even on 64bit systems with less than 4G RAM, we can now use fixmap
to handle acpi SIT near end of ram.
change e820_end to e820_end_of_ram again?
or e820_ram_pfn?
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
to avoid warning from find_low_pfn_range for high pages size etc
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
When system have 4g less ram installed, and acpi table sit
near end of ram, make max_pfn cover them too,
so 64bit kernel don't need to mess up fixmap.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so when it is called after early_param, e820_saved get updated too.
esp for mpc update.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so other path that will override memory_setup or
machine_specific_memory_setup could have e820_saved too.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch uses the /sys/firmware/memmap interface provided in the last patch
on the x86 architecture when E820 is used. The patch copies the E820
memory map very early, and registers the E820 map afterwards via
firmware_map_add_early().
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: yhlu.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so it has a more meaningful name.
also change it to static.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Ying Huang would like setup_data to be reserved, but not included in the
no save range.
Here we try to modify the e820 table to reserve that range early.
also add that in early_res in case bootloader messes up with the ramdisk.
other solution would be
1. add early_res_to_highmem...
2. early_res_to_e820...
but they could reserve another type memory wrongly, if early_res has some
resource reserved early, and not needed later, but it is not removed from
early_res in time. Like the RAMDISK (already handled).
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org
Tested-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
when 64bit resource is not enabled, we get:
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c: In function ‘e820_reserve_resources’:
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:1217: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
because res->start/end is resource_t aka u32. it will overflow.
fix it with temp end of u64
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch brings back limiting of the E820 map when a user-defined
E820 map is specified. While the behaviour of i386 (32 bit) was to limit
the E820 map (and /proc/iomem), the behaviour of x86-64 (64 bit) was not to
limit.
That patch limits the E820 map again for both x86 architectures.
Code was tested for compilation and booting on a 32 bit and 64 bit system.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com
Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Fix some problems with (and applies on top of) a previous patch:
x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printks
Primarily change "0x%8lx" format, which displays with a right aligned
space filled hex number (spaces between the "0x" prefix and the number),
into "%0#10lx" format, which zero fills instead of space fills, and
which uses the printf flag '#' to request the "0x" prefix instead of
hard coding it.
Also replace some other "0x%lx" formats with "%#lx", making use of the
'#' printf flag again.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: "Huang
Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This is a preparatory patch for the next patch in series.
Moves some code from e820_setup_gap to a new function e820_search_gap.
This patch is a part of a bug fix where we walk the ACPI table to calculate
a gap for PCI optional devices.
v1->v2: Patch on top of tip/master.
Fixes a bug introduced in the last patch about the typeof "last".
Also the new function e820_search_gap now returns if we found a gap in
e820_map.
Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
before that we relay on sanitize_e820_map to remove the overlap.
but e820_update_range(,,E820_RESERVED, E820_RAM) will not work
this patch fix that
who is going to use this?
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Add support for overlapping early memory reservations.
In general, they still can't overlap, and will panic
with "Overlapping early reservations" if they do overlap.
But if a memory range is reserved with the new call:
reserve_early_overlap_ok()
rather than with the usual call:
reserve_early()
then subsequent early reservations are allowed to overlap.
This new reserve_early_overlap_ok() call is only used in one
place so far, which is the "BIOS reserved" reservation for the
the EBDA region, which out of Paranoia reserves more than what
the BIOS might have specified, and which thus might overlap with
another legitimate early memory reservation (such as, perhaps,
the EFI memmap.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: "Huang
Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
... so could add real hole in e820
agp check is using request_mem_region, and could fail if e820 is reserved...
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
1. let 64bit support 88 and e801 too
2. introduce default_machine_specific_memory_setup, and reuse it
for voyager
v2: fix 64 bit compiling
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Yinghai Lu
Cyrill Gorcunov
Bernhard Walle
Alok Kataria
Paul Jackson