Commit Graph

206 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Li Zefan b9c8300c2a Btrfs: remove a BUG_ON() in btrfs_commit_transaction()
wait_for_commit() always returns 0.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01 14:30:47 -04:00
Li Zefan 72d63ed642 Btrfs: use wait_event()
Use wait_event() when possible to avoid code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01 14:30:46 -04:00
Josef Bacik 81317fdedd Btrfs: fix deadlock when throttling transactions
Hit this nice little deadlock.  What happens is this

__btrfs_end_transaction with throttle set, --use_count so it equals 0
  btrfs_commit_transaction
    <somebody else actually manages to start the commit>
    btrfs_end_transaction --use_count so now its -1 <== BAD
      we just return and wait on the transaction

This is bad because we just return after our use_count is -1 and don't let go
of our num_writer count on the transaction, so the guy committing the
transaction just sits there forever.  Fix this by inc'ing our use_count if we're
going to call commit_transaction so that if we call btrfs_end_transaction it's
valid.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:46 -04:00
Josef Bacik b5009945be Btrfs: do transaction space reservation before joining the transaction
We have to do weird things when handling enospc in the transaction joining code.
Because we've already joined the transaction we cannot commit the transaction
within the reservation code since it will deadlock, so we have to return EAGAIN
and then make sure we don't retry too many times.  Instead of doing this, just
do the reservation the normal way before we join the transaction, that way we
can do whatever we want to try and reclaim space, and then if it fails we know
for sure we are out of space and we can return ENOSPC.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-07-11 09:58:47 -04:00
Chris Mason e999376f09 Btrfs: avoid delayed metadata items during commits
Snapshot creation has two phases.  One is the initial snapshot setup,
and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify
the root we are snapshotting.

The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a
delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot,
and delayed directory item insertion.

This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we
record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-17 16:38:47 -04:00
Chris Mason e038dca803 Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work into for-linus
Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/transaction.c

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-17 14:16:13 -04:00
Chris Mason 7585717f30 Btrfs: fix relocation races
The recent commit to get rid of our trans_mutex introduced
some races with block group relocation.  The problem is that relocation
needs to do some record keeping about each root, and it was relying
on the transaction mutex to coordinate things in subtle ways.

This fix adds a mutex just for the relocation code and makes sure
it doesn't have a big impact on normal operations.  The race is
really fixed in btrfs_record_root_in_trans, which is where we
step back and wait for the relocation code to finish accounting
setup.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-17 13:36:58 -04:00
Josef Bacik ed0ca14021 Btrfs: set no_trans_join after trying to expand the transaction
We can lockup if we try to allow new writers join the transaction and we have
flushoncommit set or have a pending snapshot.  This is because we set
no_trans_join and then loop around and try to wait for ordered extents again.
The problem is the ordered endio stuff needs to join the transaction, which it
can't do because no_trans_join is set.  So instead wait until after this loop to
set no_trans_join and then make sure to wait for num_writers == 1 in case
anybody got started in between us exiting the loop and setting no_trans_join.
This could easily be reproduced by mounting -o flushoncommit and running xfstest
13.  It cannot be reproduced with this patch.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-06-15 13:24:47 -04:00
Sage Weil 38e880540f Btrfs: clear current->journal_info on async transaction commit
Normally current->jouranl_info is cleared by commit_transaction.  For an
async snap or subvol creation, though, it runs in a work queue.  Clear
it in btrfs_commit_transaction_async() to avoid leaking a non-NULL
journal_info when we return to userspace.  When the actual commit runs in
the other thread it won't care that it's current->journal_info is already
NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-10 16:42:29 -04:00
Josef Bacik 3473f3c06a Btrfs: unlock the trans lock properly
In btrfs_wait_for_commit if we came upon a transaction that had committed we
just exited, but that's bad since we are holding the trans_lock.  So break
instead so that the lock is dropped.  Thanks,

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-06-09 10:15:17 -04:00
David Sterba 7841cb2898 btrfs: add helper for fs_info->closing
wrap checking of filesystem 'closing' flag and fix a few missing memory
barriers.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-06-04 08:11:22 -04:00
Chris Mason ff5714cca9 Merge branch 'for-chris' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work into for-linus

Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
	fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
	fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
	fs/btrfs/inode.c
	fs/btrfs/transaction.c

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-28 07:00:39 -04:00
Josef Bacik d82a6f1d7e Btrfs: kill BTRFS_I(inode)->block_group
Originally this was going to be used as a way to give hints to the allocator,
but frankly we can get much better hints elsewhere and it's not even used at all
for anything usefull.  In addition to be completely useless, when we initialize
an inode we try and find a freeish block group to set as the inodes block group,
and with a completely full 40gb fs this takes _forever_, so I imagine with say
1tb fs this is just unbearable.  So just axe the thing altoghether, we don't
need it and it saves us 8 bytes in the inode and saves us 500 microseconds per
inode lookup in my testcase.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23 13:03:12 -04:00
Josef Bacik a4abeea41a Btrfs: kill trans_mutex
We use trans_mutex for lots of things, here's a basic list

1) To serialize trans_handles joining the currently running transaction
2) To make sure that no new trans handles are started while we are committing
3) To protect the dead_roots list and the transaction lists

Really the serializing trans_handles joining is not too hard, and can really get
bogged down in acquiring a reference to the transaction.  So replace the
trans_mutex with a trans_lock spinlock and use it to do the following

1) Protect fs_info->running_transaction.  All trans handles have to do is check
this, and then take a reference of the transaction and keep on going.
2) Protect the fs_info->trans_list.  This doesn't get used too much, basically
it just holds the current transactions, which will usually just be the currently
committing transaction and the currently running transaction at most.
3) Protect the dead roots list.  This is only ever processed by splicing the
list so this is relatively simple.
4) Protect the fs_info->reloc_ctl stuff.  This is very lightweight and was using
the trans_mutex before, so this is a pretty straightforward change.
5) Protect fs_info->no_trans_join.  Because we don't hold the trans_lock over
the entirety of the commit we need to have a way to block new people from
creating a new transaction while we're doing our work.  So we set no_trans_join
and in join_transaction we test to see if that is set, and if it is we do a
wait_on_commit.
6) Make the transaction use count atomic so we don't need to take locks to
modify it when we're dropping references.
7) Add a commit_lock to the transaction to make sure multiple people trying to
commit the same transaction don't race and commit at the same time.
8) Make open_ioctl_trans an atomic so we don't have to take any locks for ioctl
trans.

I have tested this with xfstests, but obviously it is a pretty hairy change so
lots of testing is greatly appreciated.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23 13:00:57 -04:00
Josef Bacik 2a1eb4614d Btrfs: if we've already started a trans handle, use that one
We currently track trans handles in current->journal_info, but we don't actually
use it.  This patch fixes it.  This will cover the case where we have multiple
people starting transactions down the call chain.  This keeps us from having to
allocate a new handle and all of that, we just increase the use count of the
current handle, save the old block_rsv, and return.  I tested this with xfstests
and it worked out fine.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23 13:00:57 -04:00
Josef Bacik 7a7eaa40a3 Btrfs: take away the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction
I keep forgetting that btrfs_join_transaction() just ignores the num_items
argument, which leads me to sending pointless patches and looking stupid :).  So
just kill the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction and
btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction, since neither of them use it.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23 13:00:56 -04:00
Chris Mason 712673339a Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arne/btrfs-unstable-arne into inode_numbers
Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/Makefile
	fs/btrfs/ctree.h
	fs/btrfs/volumes.h

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-23 06:30:52 -04:00
Chris Mason 945d8962ce Merge branch 'cleanups' of git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/btrfs-unstable into inode_numbers
Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
	fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
	fs/btrfs/inode.c
	fs/btrfs/tree-log.c

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-22 12:33:42 -04:00
Chris Mason dcc6d07322 Merge branch 'delayed_inode' into inode_numbers
Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/inode.c
	fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
	fs/btrfs/transaction.c

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-22 07:07:01 -04:00
Miao Xie 16cdcec736 btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation
Changelog V5 -> V6:
- Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the
  root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go.

Changelog V4 -> V5:
- Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by
  Chris Mason.
- Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch.
- Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by
  Itaru Kitayama.

Changelog V3 -> V4:
- Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache
  inode in time.

Changelog V2 -> V3:
- Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items
  balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh.
- Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment.
- Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason

Changelog V1 -> V2:
- break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes,
  which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the
  delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item.
- introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes.

Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs
is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions,
such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on.

If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the
performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name
index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update.

Implementation:
- introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to
  manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory.
  One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the
  other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with
  by the work thread.
- Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name
  index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to
  manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree.
- introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used
  to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion
  and deletion and the delayed inode update.
  When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some
  delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then
  go back.
  When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all
  the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work
  queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some
  threshold value.
- When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the
  information into the delayed inserting rb-tree.
  And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items
  balance. (The balance policy is above.)
- When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it
  in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not,
  add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree.
  Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the
  delayed items and do delayed items balance.
  (The same to inserting manipulation)
- When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the
  inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after
  dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion.
- We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the
  delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more
  inode updates.
- If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node.
- the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode.
- Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items
  and the delayed inode update.

I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the
performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%.

Before applying this patch:
Create files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 1.096108
        Average time: 0.000022
Delete files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 1.510403
        Average time: 0.000030

After applying this patch:
Create files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 0.932899
        Average time: 0.000019
Delete files:
        Total files: 50000
        Total time: 1.215732
        Average time: 0.000024

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3

Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help!

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-21 09:30:56 -04:00
Arne Jansen a2de733c78 btrfs: scrub
This adds an initial implementation for scrub. It works quite
straightforward. The usermode issues an ioctl for each device in the
fs. For each device, it enumerates the allocated device chunks. For
each chunk, the contained extents are enumerated and the data checksums
fetched. The extents are read sequentially and the checksums verified.
If an error occurs (checksum or EIO), a good copy is searched for. If
one is found, the bad copy will be rewritten.
All enumerations happen from the commit roots. During a transaction
commit, the scrubs get paused and afterwards continue from the new
roots.

This commit is based on the series originally posted to linux-btrfs
with some improvements that resulted from comments from David Sterba,
Ilya Dryomov and Jan Schmidt.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
2011-05-12 14:45:20 +02:00
David Sterba 182608c829 btrfs: remove old unused commented out code
Remove code which has been #if0-ed out for a very long time and does not
seem to be related to current codebase anymore.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-05-06 12:34:10 +02:00
David Sterba f993c883ad btrfs: drop unused argument from extent_io_tree_init
all callers pass GFP_NOFS, but the GFP mask argument is not used in the
function; GFP_ATOMIC is passed to radix tree initialization and it's the
only correct one, since we're using the preload/insert mechanism of
radix tree.
Let's drop the gfp mask from btrfs function, this will not change
behaviour.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-05-02 13:57:21 +02:00
Li Zefan 82d5902d9c Btrfs: Support reading/writing on disk free ino cache
This is similar to block group caching.

We dedicate a special inode in fs tree to save free ino cache.

At the very first time we create/delete a file after mount, the free ino
cache will be loaded from disk into memory. When the fs tree is commited,
the cache will be written back to disk.

To keep compatibility, we check the root generation against the generation
of the special inode when loading the cache, so the loading will fail
if the btrfs filesystem was mounted in an older kernel before.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-04-25 16:46:11 +08:00
Li Zefan 33345d0152 Btrfs: Always use 64bit inode number
There's a potential problem in 32bit system when we exhaust 32bit inode
numbers and start to allocate big inode numbers, because btrfs uses
inode->i_ino in many places.

So here we always use BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid, which is an
u64 variable.

There are 2 exceptions that BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid !=
inode->i_ino: the btree inode (0 vs 1) and empty subvol dirs (256 vs 2),
and inode->i_ino will be used in those cases.

Another reason to make this change is I'm going to use a special inode
to save free ino cache, and the inode number must be > (u64)-256.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-04-25 16:46:09 +08:00