ASSERT in
util.c.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The 32/64 compatibility code in the DLM does not check the validity of
the lock name length passed into it, so it can easily overwrite memory
if the value is rubbish (as early versions of libdlm can cause with
unlock calls, it doesn't zero the field).
This patch restricts the length of the name to the amount of data
actually passed into the call.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To prevent the master of an rsb from changing rapidly, an unused rsb is kept
on the "toss list" for a period of time to be reused. The toss list was
being cleared completely for each recovery, which is unnecessary. Much of
the benefit of the toss list can be maintained if nodes keep rsb's in their
toss list that they are the master of. These rsb's need to be included
when the resource directory is rebuilt during recovery.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The invalid lockspace messages are normal and can appear relatively
often. They should be suppressed without debugging enabled.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
The dlm_put_lkb() can free the lkb and its associated ua structure,
so we can't depend on using the ua struct after the put.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
In a rare case we may need to repeat a local resource directory lookup
due to a race with removing the rsb and removing the resdir record.
We'll never need to do more than a single additional lookup, though,
so the infinite loop around the lookup can be removed. In addition
to being unnecessary, the infinite loop is dangerous since some other
unknown condition may appear causing the loop to never break.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Non-forced unlocks should be rejected if the lock is waiting on the
rsb_lookup list for another lock to establish the master node.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been
cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new
validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type,
process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct
nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the
lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly
bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad
message.
Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely,
it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught
by these checks.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Messages from nodes that are no longer members of the lockspace should be
ignored. When nodes are removed from the lockspace, recovery can
sometimes complete quickly enough that messages arrive from a removed node
after recovery has completed. When processed, these messages would often
cause an error message, and could in some cases change some state, causing
problems.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
When a failed request (EBADR or ENOTBLK) is unlocked/canceled instead of
retried, there may be other lkb's waiting on the rsb_lookup list for it
to complete. A call to confirm_master() is needed to move on to the next
waiting lkb since the current one won't be retried.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
When recovery looks at locks waiting for replies, it fails to consider
locks that have already received a reply for their first remote operation,
but not received a reply for secondary, overlapping unlock/cancel. The
appropriate stub reply needs to be called for these waiters.
Appears when we start doing recovery in the presence of a many overlapping
unlock/cancel ops.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Al Viro
Denis Cheng
David Teigland
Patrick Caulfeld