Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is
most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the
system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers.
Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as
a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also
benefit.
The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where
possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the
built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately.
Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a
callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call
irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such
work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in
processing the work.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
[ various fixes ]
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Fix this linux-next build failure that Stephen reported:
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c: In function 'armpmu_event_init':
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:543: error: request for member 'num_events' in something not a structure or union
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: paulus <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20101014164925.4fa16b75.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm: (28 commits)
ARM: 6411/1: vexpress: set RAM latencies to 1 cycle for PL310 on ct-ca9x4 tile
ARM: 6409/1: davinci: map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE
ARM: 6408/1: omap: Map only available sram memory
ARM: 6407/1: mmu: Setup MT_MEMORY and MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED L1 entries
ARM: pxa: remove pr_<level> uses of KERN_<level>
ARM: pxa168fb: clear enable bit when not active
ARM: pxa: fix cpu_is_pxa*() not expanding to zero when not configured
ARM: pxa168: fix corrected reset vector
ARM: pxa: Use PIO for PI2C communication on Palm27x
ARM: pxa: Fix Vpac270 gpio_power for MMC
ARM: 6401/1: plug a race in the alignment trap handler
ARM: 6406/1: at91sam9g45: fix i2c bus speed
leds: leds-ns2: fix locking
ARM: dove: fix __io() definition to use bus based offset
dmaengine: fix interrupt clearing for mv_xor
ARM: kirkwood: Unbreak PCIe I/O port
ARM: Fix build error when using KCONFIG_CONFIG
ARM: 6383/1: Implement phys_mem_access_prot() to avoid attributes aliasing
ARM: 6400/1: at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout
ARM: 6398/1: add proc info for ARM11MPCore/Cortex-A9 from ARM
...
If a signal hits us outside of a syscall and another gets delivered
when we are in sigreturn (e.g. because it had been in sa_mask for
the first one and got sent to us while we'd been in the first handler),
we have a chance of returning from the second handler to location one
insn prior to where we ought to return. If r0 happens to contain -513
(-ERESTARTNOINTR), sigreturn will get confused into doing restart
syscall song and dance.
Incredible joy to debug, since it manifests as random, infrequent and
very hard to reproduce double execution of instructions in userland
code...
The fix is simple - mark it "don't bother with restarts" in wrapper,
i.e. set r8 to 0 in sys_sigreturn and sys_rt_sigreturn wrappers,
suppressing the syscall restart handling on return from these guys.
They can't legitimately return a restart-worthy error anyway.
Testcase:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <errno.h>
void f(int n)
{
__asm__ __volatile__(
"ldr r0, [%0]\n"
"b 1f\n"
"b 2f\n"
"1:b .\n"
"2:\n" : : "r"(&n));
}
void handler1(int sig) { }
void handler2(int sig) { raise(1); }
void handler3(int sig) { exit(0); }
main()
{
struct sigaction s = {.sa_handler = handler2};
struct itimerval t1 = { .it_value = {1} };
struct itimerval t2 = { .it_value = {2} };
signal(1, handler1);
sigemptyset(&s.sa_mask);
sigaddset(&s.sa_mask, 1);
sigaction(SIGALRM, &s, NULL);
signal(SIGVTALRM, handler3);
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &t1, NULL);
setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &t2, NULL);
f(-513); /* -ERESTARTNOINTR */
write(1, "buggered\n", 9);
return 1;
}
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Al Viro reports that calling "sys_sigsuspend(-ERESTARTNOHAND, 0, 0)"
with two signals coming and being handled in kernel space results
in the syscall restart being done twice.
Avoid this by clearing the 'why' flag when we call the signal handling
code to prevent further syscall restarts after the first.
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Neither the overcommit nor the reservation sysfs parameter were
actually working, remove them as they'll only get in the way.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: paulus <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Replace pmu::{enable,disable,start,stop,unthrottle} with
pmu::{add,del,start,stop}, all of which take a flags argument.
The new interface extends the capability to stop a counter while
keeping it scheduled on the PMU. We replace the throttled state with
the generic stopped state.
This also allows us to efficiently stop/start counters over certain
code paths (like IRQ handlers).
It also allows scheduling a counter without it starting, allowing for
a generic frozen state (useful for rotating stopped counters).
The stopped state is implemented in two different ways, depending on
how the architecture implemented the throttled state:
1) We disable the counter:
a) the pmu has per-counter enable bits, we flip that
b) we program a NOP event, preserving the counter state
2) We store the counter state and ignore all read/overflow events
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: paulus <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The validate_event function in the ARM perf events backend has the
following problems:
1.) Events that are disabled count towards the cost.
2.) Events associated with other PMUs [for example, software events or
breakpoints] do not count towards the cost, but do fail validation,
causing the group to fail.
This patch changes validate_event so that it ignores events in the
PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF state or that are scheduled for other PMUs.
Reported-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
The 2.6.36-rc kernel added three new system calls:
fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, and prlimit64. This patch
wires them up on ARM.
The only non-trivial issue here is the u64 argument to
sys_fanotify_mark(), but it is the 3rd argument and thus
passed in r2/r3 in both kernel and user space, so it causes
no problems.
Tested with a 2.6.36-rc2 EABI kernel on an ixp4xx machine.
Tested-by: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This is purely a cosmetic change to the ARM perf backend because the current
comments about the relationship between NMIs, interrupt context and
perf_event_do_pending are misleading.
This patch updates the comments so that they reflect what the code
actually does (which is in line with other architectures).
Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>