In case thermal_zone_xxx_register() returns an error, priv->zone
isn't NULL any more, but contains the error code.
This is passed to thermal_zone_device_unregister(), then. This checks
for priv->zone being NULL, but the error code is != NULL. So it works
with the error code as a pointer. Crashing immediately.
To fix this, reset priv->zone to NULL before entering
rcar_gen3_thermal_remove().
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer
dereference later at line 472:
data->socdata = of_id->data;
For fixing this problem, we use of_device_get_match_data(), this will
simplify the code a little by using a standard function for
getting the match data.
Reported-by: coverity (CID 1324128)
Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
The field "owner" is set by core. Thus delete an extra initialisation.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Currently all CPU cooling devices share a
`struct thermal_cooling_device_ops` instance. The thermal core uses the
presence of functions in this struct to determine if a cooling device
has a power model (see cdev_is_power_actor). cpu_cooling.c adds the
power model functions to the shared struct when a device is registered
with a power model.
Therefore, if a CPU cooling device is registered using
[of_]cpufreq_power_cooling_register, _all_ devices will be determined to
have a power model, including any registered with
[of_]cpufreq_cooling_register. This can result in cpufreq_state2power
being called on a device where dyn_power_table is NULL.
With this commit, instead of having a shared thermal_cooling_device_ops
which is mutated, we have two versions: one with the power functions and
one without.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
The driver allocates the mutex but not initialize it.
Use mutex_init() on it to initialize it correctly.
This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
When multiple thermal zones are bound to the same cooling device, multiple
kernel threads may want to update the cooling device state by calling
thermal_cdev_update(). Having cdev not protected by a mutex can lead to a race
condition. Consider the following situation with two kernel threads k1 and k2:
Thread k1 Thread k2
||
|| call thermal_cdev_update()
|| ...
|| set_cur_state(cdev, target);
call power_actor_set_power() ||
... ||
instance->target = state; ||
cdev->updated = false; ||
|| cdev->updated = true;
|| // completes execution
call thermal_cdev_update() ||
// cdev->updated == true ||
return; ||
\/
time
k2 has already looped through the thermal instances looking for the deepest
cooling device state and is preempted right before setting cdev->updated to
true. Now, k1 runs, modifies the thermal instance state and sets cdev->updated
to false. Then, k1 is preempted and k2 continues the execution by setting
cdev->updated to true, therefore preventing k1 from performing the update.
Notice that this is not an issue if k2 looks at the instance->target modified by
k1 "after" it is assigned by k1. In fact, in this case the update will happen
anyway and k1 can safely return immediately from thermal_cdev_update().
This may lead to a situation where a thermal governor never updates the cooling
device. For example, this is the case for the step_wise governor: when calling
the function thermal_zone_trip_update(), the governor may always get a new state
equal to the old one (which, however, wasn't notified to the cooling device) and
will therefore skip the update.
CC: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CC: Peter Feuerer <peter@piie.net>
Reported-by: Toby Huang <toby.huang@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michele Di Giorgio <michele.digiorgio@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Added suspend/resume callback to disable/enable PCH thermal sensor
respectively. If the sensor is enabled by the BIOS, then the sensor status
will not be changed during suspend/resume.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Pull thermal management fixes from Zhang Rui:
- fix an ordering issue in cpu cooling that cooling device is
registered before it's ready (freq_table being populated).
(Lukasz Luba)
- fix a missing comment update (Caesar Wang)
* 'for-rc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux:
thermal: add the note for set_trip_temp
thermal: cpu_cooling: fix improper order during initialization
Most of the callers of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() already have the
pointer to a valid 'policy' structure and they don't really need to go
through the per-cpu variable first and then a check to validate the
frequency, in order to find the freq-table for the policy.
Directly use the policy->freq_table field instead for them.
Only one user of that API is left after above changes, cpu_cooling.c and
it accesses the freq_table in a racy way as the policy can get freed in
between.
Fix it by using cpufreq_cpu_get() properly.
Since there are no more users of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() left, get
rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> (cpu_cooling.c)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The freq_table array is not populated before calling
thermal_of_cooling_register. The code which populates the freq table was
introduced in commit f6859014.
This should be done before registering new thermal cooling device.
The log shows effects of this wrong decision.
[ 2.172614] cpu cpu1: Failed to get voltage for frequency 1984518656000: -34
[ 2.220863] cpu cpu0: Failed to get voltage for frequency 1984524416000: -34
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.19+
Fixes: f6859014c7 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Store frequencies in descending order")
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
commit 059500940d (ACPI/video: export acpi_video_get_levels)
mistakenly dropped the correct value of max_level and that caused the
set_level function following failed and the acpi_video backlight interface
didn't get created. Fix this by passing back the correct max_level value.
While at it, also fix the param used in acpi_video_device_lcd_query_levels
where acpi_handle is expected but acpi_video_device is passed.
Fixes: 059500940d (ACPI/video: export acpi_video_get_levels)
Reported-and-tested-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Pull thermal management updates from Zhang Rui:
- Introduce generic ADC thermal driver, based on OF thermal (Laxman
Dewangan)
- Introduce new thermal driver for Tango chips (Marc Gonzalez)
- Rockchip driver support for RK3399, RK3366, and some fixes (Caesar
Wang, Elaine Zhang and Shawn Lin)
- Add CPU power cooling model to Mediatek thermal driver (Dawei Chien)
- Wider usage of dev_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register (Eduardo Valentin)
- TI thermal driver gained a new maintainer (Keerthy).
- Enabled powerclamp driver by checking CPU feature and package cstate
counter instead of CPU whitelist (Jacob Pan)
- Various fixes on thermal governor, OF thermal, Tegra, and RCAR
* 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux: (50 commits)
thermal: tango: initialize TEMPSI_CFG
thermal: rockchip: use the usleep_range instead of udelay
thermal: rockchip: add the notes for better reading
thermal: rockchip: Support RK3366 SoCs in the thermal driver
thermal: rockchip: handle the power sequence for tsadc controller
thermal: rockchip: update the tsadc table for rk3399
thermal: rockchip: fixes the code_to_temp for tsadc driver
thermal: rockchip: disable thermal->clk in err case
thermal: tegra: add Tegra132 specific SOC_THERM driver
thermal: fix ptr_ret.cocci warnings
thermal: mediatek: Add cpu dynamic power cooling model.
thermal: generic-adc: Add ADC based thermal sensor driver
thermal: generic-adc: Add DT binding for ADC based thermal sensor
thermal: tegra: fix static checker warning
thermal: tegra: mark PM functions __maybe_unused
thermal: add temperature sensor support for tango SoC
thermal: hisilicon: fix IRQ imbalance enabling
thermal: hisilicon: support to use any sensor
thermal: rcar: Remove binding docs for r8a7794
thermal: tegra: add PM support
...
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt recommends to use
usleep_range on delays > 10usec.
The usleep_range indeed reduces CPU load, since the udelay will busy wait
for enough loop cycles to achieve the desired delay.
Fixes commit b06c52db39fd ("thermal: rockchip:
handle the power sequence for tsadc controller").
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Suggested-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
The RK3366 SoCs have two Temperature Sensors, channel 0 is for CPU
channel 1 is for GPU.
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>