Function acpi_sleep_syscore_init has no external user so it should be
static.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit eed4d47efe (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from
suspend-to-idle) introduced acpi_freeze_sync() whose purpose is to
flush all of the processing of possible wakeup events signaled via
the ACPI SCI. However, it doesn't flush the query workqueue used
by the EC driver, so the events generated by the EC may not be
processed timely which leads to issues (increased overhead at least,
lost events possibly).
To fix that introduce acpi_ec_flush_work() that will flush all of
the outstanding EC work and call it from acpi_freeze_sync().
Fixes: eed4d47efe (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some recent Dell laptops, including the XPS13 model numbers 9360 and
9365, cannot be woken up from suspend-to-idle by pressing the power
button which is unexpected and makes that feature less usable on
those systems. Moreover, on the 9365 ACPI S3 (suspend-to-RAM) is
not expected to be used at all (the OS these systems ship with never
exercises the ACPI S3 path in the firmware) and suspend-to-idle is
the only viable system suspend mechanism there.
The reason why the power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle doesn't
work on those systems is because their power button events are
signaled by the EC (Embedded Controller), whose GPE (General Purpose
Event) line is disabled during suspend-to-idle transitions in Linux.
That is done on purpose, because in general the EC tends to be noisy
for various reasons (battery and thermal updates and similar, for
example) and all events signaled by it would kick the CPUs out of
deep idle states while in suspend-to-idle, which effectively might
defeat its purpose.
Of course, on the Dell systems in question the EC GPE must be enabled
during suspend-to-idle transitions for the button press events to
be signaled while suspended at all, but fortunately there is a way
out of this puzzle.
First of all, those systems have the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag set
in their ACPI tables, which means that the OS is expected to prefer
the "low power S0 idle" system state over ACPI S3 on them. That
causes the most recent versions of other OSes to simply ignore ACPI
S3 on those systems, so it is reasonable to expect that it should not
be necessary to block GPEs during suspend-to-idle on them.
Second, in addition to that, the systems in question provide a special
firmware interface that can be used to indicate to the platform that
the OS is transitioning into a system-wide low-power state in which
certain types of activity are not desirable or that it is leaving
such a state and that (in principle) should allow the platform to
adjust its operation mode accordingly.
That interface is a special _DSM object under a System Power
Management Controller device (PNP0D80). The expected way to use it
is to invoke function 0 from it on system initialization, functions
3 and 5 during suspend transitions and functions 4 and 6 during
resume transitions (to reverse the actions carried out by the
former). In particular, function 5 from the "Low-Power S0" device
_DSM is expected to cause the platform to put itself into a low-power
operation mode which should include making the EC less verbose (so to
speak). Next, on resume, function 6 switches the platform back to
the "working-state" operation mode.
In accordance with the above, modify the ACPI suspend-to-idle code
to look for the "Low-Power S0" _DSM interface on platforms with the
ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag set in the ACPI tables. If it's there,
use it during suspend-to-idle transitions as prescribed and avoid
changing the GPE configuration in that case. [That should reflect
what the most recent versions of other OSes do.]
Also modify the ACPI EC driver to make it handle events during
suspend-to-idle in the usual way if the "Low-Power S0" _DSM interface
is going to be used to make the power button events work while
suspended on the Dell machines mentioned above
Link: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdf
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ
during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events
signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However,
on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while
suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact,
quite often they should just be discarded.
Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in
order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume
and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point
when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after
executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path.
For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the
platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines
like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be
used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops.
In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI
has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced
system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually
processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should
resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event
queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due
to race conditions.
In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs
to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that
it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup
events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from
suspending is not enabled. However, to preserve the existing
behavior with respect to suspend-to-RAM, this only is done in
the suspend-to-idle case and only if an SCI has occurred while
suspended.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The wakeup.flags.enabled flag in struct acpi_device is not used
consistently, as there is no reason why it should only apply
to the enabling/disabling of the wakeup GPE, so put the invocation
of acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() under it too.
Moreover, it is not necessary to call
acpi_enable_wakeup_devices() and acpi_disable_wakeup_devices() for
suspend-to-idle, so don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Revert commit eed4d47efe (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups
from suspend-to-idle) as it turned out to be premature and triggered
a number of different issues on various systems.
That includes, but is not limited to, premature suspend-to-RAM aborts
on Dell XPS 13 (9343) reported by Dominik.
The issue the commit in question attempted to address is real and
will need to be taken care of going forward, but evidently more work
is needed for this purpose.
Reported-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Pull more ACPI updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"These update the ACPICA code in the kernel to upstream revision
20170303 which adds a few minor fixes and improvements, update ACPI
SoC drivers with new device IDs, platform-related information and
similar, fix the register information in the xpower PMIC driver,
introduce a concept of "always present" devices to the ACPI device
enumeration code and use it to fix a problem with one platform, and
fix a system resume issue related to power resources.
Specifics:
- Update the ACPICA code in the kernel to upstream revision 20170303
which includes:
* Minor fixes and improvements in the core code (Bob Moore,
Seunghun Han).
* Debugger fixes (Colin Ian King, Lv Zheng).
* Compiler/disassembler improvements (Bob Moore, David Box, Lv
Zheng).
* Build-related update (Lv Zheng).
- Add new device IDs and platform-related information to the ACPI
drivers for Intel (LPSS) and AMD (APD) SoCs (Hanjun Guo, Hans de
Goede).
- Make it possible to quirk ACPI-enumerated devices as "always
present" on platforms where they are incorrectly reported as not
present by the AML and add the INT0002 device ID to the list of
"always present" devices (Hans de Goede).
- Fix the register information in the xpower PMIC driver and add
comments to map the registers to symbols used by AML to it (Hans de
Goede).
- Move the code turning off unused ACPI power resources during system
resume to a point after all devices have been resumed to avoid
issues with power resources that do not behave as expected (Hans de
Goede)"
* tag 'acpi-extra-4.12-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (22 commits)
ACPI / power: Delay turning off unused power resources after suspend
ACPI / PMIC: xpower: Fix power_table addresses
ACPI / LPSS: Call pwm_add_table() for Bay Trail PWM device
ACPICA: Update version to 20170303
ACPICA: iasl: add ASL conversion tool
ACPICA: Local cache support: Allow small cache objects
ACPICA: Disassembler: Do not unconditionally remove temporary names
ACPICA: iasl: Fix IORT SMMU GSI disassembling
ACPICA: Cleanup AML opcode definitions, no functional change
ACPICA: Debugger: Add interpreter blocking mark for single-step mode
ACPICA: debugger: fix memory leak on Pathname
ACPICA: Update for automatic repair code for objects returned by evaluate_object
ACPICA: Namespace: fix operand cache leak
ACPICA: Fix several incorrect invocations of ACPICA return macro
ACPICA: Fix a module for excessive debug output
ACPICA: Update some function headers, no funtional change
ACPICA: Disassembler: Enhance resource descriptor detection
i2c: designware: Add ACPI HID for Hisilicon Hip07/08 I2C controller
ACPI / APD: Add clock frequency for Hisilicon Hip07/08 I2C controller
ACPI / bus: Add INT0002 to list of always-present devices
...
The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ
during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events
signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However,
on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while
suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact,
quite often they should just be discarded.
Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in
order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume
and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point
when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after
executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path.
For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the
platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines
like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be
used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops.
In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI
has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced
system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually
processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should
resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event
queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due
to race conditions.
In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs
to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that
it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup
events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from
suspending is not enabled (that also helps to catch device-induced
wakeup events occurring during suspend transitions in progress).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 660b1113e0 (ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources
during resume) introduced a check for ACPI power resources which have
been turned on by the BIOS during suspend and turns these back off again.
This is causing problems on a Dell Venue Pro 11 7130 (i5-4300Y) it causes
the following messages to show up in dmesg:
[ 131.014605] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S3
[ 131.150271] acpi LNXPOWER:07: Turning OFF
[ 131.150323] acpi LNXPOWER:06: Turning OFF
[ 131.150911] acpi LNXPOWER:00: Turning OFF
[ 131.169014] ACPI : EC: interrupt unblocked
[ 131.181811] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI
[ 133.535728] pci_raw_set_power_state: 76 callbacks suppressed
[ 133.535735] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Refused to change power state,
currently in D3
[ 133.597672] PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 2428.891 msecs
Followed by a bunch of iwlwifi errors later on and the pcie device
dropping from the bus (acpiphp thinks it has been unplugged).
Disabling the turning off of unused power resources fixes this. Instead
of adding a quirk for this system, this commit fixes this by moving the
disabling of unused power resources to later in the resume sequence
when the iwlwifi card has been moved out of D3 so the ref_count for
its power resource no longer is 0.
This new behavior seems to match the intend of the original commit which
commit-msg says: "(... which means that no devices are going to need them
any time soon) and we should turn them off".
This also avoids power resources which we need when bringing devices out
of D3 from getting bounced off and then back on again.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In commit 821d6f0359 (ACPI / sleep: Do not save NVS for new machines to
accelerate S3), to optimize S3 suspend/resume speed, code is introduced
to ignore NVS memory saving during S3 for all the platforms later than
2012.
But, Lenovo G50-45, a platform released in 2015, still needs NVS memory
saving during S3. A quirk is introduced for this platform.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189431
Tested-by: Przemek <soprwa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[ rjw: Drop unnecessary code ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Revert commit 08b98d3291 (PM / sleep / ACPI: Use the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0
flag) as it caused system suspend (in the default configuration) to fail
on Dell XPS13 (9360) with the Kaby Lake processor.
Fixes: 08b98d3291 (PM / sleep / ACPI: Use the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag)
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Modify the ACPI system sleep support setup code to select
suspend-to-idle as the default system sleep state if the
ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag is set in the FADT and the
default sleep state was not selected from the kernel command
line.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
* acpi-wdat:
watchdog: wdat_wdt: Fix warning for using 0 as NULL
watchdog: wdat_wdt: fix return value check in wdat_wdt_probe()
platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
mfd: lpc_ich: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
ACPI / watchdog: Add support for WDAT hardware watchdog
* acpi-ec:
ACPI / EC: Fix issues related to boot_ec
ACPI / EC: Fix a gap that ECDT EC cannot handle EC events
ACPI / EC: Fix a memory leakage issue in acpi_ec_add()
ACPI / EC: Cleanup first_ec/boot_ec code
ACPI / EC: Enable event freeze mode to improve event handling for suspend process
ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for suspend process
ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process
ACPI / EC: Fix an issue that SCI_EVT cannot be detected after event is enabled
ACPI / EC: Add EC_FLAGS_QUERY_ENABLED to reveal a hidden logic
ACPI / EC: Add PM operations for suspend/resume noirq stage
This patch makes 2 changes:
1. Restore old behavior
Originally, EC driver stops handling both events and transactions in
acpi_ec_block_transactions(), and restarts to handle transactions in
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(), restarts to handle both events and
transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions().
While currently, EC driver still stops handling both events and
transactions in acpi_ec_block_transactions(), but restarts to handle both
events and transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early().
This patch tries to restore the old behavior by dropping
__acpi_ec_enable_event() from acpi_unblock_transactions_early().
2. Improve old behavior
However this still cannot fix the real issue as both of the
acpi_ec_unblock_xxx() functions are invoked in the noirq stage. Since the
EC driver actually doesn't implement the event handling in the polling
mode, re-enabling the event handling too early in the noirq stage could
result in the problem that if there is no triggering source causing
advance_transaction() to be invoked, pending SCI_EVT cannot be detected by
the EC driver and _Qxx cannot be triggered.
It actually makes sense to restart the event handling in any point during
resuming after the noirq stage. Just like the boot stage where the event
handling is enabled in .add(), this patch further moves
acpi_ec_enable_event() to .resume(). After doing that, the following 2
functions can be combined:
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early()/acpi_ec_unblock_transactions().
The differences of the event handling availability between the old behavior
(this patch isn't applied) and the new behavior (this patch is applied) are
as follows:
!Applied Applied
before suspend Y Y
suspend before EC Y Y
suspend after EC Y Y
suspend_late Y Y
suspend_noirq Y (actually N) Y (actually N)
resume_noirq Y (actually N) Y (actually N)
resume_late Y (actually N) Y (actually N)
resume before EC Y (actually N) Y (actually N)
resume after EC Y (actually N) Y
after resume Y (actually N) Y
Where "actually N" means if there is no triggering source, the EC driver
is actually not able to notice the pending SCI_EVT occurred in the noirq
stage. So we can clearly see that this patch has improved the situation.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now GPE can be masked via the new acpi_mask_gpe() API and this patch
modifies /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpexx to use this new facility.
Writes "mask/unmask" to this file now invokes acpi_mask_gpe().
Reads from this file now returns new "EN/STS" when the corresponding GPE
hardware register's EN/STS bits are flagged, and new "masked/unmasked"
attribute to indicate the status of the masking mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The _PTS control method is defined in the section 7.4.1 of acpi 6.0
spec. The _PTS control method is executed by the OS during the sleep
transition process for S1, S2, S3, S4, and for orderly S5 shutdown.
The _PTS control method provides the BIOS a mechanism for performing
some housekeeping, such as writing the sleep type value to the embedded
controller, before entering the system sleeping state. Note that some
Lenovo Server BIOS use this mechanism to detect reboot event and
prompt user by popped dialog box.
According to section 7.5 of acpi 6.0 spec, _PTS should run after _TTS.
Add a _PTS evaulation to the existing _TTS reboot notifier and change
the notifier name to reflect the fact that it's not for _TTS only any
more.
Signed-off-by: Ocean He <hehy1@lenovo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nagananda Chumbalkar <nchumbalkar@lenovo.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off only if
we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also want is to do
this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on non-legacy platforms.
Since some future Intel platforms are HW-full mode where the DSDT
fails to supply an _S5 object(without SLP_TYP), we should let such
kind of platform to leverage efi runtime service to poweroff.
This patch uses efi power off as first choice when S5 is unavailable,
even if there is a customized poweroff(driver provided, eg).
Meanwhile, the legacy platforms will not be affected because there is
no path for them to overwrite the pm_power_off to efi power off.
Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 58a1fbbb2e ("PM / PCI / ACPI: Kick devices that might have been
reset by firmware") added a runtime resume for devices that were runtime
suspended when the system entered suspend-to-RAM.
Briefly, the motivation was to ensure that devices did not remain in a
reset-power-on state after resume, potentially preventing deep SoC-wide
low-power states from being entered on idle.
Currently we're not doing the same when leaving suspend-to-disk and this
asymmetry is a problem if drivers rely on the automatic resume triggered
by pm_complete_with_resume_check(). Fix it.
Fixes: 58a1fbbb2e (PM / PCI / ACPI: Kick devices that might have been reset by firmware)
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
acpi_processor_sleep is neither related nor used by CPUIdle framework.
It's used in system suspend/resume path as a syscore operation. It makes
more sense to move it to acpi/sleep.c where all the S-state transition
(a.k.a. Linux system suspend/hiberate) related code are present.
Also make it depend on CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT so that
it's not compiled on architecture like ARM64 where S-states are not
yet defined in ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Jean Delvare
Rafael J. Wysocki
Linus Torvalds
Hans de Goede
Zhang Rui
Lv Zheng
Ocean He
Chen Yu
Lukas Wunner
Sudeep Holla