For Haswell, we will want another table of registers while retaining
the large common table of whitelisted registers shared by all gen7
devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
[danvet: Pipe patch through sed -e 's/\<ring\>/engine/g' to make it
apply.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.
This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.
The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.
As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
mov $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov %r9,%rsi
- mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov %r9d,%esi
+ mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
callq *0xd8(%rbx)
So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.
v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
mo more switch statements left to worry about
ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
This was forgotten in
commit d351f6d948
Author: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Date: Fri May 29 16:44:15 2015 +0300
drm/i915: Add SCRATCH1 and ROW_CHICKEN3 to the register whitelist.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM instructions are not really
variable length instructions unlike MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM where it expects
(reg, addr) pairs so use fixed length for these instructions.
v2: rebase
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
[danvet: Appease checkpatch as Mika spotted in i915_reg.h - it seems
terminally unhappy about i915_cmd_parser.c so that would be a separate
patch.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
As we may like to use a bisection search on the tables in future, we
need them to be ordered. For convenience we expect the compiled tables
to be order and check on initialisation. However, the validator used the
wrong iterators failed to spot the misordered MI tables and instead
walked off into the unknown (as spotted by kasan).
Signed-off-by: Hanno Boeck <hanno@hboeck.de>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Again hand-assemble patch ...]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
In the future, we may want to speed up command/register searching using
a bisection and so we require them to be in ascending order respectively
by command value or register address. However, this was not true for one
pair in the MI table; make it so.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Boeck <hanno@hboeck.de>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Hand-assemble patch from raw patch from Hanno and commit message from Chris.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
In this WA we need to set GEN8_L3SQCREG4[21:21] and reset it after PIPE_CONTROL
instruction but there is a slight complication as this is applied in WA batch
where the values are only initialized once.
Dave identified an issue with the current implementation where the register value
is read once at the beginning and it is reused; this patch corrects this by saving
the register value to memory, update register with the bit of our interest and
restore it back with original value.
This implementation uses MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM which is currently only used
by command parser and was using a default length of 0. This is now updated
with correct length and moved to appropriate place.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Only bit 27 of SCRATCH1 and bit 6 of ROW_CHICKEN3 are allowed to be
set because of security-sensitive bits we don't want userspace to mess
with. On HSW hardware the whitelisted bits control whether atomic
read-modify-write operations are performed on L3 or on GTI, and when
set to L3 (which can be 10x-30x better performing than on GTI,
depending on the application) require great care to avoid a system
hang, so we currently program them to be handled on GTI by default.
Beignet can immediately start taking advantage of this change to
enable L3 atomics. Mesa should eventually switch to L3 atomics too,
but a number of non-trivial changes are still required so it will
continue using GTI atomics for now.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In some cases it might be unnecessary or dangerous to give userspace
the right to write arbitrary values to some register, even though it
might be desirable to give it control of some of its bits. This patch
extends the register whitelist entries to contain a mask/value pair in
addition to the register offset. For registers with non-zero mask,
any LRM writes and LRI writes where the bits of the immediate given by
the mask don't match the specified value will be rejected.
This will be used in my next patch to grant userspace partial write
access to some sensitive registers.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Until now the software command checker assumed that commands could
read or write at most a single register per packet. This is not
necessarily the case, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM expects a variable-length
list of offset/value pairs and writes them in sequence. The previous
code would only check whether the first entry was valid, effectively
allowing userspace to write unrestricted registers of the MMIO space
by sending a multi-register write with a legal first register, with
potential security implications on Gen6 and 7 hardware.
Fix it by extending the drm_i915_cmd_descriptor table to represent
multi-register access and making validate_cmd() iterate for all
register offsets present in the command packet.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Move the madvise logic out of the execbuffer main path into the
relatively rare allocation path, making the execbuffer manipulation less
fragile.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
vmap_batch() calculates amount of needed pages for the mapping
we are going to create. And it uses this page count as an
argument for the for_each_sg_pages() macro. The macro takes the number
of sg list entities as an argument, not the page count. So we ended
up iterating through all the pages on the mapped object, corrupting
memory past the smaller pages[] array.
Fix this by bailing out when we have enough pages.
This regression has been introduced in
commit 17cabf571e
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Wed Jan 14 11:20:57 2015 +0000
drm/i915: Trim the command parser allocations
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Currently, the command parser tries to create a secondary batch exactly
as large as the original, and vmap both. This is open to abuse by
userspace using extremely large batch objects, but only executing very
short batches. For example, this would be if userspace were to implement
a command submission ringbuffer. However, we only need to allocate pages
for just the contents of the command sequence in the batch - all
relocations copied to the secondary batch will reference the original
batch and so there can be no access to the secondary batch outside of
the explicit execution region.
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_big #ivb,byt,hsw
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88308
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Move it to a separate function since the main do_execbuffer function
already has so much going on.
v2:
- Move pin/unpin calls inside i915_parse_cmds() (Chris W, v4 7/7
feedback)
Issue: VIZ-4719
Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Previously we couldn't trust the user-supplied batch length because
it came directly from userspace (i.e. untrusted code). It would have
affected what commands software parsed without regard to what hardware
would actually execute, leaving a potential hole.
With the parser now copying the user supplied batch buffer and writing
MI_NOP commands to any space after the copied region, we can safely use
the batch length input. This should be a performance win as the actual
batch length is frequently much smaller than the allocated object size.
v2: Fix handling of non-zero batch_start_offset
Issue: VIZ-4719
Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This patch sets up all of the tracking and copying necessary to
use batch pools with the command parser and dispatches the copied
(shadow) batch to the hardware.
After this patch, the parser is in 'enabling' mode.
Note that performance takes a hit from the copy in some cases
and will likely need some work. At a rough pass, the memcpy
appears to be the bottleneck. Without having done a deeper
analysis, two ideas that come to mind are:
1) Copy sections of the batch at a time, as they are reached
by parsing. Might improve cache locality.
2) Copy only up to the userspace-supplied batch length and
memset the rest of the buffer. Reduces the number of reads.
v2:
- Remove setting the capacity of the pool
- One global pool instead of per-ring pools
- Replace batch_obj with shadow_batch_obj and hook into eb->vmas
- Memset any space in the shadow batch beyond what gets copied
- Rebased on execlist prep refactoring
v3:
- Rebase on chained batch handling
- Squash in setting the secure dispatch flag
- Add a note about the interaction w/secure dispatch pinning
- Check for request->batch_obj == NULL in i915_gem_free_request
v4:
- Fix read domains for shadow_batch_obj
- Remove the set_to_gtt_domain call from i915_parse_cmds
- ggtt_pin/unpin in the parser block to simplify error handling
- Check USES_FULL_PPGTT before setting DISPATCH_SECURE flag
- Remove i915_gem_batch_pool_put calls
v5:
- Move 'pending_read_domains |= I915_GEM_DOMAIN_COMMAND' after
the parser (danvet, from v4 0/7 feedback)
Issue: VIZ-4719
Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>