Pending events may have stale pointer references to struct drm_file objects
after a file has been closed, but before the event is supposed to be
attached to the drm file. Remove such events on file close.
Tested with "modetest".
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
CEA actually specifies an interlaced mode with even vtotal and
supplies a diagram showing how this is supposed to work.
Note that interlaced modes with an even vtotal seem to be a fairly
recent invention. All modelines lore I could dig up with googling says
that vtotal for interlaced modes _needs_ to be odd. But the even
modelines in CEA are not a spec-bug, there's a figure in CEA-861-E
called "Figure 5 Special Interlaced Video Format Timing (Even Vtotal)"
that explains how it's supposed to work. Furthermore intel Bspec
explicitly mentions that both odd and even interlaced vtotal are
supported (VTOTAL register in the south display engine of PCH split
chips).
Acked-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The locking in our setup and teardown paths is rather arbitrary, but
generally we try to protect gem stuff with dev->struct_mutex. Further,
the ums/gem ioctl to setup gem _does_ take the look. So fix up this
benign inconsistency.
Notice while reading through code.
v2: Rebased on top of the ppgtt code.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We still have reports of missed irqs even on Sandybridge with the
HWSTAM workaround in place. Testing by the bug reporter gets rid of
them with the forcewake voodoo and no HWSTAM writes.
Because I've slightly botched the rebasing I've left out the ACTHD
readback which is also required to get IVB working. Seems to still
work on the tester's machine, so I think we should go with the more
minmal approach on SNB. Especially since I've only found weak evidence
for holding forcewake while waiting for an interrupt to arrive, but
none for the ACTHD readback.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45181
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45332
Tested-by: Nicolas Kalkhof nkalkhof()at()web.de
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Currently we reserve seqnos only when we emit the request to the ring
(by bumping dev_priv->next_seqno), but start using it much earlier for
ring->oustanding_lazy_request. When 2 threads compete for the gpu and
run on two different rings (e.g. ddx on blitter vs. compositor)
hilarity ensued, especially when we get constantly interrupted while
reserving buffers.
Breakage seems to have been introduced in
commit 6f392d5486
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Sat Aug 7 11:01:22 2010 +0100
drm/i915: Use a common seqno for all rings.
This patch fixes up the seqno reservation logic by moving it into
i915_gem_next_request_seqno. The ring->add_request functions now
superflously still return the new seqno through a pointer, that will
be refactored in the next patch.
Note that with this change we now unconditionally allocate a seqno,
even when ->add_request might fail because the rings are full and the
gpu died. But this does not open up a new can of worms because we can
already leave behind an outstanding_request_seqno if e.g. the caller
gets interrupted with a signal while stalling for the gpu in the
eviciton paths. And with the bugfix we only ever have one seqno
allocated per ring (and only that ring), so there are no ordering
issues with multiple outstanding seqnos on the same ring.
v2: Keep i915_gem_get_seqno (but move it to i915_gem.c) to make it
clear that we only have one seqno counter for all rings. Suggested by
Chris Wilson.
v3: As suggested by Chris Wilson use i915_gem_next_request_seqno
instead of ring->oustanding_lazy_request to make the follow-up
refactoring more clearly correct. Also improve the commit message
with issues discussed on irc.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45181
Tested-by: Nicolas Kalkhof nkalkhof()at()web.de
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If we don't have a sufficient number of free entries in the FIFO, we
proceed to do a write anyway. With this check we should have a clue if
that write actually failed or not.
After some discussion with Daniel Vetter regarding his original
complaint, we agreed upon this.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This is similar to a patch I wrote several months ago. It's been updated
for the new FORCEWAKE_MT. As recommended by Chris Wilson, use WARN()
instead of DRM_ERROR, so we can get a backtrace.
This shouldn't impact performance too much as the extra register read
can replace the POSTING_READ we had previously.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Add register definitions for GTFIFODBG, and clear it during init time to
make sure state is correct.
This register tells us if either a read, or a write occurred while the
fifo was full. It seems like bit 2 is an OR of bit 0 and bit 1, so we
check that as well, but the documents are not quite clear.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by (v1): Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I'm not sure why they are needed (I didn't notice any difference in my
tests), but these bits are in our documentation and they are also set by
the Windows driver.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The drm core _really_ likes to frob around with the crtc timings and
put halfed vertical timings (in fields) in there. Which confuses the
overlay code, resulting in it's refusal to display anything at the
lower half of an interlaced pipe.
Tested-by: Christopher Egert <cme3000@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The hw seems to use this to correctly insert the required delay
before/after an even/odd interlaced field. This might also explain
why we need to substract 1 half-line from vtotal - if the hw just
adds the delay programmend in VSYNCSHIFT the total frame time would be
about that too long.
These registers seems to only exist on gen4 and later. For paranoia
also program it to 0 for progressive modes, but according to
documentation the hw should just ignore it in this case.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Alfonso Fiore <alfonso.fiore@gmail.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
gen2 doesn't support it, so be a bit more paranoid and add a check to
ensure that we never ever set an unsupported interlaced bit.
Ensure that userspace can't set an interlaced mode by resetting
interlace_allowed for the crt on gen2. dvo and lvds are the only other
encoders that gen2 supports and these already disallow interlaced
modes.
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
According to bspec, we need to subtract an additional line from vtotal
for interlaced modes and vblank_end needs to equal vtotal. All other
timing fields do not need this special treatment, so kill it.
Bspec says that this is irrespective of whether the interlaced mode
has an odd or even vtotal, both modes are supported.
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Christopher Egert <cme3000@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alfonso Fiore <alfonso.fiore@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We have a pretty decent confusion about vertical timings of interlaced
modes. Peter Ross has written a patch that makes interlace modes work
on a lot more platforms/output combinations by doubling the vertical
timings.
The issue with that patch is that core drm _does_ support specifying
whether we want these vertical timings in fields or frames, we just
haven't managed to consistently use this facility. The relavant
function is drm_mode_set_crtcinfo, which fills in the crtc timing
information.
The first thing to note is that the drm core keeps interlaced modes in
frames, but displays modelines in fields. So when the crtc modeset
helper copies over the mode into adjusted_mode it will already contain
vertical timings in half-frames. The result is that the fixup code in
intel_crtc_mode_fixup doesn't actually do anything (in most cases at
least).
Now gen3+ natively supports interlaced modes and wants the vertical
timings in frames. Which is what sdvo already fixes up, at least under
some conditions.
There are a few other place that demand vertical timings in fields
but never actually deal with interlaced modes, so use frame timings
for consistency, too. These are:
- lvds panel,
- dvo encoders - dvo is the only way gen2 could support interlaced
mode, but currently we don't support any encoders that do.
- tv out - despite that the tv dac sends out an interlaced signal it
expects a progressive mode pipe configuration.
All these encoders enforce progressive modes by resetting
interlace_allowed.
Hence we always want crtc vertical timings in frames. Enforce this in
our crtc mode_fixup function and rip out any redudant timing
computations from the encoders' mode_fixup function.
v2-4: Adjust the vertical timings a bit.
v5: Split out the 'subtract-one for interlaced' fixes.
v6: Clarify issues around tv-out and gen2.
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Christopher Egert <cme3000@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alfonso Fiore <alfonso.fiore@gmail.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
- Clarify which bits are for which chips.
- Note that gen2 can't do interlaced directly (only via dvo tv chips).
- Move the mask to the top to make it clearer how wide this field is.
- Add defintions for all possible values.
This patch doesn't change any code.
v2: Paulo Zanoni pointed out that the pixel doubling modes do no
longer exist on ivb.
Cc: Peter Ross <pross@xvid.org>
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Christopher Egert <cme3000@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alfonso Fiore <alfonso.fiore@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Back-merge from drm-fixes into drm-intel-next to sort out two things:
- interlaced support: -fixes contains a bugfix to correctly clear
interlaced configuration bits in case the bios sets up an interlaced
mode and we want to set up the progressive mode (current kernels
don't support interlaced). The actual feature work to support
interlaced depends upon (and conflicts with) this bugfix.
- forcewake voodoo to workaround missed IRQ issues: -fixes only enabled
this for ivybridge, but some recent bug reports indicate that we
need this on Sandybridge, too. But in a slightly different flavour
and with other fixes and reworks on top. Additionally there are some
forcewake cleanup patches heading to -next that would conflict with
currrent -fixes.
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Jakob Bornecrantz
Thomas Hellstrom
Daniel Vetter
Ben Widawsky
Paulo Zanoni
Peter Ross