Cleans up clang warning:
warning: variable 'info' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Fixes: 89dbf1962a ("apparmor: move change_hat mediation to using labels")
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Currently variable size is a unsigned size_t, hence comparisons to
see if it is less than zero (for error checking) will always be
false. Fix this by making size a ssize_t
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1466080 ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 8e51f9087f ("apparmor: Add support for attaching profiles via xattr, presence and value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Overlapping domain attachments using the current longest left exact
match fail in some simple cases, and with the fix to ensure consistent
behavior by failing unresolvable attachments it becomes important to
do a better job.
eg. under the current match the following are unresolvable where
the alternation is clearly a better match under the most specific
left match rule.
/**
/{bin/,}usr/
Use a counting match that detects when a loop in the state machine is
enter, and return the match count to provide a better specific left
match resolution.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
This converts profile attachment based on xattrs to a fixed extended
conditional using dfa matching.
This has a couple of advantages
- pattern matching can be used for the xattr match
- xattrs can be optional for an attachment or marked as required
- the xattr attachment conditional will be able to be combined with
other extended conditionals when the flexible extended conditional
work lands.
The xattr fixed extended conditional is appended to the xmatch
conditional. If an xattr attachment is specified the profile xmatch
will be generated regardless of whether there is a pattern match on
the executable name.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
Make it possible to tie Apparmor profiles to the presence of one or more
extended attributes, and optionally their values. An example usecase for
this is to automatically transition to a more privileged Apparmor profile
if an executable has a valid IMA signature, which can then be appraised
by the IMA subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Domain transition so far have been largely blocked by no new privs,
unless the transition has been provably a subset of the previous
confinement. There was a couple problems with the previous
implementations,
- transitions that weren't explicitly a stack but resulted in a subset
of confinement were disallowed
- confinement subsets were only calculated from the previous
confinement instead of the confinement being enforced at the time of
no new privs, so transitions would have to get progressively
tighter.
Fix this by detecting and storing a reference to the task's
confinement at the "time" no new privs is set. This reference is then
used to determine whether a transition is a subsystem of the
confinement at the time no new privs was set.
Unfortunately the implementation is less than ideal in that we have to
detect no new privs after the fact when a task attempts a domain
transition. This is adequate for the currently but will not work in a
stacking situation where no new privs could be conceivably be set in
both the "host" and in the container.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Now that file contexts have been moved into file, and task context
fns() and data have been split from the context, only the cred context
remains in context.h so rename to cred.h to better reflect what it
deals with.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
now that cred_ctx has been removed we can rename task_ctxs from tctx
without causing confusion.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
With the task domain change information now stored in the task->security
context, the cred->security context only stores the label. We can get
rid of the cred_ctx and directly reference the label, removing a layer
of indirection, and unneeded extra allocations.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
The task domain change info is task specific and its and abuse of
the cred to store the information in there. Now that a task->security
field exists store it in the proper place.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
The intended behaviour in apparmor profile matching is to flag a
conflict if two profiles match equally well. However, right now a
conflict is generated if another profile has the same match length even
if that profile doesn't actually match. Fix the logic so we only
generate a conflict if the profiles match.
Fixes: 844b8292b6 ("apparmor: ensure that undecidable profile attachments fail")
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
It used to be that unconfined would never attach. However that is not
the case anymore as some special profiles can be marked as unconfined,
that are not the namespaces unconfined profile, and may have an
attachment.
Fixes: f1bd904175 ("apparmor: add the base fns() for domain labels")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Profiles that have an undecidable overlap in their attachments are
being incorrectly handled. Instead of failing to attach the first one
encountered is being used.
eg.
profile A /** { .. }
profile B /*foo { .. }
have an unresolvable longest left attachment, they both have an exact
match on / and then have an overlapping expression that has no clear
winner.
Currently the winner will be the profile that is loaded first which
can result in non-deterministic behavior. Instead in this situation
the exec should fail.
Fixes: 898127c34e ("AppArmor: functions for domain transitions")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Pull apparmor updates from John Johansen:
"This is the apparmor pull request, similar to SELinux and seccomp.
It's the same series that I was sent to James' security tree + one
regression fix that was found after the series was sent to James and
would have been sent for v4.14-rc2.
Features:
- in preparation for secid mapping add support for absolute root view
based labels
- add base infastructure for socket mediation
- add mount mediation
- add signal mediation
minor cleanups and changes:
- be defensive, ensure unconfined profiles have dfas initialized
- add more debug asserts to apparmorfs
- enable policy unpacking to audit different reasons for failure
- cleanup conditional check for label in label_print
- Redundant condition: prev_ns. in [label.c:1498]
Bug Fixes:
- fix regression in apparmorfs DAC access permissions
- fix build failure on sparc caused by undeclared signals
- fix sparse report of incorrect type assignment when freeing label proxies
- fix race condition in null profile creation
- Fix an error code in aafs_create()
- Fix logical error in verify_header()
- Fix shadowed local variable in unpack_trans_table()"
* tag 'apparmor-pr-2017-09-22' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor:
apparmor: fix apparmorfs DAC access permissions
apparmor: fix build failure on sparc caused by undeclared signals
apparmor: fix incorrect type assignment when freeing proxies
apparmor: ensure unconfined profiles have dfas initialized
apparmor: fix race condition in null profile creation
apparmor: move new_null_profile to after profile lookup fns()
apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation
apparmor: add more debug asserts to apparmorfs
apparmor: make policy_unpack able to audit different info messages
apparmor: add support for absolute root view based labels
apparmor: cleanup conditional check for label in label_print
apparmor: add mount mediation
apparmor: add the ability to mediate signals
apparmor: Redundant condition: prev_ns. in [label.c:1498]
apparmor: Fix an error code in aafs_create()
apparmor: Fix logical error in verify_header()
apparmor: Fix shadowed local variable in unpack_trans_table()
The AppArmor bprm_secureexec hook can be merged with the bprm_set_creds
hook since it's dealing with the same information, and all of the details
are finalized during the first call to the bprm_set_creds hook via
prepare_binprm() (subsequent calls due to binfmt_script, etc, are ignored
via bprm->called_set_creds).
Here, all the comments describe how secureexec is actually calculated
during bprm_set_creds, so this actually does it, drops the bprm flag that
was being used internally by AppArmor, and drops the bprm_secureexec hook.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
John Johansen
Zygmunt Krynicki
Colin Ian King
Matthew Garrett
Linus Torvalds
Kees Cook